Using data from the eight-nation Political Action opinion survey undertaken during the mid-1970s, this article tests the mistrustful-efficacious hypothesis outlined by William Gamson—the idea that a combination of high political efficacy and low political trust is the optimum combination for political mobilization. Several different versions of the hypothesis are tested and several different combinations of control variables are included in the analysis, but no matter how the hypothesis is tested, the results are consistently weak. The concluding discussion centers on the reasons for this poor performance and its implications.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABRAVANEL, M. D. and R. J. BUSCH (1975) “Political competence, political trust, and the action orientations of university students.”J. of Politics37 (February): 57-82.
2.
ALTHAUSER, R. (1971) “Multicollinearity and non-additive regression models,” pp. 453-472 in Hubert H. Blalock (ed.) Causal Models in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine.
3.
BALCH, G. (1974) “Multiple indicators in survey research: the concept “sense of political efficacy.”Pol. Methodology1 (Spring): 1-43.
4.
BARNES, S. H. , M. KASSE, and K. R. ALLERBECK, B. G. FARAH, F. HEUNKS, R. INGLEHART, M. K. JENNINGS, H. D. KLINGEMANN, A. MARSH, and L. ROSENMAYR (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
CRAIG, S. C. (1980) “The mobilization of political discontent.”Pol. Behavior2: 189-209.
6.
CRAIG, S. C. (1979) “Efficacy, trust, and political behavior: an attempt to resolve a lingering conceptual dilemma.”Amer. Politics Q.7 (April): 255-239.
7.
CRAIG, S. C. and M. MAGGIOTTO (1981) “Political discontent and political action.”J. of Politics43 (May): 514-522.
8.
DRAPER, N. and H. SMITH (1966) Applied Regression Analysis. New York: John Wiley.
9.
EASTON, D. (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.
10.
EVANS, S. and K. HILDEBRANDT (1979) “Technical appendix,” pp. 537-592 in S. H. Barneset al.Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
FARAH, B. G. , S. H. BARNES, and F. HEUNKS (1979) “Political dissatisfaction,” pp. 409-448 in S. H. Barneset al.Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
FRASER, J. (1970) “The mistrustful-efficacious hypothesis and political participation.”J. of Politics32 (May): 444-449.
13.
GAMSON, W. A. (1971) “Political trust and its ramifications,” pp. 41-55 in Gilbert Abcarian and John W. Soule (eds.) Social Psychology and Political Behavior. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
14.
GAMSON, W. A. (1968) Power and Discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
15.
HAWKINS, B. W. , V. L. MARANDO, and G. A. TAYLOR (1971) “Efficacy, mistrust, and political participation: findings from addtional data and indicators.”J. of Politics33 (November): 1130-1136.
16.
KAASE, M. and A. MARSH (1979) “Political action: a theoretical perspective,” pp. 27-56 in S. H. Barneset al., Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
17.
KLINGEMANN, H. D. (1979a) “Ideological conceptualization and political action,” pp. 279-304 in S. H. Barneset al., Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
KLINGEMANN, H. D. (1979b) “Measuring ideological conceptualizations,” pp. 215-254 in S. H. Barneset al., Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
MARSH, A. (1977) Protest and Political Consciousness. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
MARSH, A. and M. KAASE (1979) “Background of political action,” pp. 97-136 in S. H. Barneset al., Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
McPHERSON, J. MILLER , S. WELCH, and C. CLARK (1977) “The stability and reliability of political efficacy: using path analysis to test alternative models.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.71 (June): 509-521.
22.
MULLER, E. N. (1977) “Behavioral correlates of political support.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.71 (June): 454-467.
23.
MULLER, E. N. and T. O. JUKAM (1977) “On the meaning of political support.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.71 (December): 1561-1595.
24.
NILSON, D. C. and L. B. NILSON (1980) “Trust in elites and protest orientation: an integrative approach.”Pol. Behavior2, 4: 385-404.
25.
PAIGE, J. M. (1971) “Political orientation and riot participation.”Amer. Soc. Rev.36: 810-820.
26.
SCHWARTZ, D. C. (1973) Political Alienation and Political Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
27.
SEIDMAN, D. (1976) “On choosing between linear and log-linear models.”J. of Politics38 (May): 461-466.
28.
SELIGSON, M. A. (1980a) “A problem-solving approach to measuring political efficacy. Social Science Q.60 (March): 630-642.
29.
SELIGSON, M. A. (1980b) “Trust, efficacy, and modes of political participation: a study of Costa Rican peasants.”British J. of Pol. Sci.10: 75-98.
30.
WATTS, M. W. (1973) “Efficacy, trust, and commitment to the political process.”Social Science Q.54 (December): 623-631.
31.
Zentralarchiv für empirische Sozialforschung (1979) Political Action: An Eight Nation Study 1973-1976. Cologne: University of Cologne.
32.
ZURCHER, L. A., Jr. and J. K. MONTS (1972) “Political efficacy, political trust, and antipornography crusading: a research note.”Sociology and Social Research56: 211-220.
