A growing body of scholarship on the political and economic subordination of women in the Muslim world has argued that widespread patriarchal attitudes toward women’s roles in public life can be ameliorated by offering progressive reinterpretations of Islamic scriptures. In this article, we explore this hypothesis with a large-scale survey experiment conducted among adult Egyptians in late 2013. In the study, a subset of respondents were exposed to an argument in favor of women’s political equality that was grounded in the Qur’ān, Islam’s holiest text. We found that this group was significantly more willing to express approval of female political leadership than those exposed to a non-religious argument in favor of women’s eligibility for political leadership. A further analysis of conditional treatment effects suggests that the religious justification for female political leadership was more likely to elicit agreement among less educated and less pious respondents, and when delivered by women and targeted at men. Our findings suggest that Islamic discourse, so often used to justify the political exclusion of women, can also be used to help empower them.
AdkinsT.LaymanG. C.CampbellD. E.GreenJ. C. (2013). Religious group cues and citizen policy attitudes in the United States. Politics and Religion, 6, 235-263.
2.
AhmedL. (1989). Arab culture and writing women’s bodies. Gender Issues, 9(1), 41-55.
3.
AhmedL. (1992). Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of a modern debate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
al-AzmS. J. (1997). Is Islam secularizable? In OzdalgaE.PerssonS. (Eds.), Civil society, democracy, and the Muslim world (pp. 17-22). London, England: Curzon Press.
5.
AlbertsonB. L. (2015). Dog-whistle politics: Multivocal communication and religious appeals. Political Behavior, 37, 3-26.
6.
AlexanderA. C.WelzelC. (2011). Islam and patriarchy: How robust is Muslim support for patriarchal values?International Review of Sociology, 21, 249-276.
7.
AndersonL. (1995). Critique of the political culture approach. In NobleP.BrynenR.KoranyB. (Eds.), Political liberalization and democratization in the Arab world: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 77-92). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
8.
AyubiN. N. M. (1991). Political Islam: Religion and politics in the Arab world. London, England: Routledge.
9.
BadranM. (1996). Feminists, Islam, and nation: Gender and the making of modern Egypt. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
BarabasJ.JeritJ. (2010). Are survey experiments externally valid?American Political Science Review, 104, 226-242.
11.
BarakatH. (1993). The Arab world: Society, culture, and state. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
BarlasA. (2009). Believing Women in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. Austin: University of Texas Press.
13.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
14.
BensteadL. J. (2014). Effects of interviewer-respondent gender interaction on attitudes toward women and politics: Findings from Morocco. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(3), 369-383.
15.
BlandJ. M.AltmanD. G. (1995). Multiple significance tests: The Bonferroni method. British Medical Journal, 310, Article 170.
16.
BlaydesL.GillumR. (2013). Religiosity-of-interviewer effects: Assessing the impact of veiled enumerators on survey response in Egypt. Politics and Religion, 6, 459-482.
17.
BlaydesL.LinzerD. (2008). The political economy of women’s support for fundamentalist Islam. World Politics, 60, 576-609.
18.
BolzendahlC. I.MyersD. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974-1998. Social Forces, 83, 759-789.
19.
BrownK. (2006). Realising Muslim women’s rights: The role of Islamic identity among British Muslim women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 29, 417-430.
20.
BuntG. R. (2009). iMuslims: Rewiring the house of Islam. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
21.
CalfanoB. R.DjupeP. A. (2009). God talk: Religious cues and electoral support. Political Research Quarterly, 62, 329-339.
22.
CampbellD. E.GreenJ. C.LaymanG. C. (2011). The party faithful: Partisan images, candidate religion, and the electoral impact of party identification. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 42-58.
23.
CharneyE.EnglishW. (2012). Candidate genes and political behavior. American Political Science Review, 106, 1-34.
24.
CharradM. M. (2009). Kinship, Islam, or oil: Culprits of gender inequality?Politics & Gender, 5, 546-553.
25.
ChiG. Y. H.ChenG.RothmannM.LiN. (2003). Active control trials. In ChowS-C (Ed.), ChowS-C (Ed.), Encyclopedia of biopharmaceutical statistics (pp. 9-15). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
26.
CunninghamM. (2008). Changing attitudes toward the male breadwinner, female homemaker family model: Influences of women’s employment and education over the lifecourse. Social Forces, 87, 299-323.
27.
DavisN. J.RobinsonR. V. (2006). The egalitarian face of Islamic orthodoxy: Support for Islamic law and economic justice in seven Muslim-majority nations. American Sociological Review, 71, 167-190.
28.
DonnoD.RussettB. (2004). Islam, authoritarianism, and female empowerment: What are the linkages?World Politics, 56, 582-607.
29.
El SaadawiN. (2007). The hidden face of Eve: Women in the Arab world. London, England: Zed Books.
30.
FadelM. (1997). Two women, one man: Knowledge, power, and gender in medieval Sunni legal thought. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 29, 185-204.
31.
FerneaE. W. (2010). In search of Islamic feminism. New York, NY: Anchor.
32.
FishM. S. (2002). Islam and authoritarianism. World Politics, 55, 4-37.
33.
GainesB. J.KuklinskiJ. H.QuirkP. J. (2007). The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15, 1-20.
34.
GilensM. (2002). An anatomy of survey-based experiments. In ManzaJ.Lomax CookF.PageB. J. (Eds.), Navigating public opinion (pp. 232-250). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
35.
GonzálezA. L. (2013). Islamic feminism in Kuwait: The politics and paradoxes. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
36.
GrimmerJ.MessingS.WestwoodS. J. (2014). Estimating heterogeneous treatment effects and the effects of heterogeneous treatments with ensemble methods. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
37.
