Although many countries meet electoral standards of democracy, often these regimes fail to promote social inclusion or meaningful representation. We argue that systems of exclusion have deleterious consequences for how people think about democracy, undermining tolerance for political dissent. Using cross-national public opinion data together with contextual measures of economic and political marginalization along ethnoracial lines, we evaluate the relationships between exclusion and political tolerance across Latin America. Over-time analysis in Bolivia further probes the mechanisms linking exclusion to intolerance. We find that tolerance of dissent is depressed where ethnoracial hierarchies are pronounced. We advance understanding of oft-unexplained society-level differences in political tolerance and emphasize the importance of the macro-structural context in shaping citizens’ commitments to basic democratic rights.
AberbachJ. D.WalkerJ. L. (1970). Political trust and racial ideology. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1199–1219.
2.
AcemogluD.García-JimenoC.RobinsonJ. A. (2012). Finding Eldorado: Slavery and long-run development in Colombia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40(4), 534–564.
3.
AlbertiC. (2019). Populist multiculturalism in the Andes: Balancing political control and societal autonomy. Comparative Politics, 52(1), 43–63.
4.
AlesinaA.BaqirR.EasterlyW. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(4), 1243–1284.
5.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
6.
AnriaS. (2018). When movements become parties: The Bolivian MAS in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
7.
AslamA. (2017). Ordinary democracy: Sovereignty and citizenship beyond the neoliberal impasse. Oxford University Press.
8.
BaldwinK.HuberJ. D. (2010). Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review, 104(4), 644–662.
9.
BarrónM. (2008). Exclusion and discrimination as sources of inter-ethnic inequality in Peru. Economía, 31(61), 51–80.
10.
BloomeD. (2014). Racial inequality trends and the intergenerational persistence of income and family structure. American Sociological Review, 79(6), 1196–1225.
11.
BoboL.GilliamF. D. (1990). Race, sociopolitical participation, and Black empowerment. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 377–393.
12.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 62(3), 465–480.
13.
BoothJ.SeligsonM. A. (2009). The legitimacy puzzle in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
14.
CalarcoJ. M. (2014). Coached for the classroom: Parents’ cultural transmission and children’s reproduction of educational inequalities. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 1015–1037.
15.
CaldwellK. (2007). Negras in Brazil: Re-envisioning Black women, citizenship, and the politics of identity. Rutgers University Press.
16.
CarlinR. E.SingerM. M.ZechmeisterE. J. (Eds.). (2015). The Latin American voter: Pursuing representation and accountability in challenging contexts. University of Michigan Press.
17.
ClealandD. P. (2017). The power of race in Cuba: Racial ideology and Black consciousness during the revolution. Oxford University Press.
18.
CohenE. F. (2009). Semi-citizenship in democratic politics. Cambridge University Press.
19.
ContrerasD. A. (2016). Exit over voice in Dominican ethnoracial politics. Latin American Research Review, 51(3), 202–226.
20.
CooksonT. P. (2018). Unjust conditions: Women’s work and the hidden cost of cash transfer programs. University of California Press.
Correa AsteN.RoopnaraineT. (2014). Pueblos indígenas y programas de transferencias condicionadas. BID.
23.
CruikshankB. (1999). The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. Cornell University Press.
24.
DawsonM. C. (1995). Behind the mule: Race and class in African-American politics. Princeton University Press.
25.
De MicheliD. (2019). Back to Black: Racial reclassification and political identity formation in Brazil (Doctoral dissertation). Cornell University.
26.
DouglassF. (1955). The lessons of the hour. In FonerP. S. (Ed.), The life and writings of Frederick Douglass, vol. iv: Reconstruction and after (pp. 491–523). International Publishers.
27.
DuchR. M.GibsonJ. L. (1992). Putting up with fascists in western Europe: A comparative, cross-level analysis of political tolerance. Western Political Quarterly, 45(1), 237–273.
28.
EastonD.DennisJ. (1969). Children in the political system: Origins of political legitimacy. McGraw-Hill.
29.
FearonJ. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 195–222.
30.
FischerR.HankeK.SibleyC. G. (2012). Cultural and institutional determinants of social dominance orientation. Political Psychology, 33(4), 437–467.
31.
Freedom House. (2018). Freedom in the world 2018 (tech. rep.). Freedom House.
32.
GandelmanN.ÑopoH.RipaniL. (2011). Traditional excluding forces: A review of the quantitative literature on the economic situation of Indigenous peoples, Afro-descendants, and people living with disability. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(4), 147–179.
33.
GibsonJ. L. (1992). Alternative measures of political tolerance: Must tolerance be “leastliked”?American Journal of Political Science, 36(2), 560–577.
34.
GibsonJ. L. (2003). The legacy of apartheid: Racial differences in the legitimacy of democratic institutions and processes in the new South Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 36(7), 772–800.
35.
GibsonJ. L. (2006). Enigmas of intolerance. Perspectives on Politics, 4(1), 21–34.
36.
