AGOR, W. H. (1970) “The Senate in the Chilean political system, ” Pp. 228–272 in A. Kornberg and L. Musolf (eds.) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
2.
ALMOND, G. (1969–1970) “Determinancy-choice, stability-change: some thoughts on a contemporary polemic in political theory.”Government and Opposition5 (Winter).
3.
ALMOND, G. (1969) “Political development: analytic and normative perspectives.”Comparative Pol. Studies1 (January).
4.
APTER, D. (1965) The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
5.
APTER, D. and C. ADRIAN (1968) “Comparative government: developing new nations.”J. of Politics30 (February).
6.
BAY, C. (1967) “The cheerful science of dismal politics, ” Pp. 208–230 in T. Roszak (ed.) The Dissenting Academy.New York: Random House.
7.
BENDIX, R. and S. M. LIPSET (1956) “Political sociology.”Current Sociology5: 79–99.
8.
BERGER, P. L. and T. LUCKMAN (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
9.
BINDER, L. et al. [ed.] (1971) Crises and Sequences in Political Development. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
10.
BLACK, C. E. (1966) Dynamics of Modernization. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
BRAIBANTI, R. (1971) “The policy sciences and a general theory of political change.” Conference of International Studies Organization, Italy. (unpublished)
12.
BRAIBANTI, R. (1969) “External inducement of political administrative development: an institutional strategy, ” pp. 3–106 in Political and Administrative Development. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
13.
BRAIBANTI, R. (1968) “Role of law in political development, ” pp. 1–26 in R. Wilson (ed.) International and Comparative Law of the Commonwealth. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
14.
BROWN, B. (1969) “The French experience of modernization.”World Politics21 (April): 366–391.
15.
BRUNNER, R. and G. BREWER (1971) Organized Complexity: Empirical Theories of Political Development. New York: Free Press.
16.
CORNING, P. (1971) “Biological bases of behavior and some implications for political science.”World Politics23 (April).
17.
CROW, R. E. (1970) “Parliament in the Lebanese political system, ” Pp. 273–302 in A. Kornberg and L. Musolf (eds.) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
18.
DE SCHWEINITZ, K. (1970) “Growth, development and political modernization.”World Politics22 (July).
19.
DEUTSCH, K. (1951) “Mechanism, organism and society: some models in natural and social sciences.”Philosophy of Sci.18 (July): 230–252.
20.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (1966) Modernization: Protest and Change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
21.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (1965) “The study of processes of institutionalization: institutional change and comparative institutions, ” Pp. 3–68 in Essays on Comparative Institutions. New York: John Wiley.
22.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (1964) “Institutionalization and change.”Amer. Soc. Rev. 29: 235–247.
23.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (1962–1963) “Initial institutional patterns of political modernization.”Civilizations 12;13: 461–472; 15–26.
24.
ESMAN, M. J. (1962a) “A note on institutional building in national development.” Pittsburgh. (mimeo)
25.
ESMAN, M. J. (1962b) “Institutional building and national development: a research note.”International Development Rev. 4: 27–30.
26.
FRIEDMAN, L. M. (1969) “Legal culture and social development.”Law and Society4 (August): 29–44.
27.
FRIEDRICH, C. (1970) “Political development and the objectives of modern government, ” Pp. 107–135 in R. Braibanti (ed.) Political and Administrative Development. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
28.
GARFINKEL, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
29.
GERLICH, P. (1972) “The institutionalization of European Parliaments, ” in A. Kornberg (ed.) Legislatures in Comparative Perspective.New York: David McKay.
30.
GOULET, D. (1968) “Development for what?”Comparative Pol. Studies1 (July).
31.
GROSSHOLTZ, J. (1970) “Integrative factors in the Malaysian and Philippine legislatures.”Comparative Politics3 (October): 93–113.
32.
GUTENSCHWAGER, G. A. (1970) “Social reality and social change.”Social Research37 (Spring): 48–70.
