We thank the editors of Comparative Political Studies for having invited us to join this symposium. Rather than addressing separate points made by Munck, Paine, and Schneider, we focus on two related problems that unite their pieces, that are of high relevance beyond this symposium, and that we have addressed only indirectly in our original article. The first problem concerns the over-inflation of the Boolean concept of necessity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA), the second one ignorance about the formalities of the theory of causation which QCA rests on.
BaumgartnerM.ThiemA. (2015). Model ambiguities in configurational comparative research. Sociological Methods & Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0049124115610351
2.
FissP. C. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1180-1198.
3.
GoertzG.MahoneyJ. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
MackieJ. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study of causation. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
5.
MahoneyJ.KimballE.KoivuK. L. (2009). The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 114-146.
6.
McCluskeyE. J. (1956). Minimization of Boolean functions. Bell System Technical Journal, 35, 1417-1444.
7.
MunckG. L. (2016). Assessing set-theoretic comparative methods: A tool for qualitative comparativists?Comparative Political Studies, 49, 775-780.
8.
PaineJ. (2016). Set-theoretic comparative methods: Less distinctive than claimed. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 703-741.
9.
QuineW. V. (1952). The problem of simplifying truth functions. American Mathematical Monthly, 59, 521-531.
10.
RaginC. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
RaginC. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
RaginC. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
RaginC. C. (2014). Comment: Lucas and Szatrowski in critical perspective. Sociological Methodology, 44, 80-94.
14.
RaginC. C.StrandS. I. (2008). Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to study causal order: Comment on Caren and Panofsky (2005). Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 431-441.
15.
SchneiderC. Q. (2016). Real differences and overlooked similarities. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 781-792.
16.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
ThiemA.BaumgartnerM.BolD. (2016). Still lost in translation! A correction of three misunderstandings between configurational comparativists and regressional analysts. Comparative Political Studies, 49, 742-774.
18.
TurnerH. (1999). A logic of universal causation. Artificial Intelligence, 113, 87-123.