GolebiowskaE. A. (1999). Gender gap in political tolerance. Political Behavior, 21(1), 43–66.
37.
GonzálezY. M. (2020). Authoritarian police in democracy: Contested security in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
38.
HadlerM. (2012). The influence of world societal forces on social tolerance. Sociological Quarterly, 53(2), 211–237.
39.
HaleC. R. (2002). Does multiculturalism menace? governance, cultural rights and the politics of identity in Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies, 34(3), 485–524.
40.
HallG. H.PatrinosH. A. (2012). Indigenous peoples, poverty, and development. Cambridge University Press.
41.
HanchardM. G. (1994). Orpheus and power:The movimento negro of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil 1945-1988. Princeton University Press.
42.
HookerJ. (2005). Indigenous inclusion/Black exclusion: Race, ethnicity and multicultural citizenship in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies, 37(2), 285–310.
43.
HookerJ. (2017). Theorizing race in the Americas: Douglass, Sarmiento, Du Bois, and Vasconcelos. Oxford University Press.
44.
HouleC. (2017). Inequality, ethnic diversity, and redistribution. Journal of Economic Inequality, 15(1), 1–23.
45.
HtunM. (2016). Inclusion without representation in Latin America: Gender quotas and ethnic reservations. Cambridge University Press.
46.
HuberE.StephensJ. D. (2012). Democracy and the left: Social policy and inequality in Latin America. University of Chicago Press.
47.
HunterW.SugiyamaN. B. (2014). Transforming subjects into citizens: Insights from Brazil’s Bolsa Família. Perspectives on Politics, 12(4), 829–845.
48.
JohnsonM. (2020a). Electoral discrimination: The relationship between skin color and vote buying in Latin America. World Politics, 72(1), 80–120.
49.
JohnsonM. (2020b). Fluidity, phenotype and Afro-Latin group consciousness. Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics, 5(2), 1–28.
50.
KellyN. J. (2020). America’s inequality trap. University of Chicago Press.
51.
KirchnerA.FreitagM.RappC. (2011). Crafting tolerance: The role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. European Political Science Review, 3(2), 201–227.
52.
KitscheltH.HawkinsK. A.LunaJ. P.RosasG.ZechmeisterE. J. (2010). Latin American party systems. Cambridge University Press.
53.
KrögerM.LalanderR. (2016). Ethno-territorial rights and the resource extraction boom in Latin America: Do constitutions matter?Third World Quarterly, 37(4), 682–702.
54.
LeeT. (2008). Race, immigration, and the identity-to-politics link. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 457–478.
55.
LermanA. E.WeaverV. M. (2014). Arresting citizenship: The democratic consequences of American crime control. University of Chicago Press.
56.
LevinS.SidaniusJ.RabinowitzJ. L.FedericoC. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19(2), 373–404.
57.
LevittB. S. (2015). Discrimination and the distrust of democratic institutions in Latin America. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3(3), 417–437.
58.
LovemanM. (2014). National colors: Racial classification and the state in Latin America. Oxford University Press.
59.
LuceroJ. A. (2008). Struggles of voice: The politics of Indigenous representation in the Andes. University of Pittsburgh Press.
60.
LunaJ. P. (2014). Segmented representation: Political party strategies in unequal democracies. Oxford University Press.
61.
MachineaJ. L.BárcenaA.LeónA. (2005). Objetivos de desarrollo del milenio: Una mirada desde américa latina y el caribe. CEPAL.
62.
MadridR. L. (2012). The rise of ethnic politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
63.
ManciniL.StewartF.BrownG. K. (2008). Approaches to the measurement of horizontal inequalities. In StewartF. (Ed.), Horizontal inequalities and conflict (pp. 85–101). Palgrave Macmillan.
64.
MarcusG. E.Theiss-MorseE.SullivanJ. L.WoodS. L. (1995). With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge University Press.
65.
Marquart-PyattS.PaxtonP. (2007). In principle and in practice: Learning political tolerance in eastern and western Europe. Political Behavior, 29(1), 89–113.
66.
McClainP. D.Johnson CarewJ. D.WaltonE.WattsC. S. (2009). Group membership, group identity, and group consciousness: Measures of racial identity in American politics?Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 471–485.
67.
McLarenL. M. (2012). The cultural divide in Europe: Migration, multiculturalism, and political trust. World Politics, 64(2), 199–241.
68.
MettlerS.SossJ. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2(1), 55–73.
69.
MilerK. C. (2018). Poor representation: Congress and the politics of poverty in the United States. Cambridge University Press.
70.
MillerA. H.GurinP.GurinG.MalanchukO. (1981). Group consciousness and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 494–511.
71.
MillsC. W. (1997). The racial contract. Cornell University Press.
72.
Mitchell-WalthourG. L. (2018). The politics of blackness: Racial identity and political behavior in contemporary Brazil. Cambridge University Press.
73.
Moraes SilvaG.de Souza LeãoL. T. (2012). O paradoxo da mistura. identidades, desigualdades e percepção de discriminação entre brasileiros pardos. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 27(80), 117–133.
