Under severe fiscal constraints that plagued colonial states, how did governments allocate their coercive power throughout the colonized territory? In this paper, I highlight the pre-colonial state consolidation as an important determinant of colonial coercion. When the state established control over society by appointing new local agents, the society became more compliant to state demands, reducing the need for coercion over the long run. To evaluate this argument in British Burma, I collected new data from indigenous land revenue inquests and colonial police reports, using the pre-colonial variation in local headman appointment after a plausibly exogenous extinction of a hereditary line. I find that places closer to locations that received new pre-colonial headmen experienced significantly lower colonial police presence. Neither spatial correlation nor the presence of other state institutions can explain the results. The findings emphasize the deep origins of contentious state-society relations that extend beyond colonial legacies.
AcemogluD.Garcia-JimenoC.RobinsonJ. A. (2012). Finding eldorado: Slavery and long-run development in Colombia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40(4), 534–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.07.003
2.
AcemogluD.JohnsonS.RobinsonJ. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1369–1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369
3.
AndayaB. W.AndayaL. Y. (2015). A History of Early Modern Southeast Asia (pp. 1400–1830). Cambridge University Press.
4.
Aung-ThwinM. (1985). The british “pacification” of burma: Order without meaning. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 16(2), 245–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022463400008432
5.
BandyopadhyayS.GreenE. (2016). Precolonial political centralization and contemporary development in Uganda. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 64(3), 471–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/685410
6.
BatesR. H. (2014). “The imperial peace.” Chap. 3 in Africa’s Development in Historical Perspective, edited by AkyeampongEmmanuelBatesRobert H.NunnNathanRobinsonJames A., 424–446. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BerryS. (1992). Hegemony on a shoestring: Indirect rule and access to agricultural land. Africa, 62(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1159747
8.
BooneC. (2003). Political Topographies of the African State: Territorial Authority and Institutional Choice. Cambridge University Press.
9.
CadyJ. F. (1965). A History of Modern Burma. Cornell University Press.
10.
CallahanM. P. (2003). Making enemies: War and state building in Burma. Cornell University Press.
11.
CappelenC.SorensJ. (2018). Pre-colonial centralisation, traditional indirect rule, and state capacity in Africa. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 56(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662043.2017.1404666
12.
CrosthwaiteC. (1912). The Pacification of Burma. Arnold.
13.
De JuanA.KrautwaldF.PierskallaJ. H. (2017). Constructing the state: Macro strategies, micro incentives, and the creation of police forces in colonial Namibia. Politics & Society, 45(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329217705352
14.
DellM. (2010). The persistent effects of Peru’s mining mita. Econometrica, 78(6), 1863–1903.
15.
DellM.LaneN.QuerubinP. (2018). The historical state, local collective action, and economic development in Vietnam. Econometrica, 86(6), 2083–2121. https://doi.org/10.3982/ecta15122
16.
DinceccoM. (2017). State Capacity and Economic Development: Present and Past. Cambridge University Press.
17.
EngermanS. L.SokolofK. L. (2012). Economic Development in the Americas since 1500: Endowments and Institutions. Cambridge University Press.
18.
FrankemaE.Van WaijenburgM. (2014). Metropolitan blueprints of colonial taxation? Lessons from fiscal capacity building in British and French Africa, c. 1880–1940. The Journal of African History, 55(3), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002185371400036x
19.
FriedlineT.MasaR. D.ChowaG.A. N. (2015). Transforming wealth: Using the Inverse Hyperbolic Sine (IHS) and splines to predict youth’s math achievement. Social Science Research, 49, 264–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.08.018
20.
GarfiasF.SellarsE. A. (2021). From conquest to centralization: Domestic conflict and the transition to direct rule. The Journal of Politics (Chicago, Illinois), 83(3), 992–1009. https://doi.org/10.1086/711175.
21.
GennaioliN.RainerI. (2007). The modern impact of precolonial centralization in Africa. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(3), 185–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-007-9017-z
22.
GhoshP. (2000). Brave Men of the Hills: Resistance and Rebellion in Burma (pp. 1825–1932). University of Hawaii Press.
23.
GuyerJ. I.BelingaS. M. E. (1995). Wealth in people as wealth in knowledge: Accumulation and composition in Equatorial Africa. The Journal of African History, 36(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021853700026992
24.
GyiM. M. (1983). Burmese Political Values: the Socio-political Roots of Authoritarianism. Praeger Publishers.
de KadtD.LarreguyH. A. (2018). Agents of the regime? Traditional leaders and electoral politics in South Africa. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/694540
31.
KimD.TajimaY. (2022). Smuggling and Border Enforcement (1–38). International Organization.
