The postcolonial world exhibits stark variation in how citizens of formerly colonized states view their former colonizers. Some harbor continuing animosity, while others view former colonizer countries favorably. We argue that this variation can be explained by the type of national narrative postcolonial states construct upon independence. We conduct a comparative historical analysis of three formerly colonized Asian countries—the Philippines under the United States, Korea under the Japanese, and Indonesia under the Dutch—and find that distinct founding national narratives lead to differing contemporary public opinion. The continuity narrative in the Philippines, emphasizing positive aspects of American rule, has led to positive public opinion towards the United States. Korea’s restoration narrative highlights an ancestral, precolonial identity and a revived Korean culture after Japanese colonialism, leading to negative perceptions of Japan. Indonesia’s “new nation” creation narrative casts colonialism as a negative yet peripheral episode in its national story, resulting in neutral perceptions of the Netherlands.
AbinalesP. N.AmorosoD. J. (2017). State and society in the Philippines. Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
AgoncilloT. A.MangahasF. B. (2005). Philippine history: Expanded & updated edition. Quezon City, Philippines: Inang Wika Publishing.
3.
AguilarF. V.Jr. (2005). Tracing origins: Ilustrado nationalism and the racial science of migration waves. The Journal of Asian Studies, 64(3), 605–637. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002191180500152x
4.
AldermanD. H. (2016). Place, naming and the interpretation of cultural landscapes. In The Routledge research companion to heritage and identity (pp. 195–213). Routledge.
AndersonB. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
7.
AppleM. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge.
8.
BakerA.CuperyD. (2023). Animosity, Amnesia, or admiration? Mass opinion around the world toward the former colonizer. British Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123422000710
BeauvaisE. (2022). The political consequences of Indigenous resentment. The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 7(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2020.25
11.
BijlP. (2018). Colonial memory and forgetting in the Netherlands and Indonesia. Colonial counterinsurgency and mass violence (pp. 261–281). Routledge.
12.
BilligM. (1995). Banal nationalism. Sage.
13.
BlandB.LaksmanaE. A.KassamN. (2021). Charting their own course: How Indonesians see the world. Lowy Institute.
14.
CaprioM. E. (2016). The politics of assimilation: Koreans into Japanese. In Routledge handbook of modern Korean history (pp. 111–123). Routledge.
15.
ChatterjeeP. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories (Vol. 4). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691201429
ChingL. T. S. (2019). Anti-Japan. Duke University Press.
18.
ChoiB.-taek. (2009). Tendency of narratives related to the 31 movement in post-liberation history textbooks. History and Reality, 74, 265–297.
19.
CoendersM.ScheepersP. (2003). The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political Psychology, 24(2), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00330
20.
DardenK.MylonasH. (2016). Threats to territorial integrity, national mass schooling, and linguistic commonality. Comparative Political Studies, 49(11), 1446–1479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015606735
21.
De JuanA.PierskallaJ. H. (2017). The comparative politics of colonialism and its legacies: An introduction. Politics & Society, 45(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329217704434
22.
DeliasD. M. B. (2005). Dividing Nations: Early American Colonial Policies and Continuing Legacies in the case of the Cordillera, Philippines. Politikon: The IAPSS Journal of Political Science10 (2005): 34-50.
23.
DulayD. (2024). Elite contestation and official nationalism: Explaining founding colonial narratives in Southeast Asia.
24.
DwipayamaG.RamadhanK. H. (1991). Soeharto, my thoughts, words, and deeds: An autobiography. Citra Lamtoro Gung Persada.
25.
ElsonR. E. (2008). The idea of Indonesia: A history. Cambridge University Press.
FosterS. (2012). Re-thinking history textbooks in a globalised world. In CarreteroM.AsensioM.Rodríguez-MoneoM. (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities. Information Age Publishing.
GoldsmithB. E.HoriuchiY.KellyM. (2021). Does public diplomacy sway foreign public opinion? Identifying the effect of high-level visits. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1342–1357. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000393
33.
GreverM.Van der VliesT. (2017). Why national narratives are perpetuated: A literature review on new insights from history textbook research. London Review of Education, 15(2), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.2.11
34.
GriesP. H.ZhangQ.MasuiY.LeeY. W. (2009). Historical beliefs and the perception of threat in Northeast Asia: Colonialism, the tributary system, and China–Japan–Korea relations in the twenty-first century. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(2), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcn028
35.
HainsworthG. B. (1983). The political economy of Pancasila in Indonesia. Current History, 82(483), 167–179.
HanS.-Y. (2021). Syngman rhee's speaking activities and public diplomacy during the U.S.-Japan War, 1941-1945. Korean Journal of International Relations, 61(3), 83–119. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjir.2021.09.61.3.83
HurA. (2022). Narratives of civic duty: How national stories shape democracy in Asia. Cornell University Press.
40.
HutchinsonJ.SmithA. D. (Eds.), (1994). Nationalism. Oxford University Press.
41.
JoE. A. (2022). Memory, institutions, and the domestic politics of South Korean–Japanese relations. International Organization, 76(4), 767–798. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818322000194
42.
JungJ.-H. (2012). The contents and achievements of the Korean Language roadfinding movement after liberation. Hangeul, 296, 151–196. https://doi.org/10.22557/hg.2016.06.296.151
43.
KahinG. M. T. (2018). Nationalism and revolution in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
44.
