BLALOCK, H. M. (1969) Theory Construction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
2.
CAMPBELL, A., P. CONVERSE., W. MILLER., and D. STOKES (1960) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley.
3.
CARNAP, R. (1962) “The aim of inductive logic, ” in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.
4.
COHEN, M. R. and E. NAGEL (1934) Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
5.
DUVERGER, M. (1951) Political Parties. New York: John Wiley.
6.
GALTUNG, J. (1967) Theory and Methods of Social Research. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
7.
GALTUNG, J. (1965) “Some aspects of comparative research.”Polls2 (October): 10–15.
8.
GURR, T. R. (1971) “A causal model of civil strife: a comparative analysis using new indices, ” in J. V. Gillespie and B. A. Nesvold (eds.) Macro-Quantitative Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
9.
HEMPEL, C. G. (1966) Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
10.
HOLT, R. T. and J. E. TURNER [eds.] (1970) The Methodology of Comparative Research. New York: Free Press.
11.
HOPKINS, T. and I. WALLERSTEIN (1967) “The comparative study of national societies.”Social Sci. Information5 (October): 52–78.
12.
HYMAN, H. (1955) Survey Design and Analysis. New York: Free Press.
13.
International Studies of Values in Politics (1971) Values and the Active Community. New York: Free Press.
14.
KALLEBERG, A. (1966) “The logic of comparison: a methodological note on the comparative study of political systems.”World Politics19 (October): 71–79.
15.
KORNHAUSER, W. (1959) The Politics of Mass Society. New York: . Free Press.
16.
LAKATOS, I. and A. MUSGRAVE (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: University Press.
17.
LaPALOMBARA, J. (1968) “Macrotheories and microapplications in comparative politics: a widening chasm.”Comp. Politics1 (October): 52–78.
18.
LAZARSFELD, P. F. and M. ROSENBERG [eds.] (1955) The Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.
19.
LIJPHART, A. (1971) “Comparative politics and the comparative method.”Amer. Pol. Sci Rev.65 (September): 682–693.
20.
LIPSET, S. M. (1960) Political Man. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
21.
MILBRATH, L. (1965) Political Participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.
22.
NADEL, S. F. (1951) The Foundations of Social Anthropology. New York: Free Press.
23.
NAGEL, E. [ed.] (1950) John Stuart Millapos;s Philosophy of Scientific Method. New York: Hafner.
24.
NAGEL, E. (1961) The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
25.
NIE, N. H., G. B. POWELL, and K. PREWETT (1969) “Social structure and political participation: developmental relationships, I.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.63 (June): 361–378.
26.
PEIERLS, R. E. (1956) The Laws of Nature. New York: Charles Scribnerapos;s.
27.
POPPER, K. (1968) Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper.
28.
POPPER, K. (1961) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Science Editions.
29.
PRZEWORSKI, A. and H. TEUNE (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley.
30.
ROSENBERG, M. (1968) The Logic of Survey Analysis. New York: Basic Books.
31.
SARTORI, G. (1970) “Concept misformation in comparative politics.”Amer. Pol. Sci Rev.64 (December): 1033–1053.
32.
SHIVELY, W. P. (1969) “‘Ecological’ inference: the use of aggregate data to study individuals.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.63 (December): 1183–1196.
33.
STOKES, D. (1969) “Cross-level inference as a game against nature, ” in J. L. Bernd (ed.) Mathematical Applications in Political Science, IV. Charlottesville: Univ. Press of Virginia.
34.
TOULMIN, S. (1960) The Philosophy of Science. New York: Harper.
35.
Websterapos;s New International Dictionary (1958) Springfield Mass.: G. and C. Merriam.
36.
WONNACOTT, R. J. and T. H. WONNACOTT (1970) Econometrics. New York: John Wiley.
