Comparing the asylum policies of three Western states, this article argues against two claims raised in recent writings on international migration: that states' capacity of controlling unwanted migration is declining; and that such diminished control capacity is due to an international human rights regime restricting states' discretion over the admission and expulsion of aliens. This comparison suggests that there is an increasing willingness and capacity of states to control mass asylum seeking. State constraints in asylum policy arise more from domestic than from international legal norms. Asylum policies are everywhere shaped by the two increasingly conflicting principles of liberal nation-states: popular sovereignty and the protection of human rights.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aleinikoff, Alexander . (1994). Safe haven: Pragmatics and prospects. Virginia Journal of International Law, 35(13), 71-79.
2.
Amnesty International . (1991). United Kingdom: Deficient policy and practice for the protection of asylum seekers [Mimeograph]. London.
3.
Anker, Deborah , & Blum, Carolyn Patty. (1989). New trends in asylum jurisprudence. International Journal of Refugee Law, 1(1), 67-82.
4.
Arendt, Hannah . (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace.
5.
Bade, Klaus J. , (Ed.). (1992). Auslaender, Aussiedler, Asyl in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2nd ed.). Hannover: Niedersaechsische Landeszentrale fuer politische Bildung.
6.
Bade, Klaus J. (1994). Auslaender Aussiedler, Asyl. Munich: Beck.
7.
Brimelow, Peter . (1995). Alien nation. New York: Random House.
8.
Brubaker, Rogers . (1994). Are immigration control efforts really failing? In W. Cornelius, P.L. Martin, & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling immigration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9.
Bull, Hedley . (1977). The anarchical society. London: Macmillan.
10.
Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) . (1985). Immigration control procedures: Report of a formal investigation. London: Author.
11.
Cornelius, Wayne , Martin, P. L., & Hollifield, J. F. (Eds.). (1994). Controlling immigration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
12.
Dinh, Viet D. (1994). Law and asylum. In N. Mills (Ed.), Arguing immigration. New York: Touchstone.
13.
Feldman, David . (1993). Civil liberties and human rights in England and Wales. Oxford: Clarendon.
14.
Freeman, Gary . (1992). Migration policy and politics in the receiving states. International Migration Review, 26(4), 1144-1167.
15.
Freeman, Gary . (1994). Can liberal states control unwanted migration?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 534, 17-30.
16.
German Interior Ministry . (1993). Geschichte, Organisation, Aufgaben. Bonn: Osang.
17.
Goodwin-Gill, Guy . (1978). International law and the movement of persons between states. Oxford: Clarendon.
18.
Goodwin-Gill, Guy . (1983). The refugee in international law. Oxford: Clarendon.
19.
Habermas, Juergen . (1994). Human rights and popular sovereignty. Ratio Juris, 7(1), 1-13.
20.
Hailbronner, Kay . (1992). Der Auslaender in der deutschen Sozialordnung. Vierteljahresschrift fuer Sozialrecht, 2, 77-98.
21.
Helton, Arthur C. (1991). The mandate of U.S. courts to protect aliens and refugees under international human rights law. Yale Law Journal, 100, 2335-2346.
22.
Henkin, Louis . (1987). The Constitution and United States sovereignty. Harvard Law Review, 100, 853-886.
23.
Henkin, Louis . (1990). The age of rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
24.
Hollifield, James . (1992). Immigrants, markets, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
Jackson, Robert H. , & Rosberg, Carl G. (1982). Why Africa's weak states persist. World Politics, 1, 1-24.
26.
Jacobson, David . (1995). Rights across borders. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
27.
Joppke, Christian . (1996). Multiculturalism and immigration: A comparison of the United States, Germany, and Britain. Theory and Society, 25, 449-500.
28.
Kanstroom, Daniel . (1993a). The shining city and the fortress: Reflections on the “Euro solution” to the German immigration dilemma. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 16, 201-243.
29.
Kanstroom, Daniel . (1993b). Wer sind wir wieder? Laws of asylum, immigration, and citizenship in the struggle for the soul of the new Germany. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 155-210.
30.
Keely, Charles B. , & Russell, Sharon Stanton. (1994). Responses of industrial countries to asylum-seekers. Journal of International Affairs, 47, 399-417.
31.
Krasner, Stephen . (1988). Sovereignty: An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 21(1), 66-94.
32.
Krasner, Stephen . (1993). Westphalia and all that. In J. Goldstein & R. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
33.
