In recent decades, liberal democracies have considerably expanded the scope for citizen participation, calling their citizens to vote in a growing number of popular votes. This research investigates the effects of the rising election frequency on electoral participation. It expands on the voting calculus and theorizes which, when, and how past votes affect current voter turnout. We argue that all election types contribute to a common factor of election frequency, whose high values depress turnout and reduce the effectiveness of party mobilization even in the most important elections. We find support for the new theory using an original database of all significant elections and referendums held in 22 European democracies between 1939 and 2019, two natural experiments, and survey data from the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Our findings shed light on contemporary participation trends and have major implications for democratic citizenship and democratic institutional engineering.
AchenC.BartelsL. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.
2.
AltmanD. (2013). Does an active use of mechanisms of direct democracy impact electoral participation? Evidence from the U.S. States and the Swiss cantons. Local Government Studies, 39(6), 739–755.
3.
AngristJ.PischkeJ.-S. (2008 December 15). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
4.
AnziaS. F. (2011). Election timing and the electoral influence of interest groups. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 412–427.
5.
ArtésJ.JuradoI. (2022). The effect of compulsory civic duty on turnout. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2022 EPSA meeting inPrague.
6.
ArzheimerK. (2009). Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 259–275.
7.
AugenblickN.NicholsonS. (2016). Ballot position, choice fatigue, and voter behaviour. The Review of Economic Studies, 83(2), 460–480.
8.
BarberB. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.
9.
BhattiY.HansenK. M.WassH.2016. First-time boost beats experience: The effect of past eligibility on turnout. Electoral Studies, 41(4), 151–158.
10.
BlaisA. (2000). To vote or not to vote? The merits and limits of rational choice theory. University of Pittsburgh Press.
11.
BlaisA. (2014). Why is turnout so low in Switzerland? Comparing the attitudes of Swiss and German citizens towards electoral democracy. Swiss Political Science Review, 20(4), 520–528.
12.
BlaisA.DaoustJ.-F. (2020). Motivation to vote. UBC Press.
13.
BlaisA.DassonnevilleR.KostelkaF. (2020). Political equality and turnout. In RohrschneiderR.TomassenJ. (Eds.), In: Handbook of political representation in liberal democracies. Oxford University Press.
14.
BlaisA.RubensonD. (2013). The source of turnout decline new values or new contexts?Comparative Political Studies, 46(1), 95–117.
15.
BowlerS.DenemarkD.DonovanT.McDonnellD. (2017). Right-wing populist party supporters: Dissatisfied but not direct democrats. European Journal of Political Research, 56(1):70–91.
16.
BowlerS.DonovanT. (1998). Demanding choices: Opinion, voting, and direct democracy. University of Michigan Press.
17.
BowlerS.DonovanT.HappT. (1992). Ballot propositions and information costs: Direct democracy and the fatigued voter. The Western Political Quarterly, 45(2), 559–568.
18.
BoydR. (1986). Election calendars and voter turnout. American Politics Research, 14(1), 89–104.
19.
CantoniE.GazzèL.SchaferJ. (2021). Turnout in concurrent elections: Evidence from two quasi-experiments in Italy. European Journal of Political Economy, 70, 102035.
20.
ChongD.DruckmanJ. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 663–680.
21.
CohenJ. (1982). Chance in election calendars and turnout decline: A test of boyd’s hypothesis. American Politics Quarterly, 10(2), 246–254.
22.
CSES. (2018). Comparative study of electoral systems. Integrated Module Dataset (IMD). [dataset and documentation]. December 8, 2020 version. doi: 10.7804/cses.imd.2020-12-08.
23.
CurticeJ.FisherS.FordR.EnglishP. (2018). Appendix 1: The results analysed. In The British general election of 2017. (pp. 549–495). Palgrave Macmillan.
24.
della PortaD. (2019). For participatory democracy: Some notes. European Political Science, 18(4), 603–616.
25.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper.
26.
DvořákT.ZouharJ.NovákJ. (2017). The effect of direct democracy on turnout: Voter mobilization or participatory momentum?Political Research Quarterly, 70(2), 433–448.
27.
EzrowL.XezonakisG. (2016). Satisfaction with democracy and voter turnout A temporal perspective. Party Politics, 22(1):3–14.
FatkeM. (2015). Participation and political equality in direct democracy: Educative effect or social bias. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(1), 99–118.
30.
Fauvelle-AymarC.FrançoisA. (2015). Mobilization, cost of voting and turnout: A natural randomized experiment with double elections. Public Choice, 162(1):183–199.
31.
Fauvelle-AymarC.StegmaierM. (2008). Economic and political effects on European parliamentary electoral turnout in post-communist Europe. Electoral Studies, 27(4):661–672.
32.
FeitosaF.GalaisC. (2020). How stable is the sense of civic duty to vote? A panel study on the individual-level stability of the attitude. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 32(2), 344–353.
33.
FoxR. (2009). Engagement and participation: What the PublicWant and how our politicians need to respond. Parliamentary Affairs, 62(4):673–685.
34.
FranklinM. N.HoboltS. B. (2011). The legacy of lethargy: How elections to the European Parliament depress turnout. Electoral Studies Union, 30(1), 67–76. Special Symposium: Electoral democracy in the European.
35.
FreitagM.Stadelmann-SteffenI. (2010). Stumbling block or stepping stone? The influence of direct democracy on individual participation in parliamentary elections. Electoral Studies Governments, 29(3), 472–483. Special Symposium: Voters and Coalition.
