This article explores the dilemma surrounding the general utility of realignment theory in analyzing the connection between elections and policy shifts; the theory seems to work well in the American context but is less useful in explaining British politics. We reverse the normal analysis, focusing on periods associated with major policy shifts and attempting to discover cross-national similarities in the elections associated with those policy shifts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ANDERSON, J. E. (1979) Public Policy Making. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
2.
ARROW, K. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: John Wiley.
3.
BEER, S. (1965) British Politics in the Collectivist Age. New York: Knopf.
4.
BLEASE, W. L. (1913) A Short History of Liberalism. London.
5.
BLEWETT, N. (1972) The Peers, the Parties and the People: The British General Election of 1910. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
6.
BRADY, D. (1973) Congressional Voting in a Partisan Era: A Study of the McKinley Houses and a Comparison to the Modern House of Representatives. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.
7.
BRADY, D. and H. W. STEPHENS (1983) “Elections and major policy shifts in Britain and the U.S.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Social Science History Association. Bloomington, IN, October 15.
8.
BRADY, D. and J. STEWART (1982) “Congressional party realignment and transformations of public policy in three alignment eras.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.26: 333-360.
9.
BRETON, A. (1974) The Economic Theory of Democracy. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
10.
BRUCE, M. (1966) The Coming of the Welfare State. New York: Schocken.
11.
BURNHAM, W. (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: Norton.
12.
BUTLER, D. and D. STOKES (1969) Political Change in Britain. New York: St. Martin's.
13.
CARTY, R. K. (1983) Electoral Politics in Ireland: Party and Parish Pump. New York: Brandon.
14.
CLUBB, J. , W. FLANIGAN, and N. ZINGALE (1980) Partisan Realignment: Voters, Parties, and Governments in American History. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
COLE, G.D.H. (1948) A History of the Labour Party. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
16.
CRAIG, F.W.S. (1971) British Electoral Facts: 1885-1975. London: Macmillan.
17.
CREWE, I. (1980) “Prospects for party realignment: an Anglo-American comparison.”Comparative Politics12: 379-400.
18.
CREWE, I. (1983) “The electorate: partisan dealignment ten years on.”West European Politics6: 183-215.
19.
CREWE, I. and B. SARLVIK (1983) Decade of Dealignment. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
20.
DAHL, R. (1956) A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
21.
DICEY, A. V. (1886) England's Case Against Home Rule. London: Richmond.
22.
DOWNS, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Rowe.
23.
ELAZAR, D. (1972) American Federalism: A View From the States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
24.
FARRELL, B. (1971) The Founding of Dail Eireann. Dublin.
25.
FENNO, R. (1973) Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
26.
FLANIGAN, W. H. and N. H. ZINGALE (1974) “Measures of electoral competition.”Pol. Methodology1: 31-60.
27.
FRASER, D. (1973) The Evolution of the British Welfare State. New York: Barnes & Noble.
28.
GARVIN, T. (1981) The Evolution of Irish Nationalist Politics. New York: Holmes & Meier.
29.
GINSBERG, B. (1972) “Critical elections and the substance of party conflict: 1844-1968.”Midwest J. of Pol. Sci.16: 603-625.
30.
GINSBERG, B. (1976) “Critical elections and public policy.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70: 41-49.
31.
GINSBERG, B. (1982) “Consequences of consent: elections, citizen control, and popular acquiescence.”Pol. Sci. Serv.
32.
HELCO, H. (1974) Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
33.
HOGAN, J. (June 15, 1938) Irish Times.
34.
HOTELLING, H. (1929) “Stability in competition.”Economic J.39: 41-57.
35.
HUITT, R. (1957) “The Morse committee assignment controversy: a study in Senate norms.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.51: 313-329.
36.
HUITT, R. (1961) “The outsider in the Senate: an alternative role.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.55: 574-593.
37.
HUNTINGTON, S. (1965) “Political development and political decay.”World Politics17: 386-430.
38.
JENNINGS, I. (1961) Party Politics (3 volumes). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
39.
KEY, V. O. (1955) “A theory of critical elections.”J. of Politics17: 3-18.
40.
KINNEAR, M. (1968) The British Voter: An Atlas and Survey Since 1885. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.
41.
MACKINTOSH, J. (1977) The British Cabinet. London: Stevens & Sons.
42.
MANN, T. (1978) Unsafe At Any Margin. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
43.
MANNING, M. (1972) Irish Political Parties. Dublin.
44.
MURPHY, J. (1975) Ireland in the Twentieth Century. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.
45.
MURRAN, B. K. (1980) The Peoples Budget 1909/10: Lloyd George and Liberal Politics. Oxford: Clarendon.
46.
O'LEARY, C. (1979) Dissension in the House of Commons. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.
47.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1946) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Rowe.
48.
SMITH, S. and C. DEERING (1984) Committees in Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
49.
STEPHENS, H. W. (1982) “Party realignment in Britain, 1900 to 1925: a preliminary assessment.”Social Sci. History6: 35-66.
50.
TAWNEY, R. H. (1931) Equality. New York: Harcourt & Brace.
51.
WALD, K. D. (1982) “Realignment theory and British party development: a critique.” Presented at the Social Science History Association annual meeting, Bloomington, IN.
52.
WILLIAMS, F. (1949) Fifty Years March: The Rise of the Labour Party. London.
