Why do criminal actors publicly display threatening messages? Studies of organized crime emphasize that criminal actors rely on clandestine networks of influence. Subtle or coded threats are an effective means of extending that influence, but publicizing these threats appears to undermine their chief advantage. We argue that publicized threats broadcast an imagined order, delineating who has a place in society under criminal control, and who does not. To demonstrate this argument, we construct a “grammar of threat” and use this to analyze public threats broadcast by four criminal actors: two groups in Colombia and two in Mexico. The analysis demonstrates that every group projects an order through their threats, but that the order imagined varies by group. Some orders are more clearly ideological; some are more localized or more expansive. These findings highlight the important role of communication—distinct from but often combined with violence—in criminal governance.
Álvarez-RodríguezI. M. (2021). The moral economy of drug trafficking: Armed civilians and Mexico’s violence and crime. Latin American Perspectives, 48(1), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X20982941
2.
Álvarez VanegasE.LlorenteM. V.Cajiao VélezA.GarzónV. J. C. (2017). Crimen organizado y saboteadores armados en tiempos de transición: Radiografía necesaria. Fundación Ideas Para La Paz. http://www.ideaspaz.org/publications/posts/1539
3.
AlvesJ. A. (2016). ‘Blood in reasoning’: State violence, contested territories and black criminal agency in urban Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies, 48(1), 61–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X15000838
4.
AndersonB. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
5.
AriasE. D. (2017). Criminal enterprises and governance in Latin America and the Caribbean. Cambridge University Press.
6.
ArlacchiP. (1986). Mafia business: The Mafia ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Verso.
7.
AtuestaL. (2016). Un analisis de la evolucion del crimen organizado en Mexico a traves de los narcomensajes. Centro de Investigacion y Docencia Economicas.
8.
BadilloR.MijaresV. M. (2021). Politicised crime: Causes for the discursive politicisation of organised crime in Latin America. Global Crime, 22(4), 312–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2021.2024804
9.
BarnesN. (2021). The logic of criminal territorial control: Military intervention in Rio de Janeiro. Comparative Political Studies, 55(5), 789–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211036035
10.
BlumeL. R. (2017). “The old rules no longer apply”: Explaining narco-assassinations of Mexican politicians. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 9(1), 59–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X1700900103
11.
BlumeL. R. (2021). Narco Robin hoods: Community support for illicit economies and violence in rural central America. World Development, 143. 105464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105464
12.
BlumeL. R. (2022). Collusion, Co-Optation, or Evasion: The politics of drug trafficking violence in Central America. Comparative political studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211066218
BurkeK. (1945). A grammar of motives. University of California Press.
16.
CockayneJ. (2016). Hidden power: The strategic logic of organized crime. Oxford University Press.
17.
Correa-CabreraG. (2017). Los Zetas Inc.: Criminal corporations, energy, and civil war in Mexico. University of Texas Press.
18.
CruzJ. M.Duran-MartinezA. (2016). Hiding violence to deal with the state: Criminal pacts in El Salvador and Medellin. Journal of Peace Research, 53(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343315626239
19.
DalyS. Z. (2017). Organized violence after civil war: The geography of recruitment in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
20.
Denyer WillisG. (2015). The killing consensus: Police, organized crime, and the regulation of life and death in Urban Brazil. University of California Press.
21.
DudleyS. (2011). The Zetas in Guatemala. Insight Crime.
22.
Duran-MartinezA. (2018). The politics of drug violence: Criminals, Cops and politicians in Colombia and Mexico. Oxford University Press.
23.
ErnstF. (2015). Legitimacy matters: Los Caballeros templarios and the mutation of Mexican organized crime. Journal of Money Laundering, 18(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-10-2014-0037
24.
ErnstF. (2018). ‘The training stays with you’: The elite Mexican soldiers recruited by Cartels. The Guardian.
Farfán-MéndezC. (2019). The structure of drug-trafficking organizations and money laundering practices: A risk appetite hypothesis. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1(3), 294–311. http://doi.org/10.31389/jied.1
27.
FontesA. W. (2018). Mortal doubt: Transnational gangs and social order in Guatemala city. University of California Press.
28.
FujiiL. A. (2021). Show time: The logic and power of violent display(M. Finnemore, Ed.). Cornell University Press.
29.
GambettaD. (1995). The Sicilian mafia: The business of private protection. Harvard University Press.
30.
