Although there have been several studies of attitudinal constraint in the American public, similar studies for other political systems are rare. Using the October 1974 British Election Study, the authors examine the dimensionality of attitudes among the British public. Five major dimensions—labeled socioeconomic class issues, environmental issues, ethnocentrism, morality, and law and order—emerge, though together they account for less than half the variance in the opinion set. Little variation in these issue dimensions can be explained by regional, class, education, religion, age, or sex variables. Despite the complexity of British issue attitudes, socioeconomic class attitudes dominated the issue impact on voting behavior in the October 1974 election. These findings suggest that the image of British politics as strongly class-based may owe more to the actions of political party leaders in emphasizing socioeconomic class issues than to the existence of coherent class attitudes within the electorate. The fragmentation of mass political attitudes in Britain strongly resembles the pattern in the United States, despite differences in political culture and political institutions. Such fragmentation may be inherent in a liberal democratic political system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ABRAMSON, P. R. (1971) “Social class and political change in Western Europe: a cross-national longitudinal analysis.”Comparative Pol. Studies4: 131–155.
2.
ALDRICH, J. and C. CNUDDE (1975) “Probing the bounds of conventional wisdom: a comparison of regression, probit and discriminant analysis.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.19 (August): 571–608.
3.
ALFORD, R. R. (1963) Party and Society. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4.
ALT, J. E. (1979) The Politics of Economic Decline, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
5.
ALT, J. E. I. CREWE, and B. SARLVIK (1977) “Angels in plastic: the Liberal surge in 1974.”Pol. Studies25: 343–368.
6.
ALT, J. E., B. SARLVIK., and I. CREWE (1976) “Partisanship and policy choice: issue preferences in the British electorate, February, 1974.”British J. of Pol. Sci.6:273–290.
7.
BISHOP, G., A. TUCHFARBER., and R. OLDENDICK (1978) “Change in the structure of American political attitudes: the nagging question of question wording.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.22 (May): 250–269.
8.
BISHOP, G., A. TUCHFARBER., and S. BENNETT (1979) “Questions about question wording: a rejoinder to ‘Revisiting Mass Belief Systems Revisited.’”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.23 (February): 187–192.
9.
BLONDEL, J. (1966) Voters, Parties, and Leaders. (Rev. ed.) Baltimore: Penguin.
10.
BOOKS, J. W. (1975) “Class and religious voting in three European nations: a cohort analysis.” Presented at conference of Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, May 1.
11.
BOOKS, J. W. and J. REYNOLDS (1975) “A note on class voting in Great Britain and the United States.”Comparative Pol. Studies8: 360–376.
12.
BRAND, J. (1977) “The development of national feeling in Scotland: 1945 to 1977.” Presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Washington, September 1–4.
13.
BRUNK, G. (1978) “The 1964 attitude consistency leap reconsidered.”Pol. Methodology5 (Spring): 151–166.
14.
BUDGE, I. and D. FARLIE (1977) Voting and Party Competition. New York: John Wiley.
15.
BUTLER, D. and D. KAVANAGH (1975) The British General Election of October, 1974. New York: St. Martin's.
16.
BUTLER, D. and D. KAVANAGH (1974) The British General Election of February, 1974. New York: St. Martin's.
17.
BUTLER, D. and A. KING (1966) The British General Election of 1966. London: Macmillan.
18.
BUTLER, D. and A. KING (1965) The British General Election of 1964. New York: St. Martin's.
19.
BUTLER, D. and M. PINTO-DUSCHINSKY (1970) The British General Election of 1970. London: Macmillan.
20.
BUTLER, D. and D. STOKES (1974) Political Change in Britain (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's.
21.
CAIN, B. E. (1970) “Challenges and responses in British party politics.”Comparative Politics12: 335–348.
22.
CONVERSE, P. E. (1964) “The nature of belief systems in mass publics,” in D. E. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent.New York: Macmillan.
23.
CREWE, I. and B. SARLVIK (1980) “Popular attitudes and electoral strategy,” in Z. Layton-Henry (ed.) Conservative Party Politics. London: Macmillan.
24.
CREWE, I. and J. E. ALT (1977) “Partisan dealignment in Britain 1964–1974.”British J. of Pol. Sci. 7: 129–190.
25.
Economist (1978) “What future for Britain's two-party system.” March II: 22–25.
26.
FRANKLIN, M. N. and A. MUGHAN (1978) “The decline of class voting in Britain: Problems of analysis and interpretation.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 72: 523–534.
27.
GOODMAN, L. (1975) “The relationship between modified and usual multiple-regression approaches to the analysis of dichotomous variables,” in D. Heise (ed.) Sociological Methodology 1976.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
GOODMAN, L. (1972) “A modified regression approach to the analysis of dichotomous variables.”Amer. Soc. Rev.37 (February): 28–45.
29.
GRIZZLE, J. E., C. F. STARMER, and G. G. KOCH (1969) “Analysis of categorical data by linear models.”Biometrics25: 489–504.
30.
INGLEHART, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
31.
INGLEHART, R. and H. D. KLINGEMANN (1976) “Party identification, ideological preference and the Left-Right dimension among Western mass publics,” in I. Budge et al. (eds.), Party Identification and Beyond. New York: John Wiley.
32.
INGLEHART, R. and D. SIDJANSKI (1976) “The Left, the Right, the establishment and the Swiss electorate,” In I. Budge et al. (eds.), Party Identification and Beyond. New York: John Wiley.
33.
JACKSON, T. and G. MARCUS (1975) “Political competence and ideological constraint.”Social Science Research4: 93–111.
34.
JOHNSON, R. W. and D. SCHOEN (1976) “The ‘Powell Effect’: or how one man can win.”New Society37: 168–172.
