The effects of religion on political behavior are difficult to study for a number of reasons. One difficulty is that “religion” is not a singular entity and is thus unlikely to have a unidirectional effect on political behavior. Another difficulty is that everyone in a particular place and time might be embedded in the same set of religious practices, such that the counterfactual is difficult to assess. In response to these and other challenges, we suggest opening up the black box of religion in order to examine the influence of its component parts. Specifically, we focus on exposure to sermons. We describe a study about the impact of Christian sermons in sub-Saharan Africa on reactions to inequality. We discuss the approach’s advantages and limitations and discuss how to integrate it with the study of other aspects of religion and how the approach might apply to other domains of political behavior.
Ben-Nun BloomP.ArikanG.CourtemancheM. (2015). Religious social identity, religious belief, and anti-immigration sentiment. American Political Science Review, 109(2), 203–221.
2.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.
3.
CammettM. (2014). Compassionate communalism: Welfare and sectarianism in Lebanon. Cornell University Press.
4.
CammettM.IssarS. (2010). Bricks and mortar clientelism: sectarianism and the logics of welfare allocation in Lebanon. World Politics, 62(3), 381–421.
5.
CampbellD. E. (2004). Acts of faith: Churches and political engagement. Political Behavior, 26(2), 155–180.
6.
ChhibberP. (2014). Religious practice and democracy in India. Cambridge University Press.
7.
ChongDDruckmanJ. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126.
8.
CondraL. NIsaqzadehM.LinardiS. (2019). Clerics and scriptures: Experimentally disentangling the influence of religious authority in Afghanistan. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 401–419.
9.
DancygierR. M. (2017). Dilemmas of inclusion: Muslims in European politics. Princeton University Press.
10.
DeaconG. (2015). Driving the devil out: Kenya’s born-again election. Journal of Religion in Africa, 45(2), 200–220.
11.
DeBenedictis-KessnerJ.BaumM. A.BerinskyA. J.YamamotoT. (2019). Persuading the enemy: Estimating the persuasive effects of partisan media with the preference-incorporating choice and assignment design. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 902–916.
12.
DjupeP. A.CalfanoB. (2013). God talk: Experimenting with the religious causes of public opinion. Temple University Press.
13.
DjupeP. A.GilbertC. P. (2009). The political influence of churches. Cambridge University Press.
14.
DjupeP. A.OlsonL. R. (2010). Diffusion of environmental concerns in congregations across US states. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(3), 270–301.
15.
DjupeP. A.SmithA. E. (2019). Experimentation in the study of religion and politics. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press.
16.
DriskellR.EmbryE.LyonL. (2008). Faith and politics: The influence of religious beliefs on political participation. Social Science Quarterly, 89(2), 294–314.
17.
DunningT. (2012). Natural experiments in the social sciences: A design-based approach. Cambridge University Press.
18.
DurkheimE. (1912). The elementary forms of religious life. Oxford University Press.
19.
EnglandA. (2005). Self-help books take a grip on Kenya’s middle class. Financial Times18October.
20.
GiffordP. (1994). Some recent developments in African Christianity. African Affairs, 93(373), 513–534.
21.
GiffordP. (2009). Christianity, politics and public life in Kenya. C. Hurst & Co.
22.
GillA. (2008). Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic church and the state in Latin America. University of Chicago Press.
23.
GlazierR. A. (2013). Divine direction: How providential religious beliefs shape foreign policy attitudes. Foreign Policy Analysis, 9(2), 127–142.
24.
GlazierR. A. (2015). Bridging religion and politics: The impact of providential religious beliefs on political activity. Politics and Religion, 8(3), 458–487.
25.
GorodnichenkoY.RolandG. (2012). Understanding the individualism-collectivism cleavage and its effects: Lessons from cultural psychology. In Institutions and comparative economic development (pp. 213–236). Springer.
26.
GrossmanG. (2015). The political saliency of LGBTs in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Politics, 77(2), 337–351.
27.
Grzymała-BusseA. (2015). Nations under God: How churches use moral authority to influence policy. Princeton University Press.
28.
HallS. (1980). Cultural studies: Two paradigms. Media, Culture & Society, 2(1), 57–72.
29.
HarrisF. C. (1994). Something within: Religion as a mobilizer of African-American political activism. The Journal of Politics, 56(1), 42–68.
30.
HirschmanA. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states (Vol. 25). Harvard University Press.
31.
HollandP. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.
32.
HuntingtonS. P. (1997). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Penguin Books India.
33.
HurdE. S. (2015). Beyond religious freedom: The new global politics of religion. Princeton University Press.
34.
IannacconeL. R. (1990). Religious practice: A human capital approach. Journal for the scientific study of religion, 29(3), 297–314.
35.
IyengarS. (1989). How citizens think about national issues: A matter of responsibility. American Journal of Political Science, 33(4), 878–900.
36.
JenningsM. (2014). Bridging the local and the global: Faith-based organisations and the emergence of the non-state provider sector in Tanzania. In MacleanL.CammettM. (Ed.), The politics of non-state social welfare in the global south (pp. 119–136). Cornell University Press.
37.
Jones-CorreaM. A.LealD. L. (2001). Political participation: Does religion matter?Political Research Quarterly, 54(4), 751–770.
38.
KalyvasS. N. (1996). The rise of Christian democracy in Europe. Cornell University Press.
39.
LaitinD. D. (1986). Hegemony and culture: Politics and change among the Yoruba. University of Chicago Press.
