There is a large body of research about decision cases in Western democracies. Unfortunately, the individual case studies are widely scattered so that the research has little cumulative effect. We present an effort to construct a data bank for which existing case studies are coded according to a uniform scheme. This presentation is done at a relatively early stage so that changes can still be made in response to unanticipated problems or different theoretical perspectives. The article gives the rationale for the data bank, addresses the problem of the units of analysis, enumerates the variables contained in the data bank, and illustrates for what theoretical questions the data can be used.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BACHRACH, P. and M. S. BARATZ (1962) “Two faces of power.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.56: 947-952.
2.
BAUMGARTNER, F. (1985) “French interest groups and the pluralism-corporatism debate.” Presented at the 1985 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29-September 1, New Orleans, LA.
3.
BOULTER, D. R. (1980) “Setting speed limits...and comparing public policymaking.”Comparative Politics13: 79-102.
4.
GERMANN, R. and J. STEINER (1985) “Comparing decision modes at the country level.”British J. of Pol. Sci.15: 123-126.
5.
KATZENSTEIN, P. J. (1984) Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.
6.
KEELER, J.T.S. (1985) “Situating France on the pluralism-corporatism continuum: a critique of and alternative to the Wilson perspective.”Comparative Politics17 (January): 229-249.
7.
KIRSTEIN, S. G. (1984) “Decision process and policy outcome: energy taxes in the United Kingdom and the United States.” Honors thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
8.
LIJPHART, A. (1971) “Comparative politics and the comparative method.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Res.65: 682-693.
9.
LIJPHART, A. (1977) Democracy in Plural Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
10.
LOWI, T. T. (1964) “American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory.”World Politics16: 677-715.
11.
NUSSBAUM, P. (1984) La politique energetique en France et en Italie, 1973-1983, rapport au Fonds national suisse de la recherche.
12.
PANITCH, L. (1977) “The development of corporatism in liberal democracies.”Comparative Pol. Studies10: 61-90.
13.
RIKER, W. H. (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
14.
STEINER, J. (1981) “The consociational theory and beyond.”Comparative Politics13: 339-354.
15.
STEINER, J. (1983) “Decision process and policy outcome: an attempt to conceptualize the problem at the cross-national level.”European J. of Political Research11: 309-318.
16.
STEINER, J. (1986) European Democracies. New York: Longman.
17.
WILSON, F. L. (1983) “French interest group politics: pluralist or neocorporatist?”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.77: 895-910.
18.
WINDHOFF-HERITIER, A. (1983) “Policy und `politics': Wege und Irrwege einer politikwissenschaftlichen Policy-Theorie.”Politische Vierteljahresschrift24: 347-360.
