How does intergroup inequality, specifically minority experiences of persecution, affect contributions to local public goods? Based on an original survey experiment and qualitative research in slums in Delhi, we examine how Hindus and Muslims respond to social norms around promoting cooperation on community sanitation. Mainstream theories of development predict greater willingness to contribute to public goods in more homogeneous areas. In contrast to the “diversity-deficit hypothesis,” however, we find that social accountability mechanisms are more effective among Muslims, a group that routinely faces discrimination and violence in India. We propose that this reflects “defensive cooperation,” or a set of coping strategies developed by minorities to navigate a hostile sociopolitical environment. Our findings point to a new mechanism that helps to enforce prosocial norms and, hence, public goods provision in multiethnic contexts.
AhmadI. (1966). The Ashraf-Ajlaf Dichotomy in Muslim Social Structure in India. Indian Economic and Social History Review, 3(3), 268–278.
2.
AlesinaA.FerraraE. L. (1999). Participation in Heterogeneous Communities. NBER. Working Paper No. 7155.
3.
AlesinaA.MichalopoulosS.PapaioannouE. (2016). Ethnic Inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 124(2), 428–488. https://doi.org/10.1086/685300
4.
AsherS.NovosadP.RafkinC. (2017). Estimating Intergenerational Mobility with Coarse Data: A Nonparametric Approach. World Bank. Technical report.
5.
AuerbachA. M. (2016). Clients and Communities: The Political Economy of Party Network Organization and Development in India’s Urban Slums. World Politics, 68(1), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887115000313
AuerbachA. M.ThachilT. (2018). How clients select brokers: Competition and choice in India’s slums. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541800028x
8.
BaldwinK. (2015). The Paradox of Traditional Leaders in Democratic Africa. Cambridge University Press.
9.
BaldwinK.HuberJ. (2010). Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055410000419
10.
BanerjeeA.BertrandM.DattaS.MullainathanS. (2009). Labor market discrimination in Delhi: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Comparative Economics, 37(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.002
11.
BanerjeeA.ChandrasekharA. G.DufloE.JacksonM. O. (2019). Using gossips to spread information: Theory and evidence from two randomized controlled trials. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(6), 2453–2490. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz008
12.
BanerjeeA.IyerL.SomanathanR. (2005). History, social divisions, and public goods in rural India. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1162/1542476054473251
13.
BanerjeeA.PandeR.WaltonM. (2012). Delhi’s slum-dwellers: Deprivation, preferences and political engagement among the urban poor. IGC International Growth Centre. Working Paper S-5003-INC-1.
14.
BardhanP.MookherjeeD. (2012). Political clientelism and capture theory and evidence from West Bengal, India. UNU-WIDER. Working Paper 97.
15.
BauerM.BlattmanC.ChytilováJ.HenrichJ.MiguelE.MittsT. (2016). Can war foster cooperation?The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.249
16.
BernhardH.FehrE.FischbacherU. (2006). Group affiliation and altruistic norm enforcement. The American Economic Review, 96(2), 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806777212594
17.
BertrandM.MullainathanS. (2004). Are emily and greg more employable than lakisha and jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. The American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
18.
BhalotraS.Clots-FiguerasI.IyerL.VecciJ. (2018). Leader identity and coordination. IGC International Centre. Working Paper S-89211-INC-1.
19.
BharathiN.MalghanD. V.RahmanA. (2018). More heat than light: Census-scale evidence for the relationship between ethnic diversity and economic development as a statistical artifact. IIM Bangalore Research Paper. 575.
20.
BjörkmanM.SvenssonJ. (2009). Power to the people: Evidence from a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring in Uganda*. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 735–769. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.735
21.
BrownR. A.FrankJ. (2006). Race and officer decision making: Examining differences in arrest outcomes between black and white officers. Justice Quarterly, 23(1), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820600552527
22.
CammettM.ChakrabartiP.DavidR. (2018). Pre-analysis plan: Accountability in intergroup relations and public goods provision in Indian slums. EGAP registration ID: 20180613AA. EGAP.
23.
CammettM.ChakrabartiP.RomneyD. (2023). Replication data for: Persecuted minorities and Defensive cooperation: Contributions to Public Goods by Hindus and Muslims in Delhi. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WFCQZM
24.
