Who registers to vote? Although extensive research has examined the question of who votes, our understanding of the determinants of political participation will be limited until we know who is missing from the voter register. Studying voter registration in lower-income settings is particularly challenging due to data constraints. We link the official voter register with a complete social network census of 16 villages to analyze the correlates of voter registration in rural Uganda, examining the role of individual-level attributes and social ties. We find evidence that social ties are important for explaining registration status within and across households. Village leaders—and through them, household heads—play an important role in explaining the registration status of others in the village, suggesting a diffuse process of social influence. Socioeconomic factors such as income and education do not explain registration in this setting. Together these findings suggest an alternate theory of participation is required.
AndersonM. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the abecedarian, perry preschool, and early training projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841
2.
AralSMuchnikLSundararajanA (2009). Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(51), 21544–21549. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908800106
3.
BerinskyA. J. (2005). The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States. American Politics Research, 33(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x04269419
BlattmanC. (2009). From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American Political Science Review, 103(2), 231–247. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055409090212
6.
BlattmanC.LarreguyH.MarxB.ReidO. R. (2019). Eat widely, vote wisely? Lessons from a campaign against vote buying in Uganda. NBER Working Paper No. 26293.
7.
BlaydesL. (2010). Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge University Press.
8.
BonicaA.GrumbachJ. M.HillC.JeffersonH. (2021). All-mail voting in colorado increases turnout and reduces turnout inequality. Electoral Studies, 72(August), 102363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102363
9.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082425
10.
BrierleyS.KramonE. (2020). Party campaign strategies: Rallies, canvassing and handouts in Ghana. African Affairs, 119(477), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adaa024
11.
BrierleyS.NathanN. (2021). The connections of party brokers. Journal of Politics, 83(3), 884–901.
12.
CallenM.GibsonC. C.JungD. F.LongJ. D. (2016). Improving electoral integrity with information and communications technology. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 3(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2015.14
13.
CentolaD.MacyM. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702–734. https://doi.org/10.1086/521848
14.
CrokeK.GrossmanG.LarreguyH. A.MarshallJ. (2016). Deliberate disengagement: How education can decrease political participation in electoral authoritarian regimes. American Political Science Review, 110(3), 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055416000253
15.
CruzC.LabonneJ.QuerubÍnP. (2017). Politician family networks and electoral outcomes: Evidence from the Philippines. American Economic Review, 107(10), 3006–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150343
16.
DownsA. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Harper & Row
17.
EubankN.GrossmanG.PlatasM.RoddenJ. (2021). Viral voting: Social networks and political participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 16(3), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00019092
18.
FerraliR.GrossmanG.PlatasM. R.RoddenJ. (2021). Replication data for: Who registers? Village networks, household dynamics, and voter registration in rural Uganda.
19.
GallegoA. (2014). Unequal participation Worldwide. Cambridge University Press
20.
GrossmanG.HumphreysM.Sacramone-LutzG. (2014). “I wld like u wmp to extend electricity 2 our village”: On information technology and interest articulation. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 688–705. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055414000331.
GrumbachJ.HillC. (2021). Rock the registration: Same day registration increases turnout of young voters. . https://doi.org/10.1086/714776.Journal of Politics
23.
HarrisJ. A.KamindoC.van der WindtP. (2021). Electoral administration in fledgling democracies: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Journal of Politics. . https://doi.org/10.1086/710785
24.
HersheyM. R. (2009). What we know about voter-ID laws, registration, and turnout. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42(1), 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096509090234
25.
IchinoN.SchündelnM. (2012). Deterring or displacing electoral irregularities? Spillover effects of observers in a randomized field experiment in Ghana. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381611001368
26.
IsakssonA.-S.KotsadamA.NermanM. (2014). The gender gap in African political participation: Testing theories of individual and contextual determinants. Journal of Development Studies, 50(2), 302–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.833321
JackmanS.SpahnB. (2015). Unlisted in America. Unpublished manuscript
29.
KasaraK.SuryanarayanP. (2015). When do the rich vote less than the poor and why? Explaining turnout inequality across the world. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12134
30.
KimJ.-O.PetrocikJ. R.EnoksonS. N. (1975). Voter turnout among the American States: Systemic and individual components. American Political Science Review, 69(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957888
31.
KlimekPYegorovYHanelRThurnerS (2012). Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16469–16473. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1210722109
32.
KnokeD.YangS. (2008). Social network analysis. Sage Publications.
33.
KrishnaA. (2008). Poverty, participation, and democracy: A global perspective. Cambridge University Press.
34.
KuenziM.LambrightG. M. S. (2007). Voter turnout in Africa’s multiparty regimes. Comparative Political Studies, 40(6), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006288969
35.
KuenziM.LambrightG. M. S. (2011). Who votes in Africa? An examination of electoral participation in 10 African countries. Party Politics, 17(6), 767–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068810376779
36.
LarreguyH.MarshallJ.QuerubínP. (2016). Parties, brokers, and voter mobilization: how turnout buying depends upon the party’s capacity to monitor brokers. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055415000593
37.
LarsonJ. M.LewisJ. I. (2017). Ethnic networks. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12282
38.
LeeM. M.ZhangN. (2017). Legibility and the informational foundations of state capacity. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1086/688053
39.
LeighleyJ. E.NaglerJ. (2013). Who votes now?: Demographics, issues, inequality, and turnout in the United States. Princeton University Press.
40.
MvukiyeheE.SamiiC. (2017). Promoting democracy in fragile states: Field experimental evidence from Liberia. World Development, 95(C), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.014
41.
NaglerJ. (1991). The effect of registration laws and education on us voter turnout (Vol. 85, pp. 1393–1405). The American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963952
42.
NevitteN.BlaisA.GidengilE.NadeauR. (2009). Socioeconomic status and nonvoting: A cross-national comparative analysis (pp. 85–108). The comparative study of electoral systems
43.
NichterS. (2008). Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055408080106
44.
NickersonD. W. (2008). Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055408080039
45.
RadcliffB. (1996). Turnout and the economy: A comment on jackman and miller’s ”voter turnout in the industrial democracies in the 1980s. Comparative Political Studies, 29(6), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414096029006005
46.
RobinsonA. L.GottliebJ. (2021). How to close the gender gap in political participation: Lessons from matrilineal societies in Africa. British Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123418000650
47.
RolfeM. (2012). Voter turnout: A social theory of political participation. Cambridge University Press.
48.
RuedaM. R. (2015). Buying votes with imperfect local knowledge and a secret ballot. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 27(3), 428–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629814533841
StokesS. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051683
51.
StokesS. C.DunningT.NazarenoM.BruscoV. (2013). Brokers, voters, and clientelism: The puzzle of distributive politics. Cambridge University Press.
52.
ThompsonD. M.WuJ. A.YoderJ.HallA. B. (2020). Universal vote-by-mail has no impact on partisan turnout or vote share. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(25), 14052–14056. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2007249117
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
