Human rights issues topped the agenda for many democratic presidents who followed repressive military regimes in Latin America. Traditional approaches assume that the military is powerful enough to suppress human rights initiatives. Transitions approaches closely link success or failure to military power at the time of regime change. Evidence shows not only that there were instances of policy success but also that these are not fully explained by the transitional balance of power. The authors argue that policy outcomes are inextricably tied to levels of institutional concentration and autonomy in the executive branch. Human rights gains occur when policy-making authority is centered in a few hands and where the president can use institutional channels suitably closed to military influence. Low levels of concentration and autonomy result in policy setbacks; mixed levels lead to moderate success. The authors test the model with a comparative case study of governments in Argentina and Chile.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, H. J. (1986). The judicial process (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Agüero, Felipe . (1995). Soldiers, civilians, and democracy: Post-Franco Spain in comparative perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
3.
Americas Watch . (1987, August). Truth and partial justice in Argentina. New York: Author.
4.
Americas Watch . (1991). Human rights and the politics of agreements: Chile during President Aylwin's first year. New York: Author.
5.
Anderson, C. (1992). Toward a theory of Latin American politics. In H. J. Wiarda (Ed.), Politics and social change in Latin America: Still a distinct tradition? (pp. 239-259). Boulder, CO: Westview.
6.
Arceneaux, Craig L. (1997). Institutional design, military rule, and regime transition in Argentina (1976-1983): An extension of the Remmer thesis. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 16(3), 327-350.
7.
Arriagada, G. (1988). Pinochet: The politics of power. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
8.
Arias, O. , & Gauna, R. (1993). Codigo penal y leyes complementarias edición segunda [Penal code and complementary law: Second edition]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Astrea.
9.
Camarasa, J. , Felice, R., & González, D. (1985). El juicio: Proceso al horror [The trial: Process to the horror]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Sudamericana/Planeta.
10.
Carrió, A. (1989). The criminal justice system of Argentina. Baton Rouge, LA: Paul M. Herbert Law Center.
11.
Chalmers, D. (1977). The politicized state in Latin America. In J. M. Malloy, (Ed.) Authoritarianism and corporatism in Latin America (pp. 23-95). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation . (1993). Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation, 1993 (Vol. 1). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
13.
Collier, R. B. , & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Constitución Politica de la Republica de Chile. (1995). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
15.
Crawford, K. L. (1990). Due obedience and the rights of victims: Argentina's transition to democracy. Human Rights Quarterly, 12, 17-52.
16.
Drake, P. , & Jaksic, I. (Eds.). (1991). The struggle for democracy in Chile, 1982-1990. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
17.
Fontana, A. (1986). De la crisis de malvinas a la subordinación condicionada: Conflictos intramilitares transición política en Argentina [From the Malvinas crisis to conditional subordination: Intramilitary conflicts and political transition in Argentina] (Working Paper No. 74). Notre Dame, IN: Helen Kellog Institute for International Studies.
18.
Foreign Broadcast Information Service-Latin America. (1990, March 12, p. 45).
19.
Foreign Broadcast Information Service-Latin America. (1991a, March 29, p. 17).
20.
Foreign Broadcast Information Service-Latin America. (1991b, April 18, p. 24).
21.
Garretón, M. A. (1989). The Chilean political process. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
22.
Geywitz, C. A. (1991). Reforma de la constitución política de la república de Chile. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
23.
Human Rights Watch . (1994). Chile, unsettled business: Human rights in Chile at the start of the Frei presidency. Human Rights Watch/Americas, 6, 1-35.
24.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Immergut, E. M. (1992). The rules of the game: The logic of health policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 57-89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Junta de Gobierno . (1978, April 19). Decree Law 2191. Diario Oficial, p. 1.
27.
Karl, T. L. , & Schmitter, P. C. (1991). Modes of transition in Latin America and Eastern Europe. International Social Science Journal, 128, 269-284.
28.
La Nación. (1983, April 29, pp. 13-14).
29.
La Prensa. (1986, December 27, pp. 1, 4).
30.
Linz, Juan J. (1981). Some comparative thoughts on the transition to democracy in Portugal and Spain. In J. Braga de Macedo & S. Serfaty (Eds.), Portugal since the revolution (pp. 25-46). Boulder, CO: Westview.
31.
Loveman, Brian . (1991). ¿Misión cumplida? Civil-military relations and the Chilean political transition. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 33, 35-74.
32.
March, J. G. , & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78, 734-749.
33.
Meyer, J. W. , & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
34.
Meyer, J. W. , & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
O'Donnell, G. (1973). Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism: Studies in South American politics. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.
36.
Organization of American States . (1979). Constitution of the Republic of Chile 1925. Washington, DC: Author.
37.
Pion-Berlin, D. (1987). Military breakdown and redemocratization in Argentina. In G. Lopez & M. Stohl (Eds.), Liberalization and redemocratization in Latin America (pp. 209-230). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
38.
Pion-Berlin, D. (1994). To prosecute or to pardon? Human rights decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone. Human Rights Quarterly, 16, 105-130.
39.
Pion-Berlin, D. (1997). Through corridors of power: Institutions and civil-military relations in Argentina. University Park, PA: Pennylvania State University Press.
40.
Przeworski, A. (1986). Problems in the study of transition to democracy. In G. O'Donnell, P. Schmitter, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Transitions from authoritarian rule: Comparative perspectives (pp. 47-63). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
Przeworski, A. , & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
42.
Rabkin, Rhoda . (1992-1993). The Aylwin government and tutelary democracy: LA concept in search of a case?Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 34, 119-194.
43.
Remmer, K. (1991). Military rule in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
República de Chile . (1990). Ley orgánica constitucional del congreso nacional [Constiututional organic law of the National Congress]. Santiago, Chile: Junta de Gobierno.
45.
República de Chile . (1995). Constitución política de la República de Chile [Political constitution of the Republic of Chile]. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
46.
Sancinetti, M. A. (1988). Derechos humanos en la Argentina post-dictatorial [Human rights in postdictatorial Argentina]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Lerner Editores Asociados.
47.
Schvarzer, J. (1983). Martínez de hoz: La lógica política de la política económica [Martínez de hoy: The political logic of the economic policy]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Investigaciones Sociales Sobre el Estado y la Administración.
48.
Smith, W. C. (1989). Authoritarianism and the crisis of the Argentine political economy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
49.
Valenzuela, J. Samuel . (1992). Democratic consolidation in post transitional settings: Notion, process, and facilitating positions. In S. Mainwaring, G. O'Donnell, & J. S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Issues in democratic consolidation: The new South American democracies in comparative perspective (pp. 57-104). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
50.
Viola, E. , & Mainwaring, S. (1985). Transitions to democracy: Brazil and Argentina. Journal of International Affairs, 38(2), 195-219.
51.
Waldmann, P. , & Valdéz, E. (Eds.). (1983). El poder militar en la Argentina: 1976-1981 [Military power in Argentina: 1976-1981]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Galerna.
52.
Wildavsky, A. , & Pressman, J. L. (1984). Policy implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53.
Zalaquett, J. (1991). Derechos humanos y limitaciones políticas en las transiciones democráticas del Cono Sur [Human rights and political limitations in the democratic transitions of the Southern Cone]. Colección Estudios CIEPLAN, 33, 147-186.
54.
Zirker, D. (1991). The civil-military mediators in post-1985 Brazil. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 19, 47-73.