33.
HAH, C.-D. and J. SCHNEIDER (1968) “A critique of current studies on political development and modernization.”Social Research35 (Spring).
34.
HALPERN, M. (1966) “The revolution of modernization in national and international society, ” in C. J. Friedrich (ed.) Revolution-Nomos VIII.New York: Atherton.
35.
HELGERSON, J. L. (1970) “Institutional adaptation to rapid political change: a study of the legislature in Zambia from 1959–1969.” Ph. D. dissertation. Duke University.
36.
HIRSCHMAN, A. (1970) “The search for paradigms as a hindrance to understanding.”World Politics22 (April): 329–343.
37.
HOPKINS, R. F. (1971) “Constituency ties and deviant expectations among Tanzanian legislators.”Comparative Pol. Studies4 (April): 321–339.
38.
HUDSON, M. (1969) “Democracy and social mobilization in Lebanese politics.”Comparative Politics1 (January): 245–263.
39.
HUNTINGTON, S. P. (1971) “The change to change: modernization, development and politics.”Comparative Politics3 (April): 285–298.
40.
HUNTINGTON, S. P. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
41.
HUNTINGTON, S. P. (1965) “Political development and political decay.”World Politics17 (April): 386–430.
42.
ILCHMANN, W. and N. T. UPHOFF (1969) The Political Economy of Change. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
43.
JACKSON, R. J. (1971) “The congressional committee system of the Philippines: functions in a prismatic society.” Conference on Legislative Committees, September. (unpublished)
44.
LANDAU, M. (1961) “On the use of metaphor in political analysis.”Social Research28: 331–353.
45.
LA PALOMBARA, J. (1969) “Values and ideologies in the administrative evolution of Western constitutional systems, ” in R. Braibanti (ed.) Political and Administrative Development. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
46.
LA PALOMBARA, J. (1968) “Macrotheories and microapplications in comparative politics: a widening chasm.”Comparative Politics1 (October).
47.
LA PALOMBARA, J. (1963) “An overview of bureaucracy and political development, ” in Bureaucracy and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
48.
LASSWELL, H. (1965) “Policy sciences of development.”World Politics17 (January): 286–310.
49.
LERNER, D. (1958) The Passing of Traditional Society. New York: Free Press.
50.
LEWY, G. (1968) “Historical data in comparative political analysis.”Comparative Politics1 (October).
51.
MACRIDIS, R. (1968) “Comparative politics and the study of government: the search for focus.”Comparative Politics1 (October).
52.
MAZRUI, A. (1965) “From social Darwinism to current theories on modernization: a tradition of analysis.”World Politics21 (October): 69–83.
53.
MEADOWS, P. (1968) “Eschatons of change: philosophical backgrounds of development theory.”International J. of Comparative Sociology9 (March): 41–60.
54.
MEADOWS, P. (1967) “The metaphors of order: toward a taxonomy of organizational theory, ” in L. Gross (ed.) Sociological Theory: Inquiries and Paradigms.New York: Harper & Row.
55.
MENDELSON, W. (1970) “Law and the development of nations.”J. of Politics32 (May): 223–238.
56.
MOORE, B. (1962) Political Power and Social Theory. New York: Harper & Row.
57.
NISBET, R. A. (1969) Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
58.
NORDLINGER, E. (1968) “Political development: time sequences and rates of change.”World Politics20 (April): 494–520.
59.
PACKENHAM, R. (1970) “Legislatures and political development, ” Pp. 521–582 in A. Kornberg and L. Musolf (eds.) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
60.
PAIGE, G. (1966) “Rediscovery of politics, ” Pp. 49–58 in J. Montgomery and W. Siffin (eds.) Approaches to Development: Politics, Administration and Change.New York: McGraw-Hill.
61.
Political Science (1971) Volume 4 (Fall): 579–580.
62.
