Why does government violence deter political challengers in one context but inflame them in the next? This paper argues that repression increases opposition activity at low and moderate levels but decreases it in the extreme. There is a threshold level of violence, where the opposition becomes unable to recruit new members, and the rebellion unravels—even if the government kills more innocents. We find empirical support for this proposition in disaggregated data from Chechnya and a meta-analysis of sub-national conflict dynamics in 71 countries. The data suggest that a threshold exists, but the level of violence needed to reach it varies. Many governments, thankfully, are unable or unwilling to go that far. We explore conditions under which this threshold may be higher or lower and highlight a fundamental trade-off between reducing government violence and preserving civil liberties.
BalcellsL. (2010). Rivalry and revenge: Violence against civilians in conventional civil wars1. International Studies Quarterly, 54(2), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00588.x
2.
BeissingerM. R. (2007). Structure and example in modular political phenomena: The diffusion of bulldozer/rose/orange/tulip revolutions. Perspectives on Politics, 5(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592707070776
3.
BermanE.CallenM.FelterJ. H.ShapiroJ. N. (2011). Do working men rebel? Insurgency and unemployment in Afghanistan, Iraq, and the Philippines. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55(4), 496–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002710393920
4.
BwyD. P. (1968). Political instability in Latin America: The cross-cultural test of a causal model. Latin American Research Review, 3(2), 17–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002387910002879x
5.
CarrC. (2002). The lessons of terror. Random House.
6.
ClausewitzC. V. (1832). On war. Princeton University Press.
7.
CollierP.HoefflerA. (2004). Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers New Series, 56(563), 563–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpf064
8.
ConradC. R.RitterE. H. (2013). Treaties, tenure, and torture: The conflicting domestic effects of international law. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000091
DavenportC. (2015). How social movements die. Cambridge University Press.
11.
DeNardoJ. (2014). Power in numbers: The political strategy of protest and rebellion. Princeton University Press.
12.
DownesA.CochranK. M. (2010). Targeting civilians to win? Assessing the military effectiveness of civilian victimization in interstate war. In LawrenceA.ChenowethE. (Eds.), Rethinking violence: States and non-state actors in conflict. MIT Press.
FongC.HazlettC.ImaiK. (2017). Covariate balancing propensity score for a continuous treatment: Application to the efficacy of political advertisements.
18.
FranciscoR. A. (1995). The relationship between coercion and protest an empirical evaluation in three coercive states. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002795039002003
GiblerD. M.TirJ. (2010). Settled borders and regime type: Democratic transitions as consequences of peaceful territorial transfers. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 951–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00473.x
21.
GoldsteinR. J. (2001). Political repression in modern America from 1870 to 1976. University of Illinois Press.
22.
GuardabascioB.VenturaM. (2013). Estimating the dose-response function through the glm approach.
23.
GurrT. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton University Press.
GurrT. R.LichbachM. I. (1986). Forecasting internal conflict: A competitive evaluation of empirical theories. Comparative Political Studies, 19(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414086019001001
26.
Headquarters, Department of the Army (2014). Insurgencies and countering insurgencies, field manual No. 3-24. Headquarters, Department of the Army.
27.
HeathJ. A.MasonT. D.SmithW. T.WeingartenJ. P. (2000). The calculus of fear: Revolution, repression, and the rational peasant. Social Science Quarterly, 81(2), 622–633.
HegreH.EllingsenT.GatesS.GleditschN. P. (2001). Toward a democratic civil peace? Democracy, political change, and civil war, 1816–1992. American Political Science Review, 95(01), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401000119
30.
HibbsD. A. (1973). Mass political violence, volume 253. John Wiley.
31.
HillF. (2013). The real reason putin supports assad: Mistaking Syria for chechnya. Foreign Affairs.
32.
HiranoK.ImbensG. W. (2004). The propensity score with continuous treatments. Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives, 226164, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470090456.ch7
HögbladhS.PetterssonT.ThemnérL. (2011). External support in armed conflict 1975–2009. Presenting new data. In: Paper Presented at the 52nd Annual International Studies Association Convention, Montreal, Canada, 16–19 March 2011.
35.
ImaiK.RatkovicM.GotoA.GotoM.KishimotoM.Yamamoto-HondaR.NotoH.KajioH.NodaM. (2014). Robust estimation of inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(511), 00–00. https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-6-110
36.
ImbensG. W. (2000). The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions. Biometrika, 87(3), 706–710. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/87.3.706
37.
KalyvasS. N. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
38.
KalyvasS. N.KocherM. A. (2007). How ‘free’ is free-riding in civil war? Violence, insurgency, and the collective action problem. World Politics, 59(2), 177–216. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2007.0023
39.
KazarinP. (2014). Chechenskie uroki dlya ukrainy [Chechen lessons for Ukraine]. LB.ua.
40.
KhawajaM. (1993). Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the west bank. In Sociological forum (Vol. 8, pp. 47–71). Springer.
41.
KilcullenD. (2009). The accidental guerrilla: Fighting Small wars in the midst of a big one. Oxford University Press.
