Where and how have precolonial institutions of conflict resolution remained intact? Although it is often argued that “traditional” institutions can play a key role in managing communal conflicts, little is known about the conditions of their “survival.” This article argues that historical, political, and cultural topographies are essential to understanding patterns of the persistence and demise of precolonial institutions. Traditional modes of conflict resolution remain strong where they have been internalized over centuries: in the cultural and political centers of precolonial states. I use original geocoded survey data and historical spatial information on precolonial Burundi to analyze this hypothesis. The estimations yield robust correlations between the geographic patterns of the precolonial kingdom and current modes of resource-related conflict resolution.
AcemogluD.ReedT.RobinsonJ. A. (2014). Chiefs: Economic development and elite control of civil society in Sierra Leone. Journal of Political Economy, 122, 319-368.
2.
AdanoW. R.DietzT.WitsenburgK.ZaalF. (2012). Climate change, violent conflict and local institutions in Kenya’s drylands. Journal of Peace Research, 49, 65-80.
3.
AlstonL. J.LibecapG. D.MuellerB. (1999). A model of rural conflict: Violence and land reform policy in Brazil. Environment and Development Economics, null(2), 135-160.
4.
Association pour l’Atlas du Burundi. (1979). Atlas du Burundi [Atlas of Burundi]. Gradignan, France: Author.
5.
BaldwinK. (2013). Why vote with the chief? Political connections and public goods provision in Zambia. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 794-809. doi:10.1111/ajps.12023
6.
BarronP.KaiserK.PradhanM. (2009). Understanding variations in local conflict: Evidence and implications from Indonesia. World Development, 37, 698-713.
7.
BeallJ.MkhizeS.VawdaS. (2005). Emergent democracy and “resurgent” tradition: Institutions, chieftaincy and transition in KwaZulu-Natal. Journal of Southern African Studies, 31, 755-771.
8.
BellS. (2011). Do we really need a new “constructivist institutionalism” to explain institutional change?British Journal of Political Science, 41, 883-906.
9.
BigagazaJ.AbongC.MukarubugaC. (2002). Land scarcity, distribution and conflict in Rwanda. In LindJ.SturmanK. (Eds.), Scarcity and surfeit: The ecology of Africa’s conflicts (pp. 51-78). Pretoria, South Africa: Institute for Security Studies.
10.
BoegeV. (2006). Traditional approaches to conflict transformation—Potentials and limits. Berlin, Germany: Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management.
11.
BoegeV.BrownM. A.ClementsK. P. (2009). Hybrid political orders, not fragile states. Peace Review, 21, 13-21. doi:10.1080/10402650802689997
12.
BroegaardR. J. (2005). Land tenure insecurity and inequality in Nicaragua. Development and Change, 36, 845-864. doi:10.1111/j.0012-155X.2005.00438.x
13.
ChrétienJ.-P. (1993). Burundi, l’histoire retrouvée: 25 ans de métier d’historien en Afrique [Burundi, history rediscovered: 25 years as a historian in Africa]. Paris, France: KARTHALA Editions.
14.
Colonial Chief Assessment. (1929). J.M. Derscheid Collection. University of Florida Digital Collections. Retrieved from http://ufdc.ufl.edu/derscheid
DaudelinJ. (2003). Land and violence in post-conflict situations. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: North-South Institute and the World Bank.
17.
DavidsonJ. S.HenleyD. (Eds.). (2007). The revival of tradition in Indonesian politics: The deployment of adat from colonialism to indigenism (1st ed.). London, England: Routledge.
18.
DeiningerK.CastagniniR. (2006). Incidence and impact of land conflict in Uganda. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 321-345.
19.
DeslaurierC. (2003). Le «bushingantahe» peut-il réconcilier le Burundi? [The “bushingantahe” can he reconcile Burundi?] Politique Africaine, N°, 92(4), 76-96.
20.
DexterT.NtahombayeP. (2005). Fostering the rule of law in post-conflict situations: The case of Burundi. Geneva, Switzerland: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue.
21.
Díaz-CayerosA.MagaloniB.Ruiz-EulerA. (2014). Traditional governance, citizen engagement, and local public goods: Evidence from Mexico. World Development, 53, 80-93. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.01.008
22.
DouglasM. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
23.
Falk-MooreS. (2000). Law as process: An anthropological approach. Münster, Germany: LIT Verlag Münster.
