Why have European large parties lost electoral ground in recent decades? Whereas most explanations draw on theories of dealignment, this article advances a novel, institutional, argument by focusing on the introduction of direct elections to the European Parliament (EP) in 1979. Archetypes of second-order elections, EP elections are characterized by lower vote shares for (a) large and (b) incumbent parties. Bridging the second-order elections theory with theories of political socialization, we posit that voting patterns in EP elections spill over onto national elections, especially among voters not yet socialized into patterns of habitual voting. In so doing, they increase the national vote shares of small parties. This proposition is examined using an instrumental variables approach. We also derive a set of testable propositions to shed light on the underlying mechanisms of this pattern. Our findings show that EP elections decrease support for big parties at the national arena by inculcating voting habits.
BeasleyR. K.JoslynM. R. (2001). Cognitive dissonance and post-decision attitude change in six presidential elections. Political Psychology, 22, 521-540.
3.
BestR. E. (2010). Increasing irrationality? The equilibrium relationship between electoral and legislative party system size, 1950–2005. Electoral Studies, 29, 105-116.
4.
BølstadJ.DinasE. (2016). A categorization theory of spatial voting: How the center divides the political space. British Journal of Political Science. 47, 829–850. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000393
5.
BølstadJ.DinasE.RieraP. (2013). Tactical voting and party preferences: A test of cognitive dissonance theory. Political Behavior, 35, 429-452.
6.
BrehmJ. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.
7.
CarrubbaC.TimponeR. J. (2005). Explaining vote switching across first-and second-order elections: Evidence from Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 38, 260-281.
8.
ClarkN.RohrschneiderR. (2009). Second-order elections versus first-order thinking: How voters perceive the representation process in a multi-layered system of governance. European Integration, 31, 645-664.
9.
ConverseP. E. (1969). Of time and partisan stability. Comparative Political Studies, 2, 139-171.
10.
CoxG. W. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world’s electoral systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CreweI.DenverT. D. (1985). Electoral change in Western democracies: Patterns and sources of electoral volatility. London, UK: Croom Helm.
12.
CurticeJ. (1989). The 1989 European election: Protest or green tide?Electoral Studies, 8, 217-230.
13.
DaltonR. J. (1984). Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies. The Journal of Politics, 46, 264-284.
14.
DaltonR. J. (2002). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
15.
DaltonR. J.FarrellD.McAllisterI. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
DaltonR. J.WattenbergM. P. (2002). Parties without partisans. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
Delli CarpiniM. (1989). Age and history: Generations and sociopolitical change. In SigelR. (Ed.), Political learning in adulthood (pp. 11-55). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
18.
de VriesC. E. (2007). Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale? How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics, 8, 363-385.
19.
DinasE. (2013). Opening “openness to change”: Political events and the increased sensitivity of young adults. Political Research Quarterly, 66, 868-882.
20.
DinasE. (2014). Does choice bring loyalty? Electoral participation and the development of party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 449-465.
21.
DuvergerM. (1964). Political parties: Their organization and activity in the modern state. London, UK: Methuen. (Original work published 1954)
22.
EriksonR. S. (1988). The puzzle of midterm loss. The Journal of Politics, 50, 1011-1029.
23.
EriksonR. S.FilippovM. G. (2001). Electoral balancing in federal and sub-national elections: The case of Canada. Constitutional Political Economy, 12, 313-331.
24.
EvansG.TilleyJ. (2012). How parties shape class politics: Explaining the decline of the class basis of party support. British Journal of Political Science, 42, 137-161.
25.
EzrowL.de VriesC.SteenbergenM.EdwardsE. (2011). Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters?Party Politics, 17, 275-301.
26.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
27.
FestingerL.CarlsmithJ. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
28.
FranklinM. N. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
FranklinM. N.HoboltS. B. (2011). The legacy of lethargy: How elections to the European Parliament depress turnout. Electoral Studies, 30, 67-76.
30.
FranklinM. N.MackieT. T.ValenH. (1992). Electoral change: Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in Western nations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
GerberA. S.GreenD. P.ShacharR. (2003). Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 540-550.
33.
GhitzaY.GelmanA. (2013). Deep interactions with MRP: Election turnout and voting patterns among small electoral subgroups. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 762-776.
34.
GreenD. P.ShacharR. (2000). Habit formation and political behavior: Evidence of consuetude in voter turnout. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 561-573.
35.
HixS.MarshM. (2007). Punishment or protest? Understanding European Parliament elections. The Journal of Politics, 69, 495-510.
36.
HixS.MarshM. (2011). Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European Parliament Elections across time. Electoral Studies, 30, 4-15.
37.
