With a focus on the implementation of women’s police stations (WPS), we posit that local policies that address violence against women can result in positive feedback effects on institutional legitimacy. We theorize that WPS increase police legitimacy among women by improving perceptions of personal safety and government responsiveness. To test our hypotheses, we rely on municipal and public opinion data from more than 100 municipalities in Brazil. The results of our multilevel analysis indicate that WPS produce positive feedback effects among women, resulting in higher trust in the police among women than men and closing the gender gap in perceptions of police effectiveness. Incorporating an instrumental variable in the analyses yields similar results, suggesting that these effects are not endogenous. Moreover, the results of our mediation models show that WPS’ positive effects on women’s views of police legitimacy are driven by improved perceptions of personal safety, and not perceptions of government responsiveness.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
BarnesT. D.BeaulieuE.SaxtonG. W. (2018). Restoring trust in the police: Why female officers reduce suspicions of corruption. Governance, 31, 143-161.
3.
BarnesT. D.CórdovaA. (2016). Making space for women: Explaining citizen support for legislative gender quotas in Latin America. Journal of Politics, 78, 670-686.
4.
BoatengF. D. (2017). Police legitimacy in Africa: A multilevel multinational analysis. Policing and Society, 28, 1105-1120.
5.
BoothJ.SeligsonM. (2009). The legitimacy puzzle in Latin America: Political support and democracy in eight nations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
CaltonJ.CattaneoL. B. (2014). The effect of procedural and distributive justice on intimate partner violence victims’ mental health and likelihood of future help seeking. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 329-340.
7.
CampbellA. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351.
CatterbergG.MorenoA. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 31-48.
10.
ClaytonA.O’BrienD.PiscopoJ. (2019). All male panels? Representation and democratic legitimacy. American Journal of Political Science, 63, 113-129.
EastonD. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5, 435-457.
15.
EcksteinH. (1975). Case study and theory in political science. In GreensteinF. J.PolsbyN. W. (Eds.), Handbook of political science (Vol. 7, pp. 79-137). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
16.
EsaiassonP.WlezienC. (2017). Responsiveness beyond policy satisfaction: Does it matter to citizens?Comparative Political Studies, 50, 739-765.
17.
FarrisE. M.HolmanM. R. (2015). Public officials and a private matter: Attitudes and polices in the county sheriff office regarding violence against women. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 1117-1135.
18.
FerraroK. F. (1996). Women’s fear of victimization: Shadow of sexual assault?Social Forces, 75, 667-690.
19.
GattegnoM.WilkinsJ.EvansD. (2016). The relationship between the Maria da Penha law and intimate partner violence in two Brazilian states. International Journal for Equity in Health, 15, 2-9.
20.
HautzingerS. J. (2007). Violence in the city of women: Police and batterers in Bahia, Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21.
HautzingerS. J. (2016). Policing by and for women in and beyond Brazil. In BradfordB.JaureguiB.LoaderI.SteinbergJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of global policing (pp. 573-593). London, England: Sage.
22.
HtunM. (2002). Puzzles of women’s rights in Brazil. Social Research, 69, 733-751.
23.
HuR.SunI. Y.WuY. (2015). Chinese trust in the police: The impact of political efficacy and participation. Social Science Quarterly, 96, 1012-1026.
JohnsonD.MaguireE.KuhnsJ. (2014). Public perceptions of the legitimacy of the law and legal authorities: Evidence from the Caribbean. Law & Society Review, 48, 947-978.
26.
JordanC.CampbellR.FollingstadD. (2010). Violence and women’s mental health: The impact of physical, sexual, and psychological aggression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 607-628.
27.
JubbN.CamachoG.D’AngeloA.HernándezK.MacassiI.MeléndezL.. . . YáñezG. (2010). Comisaría de la mujer en América Latina: Una puerta para detener la violencia y acceder a la justicia [Women’s Police Stations in Latin America: The Entrance Point To Deter Violence and Access Justice]. Centro de Planificación y Estudios Sociales [Center for Planning and Social Studies]. Retrieved from http://www.americalatinagenera.org/es/boletin/documentos/201101-acceso-justicia-cm-regional-final.pdf
28.
KittilsonM. C. (2010). Comparing gender, institutions, and political behavior: Toward an integrated theoretical framework. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 217-222.
29.
KöllnA. (2016). The virtuous circle of representation. Electoral Studies, 42, 126-134.
30.
Latin American Public Opinion Project. (2014). AmericasBarometer survey 2014. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. Retrieved from http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/
31.
LawlessJ. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 81-99.
32.
LüX. (2014). Social policy and regime legitimacy: The effects of education reform in China. American Political Science Review, 108, 423-437.
33.
MaloneM. (2010). The verdict is in: The impact of crime on public trust in central American justice systems. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2(3), 99-128.
34.
McDonaghE. (2010). It takes a state: Policy feedback model of women’s political representation. Perspective on Politics, 8, 69-91.
35.
MettlerS. (2015). Twenty years on Paul Pierson’s dismantling the welfare state?PS: Political Science & Politics, 48, 270-273.
36.
MettlerS.SossJ. (2004). The consequences of public policy for democratic citizenship: Bridging policy studies and mass politics. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 55-73.
37.
MitchellM. N. (2012). Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
38.
NorrisP. (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: User guide. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf
40.
PeffleyM.HurwitzJ. (2010). Justice in America: The separate realities of blacks and whites. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
PerovaE.ReynoldsS. A. (2017). Women’s police stations and intimate partner violence: Evidence from Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, 174, 188-196.
42.
PiersonP. L. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45, 595-618.
43.
PitkinH. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
44.
ReisigM. D.TankebeJ.MeskoG. (2012). Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and public cooperation with the police among young Slovene adults. Journal of Criminology and Security, 14, 147-164.
45.
SamuelsD. (2000). Reinventing local government? The evolution of Brazil’s municipalities. In KingstoneP.PowerT. (Eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, institutions and processes (pp. 77-100). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
46.
SantosC. M. (2010). From women’s police stations to the Maria da Penha law: The state’s absorption/translation of women’s demands. Revista Crítica de Ciências Socias, 89, 153-170.
TankebeJ. (2009). Policing, procedural fairness and public behaviour: A review and critique. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11, 8-19.
56.
TankebeJ. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103-135.
57.
TylerT.HuoY. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
United Nations Women. (2011). Women’s police stations in Latin America case study: An entry point for stopping violence and gaining access to justice (Brazil, Peru, Ecuador, and Nicaragua). Security Sector Module, 1-9. Retrieved from http://www.endvawnow.org/uploads/browser/files/security_wps_case_study.pdf
WangL.PreacherK. J. (2015). Moderated mediation analysis using Bayesian methods. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22, 249-269.
62.
WarrM. (1984). Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid?Social Science Quarterly, 653, 681-702.
63.
WeatherfordM. (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review, 86, 149-166.
64.
WeldonL. (2002). Protest, policy, and the problem of violence against women: A cross-national comparison. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
65.
YuanY.MacKinnonD. P. (2009). Bayesian mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 14, 301-322.
66.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
67.
ZetterbergP. (2009). Do gender quotas foster women’s political engagement?Political Research Quarterly, 62, 715-730.
68.
ZhaoJ. S.ScheiderM.ThurmanQ. (2002). The effect of police presence on public fear reduction and satisfaction: A review of the literature. The Justice Professional, 15, 273-299.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
