Strategy Versus Methodology in Comparative Research

ALMOND, G. A. and G. B. POWELL , Jr. (1966) Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston: Little, Brown.

BALL, T. (1976) “From paradigms to research programs: toward a post-Kuhnian political science.” Amer. J. of Pol. Sci. 20, 1 (February): 151–177.

BRETON, A. (1974) The Economic Theory of Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine.

BRUNNER, R. D. and K. LIEPELT (1972) “Data analysis, process analysis, and system change.” Midwest J. of Pol. Sci. 16, 4 (November): 538–569.

GOODENOUGH, W. H. (1970) Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Chicago: Aldine.

HEMPEL, C. (1969) Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.

HENNESSEY, T. and V. OSTROM [eds.] (forthcoming) Conjectures on Institutional Analysis and Design; Inquiry Into Principles of Human Consequences.

HIRSCHMAN, A. O. (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

HOLT, R. T. and J. E. RICHARDSON (1970) “Competing paradigms in comparative politics,” Pp. 22–72 in R. Holt and J. Turner (ed.) The Methodology of Comparative Research. New York: Free Press.

KUHN, T. S. (1970) “Postscript” to Kuhn (1962): 174–210.

KUHN, T. S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Pres.

LAKATOS, I. (1970) “Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes,” in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press: 91–196.

LIJPHART, A. (1975) “The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research.” Comparative Pol. Studies 8, 2 (July): 158–177.

LIJPHART, A. (1971) “Comparative politics and the comparative method.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 65, 3 (September): 682–693.

MAXWELL, N. (1974) “The rationality of scientific discovery, part II: an aim oriented theory of scientific discovery.” Philosophy of Sci. 41, 3 (September): 227–247.

MECKSTROTH, T. W. (1975) “‘Most different systems’ and ‘most similar systems’: a study in the logic of comparative inquiry.” Comparative Pol. Studies 8, 2 (July): 132–157.

MISCHEL, T. (1966) “Pragmatic aspects of explanation.” Philosophy of Sci. 33:41–59.

MOON, J. D. (1975) “The logic of political inquiry: a synthesis of opposed perspectives,” Pp. 131–228 in F. I. Greenstein and N. W. Polsby (eds.) Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 1. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

NIE, N. H. , G. B. POWELL , Jr., and K. PREWITT (1969) “Social structure and political participation: developmental relationships.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 60, 2 and 3 (June-September): 361–378; 808–832.

ORBELL, J. and T. UNO (1972) “A theory of neighborhood problem solving: political action vs. residential mobility.” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 66, 2 (June): 471–489.

POPPER, K. R. (1970) “Normal science and its dangers,” in T. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge Univ. Press: 51–58.

PRZEWORSKI, A. (1975) “Institutionalization of voting patterns, or is mobilization the source of decay?’ Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev. 69, 1 (March): 49–67.

PRZEWORSKI, A. and J. SPRAGUE (1971) “Concepts in search of explicit formulation: a study of measurement.” Midwest J. of Pol. Sci. 15, 2 (May): 183–218.

PRZEWORSKI, A. and H. TEUNE (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley.

PUTNAM, R. D. (1973) The Beliefs of Politicians: Ideology, Conflict and Democracy in Britain and Italy. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.

STORER, N. W. (1966) The Social System of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

TEUNE, H. (1975) “Comparative research, experimental design, and the comparative method.” Comparative Pol. Studies 8, 2 (July): 195–199.