Elman, Miriam Fendius . (1997). Introduction: The need for a qualitative test of the democratic peace theory. In Miriam Fendius Elman (Ed.), Paths to peace: Is democracy the answer?Cambridge: MIT Press.
2.
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor . (1996). Democratic states and commitment in international relations. International Organization, 50(1), 109-139.
3.
Hermann, Margaret G. , & Kegley, Charles W., Jr. (1995). Rethinking democracy and international peace: Perspectives from political psychology. International Studies Quarterly, 39(4), 511-533.
4.
Mansfield, Edward D. , & Snyder, Jack. (1995). Democratization and war. Foreign Affairs, 74, (3), 79-97.
5.
Matthews, John C. (1997). Turkish and Hungarian foreign policy during the interwar period: Domestic institutions and the democratic peace. In Miriam Fendius Elman (Ed.), Paths to peace: Is democracy the answer? (pp. 439-471). Cambridge: MIT Press.
6.
Owen, John M. (1997). Liberal peace, liberal war: American politics and international security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7.
Ray, James Lee . (1995). Democracy and international conflict: An evaluation of the democratic peace proposition. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
8.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas . (1994). Ideas do not float freely: Transnational coalitions, domestic structures, and the end of the cold war. International Organization, 48(2), 185-214.
9.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas . (1995). Democratic peace—Warlike democracies: A social constructivist interpretation of the democratic peace. European Journal of International Relations, 1(4), 491-517.
10.
Ordeshook, Peter C. , & Shvetsova, Olga V. (1994). Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 100-124.
