Some feminist theory suggests that women have different value priorities compared to men, which should lead to different political perspectives and political behavior among candidates for elected office. By contrast, the theory of responsible party government predicts that there should be few gender-based differences in perspectives and behavior among candidates, due to party discipline. Studies conducted in the United States and elsewhere, however, have consistently shown that legislators are district-oriented, irrespective of party affiliation. In this article, the authors apply multivariate analysis to matched mass-elite survey data collected during the 1987 Australian federal election to analyze the policy views of male and female candidates and to compare them to attitudes among their constituents. For candidates, party dominates political attitudes, with much less influence for constituency opinion and little at all for gender except on the question of advancement for women. These findings are somewhat at variance from similar studies in the United States and Britain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achen, C. H. (1977). Measuring representation: Perils of the correlation coefficient. American Journal of Political Science, 21, 808-815.
2.
Achen, C. H. (1978). Measuring representation. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 475-510.
3.
Aitkin, D. (1982). Stability and change in Australian politics. Canberra: Australian National University Press.
4.
Aitkin, D. , & Kahan, M. (1974). Australia: Class politics in the New World. In R. Rose (Ed.), Electoral behaviour (pp. 437-480). New York: Free Press.
5.
Baxter, S. , & Lansing, M. (1980). Women and politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6.
Barnes, S. H. (1977). Representation in Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Cain, B. , Ferejohn, J. & Fiorina, M. (1987). The personal vote. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Carroll, S. J. (1984). Women candidates and support for feminist concerns: The closet feminist syndrome. Western Political Quarterly, 37, 307-323.
9.
Converse, P. E. , & Pierce, R. (1986). Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political parties and political representation. Comparative Political Studies, 17, 267-299.
11.
Dalton, R. J. (1988). Citizen politics in Western democracies. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
12.
De Vaus, D. , & McAllister, I. (1989). The changing politics of women: Gender and political orientation in eleven nations. European Journal of Political Research, 17, 241-262.
13.
Diamond, I. (1977). Gender roles in the state house. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
14.
Diamond, I. , & Hartsock, N. (1981). Beyond interests in politics: A comment on Virginia Sapiro's “When are interests interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.”American Political Science Review, 75, 717-721.
15.
Dodson, D. L. (1989, April). Are parties gender-neutral? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
16.
Drewery, G., & Brock, J. (1983). The impact of women on the House of Lords (Report No. 112). Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Centre for the Study of Public Policy.
17.
Epstein, L. (1980). Whatever happened to the British party model?American Political Science Review, 74, 9-22.
18.
Erikson, R. S. (1978). Constituency opinion and congressional behavior: A reexamination of the Miller-Stokes representation data. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 511-535.
19.
Eulau, H. , & Karps, P. D. (1977). The puzzle of representation: Specifying components of responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2, 233-254.
20.
Farah, B. G. (1980). Political representation in West Germany: The institution and maintenance of elite-mass linkages. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
21.
Flammang, J. A. (1985). Female officials in the feminist capital: The case of Santa Clara County. Western Political Quarterly, 38, 95-118.
22.
Fraga, L., R. , Meier, K. J. & England, R. E. (1986). Hispanic Americans and educational policy: Limites to equal access. Journal of Politics, 48, 850-876.
23.
Franklin, M. (1988). The resurgence of conservatism in British elections after 1974. In B. Cooper, A. Kornberg, & W. Mishler (Eds.), The resurgence of conservatims in Anglo-American democracies (pp. 304-331). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
Frankovic, K. A. (1977). Gender and voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Politics Quarterly, 5, 315-330.
25.
Gehlen, F. (1977). Women members of Congress: A distinctive role. In M. Githens & J. Prestage (Eds.), A portrait of marginality (pp. 304-319). New York: David McKay.
26.
Graetz, B. , & McAllister, I. (1985). Mass-elite linkages in Australia: Empirical evidence. Politics, 20, 65-76.
27.
Graetz, B. , & McAllister, I. (1988). Dimensions of Australian society. Melbourne: Macmillan.
28.
