Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent years have seen an efflorescence of work focused on the definition and operationalization of democracy. One debate concerns whether democracy is best measured by binary or graded scales. Critics of binary indices point out at that they are overly reductionist, while defenders counter that the different levels of graded measures are not associated with a specific set of conditions. Against this backdrop, we propose to operationalize electoral democracy as a series of necessary and sufficient conditions arrayed in an ordinal scale. The resulting “lexical” index of electoral democracy, based partly on new data, covers all independent countries of the world from 1800 to 2013. It incorporates binary coding of its subcomponents, which are aggregated into an ordinal scale using a cumulative logic. In this fashion, we arrive at an index that performs a classificatory function—each level identifies a unique and theoretically meaningful regime-type—as well as a discriminating function.

Keywords

political regimes democratization regime change democracy index measurement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

R. M.

Cheibub

J. A.

Limongi

Przeworski

(1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(2), 3-36.

Armstrong

D. A.

II . (2011). Stability and change in the Freedom House political rights and civil liberties measures. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 653-662.

Bernhard

Nordstrom

Reenock

(2001). Economic performance, institutional intermediation, and democratic survival. Journal of Politics, 63, 775-803.

Boix

Miller

Rosato

(2013). A complete dataset of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1523-1554.

Brown

M. E.

Lynn-Jones

S. M.

Miller

S. E.

(Eds.). (1996). Debating the democratic peace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cheibub

J. A.

Gandhi

Vreeland

J. R.

(2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143, 67-101.

Collier

Adcock

(1999). Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about measures. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 537-565.

Collier

Levitsky

(1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49, 430-451.

Coppedge

Alvarez

Maldonado

(2008). Two persistent dimensions of democracy: Contestation and inclusiveness. Journal of Politics, 70(3), 335-350.

10.

Coppedge

Gerring

Altman

Bernhard

Fish

Hicken

. . . Teorell

(2011). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: A new approach. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 247-267.

11.

Correlates of War. (2011). State system membership (v2011). Retrieved from http://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/state-system-membership/state-system-membership

12.

Dahl

R. A.

(1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

13.

Davenport

Armstrong

(2004). Democracy and the violation of human rights: A statistical analysis from 1976–1996. American Journal of Political Science, 48, 538-554.

14.

Diamond

(2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 21-35.

15.

Elkins

(2000). Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 287-294.

16.

Freedom House. (2013). Freedom in the world 2013. Retrieved from http://www.freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world-2013/methodology

17.

Gandhi

Lust-Okar

(2009). Elections under authoritarianism. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 403-422.

18.

Gerring

Palmer

Teorell

Zarecki

(2015). Demography and democracy: A global, district-level analysis of electoral contestation. American Political Science Review, 109(3), 574-591.

19.

Gerring

Skaaning

S.-E.

Pemstein

(2014). A concept-driven approach to measurement: The Lexical Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University, MA.

20.

Gleditsch

K. S.

(2013). List of independent states. Retrieved from http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~ksg/statelist.html

21.

Gleditsch

K. S.

Ward

M. D.

(1997). Double take: A re-examination of democracy and autocracy in modern polities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41, 361-383.

22.

Goertz

(2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

23.

Hadenius

Teorell

(2007). Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 143-156.

24.

Held

(2006). Models of democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

25.

Howard

Roessler

(2006). Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 365-381.

26.

Huntington

S. P.

(1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

27.

Keyssar

(2009). The right to vote: The contested history of democracy in the United States. New York, NY: Basic Books.

28.

Knutsen

C. H.

(2010). Measuring effective democracy. International Political Science Review, 31, 109-128.

29.

Kurtz

Schrank

(2007). Growth and governance: Models, measures, and mechanisms. Journal of Politics, 69, 538-554.

30.

Levitsky

Way

(2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51-55.

31.

Lively

(1975). Democracy. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.

32.

Marshall

M. G.

Gurr

Jaggers

(2013). Polity IV project: Dataset Users’ Manual. Retrieved from http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2012.pdf

33.

Merkel

(2004). Embedded and defective democracies. Democratization, 11(1), 33-58.

34.

Møller

Skaaning

S.-E.

(2013). Regime types and democratic sequencing. Journal of Democracy, 24(1), 142-156.

35.

Munck

G. L.

(2009). Measuring democracy: A bridge between scholarship and politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

36.

Naess

Christophersen

Kvalo

(1956). Democracy, ideology, and objectivity. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget.

37.

Pemstein

Meserve

Melton

(2010). Democratic compromise: A latent variable analysis of ten measures of regime type. Political Analysis, 18, 426-449.

38.

Phillips

Wetherell

(1995). The Great Reform Act of 1832 and the political modernization of England. American Historical Review, 100, 411-436.

39.

Poggi

(1978). The development of the modern state: A sociological introduction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

40.

Przeworski

(2013). Political Institutions and Political Events (PIPE) data set. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/nyu.edu/adam-przeworski/home/data

41.

Przeworski

Alvarez

Cheibub

J. A.

Limongi

(2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and material well-being in the world, 1950–1990. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

42.

Ravallion

(2011). Mashup indices of development. World Bank Research Observer, 27, 1-32.

43.

Schattschneider

E. E.

(1942). Party government. New York, NY: Rinehart.

44.

Schedler

(2002). The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36-50.

45.

Schedler

(2012). Judgment and measurement in political science. Perspectives on Politics, 10, 21-36.

46.

Schumpeter

J. A.

(1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

47.

Seawright

Collier

(2014). Rival strategies of validation: Tools for evaluating measures of democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 111-138.

48.

Svolik

(2012). The politics of authoritarian rule. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

49.

Teorell

Charron

Dahlberg

Holmberg

Rothstein

Sundin

Svensson

(2013). The quality of government dataset, version 20Dec13. Gothenburg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg, the Quality of Government Institute. Retrieved from http://www.qog.pol.gu.se/

50.

Therborn

Göran

(1977). The rule of capital and the rise of democracy. New Left Review, 103, 3-41.

51.

Treier

Jackman

(2008). Democracy as a latent variable. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 201-217.

52.

Vanhanen

(2000). A new dataset for measuring democracy, 1810–1998. Journal of Peace Research, 37, 251-265.

53.

Vermillion

(2006). Problems in the measurement of democracy. Democracy at Large, 3(1), 26-30.

54.

Wood

Gibney

(2010). The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI. Human Rights Quarterly, 32, 367-400.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB

0.08 MB

0.19 MB

A Lexical Index of Electoral Democracy

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material