Centre for Regional Political Economy (2019). Politics and society between elections. Azim Premji University. Technical report.
ChhibberP.KumarT.SekhonJ. (2018). Preferences for descriptive representation: Asymmetries between Hindus and Muslims in India. Working Paper.
27.
ChidambaramS. (2020). How do institutions and infrastructure affect mobilization around public toilets vs. Piped water? Examining intra-slum patterns of collective action in Delhi, India. World Development, 132, 104984–105014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104984
28.
DasV. (2006). Life and words: Violence and the descent into the ordinary. University of California Press.
29.
DasV.KleinmanA.LockM. M.RampheleM.ReynoldsP. (eds), (2001). Remaking a world: Violence, social suffering, and recovery. University of California Press.
30.
Delhi Minorities Commission (2020). Report of the DMC fact-finding committee on North-East Delhi riots of February 2020. Technical report.
31.
DitlmannR. K.SamiiC.ZeitzoffT. (2017). Addressing violent intergroup conflict from the bottom up?Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 38–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12027
32.
FearonJ.LaitinD. (1996). Explaining interethnic cooperation. American Political Science Review, 90(4), 715–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/2945838
33.
FoukaV. (2019). How do immigrants respond to discrimination? The case of Germans in the US during world war I. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 405–422.
34.
GaikwadN.NellisG. (2017). The majority-minority divide in attitudes toward internal migration: Evidence from Mumbai. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 456–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12276
35.
GayerL. (2012). Safe and sound: Searching for a ”good environment” in Abul Fazl enclave, Delhi. In GayerL.JaffrelotC. (Eds.), Muslims in Indian cities: Trajectories of marginalisation (pp. 213–236). Columbia University Press.
36.
GayerL.JaffrelotC. (eds), (2012). Muslims in Indian cities: Trajectories of marginalisation. Columbia University Press.
37.
GerusoM.SpearsD. (2018). Neighborhood sanitation and infant mortality. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 125–162. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150431
38.
GinoF.GalinskyA. D. (2012). Vicarious dishonesty: When psychological closeness creates distance from one’s moral compass. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.011
39.
GinoF.GuJ.ZhongC. B. (2009). Contagion or restitution? When bad apples can motivate ethical behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1299–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.014
40.
GNCTD. (2006). Delhi Human Development Report 2006. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi/Oxford University Press. Technical Report.
41.
Government of India (2006). Social, Economic and Educational status of the Muslim community of India (SacharCommitttee Report). Technical Teport.
42.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
43.
GuptaG.MahmudM.MaitraP.MitraS.NeelimA. (2018). Religion, minority status, and trust: Evidence from a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 146, 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.11.028
44.
HabyarimanaJ.HumphreysM.PosnerD. N.WeinsteinJ. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision? An experimental approach. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 709–725. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055407070499
45.
HansenB. B.BowersJ. (2008). Covariate balance in simple, stratified, and clustered comparative studies. Statistical Science, 23(2), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1214/08-sts254
46.
HeitmeyerC. (2009). ‘There is peace here’: Managing communal relations in a town in central Gujarat. Journal of South Asian Development, 4(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/097317410900400107
47.
HellerP.MukhopadhyayP.BandaS.SheikhS. (2015). Exclusion, informality, and predation in the cities of Delhi an overview of the cities of Delhi project. Centre for Policy Research. Working paper.
48.
HigginbothamE. B. (1993). Righteous discontent: The women’s movement in the black baptist church, 1880–1920. Harvard University Press.
49.
HoffK.KshetramadeM.FehrE. (2011). Caste and punishment: The legacy of caste culture in norm enforcement. The Economic Journal, 121(556), F449–F475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2011.02476.x
50.
JeffersonH. (2023). The politics of respectability and black americans’ punitive attitudes. American Political Science Review, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422001289
51.
JeffreyC.JefferyP.JefferyR. (2008). Degrees without freedom? Education, masculinities, and unemployment in North India. Stanford University Press.
52.
JhaS.RaoV.WoolcockM. (2007). Governance in the gullies: Democratic responsiveness and leadership in Delhi’s slums. World Development, 35(2), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.10.018
53.
KhemaniS. (2015). Buying votes versus supplying public services: Political incentives to under-invest in pro-poor policies. Journal of Development Economics, 117(C), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.07.002
54.