36.
GalaisC.BlaisA. (2016). Do people feel more of a duty to vote in some elections?West European Politics, 39(4), 755–777.
37.
GarmannS. (2017). Election frequency, choice fatigue, and voter turnout. European Journal of Political Economy, 47, 19–35.
38.
GreenD.GerberA. (2015 September 30). Get out the vote: How to increase voter turnout. Brookings Institution Press.
39.
HanmerM.KalkanK. (2013). Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 263–277.
40.
HanrettyC. (2017). Areal interpolation and the UK’s referendum on EU membership. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 27(4), 466–483.
41.
HawkinsK. A.KaltwasserC. R.AndreadisI. (2020). The activation of populist attitudes. Government and Opposition, 55(2), 283–307.
42.
HealyA.MalhotraN. (2009). Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 387–406.
43.
HoogheL.MarksG. (2003). Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. The American Political Science Review, 97(2), 233–243.
44.
IyengarS.LelkesY.LevenduskyM.MalhotraN.WestwoodS. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146.
45.
JessenJ.KuehnleD.WagnerM. (2021). Downstream effects of voting on turnout and political preferences: Long-run evidence from the uk. Institute of Labor Economics. https://ftp.iza.org/dp14296.pdf
46.
KernA.HoogheM. (2018). The effect of direct democracy on the social stratification of political participation: Inequality in democratic fatigue?Comparative European Politics, 16(4), 724–744.
47.
KostelkaF. (2017). Does democratic consolidation lead to a decline in voter turnout? Global evidence since 1939. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 653–667.
48.
KostelkaF.BlaisA. (2021). The generational and institutional sources of the global decline in voter turnout. World Politics, 73(4), 629–667.
49.
KostelkaF.KrejcovaE.SaugerN.WuttkeA. (2023). Replication data for: Election frequency and voter turnout.
50.
KostelkaF.SinghS. P.BlaisA. (2022). Is compulsory voting a solution to low and declining turnout? Cross-National evidence since 1945. Political Science Research and Methods, 1–18. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2022.57.
51.
LaceyR. J. (2005). The electoral allure of direct democracy: The effect of initiative salience on voting, 1990–96, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 5(2), 168–181.
LeiningerA.RudolphL.ZittlauS. (2018). How to increase turnout in low-salience elections: Quasi-experimental evidence on the effect of concurrent second-order elections on political participation. Political Science Research and Methods, 6(3), 509–526.
54.
LijphartA. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.
55.
NonnemacherJ. (2021). Disengaging elections? Political interest, number of elections, and turnout in elections to the European parliament. European Union Politics, 22(3):545–565.
56.
NorrisP. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge University Press.
57.
O’NeillS.KreifN.GrieveR.SuttonM.SekhonJ. (2016). Estimating causal effects: Considering three alternatives to difference-in-differences estimation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 16, 1–21.
58.
ParvinP. (2018). Democracy without participation: A new politics for a disengaged era. Res Publica, 24(1), 31–52.
59.
PatemanC. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.
60.
PatemanC. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19.
61.
PetersY. (2016). Zero-sum democracy? The effects of direct democracy on representative participation. Political Studies, 64(3), 593–613.
62.
PlutzerE. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.
63.
PriorM. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766.
64.
RallingsC.ThrasherM.BorisyukG. (2003). Seasonal factors, voter fatigue and the costs of voting. Electoral Studies, 22(1):65–79.
65.
ReifK.SchmittH. (1980). Nine second-order national elections – A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44.
66.
RikerW. H.OrdeshookP. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62(1), 25–42.
67.
RosenstoneS. J.HansenJ. M. (1993 February 1). Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. Longman.
68.
RyanR.DeciE. (2017 February 14). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. The Guilford Press.
69.
ScarrowS. (2001). Direct democracy and institutional change: A comparative investigation. Comparative Political Studies, 34(6), 651–665.
70.
SchakelA. H.DandoyR. (2014). Electoral cycles and turnout in multilevel electoral systems. West European Politics, 37(3), 605–623.
71.
SchlozmanD.YohaiI. (2008). How initiatives don’t always make citizens: Ballot initiatives in the American states, 1978–2004. Political Behavior, 30(4), 469–489.
72.
SmetsK.van HamC. (2013). The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individuallevel research on voter turnout. Electoral Studies, 32(2), 344–359.
73.
SmithD.TolbertC. (2007). The instrumental and educative effects of ballot measures: Research on direct democracy in the American states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7(4), 416–445.
74.
StockemerD. (2017). What affects voter turnout? A review article/meta-analysis of aggregate research. Government and Opposition, 52(4), 698–722.
75.
TeixeiraR. (1992). The disappearing american voter. Brookings Institution Press.
76.
TolbertC. J.BowenD. C.DonovanT. (2009). Initiative campaigns: Direct democracy and voter mobilization. American Politics Research, 37(1), 155–192.
77.
TolbertC. J.SmithD. A. (2005). The educative effects of ballot initiatives on voter turnout. American Politics Research, 33(2), 283–309.
78.
van KlingerenM.OrozcoM.SpanjeJ.de VreeseC. (2015, March). Party financing and referendum campaigns in EU member states. European Parliament.
79.
WilsonS.ButlerD. (2007). A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications. Political Analysis, 15(2), 101–123.
80.
WlezienC. (2015). The myopic voter? The economy and US presidential elections. Electoral Studies, 39(4), 195–204.
81.
WooldridgeJ. M. (2010). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. MIT Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
