It is commonly viewed that violence against politicians increases support for the victim’s party. We revisit this conjecture drawing on evidence from an assassination of an opposition politician in Poland. First, we analyze engagement with Twitter content posted by opposition and government politicians using a difference-in-differences framework. Second, we use a public opinion survey collected in the days around the attack and compare party preferences of respondents interviewed just before and respondents interviewed just after the attack. Our results reveal decreased support for the victim’s (opposition) party relative to support for the government. To explain this finding, we show that the opposition antagonized the public by engaging in negative campaigning against the government over their politician’s assassination. Content analysis of tweets and news media confirms that citizens punished the opposition for their negative campaigning after the violence. Tentative evidence suggests that these effects could have had long-run political consequences.
AlesinaA.PiccoloS.PinottiP. (2019). Organized crime, violence, and politics. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(2), 457–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy036.
2.
AppletonS. (2000). The polls–trends assassinations. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1086/318642.
3.
BakerW. D.OnealJ. R. (2001). Patriotism or opinion leadership? The nature and origins of the “rally’ round the flag” effect. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(5), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002701045005006.
4.
BalcellsL.Torrats-EspinosaG. (2018). Using a natural experiment to estimate the electoral consequences of terrorist attacks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 115(42), 10624–10629. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800302115.
5.
BarberáP.2016. Less is more? How demographic sample weights can improve public opinion estimates based on Twitter data. Working Paper.
6.
BarberáP.AndreuC.NaglerJ.PatrickEganJBonneauR.JostJ. T.TuckerJ. A. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883–901.
7.
Ben-YehudaN. (1993). Political assassinations by Jews: A rhetorical device for justice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
8.
BoveV.EfthyvoulouG.PickardH. (2021). Did terrorism affect voting in the Brexit referendum?British Journal of Political Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123420000927.
9.
CagéJ.HervéN.ViaudM.-L. (2020). The production of information in an online world. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(5), 2126–2164.
10.
CrabtreeC.GolderM.GschwendT.IndridasonI. H. (2020). It is not only what you say, it is also how you say it: The strategic use of campaign sentiment. The Journal of Politics, 82(3). https://doi.org/10.1086/707613.
11.
DanieleG. (2019). Strike one to educate one hundred: Organized crime, political selection and politicians? Ability. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 159, 650–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.021.
DavenportC.Mokleiv NygårdH.FjeldeH.ArmstrongD. (2019). The consequences of contention: Understanding the aftereffects of political conflict and violence. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-064057.
14.
DiGraziaJ.McKelveyK.BollenJ.RojasF. (2013). More tweets, more votes: Social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior. PLoS One, 8(11), e79449. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079449.
15.
DinasE.HartmanE.van SpanjeJ. (2016). Dead man walking: The affective roots of issue proximity between voters and parties. Political Behavior, 38(3), 659–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9331-2.
16.
DinesenP. T.JaegerM. M. (2013). The effect of terror on institutional trust: New evidence from the 3/11 madrid terrorist attack. Political Psychology, 34(6), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12025.
17.
DobrevaD.GrinnellD.InnesM. (2019). Prophets and loss: How “soft facts” on social media influenced the Brexit campaign and social reactions to the murder of Jo Cox MP. Policy and Internet, 1–21.
18.
EsaiassonP.GranbergD. (1996). Attitudes towards a fallen leader: Evaluations of ol of Palme before and after the assassination. British Journal of Political Science, 26(3), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123400007535.
19.
GalassoV.NanniciniT.NunnariS. (2020). Positive spillovers from negative campaigning. American Journal of Political Science, 59.
20.
GarzaC. (1998). Spain’s mobilization against terrorism: The death of miguel angel Blanco. International Journal on World Peace, 15(4), 91–99.
21.
GetmanskyA.ZeitzoffT. (2014). Terrorism and voting: The effect of rocket threat on voting in Israeli elections. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 588–604. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000288.
22.
GórskaP. (2019). Polaryzacja polityczna w Polsce. Jak bardzo jesteśmy podzieleni?
23.
HalbertalM. (2012). On sacrifice. Cambridge University Press.
24.
HolmanM. R.MerollaMerollaJ. L.ZechmeisterE. J. (2021). The curious case of theresa may and the public that did not rally: Gendered reactions to terrorist attacks can cause slumps not Bumps. American Political Science Review, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055421000861.
