The relation between religious organizations and political authority is notoriously tense. Max Weber argued that this is because both compete over the same resource: human commitment. This article revisits Weber’s hypothesis. Specifically, we explore two psychological mechanisms through which Protestant missionaries affect political authority: obedience and persuadability. Exploiting exogenous variation in missionary activity in Peru, we demonstrate that missionaries make converts more obedient, which we attribute to a theological and a social mechanism. Yet, we also find that missionaries make converts less susceptible to persuasion by political authorities because they shift attention from secular topics to questions of theological importance, and endorse a skeptical stance toward the government. Exploiting variation in treatment intensity, we argue that the degree to which political authority is affected depends on a given mission’s theological strictness. We arrive at these findings by combining experimental outcomes and process-tracing evidence using Bayesian integration.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harpers.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.”Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.
3.
AndersonA. H. (2013). An introduction to Pentecostalism: Global charismatic Christianity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AudiR. (2000). Religious commitment and secular reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BakerJ. W. (1985). Sola fide, sola gratia: The battle for Luther in seventeenth-century England. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 16, 115-133.
6.
BaldassarriD.GrossmanG. (2011). Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 11023-11027.
7.
BarredaP. (1993). Evidencias de un nuevo protestantismo: El caso de la Iglesia Evangélica Peruana [Evidence of a new Protestantism: The case of the Iglesia Evangélica Peruana]. Cristianismo y Sociedad, 115, 57-81.
8.
BarroR. J. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(Suppl. 6), S158-S183.
9.
BayleP. (2005). A philosophical commentary on these words of the gospel, Luke 14:23, “compel them to come in, that my house may be full.”Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
10.
BermanE. (2000). Sect, subsidy, and sacrifice: An economist’s view of Ultra-Orthodox Jews. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 905-953.
11.
BirchB.RasmussenL. L.WogamanJ. P. (1989). Bible and ethics in the Christian life. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
12.
BlauP. M. (1963). Critical remarks on Weber’s theory of authority. American Political Science Review, 57, 305-316.
13.
BlumU.DudleyL. (2001). Religion and economic growth: Was Weber right?Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11, 207-230.
14.
CadoretteC. (1994). The deconstruction of Peru: Social chaos as Ecclesial Kairos. Missiology: An International Review, 22, 177-186.
15.
CameronA. C.GelbachJ. B.MillerD. L. (2008). Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 414-427.
16.
CasanovaJ. (2011). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.
18.
CobbM. D.KuklinskiJ. H. (1997). Changing minds: Political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 88-121.
19.
CollierD. (2011). Understanding process tracing. Political Science and Politics, 44, 823-830.
20.
CraneW. H. (1965). Mission and radical obedience. International Review of Mission, 54, 325-334.
21.
DaltonR. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76-98.
22.
De GraziaS. (1959). What authority is not. The American Political Science Review, 53, 321-331.
23.
De KwaadstenietE. W.Van DijkE. (2010). Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 515-524.
24.
DeirosP. A. (1991). Protestant fundamentalism in Latin America. In MartyM. E.ApplebyR. S. (Eds.), Fundamentalisms observed (pp. 142-197). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
del PinoP. (1996). Tiempos de guerra y de dioses: ronderos, evangélicos y senderistas en el valle del Rio Apurimac [Times of war and gods: Ronderos, evangelicals and rebels in the valley of the Rio Apurimac]. In DegregoriC. I. (Ed.), Las rondas campesinas y la derrota de Sendero Luminoso [The peasant ronderos and the defeat of the Sendero Luminoso]. IEP.
26.
ElwertF. (2013). Graphical causal models. In StephenM. L. (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 245-273). New York, NY: Springer.
27.
EscobarS. (1986). Transformation in Ayacucho: From violence to peace and hope. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, 3, 9-13.
28.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41-74.
FrestonP. (2008). Evangelical Christianity and democracy in Latin America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31.
Garrard-BurnettV.StollD. (1993). Rethinking Protestantism in Latin America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
32.
GarstenB. (2009). Saving persuasion: A defense of rhetoric and judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
GillA. J. (1994). Rendering unto Caesar? Religious competition and Catholic political strategy in Latin America, 1962-79. American Journal of Political Science, 38, 403-425.
34.
GillA. J. (2001). Religion and comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 117-138.
35.
GillA. J. (2004). Weber in Latin America: Is Protestant growth enabling the consolidation of democratic capitalism?Democratization, 11, 42-65.
36.
GillA. J. (2008). Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic church and the state in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029-1046.
38.
GrossmanG. (2015). Renewalist Christianity and the political saliency of LGBTs: Theory and evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. The Journal of Politics, 77, 337-351.
