The Effects of Decentralization on Local Governance: Evidence From Ukraine

Abstract

Decentralization is often promoted as a means of improving public service delivery, strengthening accountability, and enhancing citizen engagement. However, its effects vary widely across contexts. This paper examines how decentralization reforms shaped attitudes toward public service provision in Ukraine. Using a unique panel survey from nearly 200 Ukrainian communities, we show that decentralization increased satisfaction with healthcare and education. Investigating the mechanisms behind this result, we demonstrate that in the Ukrainian case, decentralization improved public service provision not by promoting cleaner governance (i.e., less corruption) or greater spending, but rather because reformer communities – particularly in urban areas – used funds more effectively. Cross-national analysis of 28 European countries confirms that citizens in more decentralized systems report higher satisfaction with locally provided services. Our findings highlight the importance of local administrative capacity in realizing the benefits of decentralization, offering insights for both democratic reformers and post-conflict reconstruction efforts.

Keywords

decentralization public goods local governance Ukraine

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agrawal

Ostrom

(2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29(4), 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029004002

Arends

Brik

Herrmann

Roesel

(2023). Decentralization and trust in government: Quasi-experimental evidence from Ukraine. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(4), 1356–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2023.08.002

Bader

(2020). Decentralization and a risk of local elite capture in Ukraine. In Federalism Conflicts

(Eds.), Decentralization, regional diversity, and conflict (pp. 259–282). Palgrave Macmillan.

Banerjee

Ganga

Kasianenko

Miadzvedz

Wilson Sokhey

Van De Laarschot

(2025). The effect of democratic participation on public goods provision: Evidence from local governments in Ukraine. Post-soviet Affairs, 41(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2025.2529766

Barras

(2024). Does decentralization boost electoral participation? Revisiting the question in a non-western context. Electoral Studies, 92(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102873

Bergh

(2007). Decentralization and participatory approaches to rural development: Assessing the scope for state–society synergies in Morocco. University of Oxford. [PhD thesis].

Bergvall

Charbit

Kraan

D.-J.

Merk

(2006). Intergovernmental transfers and decentralised public spending [also issued as OECD working papers on fiscal federalism no. 3.]. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5(4), 24. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v5-art24-en

Boadway

Tremblay

J.-F.

(2012). Reassessment of the Tiebout model. Journal of Public Economics, 96(11-12), 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.01.002

Bossert

T. J.

Larranaga

Giedion

Arbelaez

J. J.

Bowser

D. M.

(2003). Decentralization and equity of resource allocation: Evidence from Colombia and Chile. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81(2), 95–100.

10.

Brik

Murtazashvili

J. B.

(2022). The source of Ukraine’s resilience. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved April 20, 2023, from. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2022-06-28/source-ukraines-resilience

11.

Brink

(2022, June). Ukraine’s decentralization reforms have helped @minregion_ua respond to Russia’s brutal war and coordinate reconstruction planning. Great to meet with minister Chernyshov to discuss how @USAIDUkraine can support critical services and empower citizens in Ukraine’s recovery. Retrieved March 6, 2023, from. https://twitter.com/USAmbKyiv/status/1536385060466839552

12.

Crook

R. C.

Manor

(1998). Democracy and decentralisation in south Asia and west Africa: Participation, accountability, and performance. Cambridge University Press.

13.

D’Arcy

Cornell

(2016). Devolution and corruption in Kenya: Everyone’s turn to eat? African Affairs, 115(459), 246–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adw002

14.

Decentralizatsiya . (2020a). Movoju cifr, faktv zdorovogo gluzdu pro 120 nachebto lkvdovanih ob’dnanih gromad. Retrieved June 17, 2023, from. https://decentralization.gov.ua/news/12510

15.