PYE, L. W. (1968) “Political systems and political development, ” pp. 93–101 in S. Rokkan (ed.) Comparative Research Across Cultures and Nations. Paris: Mouton.
63.
PYE, L. W. (1966) Aspects of Political Development. Boston: Little, Brown.
64.
PYE, L. W. (1964) “Problems for research, ” in R. Ward (ed.) Studying Politics Abroad. Boston: Little, Brown.
65.
PYE, L. W. (1962) Politics, Personality and Nation Building. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Univ. Press.
66.
RHEINSTEIN, M. (1963) “Problem of law in the new nations of Africa, ” pp. 220–246 in C. Geertz (ed.) Old Societies and New States. New York: Free Press
67.
RIGGS, F. (1968) “The dialectics of development conflict.” Comparative Pol. Studies (July).
68.
RIGGS, F. (1963) “Bureaucrats and political development: a paradoxical view, ” pp. 120–167 in J. La Palombara (ed.) Bureaucracy and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
69.
ROSTOW, W. W. (1971) Politics and the Stages of Growth. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.
70.
RUSTOW, D. (1970) “Transitions to democracy.”Comparative Politics2 (April).
71.
RUSTOW, D. (1968) “Modernization and comparative Politics: prospects in research and theory.”Comparative Politics1 (October).
72.
RUSTOW, D. (1967) A World of Nations: Problems of Political Modernization. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
73.
SALAMON, L. (1970) “Comparative history and the theory of modernization.”World Politics23 (October): 83–103.
74.
SARTORI, G. (1970) “Concept misinformation in comparative politics.”Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev.44 (December).
75.
SCHUTZ, A. (1967) The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston, III.: Northwestern Univ. Press.
76.
SCHUTZ, A. (1962–1964) Collected Papers. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
77.
SIBLEY, M. Q. (1967) “Social order and human ends: some central issues in the modern problem, ” Pp. 221–255 in D. Spitz (ed.) Political Theory and Social Change.New York: Atherton.
78.
SIBLEY, M. Q. (1966) “Development for what? civilization, technology and democracy, ” pp. 226–253 in C. Press and A. Arian (eds.) Empathy and Ideology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
79.
SINGHVI, L. M. (1970) “Parliament in the Indian political system.” Pp. 179–227 in A. Kornberg and L. Musolf (eds.) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
80.
SISSON, J. R. (forthcoming) “Comparative legislative institutionalization: a theoretical explanation, ” pp. 179–227 in A. Kornberg (ed.) Legislatures in Comparative Perspective.New York: David McKay.
81.
STAUFFER, R. B. (1970) “Congress in the Philippine political system, ” Pp. 334–365 in A. Kornberg and L. Musolf (eds.) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
82.
STEERE, D. V. (1969) “Development for what?” pp. 213–235 in J. Hallowell (ed.) Development for What? Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
83.
STULTZ, N. M. (1970) “The national assembly in the politics of Kenya, ” in A. Kornberg and L. Musolf (eds.) Legislatures in Developmental Perspective. Durham, N.C.: Duke Univ. Press.
84.
STULTZ, N. M. (1969) “Parliament in a tutelary democracy: a recent case in Kenya.”J. of Politics31 (February): 95–118.
85.
TIRYAKIAN, E. (1970) “Structural sociology, ” Pp. 111–135 in E. Tiryakian and J. C. McKinney (eds.) Theoretical Sociology.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
86.
TSURUTANI, T. (1969) “Machiavelli and the problem of political development.”Rev. of Politics30 (July): 316–331.
87.
VALENZUELA, A. (1972) “Clientelistic politics in Chile: an analysis of center-local linkages.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
88.
VICKERS, G. (1968) Value Systems and Social Processes. New York: Basic Books.
89.
WEINER, M. (1965) “Political modernization and evolutional theory, ” Pp. 102–111 in H. Barringer et al. (ed.) Social Change in Developing Countries. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.
90.
WEINER, M. (1957) Party Politics in India. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.
