How does the world of work in Latin America affect the way workers act to defend their interests? To what extent have “productionist” demands, those concerning jobs, work conditions, and wages, which are highly salient across the region, been “displaced” by consumptionist or political demands? While the literature has distinguished formal and informal work grosso modo, we explore individual traits of work, which cross-cut the formal-informal distinction. Analyzing survey data from four Latin American capital cities, we find, not surprisingly, that both work-based atomization and insecurity depress demand making in the work arena. But these traits of work also affect demand making on the state, albeit in somewhat different ways. Insecurity is associated with a shift from productionist to consumptionist and political demands, while atomization is associated with a more generalized demobilization across issues. These findings have implications for the representation of worker interests in light of current labor market restructuring and raise the question if labor can reclaim an important voice in that restructuring process.
AgarwalaR. (2007). Resistance and compliance in the age of globalization: Indian women and labor organizations. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716206297520
2.
AlcañizI.ScheierM. (2007). New social movements with old party politics: The MTL Piqueteros and the Communist Party in Argentina. Latin American Perspectives, 34(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X06298749.
3.
AnnerM. S. (2011). Solidarity transformed: Labor responses to globalization and crisis in Latin America. Cornell University Press.
4.
AnriaS. (2013). Social movements, party organization, and populism: Insights from the Bolivian MAS. Latin American Politics and Society, 55(3), 19–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00201.x
5.
AnriaS. (2018). When movements become parties: The Bolivian MAS in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
6.
AnriaS.CyrJ. (2017). Inside revolutionary parties: Coalition-building and maintenance in reformist Bolivia. Comparative Political Studies, 50(9), 1255–1287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016666860
7.
BakerA.Velasco-GuachallaV. X. (2018). Is the informal sector politically different? (Null) answers from Latin America. World Development, 102, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.014
8.
BlofieldM. (2011). Introduction: Inequality and politics in Latin America. In BlofieldM. (Ed), The great gap: Inequality and the politics of redistribution in Latin America (pp. 1–18): Penn State University Press.
9.
BlofieldM. (2012). Care work and class: Domestic workers’ struggle for equal rights in Latin America. Penn State University Press.
10.
BouldingC.HolznerC. A. (2020). Community organizations and Latin America’s poorest citizens: Voting, protesting, and contacting government. Latin American Politics and Society, 62(4), 98–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/lap.2020.17
11.
BragaR. (2018). The politics of the precariat: From populism to lulista hegemony. Brill.
12.
BurgessK.LevitskyS. (2003). Explaining populist party adaptation in Latin America: Environmental and Organizational Determinants of Party Change in Argentina, Mexico, Peru, and Venezuela. Comparative Political Studies, 36(8), 881–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003256112
13.
CarnesM.MaresI. (2015). Explaining the “return of the state” in middle-income countries: Employment vulnerability, income, and preferences for social protection in Latin America. Politics & Society, 43(4), 525–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329215602893
14.
CarreF.TillyC. (2017). Where bad jobs are better: Retail jobs across countries and companies. Russell Sage Foundation.
15.
CastellsM.PortesA. (1989). World underneath: the origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy. In CastellsM.PortesA.BentonL. (Eds), The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed counties (pp. 11–40): Johns Hopkins University Press.
16.
CollierR. B.Chambers-JuC. (2012). Popular Representation in Contemporary Latin American Politics: An Agenda for Research. In KingstoneP.YasharD. (Eds), Routledge handbook of Latin American politics (pp. 564–578): Routledge.
17.
CollierR. B.CollierD. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton University Press.
18.
CollierR. B.DubalV. B.CarterC. L. (2018). Disrupting regulation, regulating disruption: The politics of Uber in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 919–937. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001093
19.
CollierR. B.HandlinS. (2009a). Reorganizing popular politics: Participation and the new interest regime in Latin America. Penn State University Press.
20.
CollierR. B.HandlinS. (2009b). Situating the analysis: Analytical approach, cases and historical context. In CollierR. B.HandlinS. (Eds), Reorganizing popular politics: Participation and the new interest regime in Latin America (pp. 32–60): Penn State University Press.
21.
CookM. L. (2007). The politics of labor reform in Latin America: Between flexibility and rights. Penn State University Press.
22.
De StefanoV. (2015). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2682602
23.
DoshP. (2009). Tactical innovation, democratic governance, and mixed motives: Popular movement resilience in peru and ecuador. Latin American Politics and Society, 51(1), 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2009.00041.x
EtchemendyS. (2011). Models of economic liberalization: Business, workers, and compensation in Latin America, Spain, and Portugal. Cambridge University Press.
27.
EtchemendyS. (2019). The rise of segmented neo-corporatism in South America: Wage coordination in Argentina and Uruguay (2005-2015). Comparative Political Studies, 52(10), 1427–1465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830729
28.
EtchemendyS.CollierR. B. (2007). Down but not out: Union resurgence and segmented neocorporatism in Argentina (2003-2007). Politics & Society, 35(3), 363–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329207304318
29.
FairfieldT. (2015). Structural power in comparative political economy: Perspectives from policy formulation in Latin America. Business and Politics, 17(3), 411–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/bap-2014-0047
30.
FineJ. R. (2006). Worker centers: Organizing communities at the edge of the dream. Cornell University Press.
GarayC. (2007). Social policy and collective action: Unemployed workers, community associations, and protest in Argentina. Politics & Society, 35(2), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329207300392
33.
