It has been taken for granted that Latin American military governments of recent decades have been under the strong influence of the National Security Doctrine. However, no systematic assessment has been made about the degree to which the doctrine directly or indirectly has shaped military perceptions. This study focuses on the Argentine military government of 1976-1981, and on its identification of threats to national security, its strategies to overcome those threats, and whether these fit within the parameters of the NSD. Through content analysis of military speeches, interviews, and private memos, it is found that members of the government perceived their adversaries in vague, operational terms; that they focused on subjective agents to the exclusion of underlying objective conditions; and that they failed to appreciate the importance of political solutions to national security problems. Together, these views find only partial support within the NSD. It is concluded that the military practiced selective vision, magnifying certain elements of the NSD while losing sight of the rest, and that this selective vision was reinforced by the disjointed character of the doctrine itself.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amnesty International . (1978) Visit Beautiful Argentina...But Remember the Forgotten Prisoners. New York: Author.
2.
ARRIAGADA HERRERA, G. (1981) El Pensamiento Político de los Militares. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Investigaciones Socioeconómicas. BAILY, S. (1967)
3.
Labor, Nationalism and Politics in Argentina. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.
4.
BASAIL, M. A. (1983) Temas de Geopolítica Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Clio.
5.
BLAUFARB, D. (1977) The Counterinsurgency Era: U.S. Doctrine and Performance from 1950 to Present. New York: Free Press.
6.
CALLAHAN, P. , L. BRADY, and M. HERMANN (1981) Describing Foreign Policy Behavior. Beverly Hills: Sage.
7.
CALVO, R. (1979) “The Church and the doctrine of national security.”J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs21 (February): 69-88.
8.
CAMPS, R. (1983a) “Interview.”Buenos Aires: Siete Dias (February 2): 1-4.
9.
CAMPS, R. (1983b) “Interview.”Buenos Aires: La Semana (June 2): 8-11.
10.
CAMPS, R. (1985) “Interview.”Buenos Aires: La Semana (May 19): 2-4.
11.
CHILD J. (1979) “Geopolitical thinking in Latin America.”Latin American Research Rev.14: 89-111.
12.
COHEN, R. (1979) Threat Perception in International Crisis. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.
13.
COLLIER, D. (1979) “Synthesis and priorities for future research,” in D. Collier (ed.) The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
14.
COMBLIN, J. (1979) The Church and the National Security State. New York: Orbis Books.
15.
Comisión Nacional Sobre la Desaparición de Personas (CONADEP) (1986) Nunca Mas. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.
16.
de NAUROIS, Lt. Col. P. (1958) “Guerra subversiva y guerra revolucionaria.”Revista de Escuela Superior de Guerra36: 687-702.
17.
Department of the Army (1967) Field Manual 31-16: Counterguerrilla Operations. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
DO CUOTO E SILVA, GEN. G. (1978) Geopolítica del Brasil. Mexico: El Cid Editor.
19.
DUVALL, R. D. and M. STOHL (1983) “Governance by terror,” in M. Stohl (ed.) The Politics of Terrorism: Second Edition. New York: Marcel Dekker.
20.
FINALY, D. J. , O. R. HOLSTI, and R. R. FAGEN (1967) Enemies in Politics. Chicago: Rand McNally.
21.
FITCH, J.S. (1977) The Military Coup d'Etat as a Political Process: Ecuador 1948-1966. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
22.
FRONTALINI, D. and M. CRISTINA (1984) El Mito de la Guerra Sucia. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Centro de Estudios Legales y Sociales.
23.
GILLESPIE, R. (1982) Soldiers of Perón: Argentina's Montoneros. Oxford: Clarendon.
24.
GRINDLE, M. (1977) “Policy change in an authoritarian regime: Mexico under Echeverría.”J. of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs19 (November): 523-555.
25.
HART, J. A. (1977) “Cognitive maps of three Latin American policy makers.”World Politics30 (October): 115-140.
26.
HILLSMAN, R. (1962) “Internal war: the new communist doctrine,” in Lt. Col. T. N. Greene (ed.) The Guerrilla—and How to Fight Him. New York: Praeger.
27.
HOLSTI, O. R. (1969) Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, PA: Addison-Wesley.
28.
