The purpose of this article is to assess the relative power of developmental, neo-Marxist, and statist explanations of inequalities in the Third World. This assessment is accomplished through the analysis of cross-sectional and short-term longitudinal data as well as several brief case studies. The cross-sectional analyses tend to suggest that, over the long run, both economic development and dependence on foreign investment generate tendencies toward increased income inequalities. The short-term longitudinal analyses, however, fail to support either of these views. Instead, they suggest that short-run changes are best explained by the nature and policies of the state in question. Authoritarian-exclusionary regimes tend to worsen inequalities over the short run, while more democratic states tend to stabilize them. We conclude that this is precisely what we should expect, given that development and dependency theories are not about what happens in the short run, but about what happens over long spans of time. We thus view as inappropriate the use of such theories to explain short-term changes in inequality in the Third World and call for more attention to the role of policy and politics as determinants of such changes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ADELMAN, I. and S. ROBINSON (1979) Income Distribution Policy in Developing Countries. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
2.
AHLUWALIA, M. S. (1978) “Rural poverty and agricultural performance in India.”J. of Development Studies14: 298-324.
3.
AHLUWALIA, M. S. (1976) “Inequality, poverty and development.”J. of Development Economics3: 307-342.
4.
AHLUWALIA, M. S. (1974) “Income inequality: some dimension of the problem,” pp. 3-37 in H. Cheneryet al. (eds.) Redistribution with Growth. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
5.
BACHA, E. and L. TAYLOR (1978) “Brazilian income distribution in the 1960s: `facts,' model results and the controversy.”J. of Development Studies14: 271-297.
6.
BARDHAN, P. (1982) “Poverty and `trickle-down' in rural India: a quantitative analysis.”Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley. (mimeo)
7.
BARDHAN, P. (1973) “On the incidence of poverty in rural India in the sixties.”Econ. and Pol. Weekly (February).
8.
BOLLEN, K. A. (1980) “Issues in the comparative measurement of political democracy.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 370-390.
9.
BORNSCHIER, V. and H. BALLMER-CAO (1979) “Income inequality: a cross-national study of the relationship between MNC-penetration, dimension of the power structure and income distribution.”Amer. Soc. Rev.44: 487-506.
10.
BORNSCHIER, V. and P. HEINTZ [eds.] (1979) Compendium of Data for World System Analysis. Zurich: Sociological Institute, University of Zurich.
11.
BORNSCHIER, V. and D. CHASE-DUNN, and R. RUBINSON (1978) “Cross-national of the effects of foreign investment and aid on economic growth and inequality: a of findings and a reanalysis.”Amer. J. of Sociology84: 651-683.
12.
BRATTON, M. (1982) “Patterns of development and underdevelopment: toward a comparison.”Int. Studies Q.26: 333-372.
13.
CARDOSO, F. H. (1973) “Associated-dependent development: theoretical and practical implications,” pp. 142-176 in A. Stephan (ed.) Authoritarian Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
14.
CARDOSO, F. H. and E. FALETTO (1978) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
15.
CHEN, E.K.Y. (1979) Hyper Growth in Asian Economies: A Comparative Study of Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan. New York: Holmes & Meier.
16.
CHENERY, H. [ed.] (1974) Redistribution with Growth. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
17.
DANDEKAR, V. M. and N. RATH (1971) Poverty in India. Bombay: State's People Press.
18.
DOS SANTOS, T. (1970) “The structure of dependence.”Amer. Econ. Rev.60: 235-246.
19.
EVANS, P. (1979) Dependent Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
20.
EVANS, P. and M. TIMBERLAKE (1980) “Dependence, inequality and the growth of the tertiary: a comparative analysis of less developed countries.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 531-552.
21.
FEI, J.C.H. , G. RANIS, and S. W. KUO (1980) Growth with Equity: The Taiwan Case. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
22.
FISHLOW, A. (1973) “Some reflections on post-1964 Brazilian economic policy,” pp. 69-118 in A. Stepan (ed.) Authoritarian Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
23.
FRANKEL, F. R. (1978) India's Political Economy, 1947-1977: The Gradual Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
24.
HOLT, R. T. and J. E. TURNER (1966) The Political Basis of Economic Development: An Explanation in Comparative Political Analysis. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
25.
HUNTINGTON, S. P. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
26.
INTRILIGATOR, M. (1978) Econometric Models: Techniques and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27.
JACKMAN, R. W. (1982) “Dependence on foreign investment and economic growth in the Third World.”World Politics34.
28.
JACKMAN, R. W. (1975) Politics and Social Equality. New York: John Wiley.
29.
JAIN, S. E. (1975) Size Distribution of Income: A Compilation of Data. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30.
KERR, C. , J. T. DUNLOP, F. HARBISON, and C. A. MYERS (1964) Industrialism and Industrial Man: The Problems of Labor and Management in Economic Growth. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
31.
KOHLI, A. (1982) “The state and class in capitalist development.” Presented at the meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Diego, March 26-29.
32.
KUZNETS, S. (1976) Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure, and Spread. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.
33.
KUZNETS, S. (1963) “Quantitative aspects of the economic growth of nations; VIII: the distribution of income by size.”Econ. Development and Cultural Change11: 1-80.
34.
KUZNETS, S. (1955) “Economic growth and income inequality.”Amer. Econ. Rev.45: 1-28.
35.
LANGONI, C. (1973) Distribucido da Renda e Desenvolvimento Economico do Brasil. Rio De Janeiro: Editora Expressas e Cultura.
36.
LENSKI, G. (1966) Power and Privilege. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
LIPSET, S. M. (1963) Political Man. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
38.
MORLEY, S. and J. WILLIAMSON (1974) “Demand, distribution and employment: the case of Brazil.”Econ. Development and Cultural Change23: 33-60.
39.
MULLER, R. (1973) “The multinational corporation and the underdevelopment of the Third World,” pp. 124-151 in C. K. Wilber (ed.) The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment. New York: Random House.
40.
NORDLINGER, E. A. (1981) On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
41.
OSHIMA, H. T. (1962) “The international comparison of size distribution of family incomes with special reference to Asia.”Rev. of Economics and Statistics44: 439-445.
42.
PAUKERT, F. (1973) “Income distribution at different levels of development: a survey of evidence.”Int. Labour Rev.108: 97-125.
43.
PERKINS, F. (1977) Class Inequality and Political Order. New York: Praeger.
44.
SERRA, J. (1979) “Three mistaken theses regarding the connection b / t industrialization and authoritarian regimes,” pp. 99-163 in D. Collier (ed.) The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
45.
SKOCPOL, T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions in France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
46.
STACK, S. (1978) “The effects of direct government involvement in the economy of the degree of income inequality: a cross-national study.”Amer. Soc. Rev.43: 880-888.
47.
STEPAN, A. (1978) The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
48.
STEPAN, A. (1971) The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
49.
TAI, H. (1973) “The political process of land reform: a comparative study,” pp. 295-305 in N. T. Uphoff and W. F. Ilchman (eds.) The Political Economy of Development. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
50.
WEEDE, E. (1981) “Correlates of the size distribution of income in cross-national analyses.”J. of Politics43: 1029-1041.
51.
WEEDE, E. (1980) “Beyond misspecification in sociological analyses of income inequality.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45: 497-501.
52.
WEEDE, E. and H. TEIFENBACH (1981) “Some recent explanations of income inequality: an evaluation and critique.”Int. Studies Q.25: 255-282.
53.
World Bank (1980) World Tables. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
54.
World Bank (1975) The Assault on World Poverty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
