The concept of party identification is widely thought to be of limited utility outside the United States, where partisan attachments are regarded as unstable. The authors argue that estimating the stability of party identification outside the United States requires attention to problems of dimensionality and measurement error. The authors develop a model for estimating the stability of partisanship that addresses these problems, and they apply the model to eight panel surveys drawn from Great Britain, Canada, and Germany. The results suggest that partisanship has been extremely stable in each country, with the exception of recent developments in Canada. The model and findings presented here suggest the need for refinement in the way partisanship is measured, and partisan stability assessed, in multiparty systems.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abramson, Paul R. , & Charles W. Ostrom, Jr. (1991). Macropartisanship: An empirical reassessment. American Political Science Review, 85, 181-192.
2.
Achen, Christopher H. (1992). Social psychology, demographic variables, and linear regression: Breaking the iron triangle in voting research. Political Behavior, 14, 195-211.
3.
Allsop, Dee , & Weisberg, Herbert F. (1988). Measuring change in party identification in an election campaign. American Journal of Political Science, 32, 996-1017.
4.
Babakus, Emin , Ferguson, Carl E. Jr., & Jöreskog, Karl G. (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24, 222-228.
5.
Belknap, George , & Campbell, Angus. (1952). Political party identification and attitudes toward foreign policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 601-623.
6.
Brody, Richard A. , & Rothenberg, Lawrence S. (1988). The instability of partisanship: An analysis of the 1980 presidential election. British Journal of Political Science, 18, 445-465.
7.
Budge, Ian , & Farlie, Dennis. (1976). A comparative analysis of factors correlated with turnout and voting choice. In Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, & Dennis Farlie (Eds.), Party identification and beyond. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Butler, David , & Stokes, Donald. (1974). Political change in Britain (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
9.
Cain, Bruce E. , & Ferejohn, John. (1981). Party identification in the United States and Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 14, 31-47.
10.
Campbell, Angus , Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., & Stokes, Donald E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley.
11.
Clarke, Harold D. , & Kornberg, Allen. (1992). Risky business: Partisan volatility and electoral choice in Canada, 1988. Electoral Studies, 11, 138-156.
12.
Clarke, Harold D. , & Kornberg, Allen. (1993). Evaluations and evolution: Public attitudes toward Canada's federal political parties, 1965-1991. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 26, 287-311.
13.
Clarke, Harold D. , & Stewart, Marianne C. (1984). Dealignment of degree: Partisan change in Britain, 1974-83. Journal of Politics, 46, 689-718.
14.
Clarke, Harold D. , & Stewart, Marianne C. (1985). Short-term forces and partisan change in Canada, 1974-80. Electoral Studies, 4, 15-35.
15.
Clarke, Harold D. , Stewart, Marianne C., & Whiteley, Paul. (1994, September). Tory trends: The dynamics of conservative party support, 1992-1994. Paper presented at the annual Elections, Public Opinion and Parties Conference, University of Cardiff, Cardiff Wales.
16.
Converse, Philip E. , & Pierce, Roy. (1985). Measuring partisanship. Political Methodology, 11, 143-166.
17.
Converse, Philip E. , & Pierce, Roy. (1986). Political representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
18.
Converse, Philip E. , & Pierce, Roy. (1992). Partisanship and the party system. Political Behavior, 14, 239-259.
19.
Crewe, Ivor . (1983). Partisan dealignment ten years on. In David Denver and Gordon Hands (Eds.), Issues and controversies in British electoral behavior. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
20.
Fiorina, Morris P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
Franklin, Charles H. (1992). Measurement and the dynamics of party identification. Political Behavior, 14, 297-309.
22.
Franklin, Charles H. , & Jackson, John E. (1983). The dynamics of party identification. American Political Science Review, 77, 957-973.
23.
Green, Donald Philip . (1990). The effects of measurement error on two-stage least-squares estimates. Political Analysis, 2, 57-74.
24.
Green, Donald Philip , & Palmquist, Bradley. (1990). Of artifacts and partisan instability. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 872-902.
25.
Green, Donald Philip , & Palmquist, Bradley. (1994). How stable is party identification?Political Behavior, 43, 437-466.
26.
Green, Donald Philip , Palmquist, Bradley, & Schickler, Eric. (1996, July). Reassessing macropartisan change. Paper presented at the Political Methodology annual meeting, Ann Arbor, MI.
27.
Green, Donald Philip , & Schickler, Eric. (1993). A multiple method approach to the measurement of party identification. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 503-535.
28.
Green, Donald Philip , & Schickler, Eric. (1996, April). The Grim Reaper, the stork, and partisan change in the North and South, 1952-1994. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
29.
Guchteneire, Paul de , LeDuc, Lawrence, & Niemi, Richard G. (1985). A compendium of academic survey studies of elections around the world. Electoral Studies, 4, 159-174.