32.
KimD. S. (2021). Empires of Vice: The Rise of Opium Prohibition across Southeast Asia. Princeton University Press.
33.
KoenigW. J. (1990). The Burmese Polity, 1752-1819: Politics, Administration, and Social Organization in the Early Kon-baung period (34). Univ of Michigan Center for.
34.
LangeM.MahoneyJ.Vom HauM. (2006). Colonialism and development: A comparative analysis of Spanish and British Colonies. American Journal of Sociology, 111(5), 1412–1462. https://doi.org/10.1086/499510
35.
LechlerM.McNameeL. (2018). Indirect colonial rule undermines support for democracy: Evidence from a natural experiment in Namibia. Comparative Political Studies, 51(14), 1858–1898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758760
36.
LeviM. (1988). Of Rule and Revenue. University of California Press.
37.
LiebermanV. (1984). Burmese Administrative Cycles: Anarchy and Conquest, c. 1580-1760. Princeton University Press.
38.
LiebermanV. (1996). Political consolidation in Burma under the early Konbaung Dynasty 1752–c. 1820. Journal of Asian History, 30(2), 152–168.
39.
LiebermanV. (2003). Strange Parallels: Southeast Asia in Global Context, c 800-1830 (1). Cambridge University Press.
40.
LiebermanV.BuckleyB. (2012). The impact of climate on Southeast Asia, circa 950–1820: New findings. Modern Asian Studies, 46(5), 1049–1096. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0026749x12000091
41.
LintnerB. (1999). Burma in Revolt: Opium and Insurgency since 1948. Silkworm Books.
42.
LiuS. X. (2022). Control, coercion, and cooptation: How rebels govern after winning civil war. World Politics, 74(1), 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887121000174
43.
LowesS.MonteroE. (2021). Concessions, violence, and indirect rule: Evidence from the Congo Free State. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2047–2091. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab021
44.
MamdaniM. (1996). Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton University Press.
45.
MattinglyD. C. (2019). The Art of Political Control in China. Cambridge University Press.
46.
MichalopoulosS.PapaioannouE. (2013). Pre-colonial ethnic institutions and contemporary African development. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 81(1), 113–152. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9613.
47.
MichalopoulosS.PapaioannouE. (2015). On the Ethnic Origins of African development: Chiefs and Precolonial Political Centralization. The Academy of Management perspectives, 29(1), 32–71. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0162.
48.
MigdalJ. S. et al. (2001). State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another. Cambridge University Press.
NakanishiY. (2013). Strong Soldiers, Failed Revolution: The State and Military in Burma, 1962–88. National University of Singapore Press.
52.
NathanN. L. (2019). Electoral consequences of colonial invention: Brokers, chiefs, and distribution in Northern Ghana. World Politics, 71(3), 417–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887119000030
53.
OlsonM. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938736
54.
PaikC.VechbanyongratanaJ. (2019). Path to centralization and development: Evidence from Siam. World Politics, 71(2), 289–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887118000321
55.
PierskallaJ.SchultzA.WibbelsE. (2017). Order, distance, and local development over the long-run. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 12(4), 375–404. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00016020
56.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.
57.
ScottJ. (2010). The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. National University of Singapore Press.
58.
StantonT. H. (2014). Law and economic development: The cautionary tale of colonial Burma. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2013.4
59.
StokesS. C.DunningT.NazarenoM.BruscoV. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.
60.
TaylorR. H. (2009). The State in Myanmar. National University of Singapore Press.
61.
ThawnghmungA. M. (2004). Behind the Teak Curtain: Authoritarianism, Agricultural Policies, and Political Legitimacy in Rural Burma/Myanmar. Routledge.
TillyC. (1975). The Formation of National States in Western Europe (8). Princeton University Press.
64.
TragerF. N.KoenigW. J (1979). Burmese Sit-Tans 1764-1826: Records of Rural Life and Administration. University of Arizona Press.
65.
WeberE. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870-1914. Stanford University Press.
66.
WigT. (2016). Peace from the past: Pre-colonial political institutions and civil wars in Africa. Journal of Peace Research, 53(4), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343316640595
67.
WrightA. (1910). Twentieth Century Impressions of Burma: Its History, People, Commerce, Industries, and Resources. Lloyd’s Greater Britain Publishing Company.
68.
ZawH. T. (2023). Replication Data for: The Pre-colonial Roots of Colonial Coercion: Evidence from British Burma. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OKA0K1
69.
ZhangN.LeeM. M. (2020). Literacy and state–society interactions in Nineteenth-Century France. American Journal of Political Science, 64(4), 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12524
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
