Based on biographical data, this study analyzes the factors affecting advancement in Japan's higher civil service. Through path analysis, it evaluates in a systematic way not only the relative importance of three widely acknowledged factors of advancement—university background, field of study, and higher civil service examinations—but also the manner in which they interact with one another. It also assesses the impact of a civil servant's “track record” on advancement. Finally, after examining the seniority principle in the context of Japanese cultural norms and the findings pertaining to merit-oriented variables, the study suggests that the seniority principle does not produce stagnation but rather facilitates mobility at the highest levels of Japanese bureaucracy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ARMSTRONG, J. A. (1973) The European Administrative Elite. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
2.
ASAI, K. (1971) Yakunin no seitai. Tokyo: Gakuyō Shobō.
3.
BISHOP, Y.M.M. , S. E. FIENBERG, and P. W. HOLLAND (1975) Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
DUNCAN, O. D. (1975) Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.
5.
DUNCAN, O. D. (1967) “Path analysis: sociological examples.”Amer. J. of Sociology72: 1-16.
6.
EDINGER, L. J. (1968) Politics in Germany: Attitudes and Process. Boston: Little, Brown.
7.
FISHER, R. A. (1940) “The precision of discriminant functions.”Annals of Eugenics10: 422-429.
8.
FUJIWARA, H. (1964) Kanryō: Nihon no seiji o ugokasu mono. Tokyo: Kōdansha.
9.
GOODMAN, L. A. (1976) “The relationship between modified and usual multiple regression approaches to the analysis of dichotomous variables,” pp. 83-110 in D. Heise (ed.) Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
GOODMAN, L. A. (1971) “The multivariate analysis of qualitative data: interactions among multiple classifications.”J. of the American Statistical Association65: 225-256.
11.
GUTTMAN, L. L. (1971) “Measurement as structural theory.”Psychometrica36: 329-347.
12.
GUTTMAN, L. L. (1941) “The quantification of a class of attributes,” in The Prediction of Personal Adjustment. New York: Social Science Research Council.
13.
HAYASHI, C. (1954) “Multidimensional quantification with the application to analysis of social phenomena.”Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics5: 121-143.
14.
HEADY, F. (1966) Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
HONDA, Y. (1974) Nihon neo kanryō ron. Tokyo: Kōdansha.
16.
HOTELLING, H. (1936) “Relations between two sets of variables.”Biometrika27: 321-377.
17.
INO, K. and M. HOKUTO (1972) Amakudari kanryō. Tokyo: Nisshin Hōdō.
18.
INOKI, M. (1964) “The civil bureaucracy,” pp. 283-300 in R. E. Ward and D. A. Rustow (eds.) Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
MANIHA, J. K. (1975) “Universalism and particularism in bureaucratic organizations.”Admin. Sci. Q.20: 177-190.
37.
MARSH, R. M. (1960) “Bureaucratic contraints on nepotism in the Ch'ing period.”J. of Asian Studies19: 117-133.
38.
MAUNG, K. (1941) “Measurement of association in a contingency table with special reference to the pigmentation of hair and eye colors of Scottish school children.”Annals of Eugenics2: 189-223.
39.
NAKANE, C. (1970) Japanese Society. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
40.
NETER, J. and E. S. MAYNES (1970) “On the appropriateness of the correlation coefficient with a 0, 1 dependent variable.”J. of the American Statistical Association65: 501-569.
SATO, T. [ed.] (1972) Tōdaibatsu. Tokyo: Yell Shuppansha.
44.
SPAULDING, R. M., Jr. (1967) Imperial Japan's Higher Civil Service Examinations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
45.
Tokyo Shinbunsha (1958) Kanchō monogatari. Tokyo: Chōbunsha.
46.
TSUJI, K. (1969) Nihon kanryōsei no kenkyū. Tokyo: Daigaku Shuppankai.
47.
TURNER, M. E. and C. E. STEVENS (1954) “The regression analysis of causal paths.”Biometrics15: 236-258.
48.
WARNER, W. L. , P. P. Van RIPER, N. H. MARTIN, and O. F. COLLINS (1963) The American Federal Executive. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
WATANABE, Y. (1976) “Kōmuin no kyaria,” pp. 169-207 in Tsuji Kiyoaki (ed.) Gyōseigaku kōsa, Vol. 4: Gyōsei to soshiki. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai.
50.
WEBER, M. (1964) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. A. M. Henderson and T. Parson, trans. New York: Free Press.
51.
WILLIAMS, E. J. (1952) “Use of scores for the analysis of association in contingency tables.”Biometrika39: 274-289.
52.
WRIGHT, S. (1968) Evolution and Genetics of Populations, Vol. 1: Genetic and Biometric Foundations. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
53.
WRIGHT, S. (1960) “Path coefficients and regression coefficients: alternative or complementary concepts?”Biometrics16: 189-202.