Decentralizatsiya . (2020b). Te, chogo nkoli ne bulo v Ukran: Urjad zatverdiv admnterustrj bazovogo rvnja, shho zabezpechit’ povsjudnst’ mscevogo samovrjaduvannja. Retrieved June 17, 2023, from. https://decentralization.gov.ua/admin/articles/12533.html

16.

Decentralizatsiya . (2020c). Urjad zmniv metodiku formuvannja spromozhnih gromad. Retrieved June 16, 2023, from. https://decentralization.gov.ua/admin/articles/12090.html

17.

del Granado

F. J. A.

Martinez-Vazquez

McNab

R. M.

(2018). Decentralized governance, expenditure composition, and preferences for public goods. Public Finance Review, 46(3), 359–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142116639127

18.

DeSisto

Pop-Eleches

Robertson

(2026). Replication data for: The effects of decentralization on local governance: Evidence from Ukraine. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/C7RROU

19.

Dickovick

J. T.

(2014). Foreign aid and decentralization: Limitations on impact in autonomy and responsiveness. Public Administration and Development, 34(3), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1691

20.

Dolan-Evans

(2023). Devolution or decapitation? Decentralization during conflict in Ukraine. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 17(1), 16–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2022.2147318

21.

Drapak

(2017). Spit decentralzac. chomu na zakarpatt zagal’muvala najuspshnsha reforma urjadu. Dyvys’.info. Retrieved November 8, 2017, from. https://dyvys.info/2017/11/08/ispyt-detsentralizatsiyi-chomu-na-zakarpatti-zagalmuvala-najuspishnisha-reforma-uryadu/

22.

Dubois

H. F. W.

Fattore

(2009). Definitions and typologies in public administration research: The case of decentralization. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(8), 704–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690902908760

23.

Dudley

(2019). Ukraine’s decentralization reform [Working Paper]. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/arbeitspapiere/Ukraine_Decentralization_Dudley.pdf

24.

EBRD . (2016). Life in transition survey III: A decade of measuring transition. https://www.ebrd.com/what-we-do/economic-research-and-data/data/lits.html

25.

Faguet

J.-P.

(2014). Decentralization and governance. World Development, 53(C), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.002

26.

Falleti

T. G.

(2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051695

27.

Fan

C. S.

Lin

Treisman

(2009). Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.001

28.

Finkel

S. E.

(1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Sage Publications, Inc.

29.

Fischer

H. W.

(2021). Decentralization and the governance of climate adaptation: Situating community-based planning within broader trajectories of political transformation. World Development, 140(3), 105340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105335

30.

Fisman

Gatti

(2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047-2727(00)00158-4

31.

Fukuyama

(2013). What is governance? Governance, 26(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12035

32.

Fung

(2004). Empowered participation: Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton University Press.

33.

Galiani

Gertler

Schargrodsky

(2008). School decentralization: Helping the good get better, but leaving the poor behind. Journal of Public Economics, 92(10–11), 2106–2120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.05.004

34.

Grindle

M. S.

(2009). Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance (course book). Princeton University Press.

35.

Heller

(2001). Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto alegre. Politics & Society, 29(1), 131–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001006, Retrieved June 16, 2023, from. https://ideas.repec.org//a/sae/polsoc/v29y2001i1p131-163.html

36.

Hiskey

J. T.

Seligson

M. A.

(2003). Pitfalls of power to the people: Decentralization, local government performance, and system support in Bolivia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(4), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02686272

37.

Hofer

Wicki

Kaufmann

(2024). Public support for participation in local development. World Development, 178(3), 106569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106569

38.

International Alert/Ukrainian Center for Independent Political Research . (2017). Decentralisation in Ukraine: Achievements, expectations and concerns. https://www.international-alert.org/publications/decentralisation-in-ukraine-achievements-expectations-and-concerns/

39.

Jarábik

Yesmukhanova

(2017). Ukraine’s slow struggle for decentralization. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved June 11, 2023, from. https://carnegieendowment.org/2017/03/08/ukraine-s-slow-struggle-for-decentralization-pub-68219

40.