39.
Grzymala-BusseA. (2012). Why comparative politics should take religion (more) seriously. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 421-442.
40.
HabermasJ. (2006). Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 1-25.
41.
HetheringtonM.SuhayE. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 546-560.
42.
HuberJ. D.StanigP. (2011). Church-state separation and redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 828-836.
43.
HumphreysM.JacobsA. M. (2015). Mixing methods: A Bayesian approach. American Political Science Review, 109, 653-673.
44.
IrelandR. (1993). The crentes of campo alegre and the religious construction of Brazilian politics. In Garrard-BurnettV.StollD. (Eds.), Rethinking Protestantism in Latin America (pp. 20-45). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
45.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
46.
KlaiberJ. (1988). The church, dictatorships, and democracy in Latin America. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books.
47.
LankinaT.GetachewL. (2013). Competitive religious entrepreneurs: Christian missionaries and female education in colonial and post-colonial India. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 103-131.
48.
LutherM. (1967). Von weltlicher Obrigkeit, wie man ihr Gehorsam schuldig sei [Of secular authority, how to be obedient]. In ClemenO. (Ed.), Luthers Werke in Auswahl [A selection of Luther’s works]. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
49.
MarchA. F. (2013). Rethinking religious reasons in public justification. American Political Science Review, 107, 523-539.
50.
MarshallR. (2009). Political spiritualities: The Pentecostal Revolution in Nigeria. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
MayoH. B. (1962). How can we justify democracy?American Political Science Review, 56, 555-566.
52.
McClendonG.RiedlR. B. (2015). Religion as a stimulant of political participation: Experimental evidence from Nairobi, Kenya. The Journal of Politics, 77, 1045-1057.
53.
MeyerB. (2004). Christianity in Africa: From African independent to Pentecostal-charismatic churches. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 447-474.
54.
MeyerB. (2010). Aesthetics of persuasion: Global Christianity and Pentecostalism’s sensational forms. South Atlantic Quarterly, 109, 741-763.
55.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
56.
NasrS. V. R. (2001). Islamic leviathan: Islam and the making of state power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
OlsonE. (2006). Development, transnational religion, and the power of ideas in the High Provinces of Cusco, Peru. Environment and Planning A, 38, 885-902.
58.
PearlJ. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika, 82, 669-688.
59.
PhilpottD. (2007). Explaining the political ambivalence of religion. American Political Science Review, 101, 505-525.
60.
PostonL. (1992). Islamic Dawah in the West: Muslim missionary activity and the dynamics of conversion to Islam. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
PurzyckiB. G.ApicellaC.AtkinsonQ. D.CohenE.McNamaraR. A.WillardA. K.. . . HenrichJ. (2016). Moralistic gods, supernatural punishment and the expansion of human sociality. Nature, 530, 327-330.
62.
RawlsJ. (1993). Political liberalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
63.
RedlawskD. P. (2002). Hot cognition or cool consideration? Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64, 1021-1044.
64.
ReuschlingW. C. (2005). “Trust and obey”: The danger of obedience as duty in evangelical ethics. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 25(2), 59-77.
65.
RubinD. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
66.
SnidermanP. M.BrodyR. A.TetlockP. E. (1993). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
67.
SperberE. (2014). Patron saints? Political incentives to promote religious change (Technical report). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2415092
68.
StennerK. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
StepanA. C. (2000). Religion, democracy, and the “twin tolerations.”Journal of Democracy, 11, 37-57.
70.
SternS. J. (1998). Shining and other paths: War and society in Peru, 1980-1995. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
71.
StollD. (1990). Is Latin America turning protestant? The politics of evangelical growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
72.
StrongS. (1992). Shining path: Terror and revolution in Peru. New York, NY: Times Books.
TaberC. S.CannD.KucsovaS. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Political Behavior, 31, 137-155.
75.
TiroleJ.BénabouR. (2006). Belief in just world and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 699-746.
76.
TusalemR. F. (2009). The role of Protestantism in democratic consolidation among transitional states. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 882-915.
77.
TylerT. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy: A relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 323-345.
78.
TylerT. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400.
79.
WebberR. (1978). Common roots: A call to evangelical maturity. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House.
80.
WeberM. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
81.
WeberM. (2009). The theory of social and economic organization. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
82.
WeithmanP. J. (2002). Religion and the obligations of citizenship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
83.
WitteJ. (2002). Law and Protestantism: The legal teachings of the Lutheran reformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
84.
WoodberryR. D. (2012). The missionary roots of liberal democracy. American Political Science Review, 106, 244-274.
85.
WulffD. M. (1991). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary views. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
86.
ZallerJ. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
