In light of gender disparities in political involvement, extant research has examined mechanisms for incorporating ordinary women into politics. We complement this literature by exploring the effect of an overlooked institution theorized to promote political equality by maximizing voter turnout: compulsory voting. We theorize that in enforced compulsory voting systems, women are more likely to receive and seek information about electoral choices than their counterparts in voluntary voting systems. Consequently, compulsory voting helps narrow the gender gap beyond voting by creating opportunities and motivations for women to engage with the electoral process and its main actors. Our multilevel analysis based on cross-national survey data lends strong support to our hypotheses. Countries with enforced mandatory voting laws display a much smaller gender gap not only in voting, but also in several other forms of electoral engagement, including political party information, campaign attentiveness, party attachment, and campaign participation.
ArkesH. R.BlumerC. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 124-140.
2.
BaldezL. (2004). Elected bodies: The gender quota law for legislative candidates in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29, 231-258.
3.
BarabasJ.JeritJ.PollockW.RaineyC. (2014). The question(s) of political knowledge. American Political Science Review, 108, 840-855.
4.
BarnesT. D.BurchardS. M. (2013). Engendering politics: The impact of descriptive representation on women’s political engagement in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 767-790.
5.
BeauregardK. (2014). Gender, political participation and electoral systems: A cross-national analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 53, 617-634.
6.
BirchS. (2009). Full participation: A comparative study of compulsory voting. New York, NY: United Nations University Press.
7.
BlaisA. (2006). What affects voter turnout?Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 111-125.
8.
BlaisA.CartyR. K. (1990). Does proportional representation foster voter turnout?European Journal of Political Research, 18, 167-181.
9.
BlaisA.DobrzynskaA. (1998). Turnout in electoral democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 33, 239-261.
10.
BradyH. E.VerbaS.SchlozmanK. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89, 271-294.
11.
BrennanJ.HillL. (2014). Compulsory voting: For and against. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BriggsJ.ChelisK. (2010). For and against compulsory voting in Britain and Belgium. Social and Public Policy Review, 4, 1-33.
13.
BrockingtonD. (2004). The Paradox of proportional representation: The effect of party systems and coalitions on individuals’ electoral participation. Political Studies, 52, 469-490.
14.
BurnetJ. (2011). Women have found respect: Gender quotas, symbolic representation and female empowerment in Rwanda. Politics & Gender, 7, 303-334.
15.
BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L.VerbaS. (2001). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
ClaytonA. (2015). Women’s political engagement under quota-mandated female representation: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment. Comparative Political Studies, 48, 333-369.
17.
CriglerA.JustM.BeltT. (2006). The three faces of negative campaigning: The democratic implications of attack ads, cynical news, and fear-arousing messages. In RedlawsD. P. (Eds.), Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing (pp. 135-163). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
DaltonR. J.WeldonS. (2007). Partisanship and party system institutionalization. Party Politics, 13, 179-196.
19.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1992, July-August). The gender gap in knowledge. The Public Perspective, 23-26.
20.
Delli CarpiniM. X.KeeterS. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
DesposatoS.NorranderB. (2009). The gender gap in Latin America: Contextual and individual influences on gender and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 141-162.
FergusonL. (2013). Gender, work, and the sexual division of labor. In WaylenG.CelisK.KantolaJ.WeldonS. L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 337-362). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
FowlerA. (2013). Electoral and policy consequences of voter turnout: Evidence from compulsory voting in Australia. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 8, 159-182.
25.
FranklinM. (1996). Electoral participation. In LeDucL.NiemiR.NorrisP. (Eds.), Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in global perspective (pp. 216-235). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
FranklinM.HirczyW. (1998). Separated powers, divided government, and turnout in U.S. presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 316-326.
27.
FunkP. (2007). Is there an expressive function of law? An empirical analysis of voting laws with symbolic fines. American Law and Economics Review, 9, 135-159.
GallegoA. (2015). Unequal political participation worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
30.
GarlandH.NewportS. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 55-69.
31.
GidengilE.Goodyear-GrantE.BlaisA.NevitteN. (2006). Gender, knowledge, and social capital. In O’NeillB.GidengilE. (Eds.), Gender and social capital (pp. 241-272). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
HolbrookT. M. (2002). Presidential campaigns and the knowledge gap. Political Communication, 19, 437-454.
33.
HuckfeldtR.SpragueJ. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
HutchingsV. L. (2003). Public opinion and democratic accountability: How citizens learn about politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
IrwinG. (1974). Compulsory voting legislation: Impact on voter turnout in the Netherlands. Comparative Political Studies, 7, 292-315.