JAQUETTE, J. S. (1972) “Revolution by fiat: the context of policymaking in Peru.”Western Pol. Q.25 (December): 648-666.
29.
JOHNSON, U. A. (1962) “Internal defense and the foreign service.”Foreign Service J.39: 20-24.
30.
KAUFMAN, R. (1979) “Industrial change and authoritarian rule in Latin America: a concrete review of the bureaucratic-authoritarian model,” in D. Collier (ed.) The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
31.
KLARE, M. and C. ARNSON (1979) “Exporting repression: U.S. support for authoritarianism in Latin America,” in R. R. Fagen (ed.) Capitalism and the State in U.S.-Latin American Relations.”Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.
32.
KNORR, K. (1976) Historical Dimensions of National Security Problems. Kansas City: Univ. Press of Kansas.
33.
LOPEZ, G. A. (1986) “National security ideology as an impetus to state violence and state terror,” in M. Stohl and G. Lopez (eds.) Governmental Violence and Repression: An Agenda for Research. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
34.
LOZADA, S. , E. S. BARCESAT, C. M. ZAMORANO, and J. J. VIAGGIO (1983) La Ideología de la Seguridad Nacional. Buenos Aires, Argentina: El Cid Editor.
35.
MARKOFF, J. and S. DUNCAN BARETTA (1985) “Professional ideology and military activism in Brazil.”Comparative Politics17: 175-191.
36.
MARTÍNEZ de HOZ, J. A. (1981) Memoria. República Argentina: Ministerio de Economía 3 (Parte 1): 147.
37.
McNAMARA, R. S. (1968) The Essence of Security: Reflections in Office. New York: Harper & Row.
38.
MEIRA MATTOS, GEN. C. (1975) Brasil—Geopolítica e Destino. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Biblioteca do Ejercito.
39.
O'DONNELL, G. (1979) Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, CA: Institute for International Studies.
40.
PARET, P. (1985) Clausewitz and the State: The Man, His Theories and His Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
41.
PARET, P. and J. W. SHY (1962) Guerrillas in the 1960's. New York: Praeger.
42.
PINOCHET, A. (1968) Geopolítica. Santiago, Chile: Editorial Gabriela Mistral.
43.
PION-BERLIN, D. (1983) “Political repression and economic doctrines: the case of Argentina.”Comparative Pol. Studies16 (April): 37-66.
44.
PURCELL, S. K. (1973) “Decision-making in an authoritarian regime: theoretical implications from a Mexican case study,”World Politics26 (October): 28-54.
45.
ROSTOW, W. W. (1962) “Guerrilla warfare in underdeveloped areas,” in Lt. Col. T. N. Greene (ed.) The Guerrilla—and How to Fight Him. New York: Praeger.
46.
SIMPSON, J. and J. BENNETT (1985) The Disappeared and the Mothers of the Plaza: The Story of the 11,000 Argentinians Who Vanished. New York: St. Martin's.
47.
SINGER, J. D. (1958) “Threat perception and the armament tension dilemma.”J. of Conflict Resolution2: 90-105.
48.
STEPAN, A. (1971) The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
49.
STEPAN, A. (1973) “The new professionalism of internal warfare and military role expansion,” in A. Stepan (ed.) Authoritarian Brazil. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
50.
TAPIA, J. A. (1980) El Terrorismo de Estado: La Doctrina de la Seguridad Nacional en el Cono Sur. Mexico: Editorial Nueva Imagen.
51.
THOMPSON, R. (1966) Defeating Communist Insurgency: The Lessons of Malaya and Vietnam. New York: Praeger.
52.
TRINQUIER, R. (1964) Modern Warfare: A French View of Counterinsurgency. New York: Praeger.
53.
VIDELA, J. R. (1977) “Press conference.” República Argentina, Secretaria de Información Pública. Dirección General de Prensa.
54.
VIDELA, J. R. (1985) Directive 504/77. Diario Del Juicio28 (December 3): 529-532.
55.
VILLEGAS, O. G. (1969) Políticas y Estrategias para el Desarrollo y la Seguridad Nacional. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Pleamar.
56.
ZINNES, D. , J. L. ZINNES, and R. D. McCLURE (1972) ``Hostility in diplomatic communication: a study of the 1914 crisis,” in C. Hermann (ed) International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research. New York: Free Press.
