Does an individual’s exposure to aspects of globalization impact their willingness to redistribute to the poor? We hypothesize that the “glitter” of foreign direct investment (FDI) in developing countries leads relatively better-off citizens to perceive that the poor now have more opportunities and are thereby less deserving of help. Findings from an experiment across three states in India reveal that subjects lower their financial support for the poor upon learning a foreign firm in a low-skilled sector is located in the vicinity. Text analysis of subjects’ responses supports the mechanism underlying our hypothesis: FDI reduces support for redistribution when subjects believe that foreign firms offer the uneducated poor higher wages and increased job opportunities.
AkbaşM.ArielyD.YukselS. (2019). When is inequality fair? An experiment on the effect of procedural justice and agency. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 161, 114–127.
AlesinaA.CozziG.MantovanN. (2012). The evolution of ideology, fairness and redistribution. The Economic Journal, 122(565), 1244–1261.
4.
AlesinaA.GiulianoP. (2011). Preferences for redistribution. In BenhabibJ.JacksonM. O.BisinA. (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1, pp. 93–131). North-Holland Publishers.
5.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5), 897–931.
6.
AllenR. C. (2017). Absolute poverty: When necessity displaces desire. American Economic Review, 107(12), 3690–3721.
7.
AutorD.DornD.HansonG.MajlesiK. (2016, September). Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure [National Bureau of Economic Research No. w22637]. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22637.pdf
8.
BastiaensI.RudraN. (2018). Democracies in peril: Taxation and redistribution in globalizing economies. Cambridge University Press.
9.
CappelenA. W.FestS.SørensenE. Ø.TungoddenB. (2014). The freedom to choose undermines the willingness to redistribute [NHH Discussion Paper].
10.
CarminesE. G.StimsonJ. A. (1980). The two faces of issue voting. American Political Science Review, 74(1), 78–91.
11.
CasonT. N.MuiV. (1998). Social influence in the sequential dictator game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 42(2–3), 248–265.
12.
CavailléC.TrumpK. (2015). The two facets of social policy preferences. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 146–160.
13.
ChamarbagwalaR. (2006). Economic liberalization and wage inequality in India. World Development, 34(12), 1997–2015.
14.
ChiltonA. S.MilnerH. V.TingleyD. (2020). Reciprocity and public opposition to foreign direct investment. British Journal of Political Science, 50(1), 129–153.
ColantoneI.StanigP. (2018). The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 936–953.
17.
CollierP. (2007). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press.
DruckmanJ. N.PetersonE.SlothuusR. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–79.
24.
EngelC. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4), 583–610.
25.
EsareyJ.SalmonT.BarrilleauxC. (2011). Social insurance and income redistribution in a laboratory experiment. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 685–698.
26.
FeenstraR. C.HansonG. H. (1997). Foreign direct investment and relative wages: Evidence from Mexico’s maquiladoras. Journal of International Economics, 42(3–4), 371–393.
FismanR.JakielaP.KarivS. (2015). How did distributional preferences change during the Great Recession?Journal of Public Economics, 128, 84–95.
29.
FongC. M. (2001). Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 82(2), 225–246.
30.
FongC. M.BowlesS.GintisH. (2006). Strong reciprocity and the welfare state. In KolmS.-C.YthierJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (Vol. 2, pp. 1439–1464). North-Holland Publishers.
31.
FongC. M.Oberholzer-GeeF. (2011). Truth in giving: Experimental evidence on the welfare effects of informed giving to the poor. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 436–444.
32.
FreundC.PierolaM. D. (2015). Export superstars. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(5), 1023–1032.
33.
FuX.BalasubramanyamV. N. (2005). Exports, foreign direct investment and employment: The case of China. The World Economy, 28(4), 607–625.
34.
GilensM. (1999). Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. University of Chicago Press.
35.
HammanJ. R.LoewensteinG.WeberR. A. (2010). Self-interest through delegation: An additional rationale for the principal-agent relationship. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1826–1846.
36.
HarrisonG. W.ListJ. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055.
37.