30.
Guchteneire, Paul de , LeDuc, Lawrence, & Niemi, Richard G. (1991). A compendium of academic survey studies of elections around the world, update 1. Electoral Studies, 10, 231-243.
31.
Heath, Anthony , & McDonald, Sarah K. (1988). The demise of party identification theory?Electoral Studies, 7, 95-107.
32.
Heath, Anthony , & Pierce, Roy. (1992). It was party identification all along: Question order effects on reports of party identification in Britain. Electoral Studies, 11, 93-105.
33.
Heise, David R. (1969). Separating reliability and stability in test-retest correlation. American Sociological Review, 34, 93-101.
34.
Jennings, M. Kent , & Niemi, Richard G. (1981). Generations and politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
Johnston, Richard . (1992). Party identification measures in the Anglo-American democracies: A national survey experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 542-559.
36.
Jöreskog, Karl G. , & Sörbom, Dag. (1993). LISREL VIII. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.
37.
Kaase, Max . (1976). Party identification and voting behavior in the West-German election of 1969. In Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, & Dennis Farlie (Eds.), Party identification and beyond. New York: John Wiley.
38.
LaPalombara, Joseph . (1987). Italian elections: The “Rashomon” effect. In Howard R. Penniman (Ed.), Italy at the polls, 1983. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
LeDuc, Lawrence . (1981). The dynamic properties of party identification: A four-nation comparison. European Journal of Political Science, 9, 257-268.
40.
LeDuc, Lawrence , Clarke, Harold D., Jenson, Jane, & Pammett, Jon. (1984). Partisan instability in Canada: Evidence from a new panel study. American Political Science Review, 78, 470-484.
41.
MacKuen, Michael B. , Erikson, Robert S., & Stimson, James A. (1989). Macropartisanship. American Political Science Review, 83, 1125-1142.
42.
MacKuen, Michael B. , Erikson, Robert S., & Stimson, James A. (1992). Question-wording and macropartisanship. American Political Science Review, 86, 475-481.
43.
Markus, Gregory B. , & Converse, Philip E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73, 1055-1070.
44.
Miller, Warren E. (1991). Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to the basics. American Political Science Review, 85, 557-568.
45.
Mughan, A. (1981). The cross-national validity of party identification: Great Britain and the United States compared. Political Studies, 29, 365-375.
46.
Norpoth, Helmut . (1978). Party identification in West Germany: Tracing an elusive concept. Political Studies, 11, 36-59.
47.
Page, Benjamin I. , & Jones, Calvin C. (1979). Reciprocal effects of policy preferences, party loyalties, and the vote. American Political Science Review, 73, 1071-1089.
48.
Palmquist, Bradley , & Green, Donald Philip. (1992). Estimation of models with correlated measurement errors from panel data. In Peter V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1992 (pp. 119-146). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
49.
Richardson, Bradley M. (1991). European party loyalties revisited. American Political Science Review, 85, 751-775.
50.
Rigdon, Edward E. , & Ferguson, Carl E. Jr. (1991). The performance of the polychoric correlation coefficient and selected fitting functions in confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 491-497.
51.
Rose, Richard , & McAllister, Ian. (1986). Voters begin to choose. London: Sage.
52.
Schickler, Eric , & Green, Donald Philip. (1993-1994). Issue preferences and the dynamics of party identification: A methodological critique. Political Analysis, 5, 151-179.
53.
Schickler, Eric , & Green, Donald Philip. (1996). A methodological note on assessing partisan stability in a multi-party system. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.
54.
Schmitt, Hermann . (1989). On party attachment in Western Europe and the utility of eurobarometer data. West European Politics, 12, 122.
55.
Sharma, Subhash , Durvasula, Srinivas, & Dillon, William R. (1989). Some results of the behavior of alternate covariance structure estimation procedures in the presence of non-normal data. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 214-221.
56.
Shiveley, W. Phillips . (1972). Party identification, party choice, & voting stability: The Weimar case. American Political Science Review, 66, 1203-1225.
57.
Thomassen, Jacques . (1976). Party identification as a cross-national concept: Its meaning in the Netherlands. In Ian Budge, Ivor Crewe, & Dennis Farlie (Eds.), Party identification and beyond. New York: John Wiley.
58.
Weisberg, Herbert F. (1980). A multidimensional conceptualization of party identification. Political Behavior, 2, 33-60.
59.
Weisberg, Herbert F. , & Smith, Charles E. Jr. (1991). The influence of the economy on party identification in the Reagan years. Journal of Politics, 53, 1077-1092.
60.
Wiley, David E. , & Wiley, James A. (1970). The estimation of measurement error in panel data. American Sociological Review, 35, 112-117.
