According to influential theories of modernization and individualization, social class has ceased to be relevant to citizens and their political behaviour in Western countries; class has been proclaimed ‘dead’. The argument is particularly strong at the subjective level where people are thought to no longer identify with social classes let alone relate this identification to politics. Using time-series election study data covering many decades combined with manifesto data from the US, Britain, Denmark, and Norway, we challenge this view and show that levels of class identification have been stable. The relationship between class identification, attitudes to redistribution and vote choice has, however, changed but this appears to result more from political parties’ varying polarization on economic and social issues than from the demise of class in voters’ minds.
Abou-ChadiT.HixS. (2021). Brahmin left versus merchant right? Education, class, multiparty competition, and redistribution in Western Europe. British Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12834
2.
AchenC. H.BartelsL. M. (2016). Democracy for realists. Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
3.
American National Election Studies. (2021). ANES 2020 time series study full release [dataset and documentation]. American National Election Studies. July 19, 2021 Version.
4.
American National Election Studies. (2022). ANES time series cumulative data file [dataset and documentation]. American National Election Studies. September 16, 2022 Version.
5.
AresM. (2022). Issue politicization and social clas: How the electoral supply activates class divides in political preferences. European Journal of Political Research, 61(2), 503–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12469
AtkinsonW. (2010). Class, individualization and late modernity. In Search of the reflexive worker. Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
BakkerR.HoboltS. B. (2013). Measuring party positions. In EvansG.De GraafN. D. (Eds.), Political choice matter: Explaining the strength of class and religious cleavages in cross-national perspective. Oxford University Press.
9.
BeckU. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity, theory, culture and society. Sage.
BeckU.Beck-GersheimE. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage.
12.
BestR. (2011). The declining electoral relevance of traditional cleavage groups. European Political Science Review, 3(2), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773910000366
13.
BonomiG.GennaioliN.TabelliniG. (2021). Identity, beliefs, and political conflict. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2371–2411. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab034
14.
BornschierS.HaffertL.HäusermannS.SteenbergenM. R.ZollingerD. (2024). Cleavage formation in the 21st century. How social identities shape voting behavior in contexts of electoral realignment. Cambridge University Press.
15.
BornschierS.HäusermannS.ZollingerD.ColomboC. (2021). How “Us” and “Them” relates to voting behavior-social structure, social identities, and electoral choice. Comparative Political Studies, 54(12), 2087–2122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997504
16.
BremerB.BusemeyerM. R. (2022). Fiscal policy preferences, trade-offs, and support for social investment. Journal of Public Policy, 42(4), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x22000095
17.
BukodiE.GoldthorpeJ. H.HalpinB.WallerL. (2016). Is education now class destiny? Class histories across three British birth cohorts. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 835–849. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw041
ClarkT. N.LipsetS. M. (Eds.), (2001). The breakdown of class politics. In A debate on post-industrial stratification. Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
ClarkT. N.LipsetS. M.RempelM. (1993). The delcining political significance of social class. International Sociology, 8(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858093008003003
22.
ClarkeH. D.SandersD.StewartM. C.PaulW. (2004). Political choice in Britain. Oxford University Press.
DaltonR. J. (2019). Citizen politics. Public opinion and political parties. In Advanced industrial democracies (7th ed.). CQ Press.
25.
D’HoogheL.AchterbergP.ReeskensT. (2018). Imagining class: A study into material social class position, subjective identificaiton, and voting behavior across Europe. Social Science Research, 70, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.11.003
26.
EidlinB. (2014). Class formation and class identity: Birth, death, and possibilities for renewal. Sociology Compass, 8(8), 1045–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12197
27.
EloI. T. (2009). Social class differentials in health and mortality: Patterns and explanations in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(553), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-115929
28.
EvansG. (2017). Social class and voting. In ArzheimerK.EvansJ.Lewis-BeckM. S. (Eds.), The sage handbook of electoral behaviour (pp. 177–198). Sage.
29.
EvansG.GraafN. D. D. (2013). Explaining cleavage strength. The role of party positions. In EvansG.Dirk De GraafN. (Eds.), Political choice matters. Explaining the strength of class and religious cleavages in cross-national perspective (pp. 3–26). Oxford University Press.
30.
EvansG.StubagerR.LangsætherP. E. (2022). The conditional politics of class identity: Class origins, identity and political attitudes in comparative perspective. West European Politics, 45(6), 1178–1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2039980
31.
EvansG.TilleyJ. R. (2011). How parties shape class politics: Explaining the decline of the class basis of party support. British Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123411000202
32.