KangH. (2021). Under the Black Umbrella: Voices from Colonial Korea, 1910–1945. Cornell University Press.
45.
KangM.-gil (1994). Colonial cultural policy and the resistance movement. In A history of contemporary Korea (pp. 149–172). Brill.
46.
KarnowS. (1992). In our image: America's empire in the Philippines. Headlines series 288 (p. 729). Foreign Policy Association.
47.
KimM.KimJ. (2017). Syngman rhee’s diplomatic activities and newspaper clippings during the Washington conference period, 1921-1922. Journal of the Korean Political Science Association, 51(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.18854/kpsr.2017.51.2.008
48.
KimS. (2016). Domination and assimilation policies of the Korean governorate during the Japanese occupation. Donggukhak, 60, 191–225.
49.
KruegerA. B.MalečkováJ. (2009). Attitudes and action: Public opinion and the occurrence of international terrorism. Science, 325(5947), 1534–1536. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170867
50.
LawrenceA. (2013). Imperial rule and the politics of nationalism: Anti-colonial protest in the French empire. Cambridge University Press.
51.
LeeA. (2019). Land, state capacity, and colonialism: Evidence from India. Comparative Political Studies, 52(3), 412–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758759
52.
LorenteB. (2013). The grip of English and Philippine language policy. In The politics of English: South Asia, Southeast Asia and the Asia Pacific (pp. 187–204). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
MartinI. (1999). Language and institution: Roots of bilingualism in the Philippines. In BautistaL.TanG. (Eds.), The Filipino bilingual: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 132–136). Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
55.
MartinI. (2009). Colonial education and the shaping of Philippine literature in English. In BautistaL.BoltonK. (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 245–259). Anvil Publishing, Inc.
56.
MillerD. (1995). On nationality. Oxford University Press.
57.
MitzenJ. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346
MylonasH.TudorM. (2023). Varieties of nationalism: Communities, narratives, identities. Cambridge University Press.
60.
NyeJ. S. (2004). Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119(2), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345
61.
OostindieG.PaasmanB. (1998). Dutch attitudes towards colonial empires, Indigenous cultures, and slaves. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 31(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecs.1998.0021
62.
OsborneB. S. (2001). Landscapes, memory, monuments, and commemoration: Putting identity in its place. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 33(3), 39–77.
63.
OsmeñaS. (1945). Speech of his excellency Sergio Osmeña, President of the Philippines, before a demonstration of the people of Manila on the grounds of Malacañan Palace on the occasion of his 67th birthday. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, 41(6), 483–488.
64.
PaauwS. (2009). One land, one nation, one language: An analysis of Indonesia’s national language policy. University of Rochester working papers in the language sciences, 5(1), 2–16.
65.
PepinskyT. B. (2016). Colonial migration and the origins of governance: Theory and evidence from Java. Comparative Political Studies, 49(9), 1201–1237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015626442
66.
QasmiA. U. (2017). Identity formation through national calendar: Holidays and commemorations in Pakistan. Nations and Nationalism, 23(3), 620–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12310
67.
ReyesA. (2011). Strategies of legitimization in political discourse: From words to actions. Discourse & Society, 22(6), 781–807. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511419927
68.
RicklefsM. C. (1993). A history of modern Indonesia since c. 1200. MacMillan.
69.
RoxasM. (1954). Papers, addresses and other writings of manuel Roxas (Vol. 1). Bureau of Public Libraries.
70.
Sejarah Pemikiran Indonesia Modern. (2015). In AbdullahT (Ed.).. Jakarta: Direktorat Sejarah dan Nilai Budaya, Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
71.
SibayanB. P.GonzalezA. (1996). Post-imperial English in the Philippines. Contributions to the Sociology of Language, 72, 139–172.
72.
SteeleB. J. (2008). Ontological security in international relations: Self-identity and the IR state. Routledge.
73.
StrausS. (2018). Making and unmaking nations: War, leadership, and genocide in modern Africa. Cornell University Press.
Tompar-TiuA.Sustento-SenerichesJ. (1995). Depression and other mental health issues: The Filipino American experience. Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
77.
TomzM. R.WeeksJ. L. P. (2020). Human rights and public support for war. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1086/705741
78.
TupasT.RuanniF. (2004). The politics of Philippine English: Neocolonialism, global politics, and the problem of postcolonialism. World Englishes, 23(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971x.2004.00334.x
79.
Van der KroefJ. M. (1972). Indonesian nationalism reconsidered. Pacific Affairs, 45(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2755260
80.
WelchR. E. (1974). American atrocities in the Philippines: The indictment and the response. Pacific Historical Review, 43(2), 233–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/3637551
81.
WertschJ. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge University Press.
82.
WimmerA. (2018). Nation building: Why some countries come together while others fall apart. Princeton University Press.
83.
YangJ.-hyun (2008). Changes in ethnic and national perceptions in national history textbook Ancient history narratives. Studies in Korean Ancient History, 52, 117–153.
YooJ.-ah. (2016). Development process and historic significance of the campaign against the Korean-Japanese conference. The Korea-Japan Historical Review, 53, 265–302. https://doi.org/10.18496/kjhr.2016.04.53.265
86.
YunP. (1984). Korean resistance to imperial Japanese aggression: On thought of Anti-Japanese Independence movement. Korea Journal, 24(3), 24–39.
87.
ZarakolA. (2010). Ontological (in) security and state denial of historical crimes: Turkey and Japan. International Relations, 24(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117809359040
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