24.
FlintJ.de WaalA. D. (2005). Darfur: A short history of a long war. London, England: Zed Books.
25.
Fred-MensahB. K. (1999). Capturing ambiguities: Communal conflict management alternative in Ghana. World Development, 27, 951-965.
26.
GahamaJ. (1983). Le Burundi sous administration belge: La période du mandat 1919-1939 [Burundi under Belgian administration: The period of the mandate 1919-1939]. Paris, France: KARTHALA Editions.
27.
GennaioliN.RainerI. (2007). The modern impact of precolonial centralization in Africa. Journal of Economic Growth, 12, 185-234.
28.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
GonzálezF. E.KingD. (2004). The state and democratization: The United States in comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 193-210.
30.
HallP. A.TaylorR. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
31.
HartmanA. (2010). Comparative analysis of land conflicts in Liberia—Grand Gedeh, Lofa and Nimba counties. Oslo, Norway: The Norwegian Refugee Council.
32.
HelmkeG.LevitskyS. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2, 725-740.
33.
HerbstJ. (2000). States and power in Africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34.
IngelaereB.KohlhagenD. (2012). Situating social imaginaries in transitional justice: The bushingantahe in Burundi. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 6, 40-59.
35.
International Crisis Group. (2003). Refugees and displaced persons in Burundi: Defuse the land bomb. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
36.
International Crisis Group. (2014). Fields of bitterness (I): Land reform in Burundi. Nairobi, Kenya: Author.
37.
KamungiP. M.OketchJ. O.HugginsC. (2004). Land access and the return and resettlement of IDPs and refugees in Burundi. Nairobi, Kenya: African Centre for Technology Studies.
KibreabG. (2002). State intervention and the environment in Sudan, 1889-1989: the demise of communal resource management. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
40.
KnillC.LenschowA. (2001). “Seek and Ye Shall Find!” Linking different perspectives on institutional change. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 187-215.
41.
KohlhagenD. (2008). La justice dans le Burundi rural [The judiciary in rural Burundi]. In MarysseS.ReyntjensF.VandeginsteS.StearnsJ. (Eds.), L’Afrique des grands lacs. Annuaire 2007-2008 (pp. 93-108). Paris, France: L’Harmattan.
42.
KohlhagenD. (2009a). Burundi: La justice en milieu rural [Burundi: The judiciary in the rural area]. Bujumbura, Burundi: RCN Justice & Démocratie.
43.
KohlhagenD. (2009b). Statistiques judiciaires burundaises Rendement, délais et typologie des litiges dans les tribunaux de residence [Burundian judiciary statistics. Outcomes, time frames and typologies of litigations in the local courts]. Bujumbura, Burundi: RCN Justice & Démocratie.
44.
LaelyT. (1995). Autorität und Staat in Burundi [Authority and state in Burundi]. Berlin, Germany: Reimer, Dietrich.
45.
LevitskyS.MurilloM. V. (2009). Variation in institutional strength. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 115-133.
46.
LundC. (2006). Twilight institutions: Public authority and local politics in Africa. Development and Change, 37, 685-705.
47.
MahoneyJ. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29, 507-548.
48.
MahoneyJ.ThelenK. (2009). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
MannM. (1984). The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 25, 185-213.
50.
MarchJ. G.OlsenJ. P. (2010). Rediscovering Institutions. New York City, NY: Simon & Schuster.
51.
MatignonÉ. (2015). Justices en mutation au Burundi [Changing Judiciaries in Burundi]. Afrique contemporaine, n°250(2), 55-80.
52.
Mercy Corps. (2011). Conflict and economic development assessment in Acholiland region, Uganda. Portland, OR: Mercy Corps.
53.
MillerN. N. (1968). The political survival of traditional leadership. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 6, 183-198.
54.
MooreS. F. (1986). Social facts and fabrications: “Customary” law on Kilimanjaro, 1880-1980. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
55.
MorapediW. G. (2006). Demise or resilience, customary law and the changing order in Africa: The case of chieftaincy in Botswana. Africa Development, 30(4). Retrieved from http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ad/article/view/22245
56.
MurdockG. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas: A summary. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
57.
MuriaasR. L. (2011). Traditional institutions and decentralisation: A typology of co-existence in Sub-Saharan Africa. Forum for Development Studies, 38, 87-107. doi:10.1080/08039410.2010.521574
58.
