Government services act as important sites of political socialization. Through interactions with the state individuals learn lessons about their value as citizens, form preferences over government services, and understand the value of political participation. What happens when the private sector replaces government provision of basic services? I explore this question in the context of a randomized private school voucher experiment in India. Based on an original household survey of 1200 households, and semi-structured interviews conducted 5 years after the voucher lottery, I find that voucher winning households hold stronger market-oriented beliefs. However, voucher winning households show little difference in political participation on most measures of political participation. I argue that these results are driven by a greater comfort with private providers as permanent economic actors. This suggests exposure to different economic actors, in the form of private schools, have the potential to change political preferences.
AbernathyS. F. (2005). School choice and the future of American democracy. University of Michigan Press.
2.
AndersonM. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the abecedarian, perry preschool, and early training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841
3.
AndrabiT.DasJ.Ijaz KhwajaA.ZajoncT. (2006). Religious school enrollment in Pakistan: A look at the data. Comparative Education Review, 50(3), 446–477. https://doi.org/10.1086/503885
4.
AnsellB. W. (2010). From the ballot to the blackboard: The redistributive political economy of education. Cambridge University Press.
5.
ASER (2017). Annual status of education report (rural) 2016. Annual Status of Education Report ASER Centre.
6.
ASER (2019). ASER report 2018. Technical report.
7.
AuerbachA. M.Kruks-WisnerG. (2020). The geography of citizenship practice: How the poor engage the state in rural and urban India. Perspectives on Politics, 18(4), 1118–1134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720000043
8.
AuerbachA. M. (2016). Clients and communities: The political economy of party network organization and developmenet in India’s urban slums. World Politics, 68(01), 111–148. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887115000313
BanerjeeA.BanerjiR.BerryJ.DufloE.KannanH.MukerjiS.ShotlandM.WaltonM. (2017). From proof of concept to scalable policies: Challenges and solutions, with an application. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(4), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.4.73
BanerjiR.MukherjeeA. N. (2008). Achieving universal elementary education in India: Future strategies for ensuring access, quality and finance. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/097380100800200204
13.
BerenschotW. (2010). Everyday mediation: The politics of public service delivery in Gujarat, India: Everyday mediation: Public service delivery in Gujarat. Development and Change, 41(5), 883–905. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01660.x
BleckJ. (2015). Education and empowered citizenship in Mali. Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
BoldT.KimenyiM.MwabuG.SandefurJ. (2015). Can free provision reduce demand for public services? Evidence from Kenyan education. The World Bank Economic Review, 29(2), 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lht038
17.
BouldingC. (2014). NGOs, political protest, and civil society. Cambridge University Press.
BussellJ. (2012). Explaining corruption: Electoral competition and varieties of rent-seeking in India. Working Paper Brow University.
20.
CammettM. C.IssarS. (2010). Bricks and mortar clientelism: Sectarianism and the logics of welfare allocation in Lebanon. World Politics, 62(3), 381–421. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887110000080
21.
CammettM. C.MacLeanL. M. (2011). Introduction: The political consequences of non-state social welfare in the global South. Studies in Comparative International Development, 46(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-010-9083-7
22.
CampbellA. L. (2003). How policies make citizens: Senior political activism and the American welfare state. Princeton University Press.
CarlsonD.ChingosM. M.CampbellD. E. (2016). The effect of private school vouchers on political participation: Experimental evidence from New York city. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(3), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1256458
25.
ClarkJ. (2004). Islam, social welfare, and the middle class: Networks, activism, and charity in Egypt, Yemen and Jordan. Indiana University Press.
26.
CohenJ.DupasP. (2010). Free distribution or cost-sharing? Evidence from a randomized malaria prevention experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.1.1
27.
CookJ. B.KoganV.LavertuS.PeskowitzZ. (2020). Government privatization and political participation: The case of charter schools. Journal of Politics, 82(1), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/705818
28.
CorbridgeS.WilliamsG.SrivastavaM.VeronR. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge University Press.
29.
CrokeK.GrossmanG.LarreguyH. A.MarshallJ. (2016). Deliberate disengagement: How education decreases political participation in electoral authoritarian regimes. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000253
30.
DaviesE. (2022). Replication data for: The lessons private schools teach: Using a field experiment to understand the effects of private services on political behavior. Comparative Political Studies Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TDUVCJ
31.