Layton-Henry, Zig . (1994). Britain: The would-be zero-immigration country. In W. Cornelius, P. L. Martin, & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling immigration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
34.
Lester, Anthony . (1994). European human rights and the British constitution. In J. Jowell & D. Oliver (Eds.), The changing constitution (3rd ed.). Oxford: Clarendon.
35.
Loescher, Gil . (1989). Introduction. In G. Loescher & L. Monahan (Eds.), Refugees and international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
Loescher, Gil , & Scanlan, John A. (1986). Calculated kindness: Refugees and America's half-open door, 1945 to the present. New York: Free Press.
37.
Macdonald, Ian A. (1983). Immigration law and practice in the United Kingdom. London: Butterworth.
38.
Macdonald, Ian A. (1987, October). The growth and development of modern immigration law. Immigration and National Law and Practice, pp. 54-59.
39.
Martin, David . (1983). Due process and the treatment of aliens. University of Pittsburgh Law Review, 44, 165-235.
40.
Martin, David . (1988). The new asylum seekers. In D. Martin (Ed.), The new asylum seekers: Refugee law in the 1980s. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
41.
Martin, David . (1989). Effects of international law on migration policy and practice: The uses of hypocrisy. International Migration Review, 33, 547-578.
42.
Meissner, Doris . (1988). Reflections on the Refugee Act of 1980. In D. Martin (Ed.), The new asylum seekers: Refugee law in the 1980s. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
43.
Miller, Mark , & Castles, Stephen. (1993). The age of migration. London: Macmillan.
44.
Motomura, Hiroshi . (1990). Immigration law after a century of plenary power. Yale Law Journal, 100, 545-613.
45.
Motomura, Hiroshi . (1993). Haitian asylum seekers: Interdiction and immigrants' rights. Cornell International Law Journal, 26, 695-717.
46.
Muench, Ursula . (1992). Asylpolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
47.
Neuman, Gerald L. (1990). Immigration and judicial review in the Federal Republic of Germany. New York University Journal of International Law, 23, 35-85.
48.
Neuman, Gerald L. (1993). Buffer zones against refugees: Dublin, Schengen, and the German asylum amendment. Virginia Journal of International Law, 33, 503-526.
49.
Pfaff, Victor . (1992). Flucht und Einwanderung. Kritische Justiz, 25, 129-146.
50.
Plender, Richard . (1988). International migration law (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.
51.
Porter, Gregory . (1992). Persecution based on political opinion: Interpretation of the Refugee Act of 1980. Cornell International Law Journal, 25, 231-276.
52.
Potelicki, Victoria . (1981). US asylum procedures: Current status and proposals for reform. Cornell International Law Journal, 14, 405-428.
Quaritsch, Helmut . (1985). Recht auf Asyl. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
55.
Randall, Chris . (1994). An asylum policy for the UK. In S. Spencer (Ed.), Strangers and citizens. London: Rivers Oram.
56.
Renner, Guenter . (1993). Asyl- und Auslaenderrechtsreform 1993. Zeitschrift fuer Auslaenderrecht und politik, 3, 118-127.
57.
Rottmann, Frank . (1984). Des Asylrecht des Art. 16 GG als liberal-rechtsstaatliches Abwehrrecht. Der Staat, 3, 337-368.
58.
Schmitt, Carl . (1934). Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveraenitaet (2nd ed.). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
59.
Schuck, Peter . 1984). The transformation of immigration law. Columbia Law Review, 84(1), 1-90.
60.
Schuck, Peter . (1991). The emerging political consensus on immigration law. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 5(1), 1-33.
61.
Shapiro, Martin , & Stone, Alec. (1994). The new constitutional politics of Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 26, 397-420.
62.
Sikkink, Kathryn . (1993). The power of principled ideas: Human rights policies in the US and Western Europe. In J. Goldstein & R. Keohane (Eds.), Ideas and foreign policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
63.
Soysal, Yasemin . (1994). Limits to citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
Sterett, Susan . (1994). Judicial review in Britain. Comparative Political Studies, 26, 421-442.
65.
Storey, Hugo . (1994). International law and human rights obligations. In S. Spencer (Ed.), Strangers and citizens. London: Rivers Oram.
66.
Teitelbaum, Michael S. (1984). Political asylum in theory and practice. Public Interest, 76, 74-86.
67.
Walzer, Michael . (1983). Spheres of justice. New York: Basic Books.
68.
Wolken, Simone . (1988). Das Grundrecht auf Asyl als Gegenstand der Innen-und Rechtspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