JonesB. F.OlkenB. A. (2009). Hit or miss? The effect of assassinations on institutions and war. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(2), 55–87. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.1.2.55.
27.
KlašnjaM.BarberáP.BeauchampN.NaglerJ.TuckerJ. (2017). Measuring public opinion with social media data. The Oxford Handbook of Polling and Survey Methods.
28.
KrakowskiK. K.MoralesJ. S.SanduD. (2021). Replication data for: Violence against politicians, negative campaigning, and public opinion: Evidence from Poland. Comparative Political Studies Dataverse. University of Minnesota.
29.
KregielewskiA.TurekM. (2020). Przewodnik po social media w Polsce. IAB Polska.
LauR. R.SigelmanL.RovnerI. B. (2007). The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytic reassessment. The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 1176–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00618.x.
32.
LeyS. (2018). To vote or not to vote: How criminal violence shapes electoral participation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 62(9), 1963–1990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002717708600.
33.
MadestamA.ShoagD.VeugerS.Yanagizawa-DrottD. (2013). Do political protests matter? Evidence from the tea party movement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1633–1685. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt021.
34.
MayerW. G. (1996). In defense of negative campaigning. Political Science Quarterly, 111(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151970.
35.
MoralesJ. S. (2020). Perceived popularity and online political dissent: Evidence from Twitter in Venezuela. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219872942.
MorisiD. (2018). When campaigns can backfire: National identities and support for parties in the 2015 UK general election in Scotland. Political Research Quarterly, 71(4), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918771529.
38.
MuñozJ.Falcó-GimenoA.HernándezE. (2020). Unexpected event during survey design: Promise and pitfalls for causal inference. Political Analysis, 28(2), 186–206.
39.
NalepaM. (2010). Skeletons in the closet: Transitional justice in post-communist Europe. Cambridge University Press.
40.
PonceA. F. (2019). Violence and electoral competition: Criminal organizations and municipal candidates in Mexico. Trends in Organized Crime, 22(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-018-9344-9.
41.
PrzeworskiA. (2019). Crises of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
42.
RathjeS.Van BavelJ. J.Sander van derL. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A, 118(26). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024292118.
43.
RavivA.SadehA.RavivA.SilbersteinO. (1998). The reaction of the Youth in Israel to the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. Political Psychology, 19(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00104.
44.
SánchezF.PalauM. (2006). Conflict, decentralisation and local governance in Colombia, 1974-2004. CEDE Bogota.
45.
SarnaP.TycE. (2020). Śmierć prezydenta Gdańska Pawła Adamowicza w nagłówkach polskich dzienników i tygodników. Res Rhetorica, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.29107/rr2020.1.1.
46.
SilvaB. C.ProkschS.-O. (2021). Fake it ?til you make it: A natural experiment to identify European politicians? Benefit from twitter bots. American Political Science Review, 115(1), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055420000817.
47.
SimasE. N.CliffordS.KirklandJ. H. (2020). How empathic concern fuels political polarization. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055419000534.
48.
SkaperdasS.GrofmanB. (1995). Modeling negative campaigning. American Political Science Review, 89(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2083074.
49.
SkocpolT. (2002). Will 9/11 and the war on terror revitalize American civic democracy?PS: Political Science and Politics, 35(3), 537–540. https://doi.org/10.1017/s104909650200080x.
50.
SnitchT. H. (1982). Terrorism and political assassinations: A transnational assessment, 1968-80. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 463(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716282463001005.
51.
TavitsM.JungJ.-H. (2021). “Valence attacks Harm the electoral performance of the left but Not the right. The Journal of Politics, 83(1).
52.
TavitsM.LetkiN. (2009). When left is right: Party ideology and policy in post-communist Europe. American Political Science Review, 103(4), 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409990220.
53.
ThomasS.HerrickR.FranklinL. D.GodwinM. L.GnabasikE.SchroedelJ. R. (2019). Not for the faint of heart: Assessing physical violence and Psychological abuse against US mayors. State and Local Government Review, 51(1).
54.
VerhulsdonkI.NaiA.KarpJ. A. (2021). Are political attacks a laughing matter? Three experiments on political humor and the effectiveness of negative campaigning. Political Research Quarterly.
55.
WimmerA. (2008). The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113(4), 970–1022. https://doi.org/10.1086/522803.
56.
Yuchtman-YaarE.HermannT. (1998). The latitude of acceptance: Israeli attitudes toward political protest before and after the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 42(6), 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042006003.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