HasselbladV.KongD. F. (2001). Statistical methods for comparison to placebo in active-control trials. Drug Information Journal, 35, 435-449.
38.
HesslingR. M.TraxelN. M.SchmidtT. J. (2004). Ceiling effect. In Lewis-BeckM. S.BrymanA.LiaoT. F. (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of social science research methods (p. 106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
HilliardM. E.ErnstM. M.GrayW. N.SaeedS. A.CortinaS. (2012). Adapting pediatric psychology interventions: Lessons learned in treating families from the Middle East. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 37, 882-892.
40.
HudsonM. C. (1977). Arab politics: The search for legitimacy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
HurdM. D.KapteynA. (2000). Anchoring and acquiescence bias in measuring assets in household surveys. New York, NY: Springer.
42.
JosephS. (1996). Gender and family in the Arab World. In SabbaghS. (Ed.), Arab women: Between defiance and restraint (pp. 194-202). Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press.
43.
KabeerN. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30, 435-464.
44.
KaneE. W.MacaulayL. J. (1993). Interviewer gender and gender attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 1-28.
45.
KaramA. M. (1997). Women, Islamisms, and the State: Contemporary feminisms in Egypt. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
46.
KarpJ. A.BrockingtonD. (2005). Social desirability and response validity: A comparative analysis of overreporting voter turnout in five countries. The Journal of Politics, 67, 825-840.
47.
LandesD. S. (1999). The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
48.
MahmoodS. (2005). Politics of piety: The Islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
McClendonG.RiedlR. (2014). Religion, redistribution, and participation: Evidence from an experiment in Nairobi, Kenya (Working paper).
50.
McLaughlinB.WiseD. (2014). Cueing god: Religious cues and voter support. Politics and Religion, 7, 366-394.
51.
MernissiF. (1987). Beyond the veil: Male-female dynamics in modern Muslim society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
52.
MitchellT. (2002). Rule of experts: Egypt, techno-politics, modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53.
MoenP.EricksonM. A.Dempster-McClainD. (1997). Their mother’s daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 281-293.
54.
MoghadamV. M. (2002). Islamic feminism and its discontents: Toward a resolution of the debate. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 27, 1135-1171.
55.
MoghissiH. (1999). Feminism and Islamic fundamentalism: The limits of postmodern analysis. London, England: Zed Books.
56.
MojabS. (2001). Theorizing the politics of “Islamic feminism.”Feminist Review, 69, 124-146.
57.
MutzD. C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
NajmabadiA. (2000). (Un) veiling feminism. Social Text, 18(3), 29-45.
59.
NederhofA. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263-280.
60.
NielsenR. A. (2013). The lonely Jihadist: Weak networks and the radicalization of Muslim Clerics (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
61.
NielsenR. A. (2015). Ethics for experimental manipulation of religion. In DesposatoS. (Ed.), Ethics and experiments: Problems and solutions for social scientists and policy professionals. London, England: Routledge.
62.
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
OlmstedJ. C. (2005). Gender, aging, and the evolving Arab patriarchal contract. Feminist Economics, 11(2), 53-78.
64.
PatelD. S. (2012). Concealing to reveal: The informational role of Islamic dress. Rationality and Society, 24, 295-323.
65.
PepinskyT. B.WelborneB. C. (2011). Piety and redistributive preferences in the Muslim world. Political Research Quarterly, 64, 491-505.
66.
PlutzerE. (1988). Work life, family life, and women’s support of feminism. American Sociological Review, 53, 640-649.
67.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569.
68.
RazackS. (2005). Geopolitics, culture clash, and gender after September 11. Social Justice, 32(4), 11-31.
69.
ReadJ. G. (2003). The sources of gender role attitudes among Christian and Muslim Arab-American women. Sociology of Religion, 64, 207-222.
70.
RizzoH.Abdel-LatifA.-H.MeyerK. (2007). The relationship between gender equality and democracy: A comparison of Arab versus non-Arab Muslim societies. Sociology, 41, 1151-1170.
71.
RobinsonJ. (2005). Female labor force participation in the Middle East and North Africa: Technical report. Philadelphia: Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania.
72.
RossM. L. (2008). Oil, Islam, and women. American Political Science Review, 102, 107-123.
73.
SachedinaA. (2009). Islam and the challenge of human rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
74.
SaidE. (1978). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the orient. New York, NY: Pantheon.
75.
ScottR. M. (2009). A contextual approach to women’s rights in the Qur’an: Readings of 4:34. The Muslim World, 99, 60-85.
76.
ShapiroI. (2006). The flight from reality: A response to Gunnell, Hardin, Shapiro, and Laitin. The Good Society, 15(1), 31-34.
77.
SharabiH. (1988). Neopatriarchy: A theory of distorted change in Arab society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
78.
SingermanD. (1995). Avenues of participation: Family, politics, and networks in urban quarters of Cairo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
79.
TempleR.EllenbergS. S. (2000). Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 1: Ethical and scientific issues. Annals of Internal Medicine, 133, 455-463.
80.
WadudA. (1999). Qur’an and woman: Rereading the sacred text from a woman’s perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81.
WeberC.ThorntonM. (2012). Courting Christians: How political candidates prime religious considerations in campaign ads. The Journal of Politics, 74, 400-413.
82.
WrightJ. D. (1975). Does acquiescence bias the index of political efficacy?Public Opinion Quarterly, 39, 219-226.
83.
ZulfiqarA. A. (2006). Religious sanctification of labor law: Islamic labor principles and model provisions. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 9, 421-444.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
