ALLERBECK, K. (1977) “Political generations: some reflections on the concept and its applications to the German case.”European J. of Pol. Research5 (June): 119–134.
2.
ALMOND, G. and S. VERBA (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
3.
ANDERSON, T. W. (1954) “Probability models for analyzing time changes in attitudes,” Pp. 17–66 in P. F. Lazarsfeld (ed.) Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences. Glencoe. IL: Free Press.
4.
BAKER, K. L. (1974) “The acquisition of partisanship in Germany.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.18 (August): 569–582.
5.
BAKER, K. L. R. DALTON, and K. HILDEBRANDT (1975) “Political stability in transition: post-war Germany.” American Political Science Association paper, San Francisco.
6.
BECK, P. A. (1975) “Models for analyzing panel data: a comparative review.”Pol. Methodology2 (1975): 357–380.
7.
BERGER, M. (1973) “Parteiidentifikation in der Bundesrepublik.”Pol. Vierteljahresschrift14 (Mai): 215–225.
8.
BOYD, R. W. (1972) “Popular control of public policy: a normal vote analysis of the 1968 election.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.66 (June): 429–449.
9.
BURNHAM, W. D. (1970) Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.
10.
BURNHAM, W. D. (1969) “The end of American party politics.”Transaction7 (December): 12–22.
11.
BUTLER, D. and D. STOKES (1969) Political Change in Britain. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
12.
CAMPBELL, A., P. E. CONVERSE, W. E. MILLER, and D. E. STOKES (1960) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
13.
CAMPBELL, A. and H. VALEN (1966) “Party identification in Norway and the United States,” pp. 245–268 in A. Campbell et al. (eds.) Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley.
14.
COLEMAN, J. S. (1964) Models of Change and Response Uncertainty. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
15.
CONVERSE, P. E. (1970) “Attitudes and non-attitudes: the continuation of a dialogue,” pp. 168–180 in E. R. Tufte (ed.) The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
CONVERSE, P. E. (1969) “Of time and partisan stability.”Comparative Pol. Studies2 (July): 139–171.
17.
CONVERSE, P. E. (1966) “The concept of the normal vote,” pp. 9–39 in A. Campbell et al. (eds.) Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley.
18.
CONVERSE, P. E. and G. DUPEUX (1966) “Politicization of the electorate in France and the United States,” pp. 269–291 in A. Campbell et al. (eds.) Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley.
19.
DENNIS, J. and D. J. McCRONE (1970) “Pre-adult development of political party identification in western democracies.”Comparative Pol. Studies3 (July): 243–263.
20.
DOBSON, D. and D. A. MEETER (1974) “Alternative Markov models for describing change in party identification.”Amer. J. of Pol. Sci.18 (August): 487–500.
21.
FALTER, J. W. (1977) “Einmal mehr: Lässt sich das Konzept der Parteiidentifikation auf deutsche Verhältnisse übertragen?”Pol. Vierteljahresschrift18: 476–500.
22.
GOODMAN, L. (1962) “Statistical methods for analyzing change.”Amer. J. of Sociology68 (July): 57–78.
23.
HYMAN, H. H. (1969) Political Socialization. New York: Free Press.
24.
KAASE, M. (1976) “Party identification and voting behavior in the West German election of 1969,” ch. 5 in I. Budge, I. Crewe, and D. Farlie (eds.) Party Identification and Beyond.New York: John Wiley.
25.
KAASE, M. (1973) “Die Bundestagswahl 1972: Probleme und Analysen.”Pol. Vierteljahresschrift14 (Mai): 145–190.
26.
KEMENY, J. G., L. SNELL, and G. THOMPSON (1966) Introduction to Finite Mathematics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
27.
LAVIES, R. R. (1973) Nichtwählen als Kategorie des Wahlverhaltens. Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag.
28.
LAZARSFELD, P. F., B. BERELSON, and H. GAUDET (1948) The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York and London: Columbia Univ. Press.
29.
LINZ, J. J. (1967) “Cleavage and consensus in West German politics: the early fifties,” pp. 283–321 in S. M. Lipset and S. M (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignment.New York: Free Press.
30.
LIPSET, S. M. and S. ROKKAN (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignment. New York: Free Press.
31.
MILLER, A. H., W. E. MILLER, A. S. RAINE, and T. A. BROWN (1976) “A majority party in disarray: policy polarization in the 1972 election.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.70 (December): 753–778.
32.
MILLER, W. E. (1976) “The cross-national use of party identification as a stimulus to political inquiry,” ch. 2 in I. Budge, I. Crewe, and D. Farlie (eds.) Party Identification and Beyond.New York: John Wiley.
33.
NIE, N. H., S. VERBA, and J. R. PETROCIK (1976) The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard Univ. Press.
34.
PAPPI, F. U. (1976) “Sozialstruktur und Wahlentscheidung bei Bundestagswahlen aus kommunalpolitischer Sicht,” Pp. 1–57 in A. Stiftung (ed.) Kommunales Wahlverhalten. Bonn: Eichholz.
35.
RADTKE, G. (1972) “Gibt es in der Bundesrepublik eine Parteienidentifikation?”Verfassung und Verfassungswirklichkeit6: 68–91.
36.
ROSE, R. and D. URWIN (1969) “Social cohesion, political parties and strains in regimes.”Comparative Pol. Studies2 (April): 7–67.
37.
SCHLETH, U. and E. WEEDE (1971) “Causal models on West German voting behavior,” Pp. 73–97 in R. Wildenmann (ed.) Sozialwiss. Jahrbuch 2, Munchen, Wien: Olzog Verlag.
38.
SHIVELY, W. P. (1972) “Voting stability and the nature of party attachments in the Weimar Republic.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.66 (December): 1203–1225.
39.
THOMASSEN, J. (1976) “Party identification as a cross-cultural concept: its meaning in the Netherlands,” ch. 4 in I. Budge, I. Crewe, and D. Farlie (eds.) Party Identification and Beyond.New York: Free Press.
40.
WIGGINS, L. M. (1973) Panel Analysis: Latent Probability Models for Attitude and Behavior Processes. Amsterdam, London and New York: Elsevier.
41.
ZOHLNHOFER, W. (1965) “Parteienidentifizierung in der Bundesrepublik und den Vereinigten Staaten,” pp. 126–168 in E. K. Scheuch and E. K (eds.) Zur Soziologie der Wahl. Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag.