Why do some political rulers engage in frequent shuffling of their governors while others allow their governors to serve longer? We argue that shuffling of governors reflects the level of a ruler’s perception of insecurity. Building on perspectives about situational origins of distrust and paranoid cognition, we argue that democratic leaders, characterized by higher levels of existential security, practice less frequent shuffling of governors compared to authoritarian ones. We also suggest that governors in localities characterized by higher levels of ethnic conflict and poor electoral performance by a ruling government are more likely to be replaced. Utilizing an original dataset of all Ottoman and Turkish governors from 1875 to 2019, our empirical analyses show that governors last longer under more democratic governments, in provinces with lower levels of ethnic diversity conflict, and stronger electoral support for the government.
AbrahamE. (2010). Reminiscences of my life. Red Sea Press.
2.
AcemoğluD.RobinsonJ. (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Books.
3.
AkhtariM.MoreiraD.TruccoL. (2022). Political turnover, bureaucratic turnover, and the quality of public services. The American Economic Review, 112(2), 442–493. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171867
4.
AkkoyunluK.ÖktemK. (2016). Existential insecurity and the making of a weak authoritarian regime in Turkey. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(4), 505–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2016.1253225
BlaydesL. (2010). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge University Press.
7.
BlaydesL.ChaneyE. (2013). The feudal revolution and Europe’s rise: Political divergence of the Christian west and the Muslim world before 1500 ce. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055412000561
8.
Box-SteffensmeierJ. M.JonesB. S. (2012). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
9.
BrownD.MobarakA. (2009). The transforming power of democracy: Regime type and the distribution of electricity. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409090200
10.
BuckleyN.FryeT.GarifullinaG.ReuterO. (2014). The political economy of Russian gubernatorial election and appointment. Europe-Asia Studies, 66(8), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2014.941695
11.
Bueno de MesquitaB.SmithA. (2022). The dictator’s handbook: Why bad behavior is almost always good politics. Public Affairs Press.
12.
CarterB. L.HassanM. (2021). Regional governance in divided societies: Evidence from the Republic of Congo and Kenya. The Journal of Politics, 83(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/708915
EgorovG.SoninK. (2011). Dictators and their viziers: Endogenizing the loyalty–competence trade-off. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 903–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01033.x
17.
EvansP. B.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (eds), (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press.
18.
FalletiT. G. (2005). A sequential theory of decentralization: Latin American cases in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051695
19.
FrantzE. (2018). Authoritarianism: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
20.
FrantzE.SteinE. A. (2016). Countering coups: Leadership succession rules in dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies, 50(7), 935–962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016655538
21.
GeddesB.WrightJ.WrightJ.FrantzE. (2018). How dictatorships work: Power, personalization, and collapse. Cambridge University Press.
HagmannT.KorfB. (2012). Agamben in the Ogaden: Violence and sovereignty in the Ethiopian–Somali frontier. Political Geography, 31(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.12.004
24.
HanioğluS. (2008). A brief history of the late ottoman empire. Princeton University Press.
25.
HardingR. (2020). Who is democracy good for? Elections, rural bias, and health and education outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1086/705745
26.
HassanM. (2020). Regime threats and state solutions: Bureaucratic loyalty and embeddedness in Kenya. Cambridge University Press.
27.
HechterM. (1977). Internal colonialism: The Celtic fringe in British national development (vol. 197, p. 1536). University of California Press.-1966.
28.
HuntingtonS. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
29.
KapucuN.PalabıyıkH. (2020). Turkish public administration: From tradition to the modern age (2nd ed.). USAK Publications.
30.
KetchleyN.WenigG. (In press). Purging to Transform the Post-Colonial State: Evidence from the 1952 Egyptian Revolution. Comparative Political Studies.
KramerR. M. (1994). The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective distrust in organizations. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02249399
33.
KramerR. M. (1998). Paranoid cognition in social systems: Thinking and acting in the shadow of doubt. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 2(4), 251–275. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_3
34.
LakeD. A.BaumM. A. (2001). The invisible hand of democracy: Political control and the provision of public services. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 587–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034006001
35.
LandryP. F.LüX.DuanH. (2017). Does performance matter? Evaluating political selection along the Chinese administrative ladder. Comparative Political Studies, 51(8), 1074–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017730078
36.
LeeM. M. (2020). Crippling leviathan: How foreign subversion weakens the state. Cornell University Press.
37.
LewisB. (1968). The emergence of modern Turkey. Oxford University Press.
38.
LinzJ. J. (2000). Totalitarian and authoritarian regimes. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
MagiyaY.PopescuB.TezcürG. (2023). Replication data for “all the Sultan’s men: Regime type, insecurity, and the shuffling of governors”. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/GJA2VW
41.
MooreB. (1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy: Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Penguin Books.
42.
MorrisB.Ze’EviD. (2019). The thirty-year genocide: Turkey’s destruction of its Christian minorities, 1894–1924. Harvard University Press.
43.
MoscaG. (1939). The ruling class. McGraw-Hill Companies.
44.
MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2008). The ties that bind: Social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 205–227. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum013
45.
MyersonR. B. (2008). The autocrat’s credibility problem and foundations of the constitutional state. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055408080076
46.
NorthD. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
PrzeworskiA. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in eastern europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
49.
QuinlivanJ. (1999). Coup-Proofing: Its practice and consequences in the Middle East. International Security, 24(2), 131–165. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560202
ReuterO. J.RobertsonG. (2012). Subnational appointments in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Russian gubernatorial appointments. The Journal of Politics, 74(4), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000631
SenA. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
54.
ShihV.AdolphC.LiuM. (2012). Getting ahead in the communist party: Explaining the advancement of central committee members in China. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055411000566
55.
SimsR. (2001). Japanese political history since the meiji restoration, 1868-2000. Springer.
56.
SomerM. (2022). Return to point zero: The Turkish-Kurdish question and how politics and ideas (Re) make empires, nations, and states. State University of New York Press.
57.
SvolikM. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge University Press.
58.
TezcürG. (2016). Ordinary people, extraordinary risks: Participation in an ethnic rebellion. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000150
59.
TezcürG.GursesM. (2017). Ethnic exclusion and mobilization: The Kurdish conflict in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 49(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041517820201378
60.
ToshJ. (1973). Colonial chiefs in a stateless society: A case-study from northern Uganda. The Journal of African History, 14(3), 473–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021853700012834
61.
WoldenseJ. (2018). The ruler’s game of musical chairs: Shuffling during the reign of Ethiopia’s last emperor. Social Networks, 52, 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.07.002
62.
YadirgiV. (2017). The political economy of the Kurds of Turkey: From the ottoman empire to the Turkish republic. Cambridge University Press.
63.
YiftachelO.GhanemA. (2004). Understanding ‘ethnocratic’ regimes: The politics of seizing contested territories. Political Geography, 23(6), 647–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2004.04.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