GarayC. (2016). Social policy expansion in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
HollandA. C.SchneiderB. R. (2017). Easy and hard redistribution: The political economy of welfare states in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics, 15(4), 988–1006. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717002122
37.
HummelC. (2017). Disobedient markets: Street vendors, enforcement, and state intervention in collective action. Comparative Political Studies, 50(11), 1524–1555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016679177
38.
HussmansR. (2004). Measuring the informal economy: From employment in the informal sector to informal employment. ILO Working Paper 53. ILO.
IranzoC.de Paula LeiteM. (2006). La subcontratación laboral en América Latina. In Garza ToledoE. de la (Ed), Teorías Sociales y Estudios Del Trabajo: Nuevos Enfoques (pp. 268–288): Anthropos and UAM-Iztapalapa.
44.
KallebergA. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400101
45.
KapiszewskiD.LevitskyS. R.YasharD. J. (Eds), (2021). The inclusionary turn in Latin American Democracies. Cambridge University Press.
46.
KatznelsonI.ZolbergA. R. (1986). Working-class formation: Nineteenth-century patterns in Western Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press.
47.
KerrC.DunlopJ. T.HarbisonF. H.MyersC. A. (1960). Industrialism and industrial man: The problems of labor and management in economic growth. Harvard University Press.
48.
KlandermansB.OegemaD. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095297
49.
KurtzM. J. (2004). The dilemmas of democracy in the open economy: Lessons from Latin America. World Politics, 56(2), 262–302. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2004.0013
LehmbruchG.SchmitterP. C. (1982). Patterns of corporatist policy-making. Sage.
52.
LevitskyS. (2003). Transforming labor-based parties in Latin America: Argentine peronism in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
53.
MankyO. (2018). Part-time miners: Labor segmentation and collective action in the Peruvian mining industry. Latin American Perspectives, 45(5), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X17709541
54.
McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press.
55.
McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. https://doi.org/10.1086/226464
56.
MilnerH. V.RudraN. (2015). Globalization and the political benefits of the informal economy. International Studies Review, 17(4), 664–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12268
57.
MurilloM. V. (2005). Partisanship amidst convergence: The politics of labor reform in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 37(4), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/20072903
58.
OndettiG. (2008). Land, protest, and politics: The landless movement and the struggle for agrarian reform in Brazil. Penn State University Press.
59.
Palmer-RubinB. (2019). Evading the patronage trap: Organizational capacity and demand making in Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 52(13–14), 2097–2134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019830745
60.
Palmer-RubinB. (2021). After corporatism: Party linkages with popular-sector organizations in neoliberal Latin America. In KapiszewskiD.LevitskyS.YasharD. (Eds), The inclusionary turn in Latin American democracies (327–361): Cambridge University Press.
Pop-ElechesG. (2008). From economic crisis to reform: IMF programs in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton University Press.
63.
PortesA.HoffmanK. (2003). Latin American class structures: Their composition and change during the neoliberal era. Latin American Research Review, 38(1), 41–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2003.0011
64.
RobertsK. M. (2002). Social inequalities without class cleavages in Latin America’s neoliberal era. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(4), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686331
65.
RobertsK. M. (2015). Changing course in Latin America: Party systems in the neoliberal era. Cambridge University Press.
RosaldoM. (2016). Revolution in the garbage dump: The political and economic fundations of the Colombian recycler movement, 1986-2011. Social Problems, 63(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spw015
68.
RosaldoM. (2021). Problematizing the ‘informal sector’: 50 Years of critique, clarification, qualification, and more critique, Sociology Compass, 15(9).
RossiF. M (2017). The poor’s struggle for political incorporation: The piquetero movement in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.
71.
RossiF. M.SilvaE. (2018). Introduction: Reshaping the political arena in Latin America. In RossiF. M.SilvaE. (Eds), Reshaping the political arena in Latin America: From resisting neoliberalism to the second incorporation (pp. 23–31): University of Pittsburgh Press.
SchipaniA. R. (2008). Organizando el descontento: Movilizaciones de desocupados en la Argentina y Chile durante las reformas de mercado. Desarrollo Económico, 48(189), 85–118.
74.
SchipaniA. R. (2019). Strategies of redistribution: The left and the popular sectors in Latin America. [Doctoral dissertation, University of California].
75.
SchneiderR. B. (2013). Hierarchical capitalism in Latin America: Business, labor, and the challenges of equitable development. Cambridge University Press.
76.
ShefnerJ. (2012). The illusion of civil society: Democratization and community mobilization in low-income Mexico. Penn State University Press.
77.
SilvaE. (2009). Challenging neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.
78.
SilvaE. (2017). Reorganizing popular sector incorporation: Propositions from Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. Politics & Society, 45(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329216683166
79.
SinclairB. (2012). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. University of Chicago Press.
SwiderSarah (2016). Building China: Informal work and the new precariat. Cornell University Press.
82.
TardanicoR. (1997). From crisis to restructuring: Latin American transformations and urban employment in world perspective. In TardanicoR.MenjívarR. (Eds),. global restructuring, employment, and social inequality in urban Latin America: (1–46): Lynne Rienner Publishers.
83.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.HenryB. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.
84.
VicinoT. J.FahlbergA. (2017). The politics of contested urban space: The 2013 protest movement in Brazil. Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(7), 1001–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2017.1323545
85.
WeilD. (2014). The fissured workplace. Harvard University Press.
WolfordW. (2010). This land is ours now: Social mobilization and the meanings of land in Brazil. Duke University Press.
88.
WrightE. O. (2000). Class counts: Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge University Press.
89.
YasharD. J. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge University Press.
