The ruler’s ability to cope with crises is critical for authoritarian durability. Yet, the coping mechanism—the actual management strategies by which rulers confront crises—is largely treated as a black box. This study takes a step in addressing this problem by examining how rulers use their appointment powers to manage the crisis that is the aftermath of failed coups. I argue that the principle challenge of this period is that rulers cannot identify the opposition and to cope, they deliberately infuse the center of the regime with officials from the periphery to dilute and ultimately weaken the invisible enemy they confront. Using a novel dataset on the appointments of mid and high level officials over the course of 34 years in Ethiopia, I find that the ruler relied considerably on outside officials following the failed coup in 1960 in ways he never did before or after the event.
AaskovenL.BokobzaL.KrishnarajanS.JacobN.SakstrupC. (2020). The morning after: Cabinet instability and the purging of ministers after failed coup attempts in autocracies. Working Paper.
2.
AbrahamE. (2011). Reminiscences of my life. The Red Sea Press.
3.
AlbertusM.,MenaldoV. (2012). If you’re against them you’re with us: The effect of expropriation on autocratic survival. Comparative Political Studies, 45(8), 973–1003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011428593.
BellinE. (2004). The robustness of authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in comparative perspective. Comparative Politics, 36(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.2307/4150140.
7.
BoixC.,SvolikM. W. (2013). The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics, 75(2), 300–316. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613000029.
8.
Bueno De MesquitaB.SmithA.SiversonR.MorrowJ. (2003). The logic of political survival. MIT Press.
9.
BrettL. Carter and Mai Hassan. 2021. “Regional Governance in Divided Societies: Evidence from the Republic of Congo and Kenya.”Journal of Politics, 83(1), 40–57.
De BruinE. (2020). How to prevent coups d’État: Counterbalancing and regime survival. Cornell University Press.
13.
EasterG. (2007). Reconstructing the state: Personal networks and elite identity in Soviet Russia: Personal networks and elite identity in Soviet Russia. Cambridge University Press.
14.
EastonM. R.,SiversonR. M. (2018). Leader survival and purges after a failed coup d’etat. Journal of Peace Research, 55(5), 596–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343318763713.
15.
EgorovG.,SoninK. (2011). Dictators and their viziers: Endogenizing the loyalty–competence trade-off. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 903–930. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41305839.
16.
GandhiJ. (2008). Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.
Habte SelassieB. (2007). The Crown and the pen: The memoirs of a lawyer turned rebel. Red Sea Press.
21.
HassanM. (2020). Regime threats and state solutions: Bureaucratic loyalty and embeddedness in Kenya. In Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108858960.
22.
HuberJ. D.,Martinez-GallardoC. (2008). Replacing cabinet ministers: Patterns of ministerial stability in parliamentary democracies. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540808012X.
23.
JacksonR. H.,RosbergC. G. (1982). Personal rule in Black Africa: Prince, Autocrat, Prophet, Tyrant. In Political science : African studies. University of California Press.
24.
JiangJ. (2018). Making bureaucracy work: Patronage networks, performance incentives, and economic development in China. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 982–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12394.
25.
KalyvasS. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge University Press.
26.
KamC.,IndriđasonI. (2005). The timing of cabinet reshuffles in five westminster parliamentary systems. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(3), 327–363. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3598639.
27.
KellerE. (1988). Revolutionary Ethiopia: From empire to people’s Republic. Indiana University Press.
28.
KellerF. B. (2016). Moving beyond factions: Using social network analysis to uncover patronage networks among Chinese elites. Journal of East Asian Studies, 16(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2015.3.
29.
KroegerA. M. (2018). Dominant party rule, elections, and cabinet instability in african autocracies. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000497.
30.
KrookM. L.,O’BrienD. Z. (2012). All the president’s men? The appointment of female cabinet ministers worldwide. Journal of Politics, 74(3), 840–855. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381612000382.
31.
LandryP. F.LüX.DuanH. (2018). Does performance matter? Evaluating political selection along the Chinese administrative ladder. Comparative Political Studies, 51(8), 1074–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017730078.
32.
LevitskyS. R.,WayL. A. (2012). Beyond patronage: Violent struggle, ruling party cohesion, and authoritarian durability. Perspectives on Politics, 10(4), 869–889. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23326923.
33.
MacKendrickP. L. (1952). Roman Colonization. Phoenix, 6(4), 139–146.
34.
MarkakisJ. (1974). Ethiopia: Anatomy of a traditional polity. Oxford Press.
35.
McGowanP. J. (2003). African military coups d’état, 1956-2001: Frequency, trends and distribution. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 41(3), 339–370. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3876235.
36.
MengA. (2019). Ruling parties in authoritarian regimes: Rethinking institutional strength. British Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123419000115.
37.
MeyerD.ShihV. C.LeeJ. (2016). Factions of different stripes: Gauging the recruitment logics of factions in the reform period. Journal of East Asian Studies, 16(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2015.5.
38.
MigdalJ. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states. Princeton University Press.
39.
NaiduS.RobinsonJ. A.YoungL. E. (Forthcoming). Social origins of dictatorships: Elite networks and political transitions in Haiti. American Political Science Review.
40.
O’BrienD. ZMendezM.PetersonJ. C.ShunJ. (2015). Letting down the ladder or shutting the door: Female prime ministers, party leaders, and cabinet ministers. Politics and Gender, 11(4), 689–717. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X15000410.
41.
QuinlivanJ. T. (1999). Coup-proofing: Its practice and consequences in the middle east. International Security, 24(2), 131–165.
42.
RazoA. (2008). Social Foundations of limited dictatorship: Networks and private protection during Mexico’s early industrialization. Social science history. Stanford University Press. ISBN 9780804756617.
RoesslerP. (2016). Ethnic politics and state power in Africa: The logic of the coup-civil war trap. Cambridge University Press.
45.
SchwabP. (1972). Decision-making in Ethiopa: A study of the political process. Associated University Press.
46.
Shen-BayhF. (2018). Strategies of repression: Judicial and extrajudicial methods of autocratic survival. World Politics, 70(3), 321–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887118000047.
47.
ShihV.AdolphC.LiuM. (2012). Getting ahead in the communist party: Explaining the advancement of central committee members in China. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000566.
48.
SinghN. (2014). Seizing power: The strategic logic of military coups. John Hopkins University Press.
49.
SmithP. (1979). Labyrinths of power: Political recruitment in twentieth-century Mexico. Princeton University Press.
50.
SpencerJ. H. (1984). Ethiopia at Bay: A personal account of the Haile Selassie years. Reference Publication.
51.
SudduthJ. K. (2017). Strategic logic of elite purges in dictatorships. Comparative Political Studies, 50(13), 1768–1801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016688004.
TzuH. F.HanF.WatsonB.HanF. (1964). Basic writings. Columbia University Press.
56.
UlfelderJ. (2005). Contentious collective action and the breakdown of authoritarian regimes. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105053786.
57.
WoldenseJ. (2018). The ruler’s game of musical chairs: Shuffling during the reign of Ethiopia’s last emperor. Social Networks, 52, 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.07.002.
58.
WoldenseJ. (2021). Replication data for: What happens when coups fail? The problem of identifying and weakening the invisible enemy. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/TNDPQU.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