Gross, D. (1989, September). Taking another look at descriptive representation: The case of women legislators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
29.
Gruhl, J. , Cassia, S., & Welch, S. (1981). Women as policymakers: The case of trial judges. American Journal of Political Science, 25, 308-325.
30.
Hibbing, J. R. , & Marsh, D. (1987). Accounting for the voting patterns of British MPs on free votes. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12, 275-297.
31.
Higley, J. , Deacon, D. & Smart, D. (1979). Elites in Australia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
32.
Hill, D. B. (1983). Women state legislators and party voting on the ERA. Social Science Quarterly, 64, 318-326.
33.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
Jackman, R. W. (1972). Political elites, mass publics, and support for democratic principles. Journal of Politics, 34, 753-773.
35.
Jackson, J. S. , Brown, B. L., & Bositis, D. (1982). Herbert McCloskey and friends revisited: 1980 Democratic and Republican Party elites compared to the mass public. American Politics Quarterly, 10, 158-180.
36.
Jewell, M. E. (1985). Legislators and constituents in the representative process. In G. Loewenberg, S. C. Patterson, & M. E. Jewell (Eds.), Handbook of legislative research (pp. 97-131). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Kathlene, L. (1989). A new approach to understanding the impact of gender on the legislative process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
38.
Kornberg, A. , Mishler, W. & Smith, J. (1975). Political elite and mass perceptions of party locations in issue space: Some tests of two positions. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 161-185.
39.
Krauss, W. R. (1974). Political implications of gender roles: A review of the literature. American Political Science Review, 68, 1706-1723.
40.
Kuklinski, J. H. (1977). Constituency opinion: A test of the surrogate model. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 34-40.
41.
Kuklinski, J. H. (1978). Representativeness and elections: A policy analysis. American Political Science Review, 72, 165-177.
42.
Kuklinski, J. H. (1979). Representative-constituency linkages: A review article. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4, 121-140.
43.
Kuklinski, J. H. , & Elling, R. C. (1977). Representational role, constituency opinion and legislative roll-call behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 21, 135-147.
44.
Leader, S. G. (1977). The policy impact of elected women officials. In L. Maisel & J. Cooper (Eds.), The impact of the electoral process (pp. 265-284). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45.
Luttbeg, N. (1968). The structure of beliefs among leaders and the public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 32, 398-409.
46.
Mayhew, D. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
47.
McAllister, I. (1991a). Party adaptation and factionalism within the Australian party system. American Journal of Political Science, 35, 206-227.
48.
McAllister, I. (1991b). Party elites, voters and political attitudes: Testing three explanations for mass-elite differences. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 24, 237-268.
49.
McAllister, I. , Mackerras, M., Ascui, A., & Moss, S. (1990). Australian political facts. Melbourne: Longman-Cheshire.
50.
McCloskey, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American politics. American Political Science Review, 58, 361-382.
51.
McCloskey, H. , Hoffman, P. J., & O'Hara, R. (1960). Issue conflict and consensus among party leaders and followers. American Political Science Review, 54, 406-427.
52.
McCrone, D. J. , & Kuklinski, J. H. (1979). The delegate theory of representation. American Journal of Political Science, 23, 278-300.
53.
Meier, K. J. , & England, R. E. (1984). Black representation and educational policy: Are they related?American Political Science Review, 78, 392-403.
54.
Mezey, S. G. (1978a). Does gender make a difference? A case study of women in politics. Western Political Quarterly, 31, 492-501.
55.
Mezey, S. G. (1978b). Women and representation: The case of Hawaii. Journal of Politics, 40, 369-385.
56.
Miller, W. E. , & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56.
57.
Montjoy, R. , Shaffer, W., & Weber, R. E. (1980). Policy preferences of party elites and masses: Conflict or consensus?American Politics Quarterly, 8, 318-343.
58.
Norris, P. , & Lovenduski, J. (1989). Women candidates for Parliament: Transforming the agenda?British Journal of Political Science, 19, 106-115.
59.
Perkins, J. , & Fowlkes, D. L. (1980). Opinion representation versus social representation; or, why women can't run as women and win. American Political Science Review, 74, 92-103.