GambettaD. (2009). Codes of the underworld: How criminals communicate. Princeton University Press.
31.
GilloolyS. (2020). Indigenous social movements and political institutionalization: A comparative case study. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 8(5), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2019.1629306
32.
GilloolyS. (2021). Who’s an expert? Leveraging trauma as expertise in peacebuilding movements. St Antony’s International Review, 16(2), 271–288.
33.
GilloolyS. (2022). Legacies of political violence and voter behavior in Colombia. Journal of Peacebuilding and Development, 17(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166211015149
34.
GoldsteinD. M. (2004). The spectacular city: Violence and performance in Urban Bolivia. Duke University Press.
35.
Gutiérrez SanínF. (2004). Criminal rebels? A discussion of civil war and criminality from the Colombian experience. Politics and Society, 32(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204263074
36.
Gutiérrez SanínF.WoodE. J. (2014). Ideology in civil war: Instrumental adoption and beyond. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313514073
HristovJ. (2009). Blood and capital: The paramilitarization of Colombia. Ohio University Press.
39.
Human Rights Clinic. (2017). “Control… over the entire state of Coahuila.” an analysis of Testimonies in Trials against Zeta members in san Antonio, Austin, and del Rio, Texas. Human Rights Clinic, University of Texas School of Law.
40.
JaffeR. (2013). The hybrid state: Crime and citizenship in urban Jamaica. American Ethnologist, 40(4), 734–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12051
41.
JohnsonP. L. (2019). The crime and state terrorism Nexus: How organized crime appropriates counterinsurgency violence. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(6), 16–26.
KalyvasS. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
46.
KearnsE. M. (2021). When to take credit for terrorism? A Cross-national examination of claims and Attributions. Terrorism and Political Violence, 33(1), 164–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2018.1540982
Kloppe-SantamaríaG. (2020). In the Vortex of violence: Lynching, extralegal justice, and the state in post-revolutionary Mexico. University of California Press.
LasswellH. (2014). The structure and function of communication in society. In MillsB.BarlowD. (Eds.), Reading media theory (2nd ed., pp. 125–153). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315832975-17
52.
Le Cour GrandmaisonR. (2016). “Vigilar y Limpiar”: Identification and self-Help justice-making in Michoacán, Mexico. Politix, 115(3), 103–125. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.115.0103
LessingB.Denyer WillisG. (2019). Legitimacy in criminal governance: Managing a drug empire from behind Bars. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 584–606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000928
MagaloniB.Franco-VivancoE.MeloV. (2020). Killing in the Slums: Social order, criminal governance, and police violence in Rio de Janeiro. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000856
PhillipsB. (2018). Terrorist tactics by criminal organizations: The Mexican case in context. Perspectives on Terrorism, 12(1), 46–63.
64.
PhillipsB.RíosV. (2020). Narco-Messages: Competition and public communication by criminal groups. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2019.43
SchellingT. (1971). What is the business of organized crime?The American Scholar, 40(4), 643–652.
69.
SchmidA. (2012). The revised academic consensus definition of terrorism. Perspectives on Terrorism, 6(2), 158–159.
70.
SchulzP. (2020). Male survivors of wartime sexual violence: Perspectives from northern Uganda. In Male survivors of wartime sexual violence. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520972865
71.
ShenkJ. L. (2021). Consultations and competing claims: Implementing participatory institutions in Colombia’s extractives industries. Comparative Politics, 55(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041522X16358097946287
72.
SmithB. T. (2021). The dope: The real history of the Mexican drug trade. W. W. Norton & Company.
73.
TaussigM. (2005). Law in a lawless land: Diary of a Limpieza in Colombia. University of Chicago Press.
Uribe AlarcónM. V. (2018). Antropología de la inhumanidad: Un ensayo interpretativo sobre el terror en Colombia. Ediciones Uniandes.
78.
VareseF. (2011). Mafias on the move: How organized crime conquers new territories. Princeton University Press.
79.
ZulverJ. M. (2021a). The endurance of women’s mobilization during “patriarchal backlash”: A case from Colombia’s reconfiguring armed conflict. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 23(3), 440–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2021.1901061
80.
ZulverJ. M. (2021b). Asociación de Mujeres Afro por la Paz: Feminism with the body and face of a woman. Latin American Perspectives, 48(4), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X211020742
81.
ZulverJ. M. (2022). High-risk feminism in Colombia: Women’s mobilization in violent contexts. Rutgers University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
