How does witnessing regime atrocities influence the political attitudes of bystanders? We argue that observing regime violence against innocent civilians triggers psychological dissonance between beliefs about the regime and the witnessed moral transgression. As a result, regime support should decrease among bystanders of state atrocities. We analyze original, highly disaggregated archival data from the Nazi death marches at the end of World War II, which confronted ordinary German citizens with the regime’s crimes. We find that locations with higher victim numbers had lower vote shares for right-wing nationalist parties after the war. Supporting our proposed mechanism, we show that (1) this effect was strongest when Nazi crimes were at the center of public discourse and (2) that witnessing Nazi atrocities was associated with individuals’ rejection of Hitler 20 years later. The findings have implications for understanding democratization prospects and people’s nostalgia for fallen autocrats.
AaskovenL. (2022). Foreign occupation and support for international cooperation: Evidence from Denmark. World Politics, 74(2), 285–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/s004388712200003x
2.
AcharyaA.BlackwellM.SenM. (2018). Deep roots: How slavery still shapes Southern politics. Princeton University Press.
AldamaA.Vásquez-CortésM.YoungL. E. (2019). Fear and citizen coordination against dictatorship. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 31(1), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629818809425
5.
AntoniouG.DinasE.KosmidisS. (2020). Collective victimhood and social prejudice: A post-Holocaust theory of anti-semitism. Political Psychology, 41(5), 861–886. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12654
6.
BalcellsL. (2012). The consequences of victimization on political identities: Evidence from Spain. Politics and Society, 40(3), 311–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329211424721
7.
BalcellsL.Torrats-EspinosaG. (2018). Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(42), 10624–10629. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800302115
BauerM.BlattmanC.ChytilováJ.HenrichJ.MiguelE.MittsT. (2016). Can war foster cooperation?Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.249
10.
BautistaM. A.GonzálezF.MartínezL. R.MuñozP.PremM. (2021). The geography of repression and opposition to autocracy. American Journal of Political Science, 67(1), 101–118. Forthcoming:1–18https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12614
11.
BigalskiU. (2007). Augenzeugen und Bilder berichten. Die Häftlinge aus den KZ-Außenlagern Landsberg/Kaufering auf dem Todesmarsch im April 1945 durch den Landkreis Fürstenfeldbruck nach Dachau. Arbeitskreis Mahnmal Fürstenfeldbruck.
12.
BlatmanD. (2011). The death marches: The final phase of Nazi genocide (pp. 1933–1944). Harvard University Press. The concentration camps.– The circumstances of evacuation – Waves of violence and acts of annihilation – Administrative chaos and the last order – Murder is rampant – Dead men marching – A society in collapse – Marched toward Gardelegen – The burning barn – After the flames – The murderers.
13.
BlattmanC. (2009). From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409090212
14.
BoyleM. J. (2014). Violence after war: Explaining instability in post-conflict states. Johns Hopkins University Press.
15.
BrandschJ. (2020). Killing civilians in civil war: The rationale of indiscriminate violence. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
CharnyshV.FinkelE. (2017). The death camp eldorado: Political and economic effects of mass violence. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 801–818. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055417000296
18.
CharnyshV.RiazS. (2022). After the genocide: Proximity to victims and support for punishing ingroup crimes.
19.
CostalliS.RuggeriA. (2019). The long-term electoral legacies of civil war in young democracies: Italy, 1946-1968. Comparative Political Studies, 52(6), 927–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018784057
20.
DahlR. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
DavenportC.Mokleiv NygårdH.FjeldeH.ArmstrongD. (2019). The consequences of contention: Understanding the aftereffects of political conflict and violence. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-064057
24.
De JuanA.GläßelC.HaassF.ScharpfA. (2023). Replication data for: The political effects of witnessing state atrocities: Evidence from the Nazi death marches. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/JQPJYN
25.
De JuanA.PierskallaJ. H. (2016). Civil war violence and political trust: Microlevel evidence from Nepal. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 33(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214544612
26.
DeMerittJ. H. R. (2016). The strategic use of state repression and political violence. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press.
27.
de MildtD. W.RüterC. F. (2013). Justiz und NS-Verbrechen: Sammlung Deutscher Strafurteile wegen Nationalsozialistischer Tötungsverbrechen 1945-1966. Bd. I. Amsterdam University Press.
28.
DistelB. (2004). Öffentliches Sterben. Vom Umgang der Öffentlichkeit mit den Todesmärschen. Dachauer Hefte, 20, 39–46.