HoboltS. B. (2014). A vote for the president? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections.Journal of European Public Policy, 21, 1528-1540.
38.
HoboltS. B.SpoonJ.-J.TilleyJ. (2009). A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European Parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 93-115.
39.
HoboltS. B.WittrockJ. (2011). The second-order election model revisited: An experimental test of vote choices in European Parliament Elections. Electoral Studies, 30, 29-40.
40.
KnutsenO. (1998). The strength of the partisan component of left-right identity. A comparative longitudinal study of left-right party polarization in eight West European countries. Party Politics, 4, 5-31.
41.
KriesiH.GrandeE.LachatR.DolezalM.BornschierS.FreyT. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42.
LipsetS. M.RokkanS. (1967). Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Free Press.
43.
LupuN. (2013). Party brands and partisanship: Theory with evidence from a survey experiment in Argentina. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 49-64.
44.
MairP. (2002). In the aggregate: Mass electoral behavior in Western Europe, 1950-2000. In KemanH. (Ed.), Comparative democratic politics (pp. 122-140). London, UK: Sage.
45.
MairP. (2005). Democracy beyond parties (Working Paper No. 05’06). Irvine: Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California.
46.
MarkusG. B.ConverseP. E. (1979). A dynamic simultaneous equation model of electoral choice. American Political Science Review, 73, 1055-1070.
47.
MarshM. (1998). Testing the second-order election model after four European elections. British Journal of Political Science, 28, 591-607.
48.
MarshM.FranklinM. (1996). The foundations: Unanswered questions from the study of European elections, 1979-1994. In van der EijkC.FranklinM. N. (Eds.), Choosing Europe? (pp. 11-32). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
49.
McPheeW.FergusonJ. (1962). Political immunization. In McPheeW.GlaserW. A. (Eds.), Public opinion and congressional elections (pp. 155-179). New York, NY: The Free Press.
50.
MeredithM. (2009). Persistence in political participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 4, 187-209.
51.
MullainathanS.SchwartzsteinJ.ShleiferA. (2008). Coarse thinking and persuasion. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 577-619.
52.
MullainathanS.WashingtonE. (2009). Sticking with your vote: Cognitive dissonance and political attitudes. Applied Economics, 1, 86-111.
53.
NarudH. M.ValenH. (2008). Coalition membership and electoral performance in Western Europe. In StrømK.MüllerW. C.BergmannT. (Eds.), Cabinets and coalition bargaining: The democratic life cycle in Western Europe (pp. 369-402). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
54.
NohlenD.StöverP. (2010). Elections in Europe: A data handbook. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlag-Ges.
55.
OppenhuisE.van der EijkC.FranklinM. (1996). The party context: Outcomes. In van der EijkC.FranklinM. N. (Eds.), Choosing Europe? (pp. 287-305). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
56.
PanebiancoA. (1988). Political parties: Organization and power (Vol. 6). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
57.
PlutzerE. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96, 41-56.
58.
ReifK. (1984). National electoral cycles and European Elections 1979 and 1984. Electoral Studies, 3, 244-255.
59.
ReifK.SchmittH. (1980). Nine second-order national elections—A conceptual framework for the analysis of European Election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8, 3-44.
60.
RohrschneiderR.WhitefieldS. (2012). The strain of representation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
61.
RoseR.MackieT. (1983). Incumbency in government: Asset or liability. In DaalderH.MairP. (Eds.), Western European party systems: Continuity and change (pp. 115-138). London, UK: Sage.
62.
SchumanH.CorningA. D. (2012). Generational memory and the critical period: Evidence for national and world events. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 1-31.
63.
SearsD. O. (1983). The persistence of early political predispositions: The roles of attitude object and life stage. In WheelerL.ShaverP. (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 79-116). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64.
ShacharR. (2003). Party loyalty as habit formation. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 251-269.
65.
ShugartM. S.WattenbergM. P. (2001). Mixed-member electoral systems: The best of both worlds?New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
66.
StokerL.JenningsK. M. (2008). Of time and the development of partisan polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 619-635.
67.
StrømK. (1990). Minority government and majority rule. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
TurnerJ. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the group. In TajfelH. (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69.
van der BrugW.van der EijkC. (2007). European elections & domestic politics: Lessons from the past and scenarios for the future. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
70.
van der EijkC.FranklinM. N. (1996). Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
71.
van EgmondM.van der BrugW.HoboltS.FranklinM.SapirE. V. (2011). European Parliament election study 2009, voter study (GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, ZA5055 Data File Version 1.1.0). doi:10.4232/1.11760
72.
WeberT. (2011). Exit, voice, and cyclicality: A micrologic of midterm effects in European Parliament elections. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 907-922.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
