The 1930s and the 1980s were decades of significant political economic change in the capitalist democracies. Depression and the rise of the industrial working class created opportunities for the establishment of social democracy in the 1930s. Stagflation and the decline of the working class made possible waves of radical rightist reform. However, this article suggests that only governments that do not have to concentrate myopically on the exigencies of winning the next election have the political space to undertake structural changes, the benefits of which may only be manifest in the medium term. In turn, successful reforms are likely to entail changes in underlying social structural conditions—such as the strengthening or weakening of organized labor movements—that both expand the electoral constituencies of the government's partisanpreferred policies and improve their macroeconomic efficacy. These propositions are examined with respect to the construction social democracy in Sweden in the 1930s and the construction of neoliberalism in Thatcher's Britain. Although the consequences of these two instances were diametrically opposed, the conditions that created the possibility for radical reform, and the strategies pursued by the governments to precipitate structural change were very similar.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alchian, A. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 59.
2.
Alt, J. (1987). Crude politics: Oil and the political economy of unemployment in Britain and Norway. British Journal of Political Science, 17, 149-199.
3.
Alvarez, M. , Garrett, G., & Lange, P. (1991). Government partisanship, labor organization and macroeconomic performance, 1967-1984. American Political Science Review, 85, 539-556.
4.
Butler, D. , & Kavanagh, D. (1984). The British general election of 1983. London: Macmillan.
5.
Callaghan, J. (1987). Time and change. London: Collins.
6.
Castles, F. (1978). The Social Democratic image of society. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7.
Crewe, I. , & Denver D. (1985). Electoral change in Western democracies. New York: Croom Helm.
8.
Dalton, R. J. , Flanagan, S. L., & Beck, P. A. (Eds.). (1984). Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Donoghue, B. (1987). Prime minister. London: Cape.
10.
Dorfman, G. (1983). British trade unions against the Trades Union Congress. London: Macmillan.
11.
Dunleavy, P. , Margetts, H., & Weir, S. (1992). Replaying the 1992 general election: How Britain would have voted under alternative electoral systems. London School of Economics and Political Science, Public Policy Paper No. 3.
12.
Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties. New York: Wiley.
13.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985). Politics against markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Frey, B. , & Schneider, F. (1978). A political economic mode of the UK. Economic Journal, 88, 243-253.
16.
Gamble, A. (1988). The free economy and the strong state. London: Macmillan.
17.
Garrett, G. (in press-a). Government and the economy in the age of interdependence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Garrett, G. (in press-b). The political consequences of Thatcherism. Political Behavior.
19.
Garrett, G. , & Lange, P. (1991). Political responses to economic decline: What's “left” for the left?International Organization, 45, 539-564.
20.
Goldstein, J. (in press). Ideas, interests and American trade policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
Gourevitch, P. (1986). Politics in hard times. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
Hall, P. (Ed.). (1989). The political power of economic ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Heath, A. , Jowell, R., & Curtice, J. (1985). How Britain votes. London: Pergamon.
24.
Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social policies in Britain and Sweden. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Hibbs, D. (1987a). The American political economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
Hibbs, D. (1987b). The political economy of the industrial democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Hoover, K. , & Plant, R. (1989). Conservative capitalism. London: Routledge.
28.
Jenkins, P. (1987). Mrs. Thatcher's revolution. London: Jonathan Cape.
29.
Kahn, P. (in press). Union politics and the restructuring of the British coal industry. In M. Golden & J. Pontusson (Eds.), Bargaining for change: Union politics in North American and Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Keeler, J.T.S. (1993). Opening the window for reform: Mandates, crises, and extraordinary policy-making. Comparative Political Studies, 25, 433-486.
31.
King, D. (1987). The new Right. Chicago: Dorsey.
32.
Korpi, W. (1978). The working class in welfare capitalism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33.
Kramer, G. (1971). Short-term fluctuations in U.S. voting behavior, 1896-1964. American Political Science Review, 65, 131-143.
34.
Krieger, J. (1986). Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of decline. London: Polity Press.
35.
Longstreth, F. (1988). From corporatism to dualism? Thatcherism and the climacteric of British trade unions in the 1980s. Political Studies, 36, 413-432.
36.
March, J. , & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
37.
Norpoth, H. (1987). Guns and butter and government popularity in Britain. American Political Science Review, 81, 949-959.
38.
Przeworski, A. , & Sprague, J. (1986). Paper stones: An electoral history of socialism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
39.
Rae, D. (1971). The political consequences of electoral laws. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Rothstein, B. (1990). Marxism, institutional analysis, and working-class power: The Swedish case. Politics and Society, 18, 317-345.
41.
Rothstein, B. (in press). Explaining Swedish corporatism: The formative moment. Scandinavian Political Studies.
42.
Scharpf, F. (1991). Crisis and choice in European social democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
43.
Skocpol, T. (1982). Political responses to capitalist crisis: Neo-Marxist theories of the state and the case of the New Deal. Politics and Society, 10, 151-201.
44.
Strom, K. (1990). Minority government and majority rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Studlar, D.et al. (1990). Privatization and the British electorate: Microeconomic policies, macroeconomic evaluations and party support. American Journal of Political Science, 34, 1077-1101.
46.
Swenson, P. (1989). Fair shares: Unions, pay and politics in Sweden and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
47.
Vickers, J. , & Yarrow, G. (1988). Privatization: An economic analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.
Weir, M. , & Skocpol, T. (1985). State structures and the possibilities of “Keynesian” responses to the Great Depression in Sweden, Britain and the United States. In P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Brining the state back in. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
White, P. (1985). The writing on the wall. London: Joseph.