36.
JenningsM. K. (1983). Gender roles and inequalities in political participation: Results from an eight-nation study. The Western Political Quarterly, 36, 364-385.
37.
JensenC. B.SpoonJ. (2011). Compelled without direction: Compulsory voting and party system spreading. Electoral Studies, 30, 700-711.
38.
JonesM. P. (2009). Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: Evidence from the Latin American vanguard. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 56-81.
39.
KamC. D.FranzeseJ. R. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
KarpJ. A.BanducciS. A. (2008). When politics is not just a man’s game: Women’s representation and political engagement. Electoral Studies, 27, 105-115.
41.
KarpJ. A.BrockingtonD. (2005). Social desirability and response validity: A comparative analysis of over-reporting voter turnout in five countries. Journal of Politics, 67, 825-840.
42.
KittilsonM. C.Schwindt-BayerL. (2010). Engaging citizens: The role of power-sharing institutions. Journal of Politics, 72, 990-1102.
43.
KittilsonM. C.Schwindt-BayerL. (2012). The gendered effects of electoral institutions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
KrookM. L. (2014). Electoral gender quotas: A conceptual analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 85-110.
45.
LauR. R.RedlawskD. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
LawlessJ. L. (2004). Politics of presence? Congresswomen and symbolic representation. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 81-99.
47.
LijphartA. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy’s unresolved dilemma. The American Political Science Review, 91, 1-14.
48.
MackerrasM.McAllisterI. (1999). Compulsory voting, party stability and electoral advantage in Australia. Electoral Studies, 18, 217-233.
49.
McPhersonJ. M.Smith-LovinL. (1986). Sex segregation in voluntary associations. American Sociological Review, 51, 61-79.
50.
MitchellM. N. (2012). Interpreting and visualizing regression models using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
NirL.McClurgS. (2015). How institutions affect gender gaps in public opinion expression. Public Opinion Quarterly, 79, 544-567.
53.
NorrisP. (2003). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2006). Gendering social capital: Bowling in women’s leagues? In O’NeillB.GidengilE. (Eds.), Gender and social capital (pp. 73-98). New York, NY: Routledge.
55.
OrdecinH.Jones-WhiteD. (2011). Gender jeopardy: What is the impact of gender differences in political knowledge on political participation?Social Science Quarterly, 92, 675-694.
56.
PanagopoulosC. (2008). The calculus of voting in compulsory voting systems. Political Behavior, 30, 455-467.
57.
PaxtonP.HughesM. M. (2014). Women, politics, and power. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
58.
PopielarzP. A. (1999). (In) voluntary association: A multilevel analysis of gender segregation in voluntary organizations. Gender & Society, 13, 234-250.
59.
QuintelierE.HoogheM.MarienS. (2011). The effect of compulsory voting on turnout stratification patterns: A cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review, 32, 396-416.
60.
RokkanS. (2009). Citizens, elections, parties: Approaches to the comparative study of the processes of development. Colchester, UK: European Consortium for Political Research Press.
61.
SchlozmanK. L.BurnsN.VerbaS. (1994). Gender and the pathways to participation: The role of resources. Journal of Politics, 56, 963-990.
62.
Schwindt-BayerL. (2009). Making quotas work: The effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34, 5-28.
63.
ShinemanV. A. (2009, April). Isolating the effect of compulsory voting on political sophistication: Exploiting intra-national variation in mandatory voting laws in Austrian provinces. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
64.
ShinemanV. A. (2012, March). Incentivizing participation increases political information: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. Paper presented at the annual experimental methods conference of the New York University Center for Experimental Social Science, New York University, New York.
65.
SinghS. (2011). How compelling is compulsory voting? A multilevel analysis of turnout. Political Behavior, 33, 95-111.
66.
SinghS. (2015). Compulsory voting and the turnout decision calculus. Political Studies, 63, 548-568.
67.
SinghS.ThorntonJ. (2013). Compulsory voting and the dynamics of partisan identification. European Journal of Political Research, 52, 188-211.
68.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
69.
TrippA. M.KangA. (2008). The global impact of quotas on the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies, 41, 338-361.
70.
ValentinoN. A.HutchingsV. L.BanksA. J.DavisA. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29, 247-273.
71.
VerbaS.BurnsN.SchlozmanK. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59, 1051-1072.
72.
VerbaS.NieN. H.KimJ. (1978). Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
ZetterbergP. (2009). Do gender quotas foster women’s political engagement? Lessons from Latin America. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 715-730.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