35.
KATZNELSON, I. (1973) Black Men, White Cities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
36.
KLEIN, R. (1976) “The case for elitism: public opinion and public policy,” in R. Rose (ed.) Studies in British Politics. (3rd ed.).New York: St. Martin's.
37.
KORNBERG, A. and R. C. FRASURE (1971) “Policy differences in British parliamentary parties.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 65: 694–703.
38.
KRITZER, H. M. (1978) “An introduction to multivariate contingency table analysis.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.22 (February): 187–226.
39.
LAWRENCE, D. (1974) Black Migrants: White Natives. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
40.
LAZER, H. (1976a) “British populism: the Labour Party and the Common Market Parliamentary debate.”Pol. Sci. Q. 91: 259–277.
41.
LAZER, H. (1976b) “The impact of trade unions and working class populism upon the British Labour Party.” Presented at annual meeting of International Studies Association, Toronto, February 29.
42.
LEMIEUX, P. H. (1977) “Political issues and liberal support in the February, 1974, British General Election.”Pol. Studies25: 323–342.
43.
LUTTBEG, N. (1968) “The structure of beliefs among leaders and the public.”Public Opinion Q. 32: 398–409.
44.
MARCUS, G. E., D. TABB., and J. L. SULLIVAN (1974) “The application of individual differences scaling to the measurement of political ideologies.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci. 18: 405–420.
45.
MILLER, W. L. (1980) “What was the profit in following the crowd: the effectiveness of party strategies on immigration and devolution.”British J. of Pol. Sci. 10: 15–38.
46.
MILLER, W. L. (1978) “Social class and party choice in England: a new analysis.”British J. of Pol. Sci. 8: 257–284.
47.
MILLER, W. L. (1977) Electoral Dynamics. New York: St. Martin's.
48.
NIE, N. with K. ANDERSEN (1974) “Mass belief systems revisited: political change and attitude structure.”J. of Politics36 (August): 541–591.
49.
NIE, N. and J. RABJOHN (1979) “Revisiting mass belief systems revisited: or, doing research is like watching a tennis match.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.23 (February): 139–175.
50.
PAGE, B. I. and R. A. BRODY (1972) “Policy voting and the electoral process: the Vietnam War issue.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 61: 979–995.
51.
POMPER, G. (1972) “From confusion to clarity: issues and American voters, 1956–1968.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.66 (June): 415–428.
52.
PULZER, P.G.J. (1967) Political Representation and Elections. New York: Praeger.
53.
PUTNAM, R. (1976) The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
54.
PUTNAM, R. (1973) The Beliefs of Politicians. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
55.
ROSE, R. (1980a) Do Parties Make a Difference? Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
56.
ROSE, R. (1980b) Politics in England. (3rd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
57.
ROSE, R. (1974a) “Britain: simple abstractions and complex realities,” in R. Rose (ed.) Electoral Behavior: A Comparative Handbook.New York: Macmillan.
58.
ROSE, R. (1974b) Politics in England. (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
59.
ROSE, R. (1974c) The Problem of Party Government. New York: Macmillan.
60.
ROSE, R. and D. URWIN (1969) “Social cohesion, political parties, and strains in regimes.”Comparative Pol. Studies2: 7–67.
61.
SCHAEFER, R. T. (1974) “Correlates of racial prejudice,” in T. Leggatt (ed.) Sociological Theory and Survey Research. London: Sage.
62.
STIMSON, J. (1975) “Belief systems: constraint complexity and the 1972 election.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci. 19: (August): 393–417.
63.
STOKES, D. (1967) “Some dynamic elements of contests for the Presidency.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.60 (March): 19–38.
64.
STUDLAR, D. T. (1980) “Immigration and racial change,” in W. B. Gwyn and W. B (eds.) Britain: Progress and Decline.New Orleans: Tulane Univ. Press.
65.
STUDLAR, D. T. (1979a) “Individual socio-economic attributes and attitudes towards coloured immigrants.”New Community7: 437–447.
66.
STUDLAR, D. T. (1979b) “Racial attitudes in Britain: a causal analysis,” Ethnicity6: 107–122.
67.
STUDLAR, D. T. (1978) “Policy voting in Britain: the colored immigration issue in the 1964, 1966, and 1970 General Elections.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 72: 46–64.
68.
STUDLAR, D. T. (1977) “Social context and attitudes towards coloured immigrants.”British J. of Sociology28: 168–184.
69.
SULLIVAN, J. L., J. PIERESON., and G. MARCUS (1978) “Ideological constraint in the mass public: a methodological critique and some new findings.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.22 (May): 233–249.
70.
SULLIVAN, J. L., J. PIERESON., and S. FELDMAN (1979) “The more things change, the more they stay the same: the stability of mass belief systems.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.23 (February): 176–186.
71.
SWOFFORD, M. (1980) “Parametric techniques for contingency table analysis.”Amer. Soc. Rev.45 (August): 664–690.
72.
TATE, C. N. (1973) “The utility of contextual variables in predicting Left-Right voting choice and social welfare policy preferences: Great Britain, Norway, The Netherlands, Germany.” Presented at the annual meeting of Southern Political Science Association, Atlanta, November 2.
73.
THEIL, H. (1970) “On the estimation of relationships involving qualitative variables.”Amer. J. of Sociology76 (July): 103–154.
74.
THOMPSON, R. J. (1978) “The Scottish National Party: its bases of support, 1949–1978.”Historicus1:44–81.
75.
WELCH, S. and J. G. PETERS (1981) “Elite attitudes on economic-welfare and social issues.” Polity.
76.
ZUCKERMAN, A. S. and M. I. LICHBACH (1977) “Stability and change in European electorates.”World Politics29: 523–551.