29.
DjuveV. L.KnutsenC. H.WigT. (2020). Patterns of regime breakdown since the French Revolution. Comparative Political Studies, 53(6), 923–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879953
30.
DownesA. B. (2007). Draining the sea by filling the graves: Investigating the effectiveness of indiscriminate violence as a counterinsurgency strategy. Civil Wars, 9(4), 420–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698240701699631
31.
DraguT.PrzeworskiA. (2019). Preventive repression: Two types of moral hazard. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000552
32.
ElsterJ. (2004). Closing the books: Transitional justice in historical perspective. Cambridge University Press.
33.
Escribà-FolchA. (2013). Repression, political threats, and survival under autocracy. International Political Science Review, 34(5), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512113488259
34.
FarissC. J.KenwickM. R.ReuningK. (2020). Estimating one-sided-killings from a robust measurement model of human rights. Journal of Peace Research, 57(6), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320965670
35.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
36.
FisherS. L. (1972). The minor parties of the Federal Republic of Germany: Toward a comparative theory of minor parties. Tulane University.
37.
FoukaV.VothH.-J. (2022). Collective remembrance and private choice: German–Greek conflict and behavior in times of crisis. American Political Science Review, 1–20. Forthcoming:1–50https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422001095
FrankfurtS.FrazierP. (2016). A review of research on moral injury in combat veterans. Military Psychology, 28(5), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/mil0000132
40.
GeddesB.WrightJ.FrantzE. (2018). How dictatorships work: Power, personalization, and collapse. Cambridge University Press.
41.
GetmanskyA.ZeitzoffT. (2014). Terrorism and voting: The effect of rocket threat on voting in Israeli elections. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 588–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000288
42.
GilliganM. J.PasqualeB. J.SamiiC. (2014). Civil war and social cohesion: Lab-in-the-field evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 604–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12067
43.
GreiserK. (2008). Die Todesmärsche von Buchenwald: Räumung, Befreiung und Spuren der Erinnerung. Wallstein.
44.
GringD. (1993). Die Todesmärsche und das Massaker von Gardelegen: NS-Verbrechen in der Endphase des Zweiten Weltkrieges. Schlütersche Verlagsanstalt.
45.
HarffB. (2003). No lessons learned from the Holocaust? Assessing risks of genocide and political mass murder since 1955. American Political Science Review, 97(01), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055403000522
46.
HoernerJ. M.JaaxA.RodonT. (2019). The long-term impact of the location of concentration camps on radical-right voting in Germany. Research and Politics, 6(4), 205316801989137–205316801989138. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019891376
47.
HomolaJ.PereiraM. M.TavitsM. (2020). Legacies of the Third Reich: Concentration camps and out-group intolerance. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000832
48.
HomolaJ.PereiraM. M.TavitsM. (2023). Fixed effects and post-treatment bias in legacy studies. Working Paper. https://osf.io/eha72/ (Accessed 31 October 2022).
49.
HuntingtonS. P. (1993). The third wave: Democratization in the late 20th century. University of Oklahoma Press.
50.
KalyvasS. N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
51.
KalyvasS. N.KocherM. A. (2007). How ”free” is free riding in civil wars? Violence, insurgency, and the collective action problem. World Politics, 59(2), 177–216. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2007.0023
52.
KlittaG. (1970). Das Finale des Zweiten Weltkrieges in Schwandorf: Eine Dokumentation. Meiller Druck und Verlag.
53.
KupatadzeA.ZeitzoffT. (2021). In the shadow of conflict: How emotions, threat perceptions and victimization influence foreign policy attitudes. British Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123418000479
54.
LachapelleJ. (2022). Repression reconsidered: Bystander effects and legitimation in authoritarian regimes. Comparative Politics, 54(4), 695–716. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522x16317396828722
55.
LichbachM. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002787031002003
56.
LitzB. T.SteinN.DelaneyE.LebowitzL.NashW. P.SilvaC.MaguenS. (2009). Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(8), 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.07.003
57.
LupuN.PeisakhinL. (2017). The legacy of political violence across generations. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 836–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12327
58.
LyallJ. (2009). Does indiscriminate violence incite insurgent attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708330881
59.