DeAngelisC.WolfP. (2019). Will democracy endure private school choice? The effect of the milwaukee parental choice program on adult voting behavior. The Journal of Private Enterprise, 34(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3177517
DeiningerK.LiuY. (2012). Evaluating program impacts on mature self-help groups in India. The World Bank Economic Review, 27(2), 272–296. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhs028
34.
DesaiS.VannemanR. (2018). India human development survey-II (IHDS-II), 2011-12. Technical report Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
35.
DillJ. S. (2009). Preparing for public life: School sector and the educational context of lasting citizen formation. Social Forces, 87(3), 1265–1290. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0159
36.
DixonP.EgaliteA. J.HumbleS.WolfP. J. (2019) Experimental results from a four-year targeted education voucher program in the slums of Delhi, India. World Development, 124, 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104644
DufloE.DupasP.KremerM. (2015). School governance, teacher incentives, and pupil–teacher ratios: Experimental evidence from Kenyan primary schools. Journal of Public Economics, 123, 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.11.008
39.
EarleJ. S.GehlbachS. (2003). A spoonful of sugar: Privatization and popular support for reform in the Czech republic. Economics and Politics, 15(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00113
40.
FlemingD. J. (2014). Learning from schools: School choice, political learning, and policy feedback. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12042
41.
GingrichJ. R. (2011). Making markets in the welfare state: The politics of varying market reforms. Cambridge University Press.
42.
Government of India (2009). The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009. No. 35 of 2009. 26 August, 2009.
43.
GuptaA. (2012). Red tape: Bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Duke University Press.
44.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
45.
HsiehC.-T.UrquiolaM. (2006). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile’s voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1477–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.11.002
46.
HsuehR.Refsum JenseniusF.NewsomeA. (2014). Fieldwork in political science: Encountering challenges and crafting solutions. PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(02), 391–393. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096514000262
JayachandranS. (2014). Incentives to teach badly: After-school tutoring in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 108, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.02.008
49.
JefferyP.JefferyR. (2008). Money itself discriminates” obstetric crises in the time of liberalization. In GuptaA.SivaramakrishnaK. (Eds.), The state in India after liberalization: Interdisciplinary perspectives number hindess 2002. Routledge.
50.
KapurD.NangiaP. (2013). A targeted approach: India’s expanding social safety net. World Politics Review.
51.
KapurD.MukhopadhyayP.SubramanianA. (2008). The case for direct cash transfers to the poor (pp. 37–43). Economic & Political Weekly.
52.
KasaraK.SuryanarayanP. (2015). When do the rich vote less than the poor and why? Explaining turnout inequality across the world. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12134
53.
KingdonG. G.MuzammilM. (2009). A political economy of education in India: The case of Uttar Pradesh. Oxford Development Studies, 37(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810902874626
54.
KingdonG. G. (2017). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review. Discussion Paper 10612 IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
55.
KingsburyI. (2019). Silencing the seventh trumpet: Analyzing the effect of private schooling on voting behavior. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 14(3), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197918799746
56.
KohliA. (1990). Democracy and discontent: India’s growing crisis of governmentability. Cambridge University Press.
57.
KremerM.LeinoJ.MiguelE.Peterson ZwaneA. (2011). Spring cleaning: Rural water impacts, valuation, and property rights institutions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 145–205. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq010
58.
KrishnaA. (2007). Politics in the middle: Mediating relationships between citizens and the state in rural North India. In WilkinsonS. I.KitscheltH. (Eds.), Patrons, clients, and policies: Patterns of democractic accountability and political competition. Cambridge University Press.
59.
KrishnaA. (2010). One illness away: Why people become poor and how they escape poverty. Oxford University Press.
60.
Kruks-WisnerG. (2018). Claiming the state: Active citizenship and social welfare in rural India. Cambridge University Press.
61.
KumlinS. (2004). The personal and the political: How personal welfare state experiences affect political trust and ideology. Palgrave Macmillan.
62.
LermanA. E. (2019). Good Enough for Government Work: The Public Reputation Crisis in America (And What We Can Do to Fix It). The University of Chicago Press.
63.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniv ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.
64.
LucasA. M.MbitiI. M. (2012). Access, sorting, and achievement: The short-run effects of free primary education in Kenya. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 226–253. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.226
65.