Keudel

Huss

(2024). Polycentric governance in practice: The case of Ukraine’s decentralised crisis response during the Russo-Ukrainian war. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 39(1), 10–35. https://doi.org/10.1332/25156918y2023d000000002

41.

Keudel

Huss

(2025). Polycentric crisis response and societal resilience: How local communities address internal displacement in Ukraine due to the Russian full-scale invasion. Post-soviet Affairs, 41(5), 436–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2025.2480529

42.

Krupnik

Kalashnikova

O. E.

Dziupyn

M. O.

Orlova

A. I.

Balasanian

V. G.

Kolesnykov

O. M.

(2016). Uchasti gromads“koi v ob’ednanni ta rozvitku teritorial”nih gromad. In All-Ukrainian Association for the Promotion of Self-Organization of the Population and Odessa Institute of Social Technologies. https://www.irf.ua/content/files/draft_doslidzhennya.pdf.

43.

Kucheriava

Kostrjukova

(2024). Currency exchange rate formation in Ukraine: Problems and ways of optimization. SSPModern Economics, State and Public Administration, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53933/mespa.v3i1.128

44.

Kulyk

(2011). Language identity, linguistic diversity and political cleavages: Evidence from Ukraine. Nations and Nationalism, 17(3), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00493.x

45.

Kuznetsova

(2019). Impact of the decentralization reform on the quality of local public services in Ukraine. Iowa State University. [Master’s Thesis]. https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/entities/publication/dbfc89aa-d224-4b8d-87ba-6e7b1399b772

46.

Ladner

Keuffer

Bastianen

(2021, December). Self-rule index for local authorities in the eu, council of Europe and oecd countries, 1990–2020 (analytical report) (KN-07-22-144-EN-N). European commission, directorate-general for regional and Urban policy. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/analysis/KN-07-22-144-EN-N.pdf

47.

Lankina

T. V.

Hudalla

Wollmann

(2008). Local governance in central and eastern Europe: Comparing performance in the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Russia. Palgrave Macmillan.

48.

Lassen

D. D.

Serritzlew

(2011). Jurisdiction size and local democracy: Evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541100013x

49.

León

Wantchekon

(2019). Clientelism in Decentralized States. In Wibbels

Rodden

J. A.

(Eds.), Decentralized Governance and Accountability: Academic Research and the Future of Donor Programming (pp. 229–247). Cambridge University Press.

50.

Madeira

R. A.

(2012). The effects of decentralization on schooling: Evidence from the Sao Paulo state’s education reform. Department of Economics, FEA-USP. https://ideas.repec.org//p/spa/wpaper/2012wpecon26.html

51.

Mansuri

Rao

(2013). Localizing development: Does participation work? World bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/11859

52.

Martinez-Vazquez

Lago-Peñas

Sacchi

(2017). The impact of fiscal decentralization: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 1095–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12182

53.

Mookherjee

(2015). Political decentralization. Annual Review of Economics, 7(1), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115527

54.

Oates

W. E.

(1972). Fiscal federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115527

55.

Onuch

Hale

(2023). The zelensky effect. Oxford University Press.

56.

Onuch

Hale

H. E.

(2018). Capturing ethnicity: The case of Ukraine. Post-soviet Affairs, 34(2-3), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2018.1452247

57.

Oxhorn

Tulchin

J. S.

Selee

A. D.

(Eds.), (2004). Decentralization, democratic governance, and civil society in comparative perspective: Africa, Asia, and latin America. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

58.

Polityuk

Hnidyi

(2022). Eu grants Ukraine candidate status in ‘historic moment. Reuters. Retrieved June 23, 2022, from. https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ukraine-becomes-eu-membership-candidate-battle-east-enters-fearsome-climax-2022-06-23/

59.

