Whereas the literature on colonial legacies has flourished in recent years, relatively less attention has been paid to the origins of colonial institutions. What explains variation in the design of colonial institutions? Some scholars have stressed the importance of precolonial factors, arguing that institutions were designed to reflect the environmental and socio-political conditions that the colonizers encountered in the colonies. Others hold that policymaking reflected the colonial powers’ metropolitan identity and aims. We believe these literature have been insufficiently attentive to the colonial state and the political ideals of colonial bureaucrats. Drawing on evidence from British India and French Algeria, we show that land policy was shaped by intense competition between ideologically motivated officials, who disagreed over the uses and aims of state power. Theorizing the role of ideas allows us to explain variation in colonial policies across both space and time while highlighting the indispensability of qualitative methods of analysis.
AbernethyD. B. (2000). The dynamics of Global dominance: European overseas empires, 1415-1980. Yale University Press.
2.
Abi-MershedO. (2010). Apostles of modernity: Saint-simonians and the civilizing mission in Algeria. Stanford University Press.
3.
AcemogluD.JohnsonS.RobinsonJ. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. The American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369.
4.
AfigboA. E. (1972). The warrant chiefs: Indirect rule in southeastern Nigeria, 1891-1929. Longman.
5.
AgeronC.-R.BrettM. (1991). Modern Algeria: A history from 1830 to the present. Hurst.
6.
AlsanM. (2015). The effect of the TseTse fly on African development. The American Economic Review, 105(1), 382–410. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20130604.
7.
BarberW. (1969). James Mill and the theory of economic policy in India. History of Political Economy, 1(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-1-1-85.
8.
BeagleholeT. H. (1966). Thomas Munro and the development of administrative policy in Madras, 1892-1818. Cambridge University Press.
9.
BellH. (1946). Glimpses of a Governor’s life: From diaries, letters, and memoranda. Sampson Low, Marston & Co.
10.
BelmessousS. (2013). Assimilation and empire. Oxford University Press.
11.
BennettA.CheckelJ. T. (Eds.), (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge University Press.
12.
BennouneM. (2002). The making of contemporary Algeria, 1830-1987. Cambridge University Press.
13.
BooneC. (2003). Political topographies of the African state: Territorial authority and institutional choice. Cambridge University Press.
14.
BouldersonH. S. (1858). Minute on Talooqdaree cases. Smith, Elder and Co.
15.
BrettM. (1988). Legislating for Inequality in Algeria: The Senatus-consulte of 14 july 1865 (51, pp. 440–461). University of London.
16.
BrowerB. C. (2009). A Desert named Peace: The violence of France’s empire in the Algerian Sahara, 1844-1902. Columbia University Press.
17.
BulutgilH. Z.MylonasH.SchenoniL. L. (2022). Theory-based research design and evidence in political science. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting.
18.
ButlerH. (1906). Oudh policy: The policy of sympathy. Pioneer Press.
19.
CampbellG. (1881). The tenure of land in India. In ProbynJ. W. (Ed.), Systems of land tenure in various countries. Cassell, Galpin & Co.
20.
CampbellG. (1893). In BernardC. E. (Ed.), Memoirs of my Indian career (2, p. 1). Macmillan & Co.
21.
CannadineD. (2001). Ornamentalism: How the British saw their empire. Oxford University Press.
22.
CohnB. S. (1966). Recruitment and training of British civil servants in India, 1600-1860. In BraibantiR. (Ed.), Bureaucratic systems emergent from the British imperial tradition. Duke University Press.
CollierD.BradyH. E.SeawrightJ. (2010). Sources of leverage in causal inference: Toward an alternative view of methodology. In Rethinking social inquiry: Diverse tools, shared standards (pp. 161–200). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
25.
ComaroffJ. (1989). Images of empire, contests of conscience: Models of colonial domination in South Africa. American Ethnologist, 16(4), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1989.16.4.02a00040.
26.
CooperF. (2005). Colonialism in question. Theory, knowledge, history. University of California Press.
27.
CrowderM. (1964). Indirect rule: French and British style. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute, 34(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/1158021.
28.
CustR. N. (1854). The collector of revenue in the North-Western provinces of India. Calcutta Review, 23(45), 136–161.
29.
De JuanA.PierskallaJ. H. (2017). The comparative politics of colonialism and its legacies: An introduction. Politics & Society, 45(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329217704434.
DeweyC. (1972). The official mind and the problem of agrarian indebtedness in India (pp. 1870–1910). University of Cambridge. [Ph.D. Dissertation].
32.
DuffieldA. (2016). The grey men of empire: Framing britain’s official mind (pp. 1854–1934). University of Arkansas. [Ph.D. Dissertation].
33.