EvansG.TilleyJ. R. (2017). The new politics of class in Britain: The political exclusion of the working class. Oxford University Press.
33.
FragaB. L.VelezY. R.WestE. A. (2025). Reversion to the mean, or their version of the dream? Latino voting in an age of populism. American Political Science Review, 119(1), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055424000406
34.
FranklinM. N.MackieT. T.ValenH. (Eds.), (1992). Electoral change. Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in Western countries. Cambridge University Press.
35.
FrankoW. W.WitkoC. (2023a). Class, policy attitudes, and us presidential voting in the post-industrial era: The importance of issue salience. Political Research Quarterly, 76(2), 882–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221120226
36.
FrankoW. W.WitkoC. (2023b). Unions, class identification, and policy attitudes. The Journal of Politics, 85(2), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.1086/722347
37.
FriedmanS.SavageM. (2017). Inequality and the class ceiling. Renewal, 25(2), 31–39.
38.
GethinA.Martínez-ToledanoC.PikettyT. (2022). Brahmin left versus merchant right: Changing political cleavages in 21 Western democracies, 1948–2020. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab036
39.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late Modern Age. Stanford University Press.
40.
GoldthorpeJ. H.MarshallG. (1992). The promising future of class analysis: A response to recent critiques. Sociology, 26(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038592026003002
41.
GrantZ.EvansG. (2024). A new dilemma of social democracy? The British labour party, the white working class and ethnic minority representation. British Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123423000601
42.
GruskyD. B.SørensenJ. B. (1998). Can class analysis be salvaged?American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1187–1234. https://doi.org/10.1086/231351
43.
HansenK. M.StubagerR. (2023). Den Danske Valgundersøgelse 2022. Centre for Voting and Parties.
44.
HeathA.CurticeJ.ElgeniusG. (2009). Individualization and the decline of class identity. In WetherellM. (Ed.), Identity in the 21st century (pp. 21–40). Palgrave MacMillan.
45.
HeathO. (2015). Policy representation, social representation and class voting in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123413000318
46.
HeathO.BennettM. (2023). Unequal Britain: The reawakening of class divisions. In FrankenburgS.ClearyE.CurticeJ. (Eds.), British social attitudes: The 40th report (pp. 3–41). National Centre for Social Research.
47.
HoogheL.MarksG. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
48.
HopkinsD. J.LelkesY.WolkenS. (2025). The rise of and demand for identity-oriented media coverage. American Journal of Political Science, 69(2), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12875
49.
HuberL. M.MeyerT. M.WagnerM. (2024). Social group appeals in party rhetoric: Effects on policy support and polarization. The Journal of Politics, 86(4), 1304–1318. https://doi.org/10.1086/729946
50.
HuddyL. (2013). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 737–773). Oxford University Press.
51.
InglehartR. (1977). The silent revolution. Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton University Press.
52.
InglehartR. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press.
53.
JansenG.EvansG.GraafN. D. D. (2013). Class voting and left-right party positions: A comparative study of 15 Western democracies, 1960-2005. Social Science Research, 42(2), 376–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.007
54.
KingstonP. W. (2000). The classless society. Stanford University Press.
55.
KitscheltH.RehmP. (2014). Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies, 47(12), 1670–1706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013516066
56.
KoedamJ.BindingG.SteenbergenM. R. (2025). Multidimensional party polarization in Europe: Cross-cutting divides and effective dimensionality. British Journal of Political Science, 55, Article e24. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123424000474
57.
KriesiH.GrandeE.LachatR.DolezalM.BornschierS.FreyT. (2008). Western European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge University Press.
58.
LamontM.ParkBo Y.Ayala-HurtadoE. (2017). Trump’s electoral speeches and his appeal to the American white working class. British Journal of Sociology, 68(Suppl 1), S153–S180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12315
59.
LangsætherP. E. (2019). Class voting and the differential role of political values: Evidence from 12 West-European countries. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties, 29(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1464015
60.
LangsætherP. E. (2023). Party families in Western Europe. Routledge.
61.
LangsætherP. E.EvansG. (2020). More than self-interest: Why diffferent classes have different attitudes to income inequality. British Journal of Sociology, 71(4), 594–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12747
62.
LangsætherP. E.StubagerR. (2019). Old wine in new bottles? Reassessing the effects of globalization on political preferences in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 58(4), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12332
63.
LazarsfeldP. F.BerelsonB.GaudetH. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. Columbia University Press.
64.
