In this article, the author assesses the prospects for the consolidation of democracy in Latin America in the 1990s, compared with the failure to achieve that goal in the 1960s, by examining the institutionalization of political parties in the two time periods. Samuel Huntington's criteria of institutionalization (adaptability, complexity, autonomy, and coherence) are used and employ a variety of indicators (some empirical, some more judgmental) to assess the degree of change between the 1960s and the 1980s. He concludes that, although there is significant variation among countries, for the majority of them, and for the Latin American region as a whole, political parties have indeed become somewhat more institutionalized over time, thereby modestly enhancing the prospects for the consolidation of democracy in the 1990s.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, R. J. (Ed.). (1982). Political parties of the Americas. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
2.
Baloyra, E. A. (Ed.). (1987). Comparing new democracies: Transitions and consolidation in Mediterranean Europe and the Southern Cone. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
Banks, A. (Ed.). (1989). Political handbook of the world. Binghamton: State University of New York.
4.
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5.
Day, A. J. (Ed.). (1988). Political parties of the world (3rd ed.). Harlow, England: Longman.
6.
Delury, G. E. (Ed.). (1987). World encyclopedia of political systems and parties (2nd ed.). New York: Facts-on-File.
7.
Diamond, L. , Linz, J., & Lipset, S. M. (Eds.). (1989). Democracy in developing countries: Latin America. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
8.
Dix, R. H. (1985). Populism: Authoritarian and democratic. Latin American Research Review, 20(2), 29-52.
9.
Dix, R. H. (1989). Cleavage structures and party systems in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 22, 23-37.
10.
Economist Intelligence Unit . (1989). Country reports. London: Business International, Ltd.
11.
Economist Intelligence Unit . (1990). Country reports. London: Business International, Ltd.
12.
Fleet, M. (1985). The rise and fall of Chilean Christian democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Gilbert, D. (1988). Sandinistas. New York: Basil Blackwell.
14.
Huntington, S. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Latin American Newsletters . (various issues). Latin American weekly report. London.
16.
Levy, D. C. (1986). The political consequences of changing socialization patterns. In R. Camp (Ed.), Mexico's political stability: The next five years (pp. 19-39). Boulder, CO: Westview.
17.
Lijphart, A. (1968). Typologies of democratic systems. Comparative Political Studies, 1, 3-44.
18.
Linz, J. , & Stepan, A. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
Mainwaring, S. (1988). Political parties and democratization in Brazil and the Southern Cone. Comparative Politics, 21, 91-120.
20.
Malloy, J. M. , & Seligson, M. A. (Eds.). (1987). The politics of regime transition in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21.
Martz, J. D. (1966). Accion democratica. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Martz, J. D. (1972). Ecuador: Conflicting political culture and the quest for progress. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
23.
McDonald, R. H. , & Ruhl, J. M. (1989). Party politics and elections in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview.
24.
Merkl, P. , & Lawson, K. (1988). When parties fail. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
O'Connor, R. E. (1980). The electorate. In H. Penniman (Ed.), Venezuela at the polls (pp. 56-90). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
26.
O'Donnell, G. A. (1973). Modernization and bureaucratic authoritarianism. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
27.
O'Donnell, G. A. , Schmitter, P., & Whitehead, L. (Eds.). (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule (Vols. 1-4). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28.
Rae, D. (1971). The political consequences of electoral laws (rev. ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
Ruddle, K. , & Gillette, P. (Eds.). (1972). Latin American political statistics. Los Angeles: Latin American Center, University of California.
30.
Seligson, M. A. (1987). Costa Rica and Jamaica. In M. Weiner & E. Ozbudun (Eds.), Competitive elections in developing countries (pp. 147-198). Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
31.
Smith, P. (1986). Leadership and change, intellectuals and technocrats in Mexico. In R. Camp (Ed.), Mexico's political stability: The next five years (pp. 101-115). Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
Snow, P. G. (1979). Political forces in Argentina (rev. ed.). New York: Praeger.
33.
Story, D. (1986). The Mexican ruling party. New York: Praeger.
34.
Valenzuela, A. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes: Chile. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
35.
Valenzuela, A. (1985). Origins and characteristics of the Chilean party system: A proposal for a parliamentary form of government. Working Paper. Washington, DC: The Wilson Center Latin American Program.
36.
Wesson, R. , & Fleischer, D. V. (1983). Brazil in transition. New York: Praeger.