DumontL. (1966). The village community from Munro to Maine. Contributions to Indian Sociology, X, 67–89.
34.
DuprazY. (2019). French and British colonial legacies in education: Evidence from the partition of Cameroon. The Journal of Economic History, 79(3), 628–668.
35.
EngermanS. L.SokoloffK. L. (1997). Factor endowments, institutions, and differential paths of growth among new world economies: A view from economic historians of the United States. In HaberS. (Ed.), How Latin America fell behind: Essays on the economic histories of Brazil and Mexico (pp. 260–304). Stanford University Press.
36.
FalletiT.MahoneyJ. (2015). The comparative sequential method. In MahoneyJ.ThelenK. A. (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 211–239). Cambridge University Press.
37.
FieldhouseD. K. (1966). The colonial empires: A comparative survey from the eighteenth century. Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
38.
Firmin-SellersK. (2000). Institutions, context, and outcomes: Explaining French and British rule in West Africa. Comparative Politics, 32(3), 253–272. https://doi.org/10.2307/422366.
39.
FrankemaE. (2010). The colonial roots of land inequality: Geography, factor endowments, or institutions?The Economic History Review, 63(2), 418–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.2009.00479.x.
40.
GalloisW. (2013). A history of violence in the early Algerian colony. Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
GannL. H.DuiganP. (1978). The rulers of British Africa, 1870-1914. Stanford University Press.
42.
GerringJ. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.
43.
GerringJ.ZiblattD.GorpJ. V.ArévaloJ. (2011). An institutional theory of direct and indirect rule. World Politics, 63(3), 377–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887111000104.
44.
GleigG. R. (1849) Life of Sir Thomas Munro (New ed, rev.condensed from the larger biography (3). J. Murray.
GohD. P. S. (2007). Imperialism and `medieval’ natives: The Malay image in Anglo-American travelogues and colonialism in Malaya and the Philippines. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877907080147.
47.
GuhaR. (1963). A rule of property for Bengal: An essay on the idea of the permanent settlement. Mouton.
48.
GuignardD. (2012). Le Sénatus-Consulte de 1863: La Dislocation Programmée de la Société Rurale Algérienne. In Historie de l’Algérie à La Période Coloniale (pp. 76–81). Éditions La Découverte et Éditions Barzakh.
49.
HaileyW. (1938). An African survey: A study of problems arising in Africa south of the Sahara. Oxford University Press.
50.
HalhedN. J. (1832). A memoir on the land tenure and principles of Taxation obtaining in the provinces attached to the Bengal presidency. In Under the ancient Hindoo system. Samuel Smith and Co.
IdevilleH. A. (1882). Le Maréchal Bugeaud: D’après sa correspondance intime et des documents inédits (pp. 1784–1849). Firmin-Didot.
55.
KaminskyA. R. (1986). The India Office, 1880-1910. Greenwood Press.
56.
KayeJ. W. (1853). The administration of the East India company: A history of Indian progress. Richard Bentley.
57.
KimD. S. (2020). Empires of Vice: The rise of opium prohibition across Southeast Asia. Princeton University Press.
58.
Kirk-GreeneA. (1999). On crown service: A history of HM colonial and Overseas civil services, 1837-1997. IB Tauris.
59.
KumarR. (1968). Western India in the nineteenth century: A study in the social history of Maharashtra. Routledge.
60.
LamoricièreL. L.BedeauM. A. (1847). Projets de colonisation pour les provinces d’Oran et de Constantine. Imprimerie Royale.
61.
LangeM.MahoneyJ.vom HauM. (2006). Colonialism and development: A comparative analysis of Spanish and British colonies. American Journal of Sociology, 111(5), 1412–1462. https://doi.org/10.1086/499510.
62.
LapassetF. (1850). Aperçu sur l’organisation des indigènes dans les territoires militaires et dans les territoires civils. Dubos Frères, Imprimeurs-Libraires.
63.
LawrenceA. K. (2013). Imperial rule and the politics of nationalism: Anti-colonial protest in the French empire. Cambridge University Press.
64.
LawrenceA. K. (2022). Violence and the colonial state in north Africa. Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting.
65.
LeeA.SchultzK. A. (2012). Comparing British and French colonial legacies: A discontinuity analysis of Cameroon. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 7(4), 365–410. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00011022.
66.
LetsaN. W.WilfahrtM. (2020). The mechanisms of direct and indirect rule: Colonialism and economic development in Africa. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 15(4), 539–577. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00019086.
67.
LevalloisA. (2004). Les écrits autobiographiques d’Ismayl Urbain. Maisonneuve.
68.
LockeR. M.ThelenK. (1995). Apples and oranges revisited: Contextualized comparisons and the study of comparative labor politics. Politics & Society, 23(3), 337–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329295023003004.