LehmannP.FranzmannS.Al-GaddooaD.BurstT.IvanuschC.RegelS.RiethmüllerF.VolkensA.WesselsB.ZehnterL. (2024). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto project (Mrg/Cmp/Marpor). Version 2024a. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)/Institut für Demokratieforschung (IfDem).
LipsetS. M.RokkanS. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In Martin LipsetS.RokkanS. (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1–64). The Free Press.
67.
ManzaJ.CrowleyN. (2018). Class divisions and political attitudes in the 21st century. In AlbarrracinD.JohnsonB. T. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (Vol. 2, pp. 367–397). Routledge.
68.
OECD. (2015). In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. OECD Publishing.
69.
OeschD. (2006). Redrawing the class map: Stratification and institutions in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland. Palgrave Macmillan.
70.
OeschD.VignaN. (2023). Subjective social class has a bad name, but predicts life chances well. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 83, Article 100759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100759
71.
OskarsonM.DemkerM. (2015). Room for realignment: The working-class sympathy for Sweden Democrats. Government and Opposition, 50(4), 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2014.41
PakulskiJ.WatersM. (1996). The reshaping and dissolution of social class in advanced society. Theory and Society, 25(5), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00188101
74.
RennwaldL.PontussonJ. (2021). Paper stones revisited: Class voting, unionization and the electoral decline of the mainstream left. Perspectives on Politics, 19(1), 36–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592720000067
75.
RobisonJ.StubagerR.ThauM.TilleyJ. R. (2021). Does class-based campaigning work? How working class appeals attract and polarize voters. Comparative Political Studies, 54(5), 723–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020957684
76.
SavageM. (2015). Social class in the 21st century. Penguin Books.
77.
SczepanskiR. (2024). Who are the cosmopolitans? How perceived social sorting and social identities relate to European and national identities. Comparative Political Studies, 57(7), 1210–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140231194054
78.
SczepanskiR.EvansG. (2023). How do opinion-based and social group identities influence each other? Evidence from a survey experiment on class and transnational political issues. Centre for Comparative and International Studies, ETHZurich. Unpublished manuscript.
79.
SmallenbroekO.HertelF. R.BaroneC. (2022). Measuring class hierarchies in postindustrial societies: A criterion and construct validation of EGP and ESEC across 31 countries. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(3), 1412–1452. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221134522
80.
SosnaudB.BradyD.FrenkS. M. (2013). Class in name only: Subjective class identity, objective class position, and vote choice in American presidential elections. Social Problems, 60(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2013.60.1.81
81.
StubagerR.HansenK. M.Lewis-BeckM. S.NadeauR. (2021). The Danish voter: Democratic ideals and challenges. University of Michigan Press.
82.
StubagerR.LangsætherP. E.HesstvedtS. (2025). Replication data for: Still going strong? The social and political relevance of class identification over time in four countries. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GMZMPX
83.
ThauM. (2021). The social divisions of politics: How parties’ group-based appeals influence social group differences in vote choice. The Journal of Politics, 83(2), 675–688. https://doi.org/10.1086/710018
84.
ThauM. (2024). The group appeal strategy: Beyond the policy perspective on party electoral success. Political Studies, 72(4), 1653–1674. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231220127
85.
ThomassenJ. (2005). Introduction. In ThomassenJ. (Ed.), The European voter. A comparative study of modern democracies (pp. 1–21). Oxford University Press.
86.
Turnbull-DugarteS. J.OrtegaA. L. (2024). Instrumentally inclusive: The political psychology of homonationalism. American Political Science Review, 118(3), 1360–1378. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055423000849
87.
van der WaalJ.AchterbergP.HoutmanD. (2007). Class is note Dead-It has been buried alive: Class voting and cultural voting in postwar Western societies (1956-1990). Politics & Society, 35(3), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329207304314
88.
VisserJ. (2006). Union membership statistics in 24 countries. Monthly Labor Review, (January), 38–49.
89.
WeedenK. A.GruskyD. B. (2005). The case for a new class map. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 141–212. https://doi.org/10.1086/428815
90.
WestheuserL.ZollingerD. (2025). Cleavage theory meets Bourdieu: Studying the role of group identities in cleavage formation. European Political Science Review, 17(1), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773924000249
91.
ZarateM. G.Quezada-LlanesE.ArmentaA. D. (2024). Se Habla Espanol: Spanish-language appeals and candidate evaluations in the United States. American Political Science Review, 118(1), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055423000084
92.
ZollingerD. (2024). Cleavage identities in voters’ own words: Harnessing open‐ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 68(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12743
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