60.
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
61.
Randall, V. (1987). Women and politics (2nd ed.). Chicago University of Chicago Press.
62.
Ranney, A. (1954). The doctrine of responsible party government. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
63.
Rasmussen, J. (1984). Is Parliament revolting? In D. T. Studlar & J. L. Waltman (Eds.), Dilemmas of change in British politics (pp. 20-47). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
64.
Rose, R. (1974a). Politics in England (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
65.
Rose, R. (1974b). The problem of party government. London: Macmillan.
66.
Robinson, T. P. , England, R. E., Fraga, L. R. & Meier, K. J. (1986). Linking passive and active representation: A review of the literature and a model for testing the linkage for women representatives. Paper presented at the annual meting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
67.
Saint-Germain, M. A. (1989). Does their difference make a difference? The impact of women on public policy in the Arizona Legislature. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 956-968.
68.
Sapiro, V. (1981). Research frontier essay: When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women. American Political Science Review, 75, 701-716.
69.
Sawer, M. , & Simms, M. (1984). A woman's place: Women and politics in Australia. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
70.
Searing, D. D. (1986). A theory of political socialization: Institutional support and deradicalization in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 341-376.
71.
Simms, M. (1981). Australia. In J. Lovenduski & J. Hills (Eds.), The politics of the second electorate (pp. 83-111). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
72.
Simms, M. (1984). A woman's place is in the House and in the Senate. In M. Simms (Ed.), Australian women and the political system. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
73.
Simms, M. (1987). Women. In I. McAllister & J. Warhurst (Eds.), Australia votes. Melbourne: Longman Cheshire.
74.
Soule, J. W. , & McGrath, W. E. (1977). A comparative study of male-female political attitudes at citizen and elite levels. In M. Githens & J. L. Prestage (Eds.), A portrait of marginality (pp. 175-195). New York: David McKay.
75.
Stewart, J., Jr. , England, R. E., & Meier, K. J. (1989). Black representation in urban school districts: From school board to office to classroom. Western Political Quarterly, 42, 287-305.
76.
Stone, W. J. (1979). Measuring constituency-representative linkages: Problems and prospects. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4, 623-639.
77.
Sullivan, J. L. , & Barnum, D. (1990). The elusive foundations of political freedom in Britain and the United States. Journal of Politics, 52, 719-739.
78.
Thomas, S. (1989). Voting patterns in the California Assembly: The role of gender. Women and Politics, 9, 43-56.
79.
Thomas S. (1991a, April). Evaluating the impact of women legislators on political policies and processes: The context of success. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
80.
Thomas, S. (1991b). The impact of women on state legislative policiesJournal of Politics, 53, 958-976.
81.
Thomas, S. , & Welch, S. (1991). The impact of gender on activities and priorities of state legislators. Western Political Quarterly, 44, 445-456.
82.
Uslaner, E. M. , & Weber, R. E. (1983). Policy congruence and American state elites: Descriptive representation versus electoral accountability. Journal of Politics, 45, 183-196.
83.
Vallance, E. (1979). Women in the House. London: Athlone.
84.
Ward, R. (1977). The Australian legend. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
85.
Weissberg, R. (1978). Collective versus dyadic representation in Congress. American Political Science Review, 72, 535-547.
Welch, S. (1985). Are women more liberal than men in the U.S. Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10, 125-134.
88.
Welch, S. , & Karnig, A. K. (1980). Black representation and urban policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89.
Welch, S. , & Studlar, D. T. (1983). The policy opinions of British political activists. Political Studies, 31, 604-619.
90.
Welch, S. , Combs, M. & Gruhl, J. (1988). Do Black judges make a difference?American Journal of Political Science, 32, 126-136.
91.
Western, J. S. (1983). Social inequality in Australian society. Melbourne: Macmillan.
92.
Wirls, D. (1986). Reinterpreting the gender gap. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 316-330.
93.
Wittkopf, E. R. , & Maggiotto, M. A. (1983). Elites and masses: A comparative analysis of attitudes towards America's world role. Journal of Politics, 45, 303-334.