69.
LorcinP. M. E. (1995). Imperial identities: Stereotyping, prejudice and race in colonial Algeria. I.B. Tauris.
70.
MacLeanL. M. (2010). Informal institutions and citizenship in rural Africa: Risk and reciprocity in Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire. Cambridge University Press.
71.
MahoneyJ. (2010). Colonialism and postcolonial development: Spanish America in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
72.
MahoneyJ. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(4), 570–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/004912411243770.
73.
MamdaniM. (1996). Citizen and subject: Contemporary Africa and the legacy of late colonialism. Princeton University Press.
74.
MarshallP. J. (1987). Empire and authority in the later eighteenth century. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, 15(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03086538708582732.
75.
MasonP. (1953). The men who ruled India: The founders. J Cape.
76.
MasonP. (1954). The men who ruled India: The guardians. Martin’s Press.
77.
McAlexanderR. J.Ricart-HuguetJ. (2021). State disengagement: Evidence from French West Africa. International Studies Quarterly, 66(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab040.
78.
McCauleyJ. F.PosnerD. N. (2015). African borders as sources of natural experiments promise and pitfalls. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2014.37.
79.
McCoyA. W. (2009). Policing America’s empire: The United States, the Philippines, and the rise of the surveillance state. University of Wisconsin Press.
80.
McLarenM. (2001). British India and British Scotland, 1880-1830: Career building, empire building, and a Scottish school of thought on Indian governance. University of Akron Press.
81.
McNameeL. (2023). Settling for less: Why states colonize and why they stop. Princeton University Press.
82.
MetcalfT. (1964). The aftermath of revolt: India, 1857-1870. Princeton University Press.
83.
MetcalfT. (1979). Land, landlords, and the British Raj: Northern India in the nineteenth century. University of California Press.
84.
MilesW. F. S. (1994). Colonizing the Hausa: British and French. In Hausaland divided: Colonialism and independence in Niger and Nigeria. Cornell University Press.
85.
MillJ. (1826). The history of British India (3rd ed., pp. 1–6). Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.
86.
MillJ. S. (1843) A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and the Methods of Scientific Investigation (1–2). John W. Parker.
87.
MillJ. S. (1871). Mr. Maine on village communities. Fortnightly Review, 9(53), 543–556.
88.
MuirW. (1853). The Honourable James Thomason: Late Lt.-Gov. Of the N. W. Provinces. Calcutta Review, 21(42), 146–197.
89.
Müller-CreponC. (2020). Continuity or change? (In)direct rule in British and French colonial Africa. International Organization, 74(4), 707–741. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818320000211.
90.
NorthD. C.SummerhillW.WeingastB. R. (2000). Order, Disorder, and economic change: Latin America versus north America. In Bueno de MesquitaB.RootH. L. (Eds.), Governing for prosperity (pp. 17–58). Yale University Press.
91.
OsbornE. L. (2003). ‘Circle of iron’: African colonial employees and the interpretation of colonial rule in French West Africa. The Journal of African History, 44(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021853702008307.
92.
OwolabiO. P. (2023). Ruling emancipated slaves and indigenous subjects: The divergent legacies of forced settlement and colonial occupation in the Global South. Oxford University Press.
93.
PearceR. D. (1982). The turning point in Africa: British colonial policy 1938-48. Frank Cass.
94.
PennerP. (1986). The Patronage bureaucracy in north India: The Robert M. Bird and James Thomason school (pp. 1820–1870). Chanankya Publications.
PerhamM. (1965). Introduction to the Fifth edition. In LugardF. (Ed.), The dual mandate in British tropical Africa. Archon Books.
97.
PeyroulouJ.-P.TengourO. S.ThénaultS. (2012). 1830-1880: La prise de possession du pays. In Historie de l’Algérie à la Période Coloniale (pp. 19–44). Éditions La Découverte et Éditions Barzakh.
98.
PierskallaJ.JuanA. D.MontgomeryM. (2019). The territorial expansion of the colonial state: Evidence from German East Africa 1890–1909. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 711–737. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123416000648.
99.
RaikesC. (1858). Notes on the revolt in the North-Western provinces of India. Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, & Roberts.
100.
RajJ. (1965). The mutiny and British land policy in north India, 1856-1868. Asia Publishing House.
101.
RangerT. (1983). The invention of tradition in colonial Africa. In HobsbawmE.RangerT. (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 211–262). Cambridge University Press.
102.
Ricart-HuguetJ. (2022). The origins of colonial investments in former British and French Africa. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 736–757. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123420000678.
103.
RichardsJ. F. (1995). The mughal empire. Cambridge University Press.
104.