LynchJ. F. (2006). Age in the welfare state. In LynchJ. (Ed), The origins of social spending on pensioners, workers, and children. Cambridge University Press.
66.
MacLeanL. M. (2011). State retrenchment and the exercise of citizenship in Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 44(9), 1238–1266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010374704
67.
ManglaA. (2015). Bureaucratic norms and state capacity in India: Implementing primary education in the himalayan region. Asian Survey, 55(5), 882–908. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2015.55.5.882
68.
MargalitY.ShayoM. (2020). How markets shape social values and political preferences: A field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12517
69.
MarshallJ. (2016). Education and voting conservative: Evidence from a major schooling reform in great britain. Journal of Politcs, 78(2), 382–395. https://doi.org/10.1086/683848
70.
MarshallJ. (2019). The anti-democrat diploma: How high school education decreases support for the democratic party. American Journal of Political Science, 63(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12409
71.
MettlerS. (2005). Soldiers to citizens: The G.I. Bill and the making of the greatest generation. Oxford University Press.
72.
MorganK. J.CampbellA. L. (2011). The delegated welfare state: Medicare, markets, and the governance of social policy. Oxford University Press.
73.
MuralidharanK.SundararamanV. (2015). The aggregate effect of school choice: Evidence from a two-stage experiment in India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(3), 1011–1066. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv013
MuralidharanK.VenkateshS. (2011b). Teacher performance pay: Experimental evidence from India. Journal of Political Economy, 119(1), 39–77. https://doi.org/10.1086/659655
76.
NeggersY. (2018). Enfranchising your own? Experimental evidence on bureaucrat diversity and election bias in India. American Economic Review, 108(6), 1288–1321. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20170404
77.
PiersonP. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710
78.
PiersonP. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
79.
PostA.BronsolerV.SalmanL. (2018). Hybrid regimes for local public goods provision: A framework for analysis. Perspectives on Politics, 15(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592717002109
80.
PrillamanS.A. (2022). Strength in Numbers: How Women's Networks Close India's Political Gender Gap. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12651
81.
PritchettL. (2013). The rebirth of education: Schooling ain’t learning. Center for Global Development.
82.
RomeroM.SinghA. (2022). The incidence of affirmative action: Evidence from quotas in private schools in India. Technical report. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE).
83.
RomeroM.SandefurJ.Aaron SandholtzW. (2020). Outsourcing education: Experimental evidence from Liberia. American Economic Review, 110(2), 364–400. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20181478
84.
RoseD. (2018). Citizens by degree: Higher education policy and the changing gender dynamics of American citizenship. In Studies in postwar American political development. Oxford University Press.
85.
RudolphS. H.RudolphL. I. (Eds.), (1972). Education and politics in India (1st ed.). Harvard University Press.
86.
RudolphL. I.RudolphS. H. (2001). Iconisation of chandrababu: Sharing sovereignty in India’s federal market economy. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(18), 1541–1552. https://doi.org/10.2307/4410579
87.
RudraN. (2002). Globalization and the decline of the welfare state in less-developed countries. International Organization, 56(2), 411–445. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081802320005522
88.
ScottJ. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
89.
SossJ. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. The American Political Science Review, 93(2), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585401
90.
SteinmoS. (2015). Historical institutionalism and experimental methods. In FioretosO.FalletiT.sheingateA. (Eds.), Oxford handbook on historical institutionalism (pp. 1–17). Oxford University Press.
91.
ThachilT. (2009). Neoliberalism’s two faces in Asia: Globalization, educational policies, and religious schooling in India, Pakistan, and Malaysia. Comparative Politics, 41(4), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041509X12911362972593
92.
ThachilT. (2011). Embedded mobilization: Nonstate service provision as electoral strategy in India. World Politics, 63(03), 434–469. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887111000116
93.
ThachilT. (2014a). Elite parties and poor voters: Theory and evidence from India. American Political Science Review, 108(02), 454–477. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000069
94.
ThachilT.(2014b). Elite parties, poor voters: How social services win votes in India. Cambridge University Press.
95.
ThachilT. (2017). Do rural migrants divide ethnically in the city? Evidence from an ethnographic experiment in India. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 908–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12315
96.
WantchekonL.NovtaN.KlasnjaM. (2014). Education and human capital externalities: Evidence from colonial Benin. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 703–757. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv004
97.
WeinerM. (1990). The child and the state in India. Princeton University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