HaysJ. C.EhrlichS. D.PeinhardtC. (2005). Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: An empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization, 59(2), 473–494.
38.
HerzerD.HühneP.NunnenkampP. (2014). FDI and income inequality: Evidence from Latin American economies. Review of Development Economics, 18(4), 778–793.
39.
HeymanF.SjoholmF.TingvallP. G. (2007). Is there really a foreign ownership wage premium? Evidence from matched employer-employee data. Journal of International Economics, 73(2), 355–376.
40.
HoffmanE.McCabeK.ShachatK.SmithV. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7(3), 346–380.
41.
HuA. G. Z.JeffersonG. H. (2002). FDI impact and spillover: Evidence from China’s electronic and textile industries. The World Economy, 25(8), 1063–1076.
LarsenC. A. (2007). The institutional logic of welfare attitudes: How welfare regimes influence public support. Comparative Political Studies, 41(2), 145–168.
44.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge University Press.
45.
LinardiS.McConnellM. A. (2011). No excuses for good behavior: Volunteering and the social environment. Journal of Public Economics, 95(5–6), 445–454.
46.
LoewensteinG. (1999). Experimental economics from the vantage-point of behavioural economics. Economic Journal, 109(453), 25–34.
47.
MagombeyiM. T.OdhiamboN. M. (2017). Foreign direct investment and poverty reduction. Comparative Economic Research, 20(2), 73–89.
48.
MargalitY. (2013). Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 80–103.
MenendezI. (2016). Globalization and welfare spending: How geography and electoral institutions condition compensation. International Studies Quarterly, 60(4), 665–676.
NarulaR.PineliA. (2019). Improving the developmental impact of multinational enterprises: Policy and research challenges. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(1), 1–24.
54.
NooruddinI.RudraN. (2014). Are developing countries really defying the embedded liberalism compact?World Politics, 66(4), 603–640.
55.
NunnenkampP.SchweickertR.WiebeltM. (2007). Distributional effects of FDI: How the interaction of FDI and economic policy affects poor households in Bolivia. Development Policy Review, 25(4), 429–450.
OorschotW. V. (2000). Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy & Politics, 28(1), 33–48.
58.
OwenE. (2019). Foreign direct investment and elections: The impact of greenfield FDI on incumbent party reelection in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 52(4), 613–645.
59.
PetersM. E. (2014). Trade, foreign direct investment, and immigration policy making in the United States. International Organization, 68(4), 811–844.
60.
PetersenM. B.AarøeL. (2013). Politics in the mind’s eye: Imagination as a link between social and political cognition. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 275–293.
61.
PetersenM. B.SlothuusR.StubagerR.TogebyL. (2011). Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 24–52.
62.
PetersenM. B.SlothuusR.TogebyL. (2010). Political parties and value consistency in public opinion formation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(3), 530–550.
PolanyiK. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
65.
RaoK. S.DharB.RanganathanK. V. K.ChoudhuryR. N.NegiV. (2014, February). FDI into India’s manufacturing sector via M&As: Trends and composition [Working Paper No. 161]. Institute for Studies in Industrial Development. http://isid.org.in/pdf/WP161.pdf
SwankD. (2016). Taxing choices: International competition, domestic institutions and the transformation of corporate tax policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(4), 571–603.
73.
TammiT. (2013). Dictator game giving and norms of redistribution: Does giving in the dictator game parallel with the supporting of income redistribution in the field?The Journal of Socio-Economics, 43, 44–48.
74.
TeliR. B. (2014). A critical analysis of foreign direct investment inflows in India. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 447–455.
WalterS. (2010). Globalization and the welfare state: Testing the microfoundations of the compensation hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly, 54(2), 403–426.
79.
WalterS. (2017). Globalization and the demand-side of politics: How globalization shapes labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(1), 55–80.
80.
WoodA. (1995). North-South trade, employment, and inequality: Changing fortunes in a skill-driven world. Oxford University Press.
81.
World Values Survey. WVS Wave 3 (1995-1998) WVS Wave 4 (1999-2004) Official Aggregate v.20140921. WVS Assn.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