74.
MorganJ.KellyN. J. (2013). Market inequality and redistribution in Latin America and the Caribbean. The Journal of Politics, 3, 672–685.
75.
MorganJ.KellyN. J. (2017). Social patterns of inequality, partisan competition, and Latin American support for redistribution. The Journal of Politics, 79(1), 193–209.
76.
MorganJ.KellyN. J. (2021). Replication data for: Inequality, exclusion, and tolerance for political dissent in Latin America. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OSISYZ
77.
MorganJ.MeléndezC. (2017). Parties under stress: Using a linkage decay framework to analyze the Chilean party system. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 8(3), 25–59.
78.
NelsonT. E.ClawsonR. A.OxleyZ. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567–583.
79.
ParedesM. (2015). Representación política indígena. Jurado Nacional de Elecciones.
80.
PaschelT. S. (2016). Becoming Black political subjects: Movements and ethno-racial rights in Colombia and Brazil. Princeton University Press.
81.
PeffleyM.RohrschneiderR. (2003). Democratization and political tolerance in seventeen countries: A multi-level model of democratic learning. Political Research Quarterly, 56(3), 243–257.
82.
PemsteinD.MarquardtK. L.TzelgovE.WangY.-t.MedzihorskyJ.KrusellJ.MiriF.RomerJ. (2020). The V-Dem measurement model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data (tech. rep.). V-Dem Working Paper Series 2020:21.
83.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751.
84.
PonceJ. (2006). Más allá de los promedios: Afrodescendientes en américa latina-los afroecuatorianos. The World Bank.
85.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763.
86.
PrattoF.TatarD. G.Conway-LanzS. (1999). Who gets what and why: Determinants of social allocations. Political Psychology, 20(1), 127–150.
87.
PyattG. (1976). On the interpretation and disaggregation of gini coefficients. The Economic Journal, 86(342), 243–255.
88.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). SAGE.
89.
RousseauS.EwigC. (2017). Latin America’s left-turn and the political empowerment of Indigenous women. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 24(4), 425–451.
90.
SanchezG. R.VargasE. D. (2016). Taking a closer look at group identity: The link between theory and measurement of group consciousness and linked fate. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 160–174.
91.
ShapiroI. (1999). Democratic justice. Yale University Press.
92.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
93.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF.Van LaarC.LevinS. (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25(6), 845–880.
94.
SilverB. D.DowleyK. M. (2000). Measuring political culture in multiethnic societies: Reaggregating the World Values Survey. Comparative Political Studies, 33(4), 517–550.
95.
SlaughterC. (2020). No strangers to hardship: African Americans, inequality, and the politics of resilience. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. APSA.
96.
SnidermanP. M.TetlockP. E.GlaserJ. M.GreenD. P.HoutM. (1989). Principled tolerance and the American mass public. British Journal of Political Science, 19(1), 25–45.
97.
SoltF. (2020). Measuring income inequality across countries and over time: The standardized world income inequality database. Social Science Quarterly, 101(3), 1183–1199.
98.
SteenbergenM. R.JonesB. S. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218–237.
99.
SullivanJ. L.PieresonJ.MarcusG. E. (1982). Political tolerance and American democracy. University of Chicago Press.
100.
TateK. (1994). From protest to politics: The new Black voters in American elections. Harvard University Press.
101.
TellesE. (2014). Pigmentocracies: Ethnicity, race, and color in Latin America. University of North Carolina Press.
102.
TillyC. (1998). Durable inequality. University of California Press.
103.
TwineF. W. (1998). Racism in a racial democracy: The maintenance of white supremacy in Brazil. Rutgers University Press.
104.
ValdiviaN.BenavidesM.ToreroM. (2007). Exclusión, identidad étnica y políticas de inclusión social en el Perú. Investigación, políticas y desarrollo en el Perú, 1, 603–667.
105.
Van CottD. L. (2000). The friendly liquidation of the past: The politics of diversity in Latin America. University of Pittsburgh Press.
106.
Van CottD. L. (2005). From movements to parties in Latin America: The evolution of ethnic politics. Cambridge University Press.
107.
Van DoornM. (2014). The nature of tolerance and the social circumstances in which it emerges. Current Sociology, 62(6), 905–927.
108.
WadeP. (2010). Race and ethnicity in Latin America (2nd ed). Pluto Press.
109.
WeldonS. A. (2006). The institutional context of tolerance for ethnic minorities. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 331–349.
110.
WestK. J. (2015). Decentralization, the inclusion of ethnic citizens, and support for democracy in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 50(3), 46–70.
111.
WitkoC.MorganJ.KellyN. J.EnnsP. K. (2021). Hijacking the agenda: Economic power and political influence. Russell Sage Foundation Press.
112.
YasharD. J. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of Indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge University Press.
113.
YoungI. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
114.
ZhangT. H.BrymR. (2019). Tolerance of homosexuality in 88 countries: Education, political freedom, and liberalism. Sociological Forum, 34(2), 501–521.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