MvuyekureA. (2003). Le catholicisme au Burundi-1922-1962 [Catholicism in Burundi-1922-1962]. Paris, France: KARTHALA Editions.
59.
MworohaE. (1977). Peuples et rois de l’Afrique des lacs: Le Burundi et les royaumes voisins au XIXe siecle [Populations and kings of Africa of the lakes: Burundi and the neighboring kingdoms in the 19th century]. Dakar, Sénégal: Nouvelles Editions africaines.
60.
MworohaE. (1987). Histoire du burundi: des origines a la fin du xixe siecle [History of Burundi: From the origins to the end of the 19th century]. Paris, France: Hatier.
61.
NorthD. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
NtabonaA. (2002). Les enjeux majeurs de la réhabilitation de l’Institution des Bashingantahe [The main challenges of the rehabilitation of the institution of the Bashingantahe]. Au Cœur de l’Afrique, 1–2, 3-21.
63.
NtsebezaL. (2004). Democratic decentralisation and traditional authority: Dilemmas of land administration in rural South Africa. The European Journal of Development Research, 16, 71-89. doi:10.1080/09578810410001688743
64.
NtsebezaL. (2005). Democracy compromised: Chiefs and the politics of the land in South Africa. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
65.
NunnN. (2008). The long-term effects of Africa’s slave trades. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 139-176.
66.
NunnN.WantchekonL. (2011). The slave trade and the origins of mistrust in Africa. American Economic Review, 101, 3221-3252.
67.
PetersB. G.PierreJ.KingD. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: Political conflict in historical institutionalism. Journal of Politics, 67, 1275-1300.
68.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69.
RibotJ. C. (2002). African decentralization local actors, powers and accountability. Geneva, Switzerland: UNRISD Programme on Democracy, Governance and Human Rights.
70.
RolandG. (2004). Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38, 109-131.
71.
RugadyaM. (2008). Analysis of post conflict land policy and land administration. A survey of IDP return and resettlement issues and lesson: Acholi and Lango regions. Washington, DC: World Bank.
72.
ScottJ. C. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
73.
ShawR.WaldorfL.HazanP. (2010). Localizing transitional justice: Interventions and priorities after mass violence. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
74.
SoiferH. D. (2006). Authority over distance: Explaining variation in state infrastructural power in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
TajimaY. (2013). The institutional basis of intercommunal order: Evidence from Indonesia’s democratic transition. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 104-119.
77.
TamanahaB. Z. (2008). Understanding legal pluralism: Past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Review, 30, 375-411.
78.
ThelenK. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369-404. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
79.
ThompsonH. (2010). Landmines and land rights in Yemen. Geneva, Switzerland: Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining.
UbinkJ. (2008). Traditional authorities in Africa: Resurgence in an era of democratisation. Leiden, The Netherlands: Leiden University Press.
82.
UvinP. (2008). Life after violence: A people’s story of Burundi. London, England: Zed Books.
83.
van DongeJ. K.PheraniL. (1999). Law and order as a development issue: Land conflicts and the creation of social order in Southern Malawi. The Journal of Development Studies, 36, 48-70.
84.
van LeeuwenM.HaartsenL. (2005). Land disputes and local conflict resolution mechanisms in Burundi. Bujumbura: Research for CED-CARITAS Burundi.
85.
VansinaJ. (1972). La légende du passé: Traditions orales du Burundi [The legend of the past: The oral traditions of Burundi]. Tervuren, Belgium: Musée royal de l’Afrique centrale.
86.
WeilenmannM. (1996). Burundi: Konflikt und Rechtskonflikt: eine rechtsethnologische Studie zur Konfliktregelung der Gerichte [Burundi: Conflict and judicial conflict: a legal-ethnological study on conflict management of the courts] (Doctoral thesis). Proefschrift Landbouwuniversiteit Wageningen. Retrieved from http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/clc/922149
87.
YamanoT.DeiningerK. (2005). Land conflicts in Kenya: causes, impacts, and resolutions. Washington, DC: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development, The World Bank.
88.
ZartmanW. (2000). Introduction: African traditional conflict “medicine.” In ZartmanW. (Ed.), Traditional cures for modern conflicts. Afrucan conflict “medicine” (pp. 1-11). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
89.
ZuckerL. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726-743.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
