The present article discusses different approaches for identifying empirical cleavage dimensions and concludes that a so-called cleavage-defined approach is most appropriate for identifying and interpreting party dimensions. It is further argued that discriminant analysis is a powerful statistical tool for analyzing cleavage dimensions in accordance with a cleavage-defined approach. Using different structural variables that are incorporated in the Lipset-Rokkan model for party cleavages in Western Europe, and two ideological dimensions (called left-right materialism and materialism/postmaterialism) as “input” for the dimensional analyses, data from Norway and the European Community countries (based on Euro-Barometer 16 from 1981) are analyzed and related to the comparative literature on cleavage structure in Western Europe.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BAKER, K. L. , R. J. DALTON, and K. HILDEBRANDT (1981) Germany Transformed—Political Culture and the New Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
2.
BUDGE, I. and D. J. FARLIE (1977) Voting and Party Competition: A Spatial Synthesis based on a Critique of Existing Approaches Applied to Surveys from Ten Democracies. New York: John Wiley.
3.
BUDGE, I. and D. J. FARLIE (1978) “The potentiality of dimensional analyses for explaning voting and party competition.”European J. of Pol. Research6: 203-231.
4.
CARTY, R. K. (1981) Party and Parish Pump. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier Univ. Press.
5.
CONVERSE, P. E. and H. VALEN (1971) “Dimensions of cleavage and perceived party distances in Norwegian voting.”Scandinavian Pol. Studies6: 107-152.
6.
DALTON, R. J. (1984) “The West German party system between two ages,” chap. 4 in R. J. Daltonet al. (eds.) Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
7.
ELDER, T. , A. H. THOMAS, and D. ARTER (1983) The Consensual Democracies. Oxford.
8.
FEATHERSTONE, K. and D. K. KATSOUDAS (1985) “Change and continuity in Greek voting behaviour.”European J. of Pol. Research13: 27-40.
9.
HEATH, A. , R. JOWELL, and J. CURTICE (1985) How Britain Votes. Oxford: Pergamon.
10.
HILL, K. (1974) “Belgium: political change in a segmented society,” chap. 2 in R. Rose (ed.) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press.
11.
INGLEHART, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution—Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
12.
INGLEHART, R. (1984) “The changing structure of political cleavages in Western societies,” chap. 2 in R. Daltonet al. (eds.) Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
13.
KLECKA, W. R. (1980) Discriminant Analysis. Sage University Paper series, Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-109. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
KNUTSEN, O. (1986) “Political cleavages and political realignment in Norway: the new politics thesis reexamined.”Scandinavian Pol. Studies9: 235-263.
15.
KNUTSEN. O. (1988) “The impact of structural and ideological party cleavages in West-European democracies—a comparative empirical analysis.”British J. of Pol. Studies.
16.
LAFFERTY, W. M. and O. KNUTSEN (1984) “Leftist and rightist ideology in a social democratic state: an analysis of Norway in the midst of the conservative resurgence.”British J. of Pol. Sciences14: 345-367.
17.
LAFFERTY, W. M. and O. KNUTSEN (1985) “Postmaterialism in a social democratic state: an analysis of the distinctiveness and congruity of the Inglehart Valye Syndrome in Norway.”Comparative Pol. Studies17: 411-430.
18.
LIJPHART, A. (1974) “The Netherlands: continuity and change in voting behavior,” chap. 2 in R. Rose (ed.) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press.
19.
LIMBERES, N. M. (1986) “The Greek election of June 1985: a socialist entrenchment.”West European Politics9: 142-147.
20.
LIPSET, S. M. and S. ROKKAN (1967) “Cleavage structure, party systems, and voter alignments: an introduction,” pp. 1-64 in S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Macmillan.
21.
MADELEY, J.T.S. (1977) “Scandinavian Christian Democracy: throwback or portent.”European J. of Pol. Research5: 267-287.
22.
MICHELAT, G. and M. SIMON (1977) “Religion, class and politics.”Comparative Pol. Studies10: 159-190.
23.
MORLINO, L. (1984) “The changing relationship between parties and society in Italy,” pp. 46-66 in S. Bartolini and P. Mair (eds.) Party Politics in Contemporary Western Europe. London: Frank Cass.
24.
MUGHAN, A. (1985) “Belgium,” chap. 12 in I. Crewe and D. Denver (eds.) Electoral Change in Western Democracies: Patterns and Sources of Electoral Volatility. London: Croom Helm.
25.
MULLER-ROMMEL, F. (1982) “Ecology parties in Western Europe.”West European Politics5: 68-74.
26.
PARISI, A. and G. PASQUINO (1979) “Changes in Italian electoral behaviour: the relationships between parties and voters.”West European Politics2: 6-30.
27.
RABIER, J.-R. , H. RIFFAULT, and R. INGLEHART (1983) Euro-Barometer 16: Noise and other Social Problems, October 1981. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
28.
ROKKAN, S. (1966) “Numerical democracy and corporate pluralism,” chap. 3 in R. Dahl (ed.) Political Opposition in Western Democracies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
29.
ROKKAN, S. (1970) “Nation-building, cleavage formation and the structuring of mass politics,” chap. 3 in S. Rokkan, Citizens, Elections, Parties. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
30.
ROSE, R. (1974) “Comparability in electoral studies,” chap. 1 in R. Rose (ed.) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press.
31.
ROSE, R. and I. McALLISTER (1986) Voters Begin to Choose: From Closed-Class to Open Elections in Britain. London: Sage.
32.
ROSE, R. and D. URWIN (1969) “Social cohesion, political parties, and strains in regimes.”Comparative Pol. Studies2: 7-67.
33.
SARLVIK, B. and I. CREWE (1983) Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
34.
VALEN, H. (1981) Valg og Politikk. Oslo: NKS-forlaget.
35.
WHYTE, J. H. (1974) “Ireland: politics without social bases,” chap. 2 in R. Rose (ed.) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook. New York: Free Press.