Pop-Eleches

Robertson

(2024). Do reforms reduce corruption perceptions? Evidence from police reform in Ukraine. Post-soviet Affairs, 40(5), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2024.2321833

60.

Pop-Eleches

Robertson

G. B.

(2018). Identity and political preferences in Ukraine – Before and after the Euromaidan. Post-soviet Affairs, 34(2-3), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2018.1452181

61.

Rabinovych

Brik

Darkovich

Savisko

Hatsko

Tytiuk

Piddubnyi

(2023). Explaining Ukraine’s resilience to Russia’s invasion: The role of local governance. Governance, 37(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12827

62.

Rabinovych

Gawrich

(2023). The conflict in eastern Ukraine and international support for the decentralization reform (2014–2022): Theory-guided observations. East European Politics and Societies, 37(3), 1036–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/08883254221139841

63.

Romanova

(2022). Ukraine’s resilience to Russia’s military invasion in the context of the decentralisation reform. Stefan Batory Foundation. https://www.batory.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Ukraines-resilience-to-Russias-military-invasion.pdf

64.

Romanova

Umland

(2019). Ukraine’s decentralization reforms since 2014: Initial achievements and future challenges. Chatham House. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2019/09/ukraines-decentralization-reforms-2014

65.

Rondinelli

D. A.

Nellis

J. R.

Cheema

G. S.

(1984). Decentralization in developing countries: A review of recent experience. The World Bank.

66.

Schantl

Hochholdinger

Rücker

Stafa

(2021). Decentralisation and local public administration reform in Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. CEMR, PLATFORMA, NALAS, KDZ. https://www.kdz.eu/en/knowledge/studies/decentralisation-and-local-public-administration-reform-georgia-moldova-and

67.

Seabright

(1996). Accountability and decentralisation in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0

68.

Sicilia

Guarini

Sancino

Andreani

Ruffini

(2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566008

69.

Solodkyy

Sasse

(2020). The link between decentralization and eu integration. New Europe Center (Ukraine) and Centre for East European and International Studies (ZOiS, Germany). https://neweurope.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Decentralization_eng_web-6.pdf

70.

Spanou

Sotiropoulos

D. A.

(2011). The odyssey of administrative reforms in Greece, 1981–2009: A tale of two reform paths. Public Administration, 89(3), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01914.x

71.

Strauss

Baczynska

Gray

(2023). Eu executive proposes to grant Georgia eu candidate status. Reuters. Retrieved November 8, 2023, from. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/eu-executive-proposes-grant-georgia-eu-candidate-status-2023-11-08/

72.

Suzuki

Sakuwa

(2016). Impact of municipal mergers on local population growth: An assessment of the merger of Japanese municipalities. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 38(4), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2016.1258887

73.

The World Bank . (2013, June). Decentralization. Retrieved January 29, 2026, from. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/communitydrivendevelopment/brief/Decentralization

74.

Tiebout

C. M.

(1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1086/257839

75.

Tommasi

Weinschelbaum

(2007). Centralization vs. decentralization: A principal-agent analysis. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9(2), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00311.x

76.

Torba

(2016). Chomu gromadi ne ob’dnujut’sja? Den’. Retrieved October 26, 2016, from. https://day.kyiv.ua/article/podrobytsi/shche-odyn-nezaplanovanyy-vizyt

77.

United Nations Development Programme . (2025, April). A joint vision: More efficient governance of neighboring communities.

78.

Vlasenko

(2022). Electoral effects of institutional reforms: Evidence from Ukraine and Russia [PhD dissertation]. The Florida State University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2742670749?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Dissertations_&_Theses

79.

Vrangbæk

(2010). Structural reform in Denmark, 2007–09: Central reform processes in a decentralised environment. Local Government Studies, 36(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930903560562

80.

Wunsch

J. S.

(2000). Refounding the african state and local self-governance: The neglected foundation [Publisher: Cambridge University Press]. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 38(3), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022278x00003438

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

2.43 MB

0.00 MB