RobeE. (1848). Essai sur l’histoire de la propriété en Algérie. Imprimerie de Dagand.
105.
RobertsonT. C. (1854). The gangetic provinces of British India. Edinburgh Magazine, 76(466), 183–205.
106.
RobinsonR. (1972). The Non-European Foundations of European imperialism. In OwenR.SutcliffeB. (Eds.), Studies in the theory of imperialism (pp. 117–140). Longman.
107.
RuedyJ. (1967). Land policy in colonial Algeria: The origins of the rural public domain. University of California Press.
108.
RueschemeyerD. (2003). Can one or a few cases yield theoretical gains? In MahoneyJ.RueschemeyerD. (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 305–336). Cambridge University Press.
109.
SaidE. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. Knopf.
110.
SajidF. (2021). Structure and agency in colonial politics: Lessons from British India and beyond [Ph.D. Dissertation]. University of Chicago.
111.
SchleyR. E. (2015). The Tyranny of Tolerance: France, religion, and the conquest of Algeria (pp. 1830–1870): University of California.
112.
SeawrightJ. (2021). Beyond Mill: Why cross-case qualitative causal inference is weak, and why we should still compare. In SimmonsE. S.Rush SmithN. (Eds.), Rethinking comparison: Innovative methods for qualitative political inquiry (pp. 31–46). Cambridge University Press.
113.
SessionsJ. E. (2009). “Unfortunate necessities”: Violence and civilization in the conquest of Algeria. In France and its spaces of war (pp. 29–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
114.
SessionsJ. E. (2011). By sword and plow: France and the conquest of Algeria. Cornell University Press.
SkocpolT.SomersM. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22(2), 174–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417500009282.
117.
SlaterD.ZiblattD. (2013). The enduring indispensability of the controlled comparison. Comparative Political Studies, 46(10), 1301–1327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012472469.
118.
SpangenbergB. (1976). British bureaucracy in India: Status, policy, and the I.C.S. In The late 19th century. Manohar.
119.
SpearP. (1967). Holt Mackenzie—Forgotten man of Bengal. Bengal, Past and Present, 86(162), 24–37.
120.
SteeleH. M. (1965). European settlement Vs. Muslim property: The Foundation of colonial Algeria, 1830-1880 [Ph.D. Dissertation]. Columbia University.
121.
SteinmetzG. (2007). The devil’s handwriting: Precoloniality and the German colonial state in Qingdao, Samoa, and Southwest Africa. University of Chicago Press.
122.
StephenC. J. (1863). The land system of British India. Calcutta Review, 38(75), 109–158.
123.
StokesE. (1959). The English utilitarians and India. Clarendon Press.
124.
StoraB. (1991). Histoire de l’Algérie coloniale: 1830-1954. La Découverte.
125.
SurkisJ. (2019). Sex, law, and sovereignty in French Algeria, 1830–1930. Cornell University Press.
126.
TarrowS. (2010). The strategy of paired comparison: Toward a theory of practice. Comparative Political Studies, 43(2), 230–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414009350044.
127.
TempleR. (1882). Men and events of my time in India. J. Murray.
128.
TempleR. (1893). James Thomason. Clarendon Press.
129.
ThorntonJ. (1854). The settlement of the North-Western provinces. Calcutta Review, 23(45), 313–367.
130.
UrbainI. (1861). L’Algérie pour les Algériens. Michel Lévy frères.
131.
UrbainI. (1862). L’Algérie française: Indigènes et immigrants. Imprimerie Jouaust et Fils.
132.
van AllenJ. (1972). “Sitting on a man”: Colonialism and the lost political institutions of Igbo women. Canadian Journal of African Studies, 6(2), 165–181.
133.
WaldnerD. (2012). Process tracing and causal mechanisms. In KincaidH. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of social science (pp. 65–84): OUP.
134.
WarnierA.DuvalJ. (1869). Bureaux arabes et colons, réponse au “Constitutionnel” pour faire suite aux “Lettres à M. Rouher.” Challamel Ainé.
135.
WilsonN. H. (2011). From reflection to refraction: State administration in British India, circa 1770–1855. American Journal of Sociology, 116(5), 1437–1477. https://doi.org/10.1086/657562.
136.
WingfieldC. (1869). Observations on land tenures and tenant right in India. Wm H Allen & Co.
137.
WolpertS. A. (1967). Morley and India, 1906-1910. University of California Press.
138.
WrightG. (1997). Tradition in the service of modernity: Architecture and Urbanism in French colonial policy, 1900-1930. In CooperF.StolerA. L. (Eds.), Tensions of empire: Colonial cultures in a Bourgeois World. University of California Press.
139.
WyrtzenJ. (2015). Making Morocco: Colonial intervention and the politics of identity. Cornell University Press.