40.
LewisV. A.MacGregorC. A.PutnamR. D. (2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42(2), 331–346.
41.
LiebermanE. S. (2015). Nested analysis: Toward the integration of comparative-historical analysis with other social science methods. In MahoneyJ.ThelenK. (Eds.), Advances in comparative-historical analysis (pp. 240–263). Cambridge University Press.
42.
MargolisM. F. (2017). How politics affects religion: Partisanship, socialization, and religiosity in America. The Journal of Politics, 80(1), 30–43.
43.
MargolisM. F. (2018). From politics to the pews: How partisanship and the political environment shape religious identity. University of Chicago Press.
44.
MarshallR. (2009). Political spiritualities: The Pentecostal revolution in Nigeria. University of Chicago Press.
45.
MartinC. J. (2018). Imagine all the people: Literature, society, and cross-national variation in education systems. World Politics, 70(3), 398–442.
46.
McCauleyJ. F. (2013). Africa’s new big man rule? Pentecostalism and patronage in Ghana. African Affairs, 112, 1–21.
47.
McCauleyJ. F. (2015). The political mobilization of ethnic and religious identities in Africa. American Political Science Review, 108(4), 801–816.
48.
McCauleyJ. F. (2017). The logic of ethnic and religious conflict in Africa. Cambridge University Press.
49.
McCauleyJ. F.PosnerD. N. (2019). The political sources of religious identification: Evidence from the Burkina Faso–Côte dÕIvoire Border. British Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 421–441.
50.
McClendonG. H.RiedlR. B. (2015). Religion as a stimulant of political participation: Experimental evidence from Nairobi, K. The Journal of Politics, 77(4), 1045–1057.
51.
McClendonG. H.RiedlR. B. (2016). Individualism and empowerment in pentecostal sermons: New evidence from Nairobi, K. African Affairs, 115(458), 119–144.
52.
McClendonG. H.RiedlR. B. (2019). From pews to politics: Religious sermons and political participation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Cambridge University Press.
53.
NgongD. (2014). African pentecostalism and religious pluralism. In ClarkC. (Ed.), Pentecostal theology in Africa (pp. 193–208). Wipf and Stock Publishers.
54.
NielsenR. (2015). Ethics for experimental manipulation of religion. In DesposatoS.(Ed.), Ethical challenges in political science experiments. Routledge.
55.
NorenzayanA. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton University Press.
56.
PaluckB.Ricart-HuguetJ. (2017). When the sorting hat sorts randomly: A natural experiment on culture. Working Paper.
57.
PaluckE. (2010). The promising integration of qualitative methods and field experiments. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 628(1), 59–71.
58.
PaluckE. L.GreenD. P. (2009). Deference, dissent, and dispute resolution: An experimental intervention using mass media to change norms and behavior in Rwanda. American political Science review, 103(4), 622–644.
59.
Pew. (2006). Spirit and power: A ten-country survey of pentecostals (Technical report). The Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
60.
PitlikH.RodeM. (2017). Individualistic values, institutional trust, and interventionist attitudes. Journal of Institutional Economics, 13(3), 575–598.
61.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociality with the ingroup and outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1471–1483.
ScheveK.StasavageD. (2006). Religion and preferences for social insurance. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(3), 255–286.
64.
SeayL. E. (2013). Effective responses: Protestants, Catholics and the provision of health care in the post-war Kivus. Review of African Political Economy, 40(135), 83–97.
65.
SenM.WasowO. (2016). Race as a bundle of sticks: Designs that estimate effects of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 499–522.
66.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.
67.
ThachilT. (2014). Elite parties, poor voters: How social services win votes in India. Cambridge University Press.
68.
ToftM. D.PhilpottD.ShahT. S. (2011). God’s century: Resurgent religion and global politics. WW Norton & Company.
69.
TrejoG. (2009). Religious competition and ethnic mobilization in Latin America: Why the Catholic Church promotes indigenous movements in Mexico. American Political Science Review, 103(3), 323–342.
70.
TrinitapoliJ.WeinrebA. (2012). Religion and AIDS in Africa. Oxford University Press.
71.
TunónG. (2017). When the Church votes left: How progressive religion hurts gender equality (Working Paper). University of California.
72.
VarshneyA. (2003). Ethnic conflict and civic life: Hindus and Muslims in India. Yale University Press.
73.
WafulaE. W. (2003). Inter-denominational mobility of the faithful among Churches in Nairobi (PhD thesis). University of Nairobi.
74.
WaldK. D.OwenD. E.HillS. S. (1988). Churches as political communities. American Political Science Review, 82(2), 531–548.
75.
WarnerC. M. (2000). Confessions of an interest group: The Catholic Church and political parties in Europe. Princeton University Press.
76.
WarnerC. M.KılınçR.HaleC. W.CohenA. B.JohnsonK. A. (2015). Religion and public goods provision: Experimental and interview evidence from Catholicism and Islam in Europe. Comparative Politics, 47(2), 189–209.
77.
WeberM. (1934). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Charles Scribner’s and Sons.
78.
WilkinsonS. I. (2006). Votes and violence: Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge University Press.
79.
WittenbergJ. (2006). Crucibles of political loyalty: Church institutions and electoral continuity in Hungary. Cambridge University Press.
80.
WoolfalkK. M. (2013). Essays on social contexts and individual politics: The political influence of religious institutions and ethno-racial neighborhood contexts (PhD thesis). Harvard University.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