KustovA.PardelliG. (2018). Ethnoracial homogeneity and public outcomes: The (Non)effects of diversity (8th ed., 112, pp. 1096–1103). American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000308
55.
LernerJ. S.TetlockP. E. (2002). Bridging individual, interpersonal, and institutional approaches to judgment and decision making: The impact of accountability on cognitive bias. In SchneiderS. L.ShanteauJ. (eds), Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research (pp. 431–457). Cambridge University Press.
56.
LivnyA. (2020). Trust and the Islamic Advantage: Religious-based movements in Turkey and the Muslim world. Cambridge University Press.
57.
LustE.RaknerL. (2018). The other side of taxation: Extraction and social institutions in the developing world. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(1), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042716-102149
58.
Mac GintyR. (2014). Everyday Peace: Bottom-up and local agency in conflict-affected societies. Security Dialogue, 45(6), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614550899
59.
MehtaD.ChatterjiR. (2001). Boundaries, names, alterities: A case study of a “communal riot” in dharavi, Bombay. In DasV.KleinmanA.LockM. M.RampheleM.ReynoldsP. (eds), Remaking a world: Violence, social suffering, and recovery. University of California Press.
60.
MiguelE.GugertyM. K. (2005). Ethnic diversity, social sanctions, and public goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics, 89(11–12), 2325–2368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.09.004
Ministry of Urban Development (2012). Service Levels in Urban Water and Sanitation Sector - A Status Report (2010–2011). Government of India. Technical Report.
OskooiiK. A. (2016a). How discrimination impacts sociopolitical behavior: A multidimensional perspective: Discrimination and sociopolitical (dis) engagement. Political Psychology, 37(5), 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12279
65.
OskooiiK. A. (2016b). How discrimination impacts sociopolitical behavior: A multidimensional perspective. Political Psychology, 37(5), 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12279
66.
OskooiiK. A. (2020). Perceived discrimination and political behavior. British Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 867–892. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123418000133
67.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
68.
PadillaF. M. (1985). Latino ethnic consciousness: The case of Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans in chicago. University of Notre Dame Press.
69.
PahwaS. (2023). Community service networks and social capital in urban Indian Muslim neighborhoods.
70.
PanagopoulosC. (2010). Affect, social pressure and prosocial motivation: Field experimental evidence of the mobilizing effects of pride, shame and publicizing voting behavior. Political Behavior, 32(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9114-0
SchildkrautD. J. (2005). The rise and fall of political engagement among latinos: The role of identity and perceptions of discrimination. Political Behavior, 27(3), 285–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-4803-9
73.
SinghP.vom HauM. (2016). Ethnicity in time: Politics, history, and the relationship between ethnic diversity and public goods provision. Comparative Political Studies, 49(10), 1303–1340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016633231
74.
SossJ.WeaverV. (2017). Police are our government: Politics, political science, and the policing of race–class subjugated communities. Annual Review of Political Science, 20(1), 565–591. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-060415-093825
75.
SpearsD.ThoratA. (2019). The puzzle of open defecation in rural India: Evidence from a novel measure of caste attitudes in a nationally representative survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 67(4), 725–755. https://doi.org/10.1086/698852
76.
SusewindR. (2017). Muslims in Indian cities: Degrees of segregation and the elusive ghetto. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(6), 1286–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x17696071
77.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (eds), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Nelson-Hall.
78.
ThachilT. (2017). Do rural migrants divide ethnically in the city? Evidence from an ethnographic experiment in India. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 908–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12315
79.
United Nations. (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
80.
UslanerE. M. (2002). The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press.
81.
VarshneyA. (2003). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press.
82.
WilkinsonS. (2004). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge University Press.
83.
WilliamsP. (2015). Everyday peace? In: Politics, citizenship and Muslim lives in India. John Wiley and Sons.
84.
WimmerA. (2020) Nation Building: Why some countries come together while others fall apart (vol. 3). Princeton University Press.
85.
WimmerA.CedermanL.-E.MinB. (2009). Ethnic politics and armed conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global data set. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 316–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400208
86.
WinterF.ZhangN. (2018). Social norm enforcement in ethnically diverse communities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2722–2727. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718309115
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
