Was the European Court of Justice a key actor in the “relaunching” of European integration in the 1980s? This article examines the crucial political role that was played by the Court with its Cassis de Dijon judgment in the rejuvenation EC harmonization policy and the development of the Single European Act. The authors challenge the dominant view that the Court's legal decisions in themselves create policy consequences, or that legal verdicts reflect the views of dominant member states, so as to create focal points around which a policy consensus emerges. They argue, instead, that the Cassis verdict acted as a catalyst, provoking a political response by the Commission, which attempted to capitalize on the verdict to create a “new approach to harmonization.” This political entrepreneurship by the Commission triggered the mobilization of interest groups that lobbied their national governments for and against mutual recognition. Generalizing from the case, this article concludes that the Court performs three crucial roles in the EC policy-making process: opening political access to self-interested individuals, launching ideas into the policy-making arena, and provoking political responses through bold argumentation and unpopular verdicts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barents, R. (1981). New developments in measures having equivalent effects. Common Market Law Review, 18(3), 271-308.
2.
Bercusson, B. (1993, May). A class act? The politics of labour law in the European Court. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Communities Studies Association, Washington, DC.
3.
Brittan, D. (1993, January). Equal Opportunities Commission for Great Britain. Talk at the Center for European Studies, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
4.
Burley, A.-M. , & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the Court. International Organization, 47(1), 41-76.
5.
Capelli, F. (1981). Les Malentendus provoqués par l'arrêt sur lecassis de Dijon. Revue du Marché Commun, 421-435.
6.
Garrett, G. (1992). The European Community's internal market. International Organization, 46(2), 533-560.
7.
Garrett, G. , & Weingast, B. (1993). Ideas, interests, and institutions: Constructing the EC's internal market. In J. Goldstein & R. Keohane (Ed.), Ideas and foreign policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8.
Gormley, L. W. (1981). Cassis de Dijon and the communication from the Commission. European Law Review, 6, 454.
9.
Gormley, L. W. (1989). Actually or potentially, directly or indirectly? Obstacles to the free movement of goods. Yearbook of European Law, 9, 197-208.
10.
Green, M. (1993, May). Setting the agenda for a New Europe: The politics of big business in EC 1992. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Communities Studies Association, Washington, DC.
11.
Green, M. (in press). The politics of big business in EC 1992. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The American University, Washington, DC.
12.
Hartley, T. C. (1988). The foundations of European Community law. Oxford: Clarendon.
13.
Jacot-Guillarmod, O. (1989, October). Creating a European economic space: Legal aspects of EC-EFTA relations. Published book based on conference proceedings at the Irish Centre for European Law, Trinity College, Dublin, 196.
14.
Keeling, D. (1992). The free movement of goods in EEC law: Basic principles and recent developments in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Communities, The International Lawyer, 26.
15.
Lauwaars, R. H. (1988). The “model directive” on technical harmonization. In R. Bieber, et al. (Eds.), 1992: One European market? A critical analysis of the Commission's internal market strategy (pp. 151-173). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
16.
Lecourt, R. (1976). L'Europe des Juges. Brussels: Établissements Émile Bruylant.
17.
Lenaerts (1988). Two hundred years of U.S. Constitution and thirty years of EEC treaty—Outlook for a comparison. In K. Lenaerts (Ed.), Two hundred years of U.S. Constitution and thirty years of EEC treaty (pp. 7-24). The Netherlands: Kulwer Law and Taxation Publications.
18.
Louis, J.-V. (1990). The Community legal order. Brussels: Commission of the European Community.
19.
Mancini, F. (1989). The making of a constitution for Europe. Common Market Law Review, 24, 595-614.
20.
Masclet, J.-C. (1980). Les articles 30, 36, et 100 du traité CEE à la lumière de l'arrêtCassis de Dijon. Revue de Droit Européen, 611-634.
21.
Mattera, A. (1980). L'Arrêt “Cassis de Dijon”: une nouvelle approche pour la réalisation et le bon fonctionnement du marché intérieur. Revue du Marché Commun, 505-513.
22.
Meier, G. (1977). Rechtsprobleme einer EG-Alkoholmarktordnung. Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft, Heft 7, 415.
23.
Meier, G. (1991). Vorgeschichte. In Die Cassis-Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs der Europäischen Gemeinschaften. Loseblattssammlung, 4. Auflage Hamburg: Behr's Verlag.
24.
Meunier-Aitsahalia, S. (1993, September). Harmonization policy in the European Community: A reassessment in the Maastricht era. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
25.
Moravcsik, A. (1991). Negotiating the Single European Act: National interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community. International Organization, 45(1), 19-56.
26.
Nicolaïdis, K. (1993a). Legal predecent and political innovation in the European Community: Explaining the emergence of managed mutual recognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Communities Studies Association, Washington, DC.
27.
Nicolaïdis, K. (1993b). Mutual recognition among nations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
28.
Painter, A. A. (1991). Cassis de Dijon digested. Business Law Review, 2(7), 199-200.
29.
Rasmussen, H. (1986). On law and policy in the European Court of Justice. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
30.
Sandholtz, W. , & Zysman, J. (1989). Recasting the European bargain. World Politics, 42(1).
31.
Smith, G. (1990). The European Court of Justice: Judges or policy makers? In The Bruge Group Publication, Suite 102 Whitehall court, Westminster, London SWIA 2EL.
32.
Stein, E. (1981). Lawyers, judges and the making of a transnational constitution. American Journal of International Law, 75(1).
33.
Vogel, D. (1991). Protective regulation and protectionism in the European Community: The creation of a common market for food and beverages. Paper presented at the meeting of the European Community Studies Association.
34.
Volcansek, M. (1986). Judicial politics in Europe. New York: Peter Lang.
35.
Volcansek, M. (1992). The European Court of Justice. Western European Politics, 15, 3.
36.
Weiler, J. (1981). The Community system: The dual character of supranationalism. Yearbook of European Law, 1, 257-306.
37.
Weiler, J. (1991). The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal, 100, 2403-2483.
38.
White, E. (1989). In search of the limits to Article 30 of the EEC Treaty. Common Market Law Review, 26, 235-280.
