In this article, we first test theories on immigrant rights across 29 countries from Europe, Africa, the Middle East, East Asia, Oceania, and the Americas, using our Indicators of Citizenship Rights for Immigrants (ICRI) data set. We focus on trajectories of nationhood and current institutional features to explain cross-national difference. We find that former colonial powers, former colonies that developed as settler countries, as well as democracies have been more likely to extend rights to immigrants. Strikingly, once we account for involvement in colonialism, we find no difference between supposedly “civic-nationalist” early nation-states and supposedly “ethnic-nationalist” latecomer nations, refuting a widely held belief in the literature on citizenship. We find no effect of a country’s degree of political globalization. We replicate these findings on a sample of 35 mainly European countries, using the migrant Integration Policy Index (MIPEX).
AcemogluD.RobinsonJ. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York, NY: Crown Business.
2.
AlesinaA.DevleeschauwerA.EasterlyW.KurlatS.WacziargR. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155-194.
3.
AustenR. (2004). Mapping Africa: Problems of regional definition and colonial/national boundaries (Fathom Archives, University of Chicago Library). Available from http://fathom.lib.uchicago.edu
4.
BalC. S. (2015). Dealing with deportability: Deportation laws and the political personhood of temporary migrant workers in Singapore. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2, 267-284.
BeineM.BurgoonB.CrockM.GestJ.HiscoxM.McGovernP.ThielemannE. (2015). Comparing immigration policies: An overview from the IMPALA database. International Migration Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/imre.12169
7.
BjerreL.HelblingM.RömerF.ZobelM. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring immigration policies: A comparative perspective. International Migration Review, 49, 555-839.
8.
BlatterJ.SchmidS. D.BlättlerA. C. (2015). The Immigrant Inclusion Index (IMIX): A Tool for Assessing the Electoral Inclusiveness of Democracies with Respect to Immigrants. Working Paper Series “Glocal Governance and Democracy.” Lucerne: University of Lucerne.
9.
BrubakerR. (1992). Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany. London, England: Harvard University Press.
FearonJ. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 195-222.
13.
FitzGeraldD. S.Cook-MartínD. (2014). Culling the masses: The democratic origins of racist immigration policy in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
GrimB. J.FinkeR. (2006). International religion indexes: Government regulation, government favoritism, and social regulation of religion. Interdisciplinary Journal on the Research of Religion, 2(1), 1-40.
15.
GoodmanS. W. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring citizenship and integration policy: Past lessons and new approaches. Comparative Political Studies, 48, 1905-1941.
16.
HammarT. (1990). Democracy and the nation state: Aliens, denizens and citizens in a world of international migration. Brookfield, VT: Avebury.
17.
HelblingM.BjerreL.RömerF.ZobelM. (2016). Measuring immigration policies: The IMPIC database. European Political Science. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1057/eps.2016.4
18.
HobsbawmE. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HobsbawmE. (1992). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HowardM. M. (2009). The politics of citizenship in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
JacobsonD. (1997). Rights across borders: Immigration and the decline of citizenship. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
23.
JanoskiT. (2010). The ironies of citizenship: Naturalization and integration in industrialized countries. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
JoppkeC. (1999). Immigration and the nation-state: The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
25.
JoppkeC. (2001). The legal-domestic sources of immigrant rights: The United States, Germany, and the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 339-366.
26.
JoppkeC. (2004). Citizenship without identity. Canadian Diversity, 3(2), 85-87.
27.
KohnH. (1944). The idea of nationalism: A study in its origins and background. New York, NY: Macmillan.
28.
KoopmansR.MichalowskiI.WaibelS. (2012). Citizenship rights for immigrants: National political processes and cross-national convergence in Western Europe, 1980-2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1202-1245.
29.
KoopmansR.StathamP.GiugniM.PassyF. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
MarkusA.SemyonovM. (Eds.). (2010). Immigration and nation building: Australia and Israel compared. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
31.
Migration Policy Group. (2010). Migrant Integration Policy Index. Available from www.mipex.eu
32.
PaxtonP.HughesM. M.ReithN. (2015). Extending the INGO network country score, 1950-2008. Sociological Science, 2, 287-307.
33.
RaijmanR.SemyonovM.SchmidtP. (2003). Do foreigners deserve rights? Determinants of public views towards foreigners in Germany and Israel. European Sociological Review, 19, 379-392.
34.
RosenhekZ. (2000). Migration regimes, intra-state conflicts, and the politics of exclusion and inclusion: Migrant workers in the Israeli welfare state. Social Problems, 47, 49-67.
35.
SassenS. (1998). The De Facto transnationalizing of immigration policy. In JoppkeC. (Ed.), Challenge to the nation-state: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States (pp. 49-85). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
SmoohaS. (2002). The model of ethnic democracy: Israel as a Jewish and democratic state. Nations and Nationalism, 8, 475-503.
37.
SoysalY. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38.
TillyC. (1994). States and nationalism in Europe 1492-1992. Theory and Society, 23, 131-146.
39.
VinkM.BauböckR. (2013). Citizenship configurations: Analysing the multiple purposes of citizenship regimes in Europe. Comparative European Politics, 11, 621-648.
40.
Wallace GoodmanS. (2010). Integration requirements for integration’s sake? Identifying, categorizing, and comparing civic integration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 753-772.
41.
WooldridgeJ. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
42.
YeohB.CheeH. L. (2015). Negotiation of (Il)legality in Singapore. In FriedmanS. L.MahdaviP. (Eds.), Migrant encounters: Intimate labor, the state, and mobility across Asia (pp. 184-204). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