42.
KimH. M.RousseauD. L. (2013). The reciprocal relationship between military conflict and democracy. Defence and Peace Economics, 24(1), 47–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2012.663580
LangerW. L. (1969). Political and social upheaval, 1832–1852. Number v. 14 in Rise of modern Europe. Harper & Row.
45.
LichbachM. I. (1987). Deterrence or escalation? The puzzle of aggregate studies of repression and dissent. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31(2), 266–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002787031002003
46.
LupuY. (2015). Legislative veto players and the effects of international human rights agreements. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12178
47.
LyallJ. (2009). Does indiscriminate violence incite insurgent attacks? Evidence from chechnya. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708330881
48.
LyallJ. (2010). Are coethnics more effective counterinsurgents? Evidence from the second Chechen war. American Political Science Review, 104(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409990323
49.
MarshallM. G.JaggersK. (2002). Polity iv project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2002.
50.
MasonT. D. (1996). Insurgency, counterinsurgency, and the rational peasant. Pubic Choice, 86(1/2), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00114875
51.
MasonT. D.KraneD. A. (1989). The political economy of death squads: Toward a theory of the impact of state-sanctioned terror. International Studies Quarterly, 33(2), 175. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600536
MeierV.KarlénN.PetterssonT.CroicuM. (2022). External support in armed conflicts: Introducing the UCDP external support dataset (ESD), 1975–2017. Journal of Peace Research, 00223433221079864. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433221079864
54.
MullerE. N.SeligsonM. A. (1987). Inequality and insurgency. American Political Science Review, 81(2), 425–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961960
55.
NaglJ. A. (2002). Learning to eat soup with a knife: Counterinsurgency lessons from Malaya and Vietnam.
56.
OlivierJ. L. (1991). State repression and collective action in South Africa, 1970–84. South African Journal of Surgery. Suid-afrikaanse Tydskrif Vir Chirurgie, 22(4), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580144.1991.10431942
57.
OppK.-D.RoehlW. (1990). Repression, micromobilization, and political protest. Social Forces, 69(2), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579672
58.
PemsteinD.MarquardtK. L.TzelgovE.WangY.-t.KrusellJ.MiriF. (2018). The v-dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data (3rd ed.). University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute. Working Paper No. 21.
RaleighC.LinkeA.HegreH.KarlsenJ. (2010). Introducing ACLED: An armed conflict location and event dataset special data feature. Journal of Peace Research, 47(5), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310378914
61.
RaslerK. (1996). Concessions, repression, and political protest in the Iranian revolution. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 132–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096410
62.
RaslerK.ThompsonW. R. (2004). The democratic peace and a sequential, reciprocal, causal arrow hypothesis. Comparative Political Studies, 37(8), 879–908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004267980
RitterE. H. (2014). Policy disputes, political survival, and the onset and severity of state repression. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712468724
SalehyanI.HendrixC. S.HamnerJ.CaseC.LinebargerC.StullE.WilliamsJ. (2012). Social conflict in Africa: A new database. International Interactions, 38(4), 503–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2012.697426
67.
SaxtonG.BensonM. (2008). Means, motives and opportunities in ethno-nationalist mobilization. International Interactions, 34(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050620701883546
68.
SchrodtP. A.UlfelderJ. (2016). Political instability task force atrocities event data collection, version 1.1b1.
69.
SiegelD. A. (2011). When does repression work? Collective action in social networks. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 993–1010. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611000727
SingerJ. D.SmallM. (1994). Correlates of war project: International and civil war data, 1816–1992 (ICpsr 9905). Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
72.
SmithR. (2007). The utility of force: The art of war in the modern world. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
73.
SundbergR.MelanderE. (2013). Introducing the ucdp georeferenced event dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 50(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313484347
74.
ThompsonR. S. (1966). Defeating communist insurgency. Praeger.
75.
TillyC. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Addison-Wesley.
76.
TillyC. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In EvansP. B.RueschemeyerD.SkocpolT. (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 169–191).
77.
ToftM. D.ZhukovY. M. (2015). Islamists and nationalists: Rebel motivation and counterinsurgency in Russia’s north caucasus. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 222–238. https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305541500012x
78.
TrinquierR. (1961). La Guerre moderne. La Table Ronde.
79.
TysonS. A. (2018). The agency problem underlying repression. Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1297–1310. https://doi.org/10.1086/698887
80.
WeinsteinJ. (2007). Inside rebellion: The politics of insurgent violence. Cambridge University Press.
81.
WeylandK. (2010). The diffusion of regime contention in European democratization, 1830–1940. Comparative Political Studies, 43(8/9), 1148–1176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010370439
82.
YoungJ. K. (2009). State capacity, democracy, and the violation of personal integrity rights. Journal of Human Rights, 8(4), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754830903324712
ZhukovY. M.DavenportC.KostyukN. (2019). Introducing xsub: A new portal for cross-national data on sub-national violence. Journal of Peace Research, 56(4), 604–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343319836697
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