LyallJ.BlairG.ImaiK. (2013). Explaining support for combatants during wartime: A survey experiment in Afghanistan. American Political Science Review, 107(4), 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000403
OsorioJ.SchubigerL. I.WeintraubM. (2018). Disappearing dissent? Repression and state consolidation in Mexico. Journal of Peace Research, 55(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343318751035
62.
PeisakhinL.QueraltD. (2022). When the state and church clash: Political legacies of religious repression in Nazi Germany.
63.
PenicS.ElcherothG.SpiniD. (2018). When Is collective exposure to war events related to more acceptance of collective guilt?Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(1), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002716645388
64.
PepinskyT. B.GoodmanS. W.ZillerC. (2023). Modeling spatial heterogeneity and historical persistence: Nazi concentration camps and contemporary intolerance. American Political Science Review, 1–10. Forthcominghttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055423000072
65.
RitterE. H.ConradC. R. (2016). Preventing and responding to dissent: The observational challenges of explaining strategic repression. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055415000623
66.
RozenasA.SchutteS.ZhukovY. (2017). The political legacy of violence: The long-term impact of Stalin’s repression in Ukraine. The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1086/692964
67.
RozenasA.ZhukovY. (2019). Mass repression and political loyalty: Evidence from Stalin’s ‘terror by hunger. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000066
SambanisN.Schulhofer-WohlJ. (2019). Sovereignty rupture as a central concept in quantitative measures of civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(6), 1542–1578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002719842657
70.
ScharpfA.GläelC.EdwardsP. (2022). International sports events and repression in autocracies: Evidence from the 1978 FIFA world cup. American Political Science Review, 1–18. Forthcoming:1–18https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055422000958
71.
ScharrerG. (1995). Todesmärsche aus dem KZ Flossenbürg durch die Stadt Straubing und den Landkreis: Historischer Überblick - dokumente - Augenzeugenberichte. Attenkofer.
SikkinkK.WallingC. B. (2007). The impact of human rights trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343307078953
74.
SirokyD. S.DzutsatiV.BustikovaL. (2022). Defection denied: A study of civilian support for insurgency in irregular war. Cambridge University Press.
75.
SønderskovK. M.DinesenP. T.FinkelS. E.HansenK. M. (2022). Crime victimization increases turnout: Evidence from individual-level administrative panel data. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123420000162
76.
SouleimanovE. A.SirokyD. S. (2016). Random or retributive?: Indiscriminate violence in the Chechen wars. World Politics, 68(4), 677–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887116000101
SteinertC. V.SteinertJ. I.CareyS. C. (2019). Spoilers of peace: Pro-government militias as risk factors for conflict recurrence. Journal of Peace Research, 56(2), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343318800524
79.
SullivanC. M. (2016). Political repression and the destruction of dissident organizations: Evidence from the archives of the Guatemalan national police. World Politics, 68(4), 645–676. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887116000125
80.
SuttonJ.ButcherC. R.SvenssonI. (2014). Explaining political jiu-jitsu: Institution-building and the outcomes of regime violence against unarmed protests. Journal of Peace Research, 51(5), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343314531004
81.
SvolikM. W. (2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. Cambridge University Press.
82.
ValentinoB.HuthP.Balch-LindsayD. (2004). “Draining the sea”: Mass killing and guerrilla warfare. International Organization, 58(02), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818304582061
83.
ViscontiG. (2020). Policy preferences after crime victimization: Panel and survey evidence from Latin America. British Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123418000297
84.
VoigtländerN.VothH.-J. (2012). Persecution perpetuated: The Medieval origins of anti-Semitic violence in Nazi Germany. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(3), 1339–1392. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjs019
85.
WaldenJ.ZhukovY. (2020). Historical legacies of political violence. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press.
86.
WernerC. (2011). KZ-Friedhöfe und -Gedenkstätten in Bayern. Schnell and Steiner.
WinterM. C. (2018). Gewalt und Erinnerung im ländlichen Raum: Die deutsche Bevölkerung und die Todesmärsche. Metropol.
89.
WoodE. J. (2003). Insurgent collective action and civil war in El Salvador. Cambridge University Press.
90.
YoungL. E. (2019). The psychology of state repression: Fear and dissent decisions in Zimbabwe. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 140–155. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541800076x
91.
ZaruskyJ. (2000). Von Dachau nach nirgendwo: Der Todesmarsch der KZ-Häftlinge im April 1945. In Bayerische Landeszentrale für politische Bildungsarbeit. Bayerische Landeszentrale für politische Bildungsarbeit.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
