Although the electoral influence of voter attitudes toward American presidential candidates has never seriously been questioned, only in relatively recent times has the existence of an equivalent effect for political party leaders in parliamentary systems become well-accepted. This analysis seeks to extend the understanding of the nature of parliamentary leadership effects to encompass the types of specific leadership qualities that influence electoral choice. Data from open-ended questions in surveys conducted in Australia in 1979 and New Zealand in 1981, taken together with earlier research, indicate a broad similarity of voter responses to different political leaders, in parliamentary as well as presidential systems. In particular, the criteria voters take into account most consistently when making leadership-based electoral decisions are positive perceptions of the “performance relevant” qualities of competence and integrity. This is evidence against the argument that voting on the basis of leadership personality is in some sense “irrational.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aimer, P. (1989). The changing party system. In H. Gold (Ed.), New Zealand politics in perspective (2nd ed., pp. 260-274). Auckland: Longman Paul.
2.
Aitkin, D. (1982). Stability and change in Australian politics (2nd ed.). Canberra: Australian National University Press.
3.
Aitkin, D. (1985). Australia. In I. Crewe & D. Denver (Eds.), Electoral change in Western democracies: Patterns and sources of electoral volatility (pp. 75-99). London: Croom Helm.
4.
Bean, C. S. (1980). Political leaders and voter perceptions: Images of Muldoon and Rowling at the 1975 and 1978 New Zealand general elections. Political Science, 32, 55-75.
5.
Bean, C. S. (1984). A comparative study of electoral behaviour in Australia and New Zealand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian National University.
6.
Bean, C. (1985). The impact of short-term forces on the vote. In H. Gold (Ed.), New Zealand politics in perspective (pp. 334-347). Auckland: Longman Paul.
7.
Bean, C. (1986a). Electoral law, electoral behaviour and electoral outcomes: Australia and New Zealand compared. Journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics, 24, 57-73.
8.
Bean, C. (1986b). An inventory of New Zealand voting surveys 1949-84. Political Science, 38, 172-184.
9.
Bean, C. , Chapman, R., Prince, J., Vowles, J., Roberts, N., Anagnoson, T., Lamare, J., & Wood, A. (1984). New Zealand voting survey, post-election 1981: User's guide for the machinereadable data file. Social Science Data Archives Study No. 119. Canberra: Australian National University.
10.
Bean, C. , & Kelley, J. (1988). Partisan stability and short-term change in the 1987 federal election: Evidence from the NSSS panel survey. Politics, 23(November), 80-94.
11.
Bean, C. , McAllister, I., & Warhurst, J. (Eds.). (1990). The greening of Australian politics: The 1990 federal election. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
12.
Bean, C. , & Mughan, A. (1989). Leadership effects in parliamentary elections in Australia and Britain. American Political Science Review, 83, 1165-1179.
13.
Brookes, R. H. , & Ashenden, A. H. (1967). The floating vote in Wellington and Palmerston North 1960-1963. Political Science, 19(July), 17-39.
14.
Butler, D. , & Stokes, D. (1974). Political change in Britain: The evolution of electoral choice (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
15.
Campbell, A. , Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.
16.
Clarke, H. D. , Jenson, J., LeDuc, L., & Pammett, J. H. (1979). Political choice in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
17.
Clarke, H. D. , Jenson, J., LeDuc, L., & Pammett, J. H. (1984). Absent mandate: The politics of discontent in Canada. Toronto: Gage.
18.
Denemark, D. (1990). The political consequences of Labour's new right agenda: Findings from the Fendalton survey, 1987. Political Science, 42, 62-82.
19.
Gant, M. M. , & Davis, D. F. (1984). Negative voter support in presidential elections. Western Political Quarterly, 37, 272-290.
20.
Gant, M. M. , & Sigelman, L. (1985). Anti-candidate voting in presidential elections. Polity, 18, 329-339.
21.
Gold, H. (Ed.). (1989). New Zealand politics in perspective (2nd ed.). Auckland: Longman Paul.
22.
Graetz, B. , & McAllister, I. (1987a). Popular evaluations of party leaders in the Anglo-American democracies. In H. D. Clarke & M. M. Czudnowski (Eds.), Political elites in Anglo-American democracies: Changes in stable regimes (pp. 44-64). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
23.
Graetz, B. , & McAllister, I. (1987b). Party leaders and election outcomes in Britain, 1974-1983. Comparative Political Studies, 19, 484-507.
24.
Hughes, C. A. (1969). Images and issues: The Queensland state elections of 1963 and 1966. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
25.
Kernell, S. (1977). Presidential popularity and negative voting: An alternative explanation of the midterm Congressional decline of the President's party. American Political Science Review, 71, 44-66.
26.
Kinder, D. R. (1986). Presidential character revisited. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 233-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Kinder, D. R. , Peters, M. D., Abelson, R. P., & Fiske, S. T. (1980). Presidential prototypes. Political Behavior, 2, 315-337.
28.
Lamare, J. W. (1984). Party identification and voting behaviour in New Zealand. Political Science, 36, 1-9.
29.
Lau, R. R. (1982). Negativity in political perception. Political Behavior, 4, 353-377.
30.
Lau, R. R. (1986). Political schemata, candidate evaluations, and voting behavior. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition: The 19th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 95-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
LeDuc, L. (1990, August-September). Political leadership in Canada: Personal and party images. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
32.
Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33.
Miller, A. H. , & Miller, W. E. (1976). Ideology in the 1972 election: Myth or reality—a rejoinder. American Political Science Review, 70, 832-849.
34.
Miller, A. H. , Wattenberg, M. P., & Malanchuk, O. (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. American Political Science Review, 80, 521-540.
35.
Milne, R. S. , & MacKenzie, H. C. (1954). Straight fight: A study of voting behaviour in the constituency of Bristol North-East at the general election of 1951. London: Hansard Society.
36.
Mitchell, A. (1962). The voter and the election: Dunedin Central. In R. M. Chapman, W. K. Jackson, & A. V. Mitchell (Eds.), New Zealand politics in action: The 1960 general election (pp. 171-200). London: Oxford University Press.
37.
Penniman, H. R. (Ed.). (1980). New Zealand at the polls: The general election of 1978. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
38.
Powell, G. B., Jr. (1986). American voter turnout in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 80, 17-43.
39.
Rawson, D. W. , & Holtzinger, S. M. (1958). Politics in Eden-Monaro. London: Heinemann.
40.
Shanks, J. M. , & Miller, W. E. (1990). Policy direction and performance evaluation: Complementary explanations of the Reagan elections. British Journal of Political Science, 20, 143-235.
41.
Sigelman, L. , & Gant, M. M. (1989). Anticandidate voting in the 1984 presidential election. Political Behavior, 11, 81-92.
42.
Stewart, M. C. , & Clarke, H. D. (1992). The (un)importance of party leaders: Leader images and party choice in the 1987 British election. Journal of Politics, 54, 447-470.
43.
Wattenberg, M. P. (1991). The rise of candidate-centered politics: Presidential elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
