How do natural resources and ethnic identity interact to incite or to mitigate social conflict? This article argues that high-value natural resources can act as an important catalyst for the politicization of ethnic, specifically indigenous identity, and contribute to social conflict as they limit the malleability of identity frames and raise the stakes of confrontations. We test this argument using unique sub-national data from Bolivian provinces. Drawing on Bolivian newspaper reports, we code conflict events for all of the 112 provinces from 2000 to 2011. We join this conflict data with information on local ethnic composition from the census, the political representation of ethnic groups at the national level, as well as geo-spatial information on gas deposits. Using time-series cross-sectional count models, we show a significant conflict-promoting effect of the share of indigenous people in provinces with gas reserves, but not without.
AllisonP.WatermanR. (2002). Fixed effects negative binomial regression models. In RossM.StolzenbergR. M. (Eds.), Sociological methodology (pp. 155-172). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
2.
AspinallE. (2007). The construction of grievance: Natural resources and identity in a separatist conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51, 950-972.
3.
BarkerC.JohnsonA.LavaletteM. (Eds.). (2001). Leadership in social movements. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
4.
BarndtW. T. (2012). Destroying the opposition’s livelihood: Pathways to violence in Bolivia since 2000. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 4(3), 3-37.
5.
BasedauM.LayJ. (2009). Resource curse or rentier peace? The ambiguous effect of oil wealth and oil dependence on violent conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 46, 757-776.
6.
BasedauM.PierskallaJ. (2014). How ethnicity conditions the effect of oil and gas on civil conflict: A spatial analysis of Africa from 1990 to 2010. Political Geography, 38, 1-11.
7.
BebbingtonD. H. (2012). Consultation, compensation and conflict: Natural gas extraction in Weenhayek territory. Journal of Latin American Geography, 1(2), 49-71.
8.
BebbingtonD. H.BebbingtonA. (2010). Anatomy of a regional conflict: Tarija and resource grievances in Morales’s Bolivia. Latin American Perspectives, 37, 140-160.
9.
BlimesR. J. (2006). The indirect effect of ethnic heterogeneity on the likelihood of civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 536-547.
10.
BormannN.-C.CedermanL.-E.VogtM. (2013,May). Ethnonationalist cleavages in civil wars: Allah’s wrath or Babel’s legacy? (NCCR Democracy Working Paper No. 58). Bern, Switzerland: NCCR. May.
11.
BoudetH.S.OrtolanoL. (2010). A tale of two sitings: Contentious politics in liquefied natural gas facility siting in California. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30 (1), 5-21.
12.
BrassP. (1991). Ethnicity and nationalism: Theory and comparison. New Delhi, India: SAGE.
13.
CanessaA. (2007). Who is indigenous? Self-identification, indigeneity, and claims to justice in contemporary Bolivia. Urban Anthropology, 36(3), 195-237.
14.
CedermanL.-E.WeidmannN.GleditschK. S. (2011). Horizontal inequalities and ethnonationalist civil war: A global comparison. American Political Science Review, 105, 478-495.
15.
CedermanL.-E.WimmerA.MinB. (2010). Why do ethnic group rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics, 62, 87-119.
ChandraK. (2006). What is ethnic identity and does it matter?Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 397-424.
18.
ClearyM. R. (2000). Democracy and indigenous rebellion in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 1123-1153.
19.
CrabtreeJ.WhiteheadL. (Eds.). (2008). Unresolved tensions: Bolivia past and present. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
20.
DeutschK. (1966). Nationalism and social communication (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
DixonJ. (2009).What causes civil war? Integrating quantitative research findings. International Studies Review, 11, 707-735.
22.
DruryB. (1994). Ethnic mobilisation: Some theoretical considerations. In RexJ.DruryB. (Eds.), Ethnic mobilisation in a multi-cultural Europe (pp. 13-22). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
23.
EatonK. (2007). Backlash in Bolivia. Politics & Society, 35, 71-102.
24.
EstebanJ.RayD. (1994). On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica, 62, 819-851.
25.
EstebanJ.MayoralL.RayD. (2012). Ethnicity and conflict: An empirical study. American Economic Review, 102 (4), 1310-1342.
26.
EviaJ.-L.LasernaR.SkaperdasS. (2008,February). Socio-political conflict and economic performance in Bolivia (CESifo Working Paper Series, 2249). Munich, Germany: CESifo Group.
27.
FearonJ. D.LaitinD. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97, 75-90.
28.
FjeldeH. (2009). Buying peace? Oil wealth, corruption and civil war, 1985-99. Journal of Peace Research, 46, 199-218.
29.
GoodwinJ.JasperJ. (Eds.). (2003). The social movements reader: Cases and concepts. Malden, MA: Blackwell Readers in Sociology.
30.
GurrT. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
GurrT. (2000). Peoples versus states: Minorities at risk in the new century. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
32.
HabyarimanaJ.HumphreysM.PosnerD. N.WeinsteinJ. M. (2007). Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision?American Political Science Review, 101, 709-725.
33.
HassnerR. (2003). “To halve and to hold”: Conflicts over sacred space and the problem of indivisibility. Security Studies, 12(4), 1-33.
34.
HinojosaL. (Ed.). (2012). Gas y desarrollo: dinámicas territoriales rurales en Tarija - Bolivia. La Paz, Bolivia[Gas and development: rural territorial dynamics in Tarija,Bolivia] Fundación Tierra y CERDET, .
35.
HinojosaL.BebbingtonA. (2008). Struggles over Territory and Livelihood in Neoliberalized Environments: Transnational Mining Companies and Civil-society Networks in the Andes. The University of Manchester.
36.
HumphreysM. (2005). Natural Resources, Conflict and Conflict Resolution. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(4), 508-537.
37.
KoosC.BasedauM. (2012,September). Does uranium mining increase civil conflict risk? Evidence from a spatiotemporal analysis of Africa from 1945 to 2010 (GIGA Working Paper No. 205). Hamburg, Germany: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
38.
LasernaR. (2010). Mire, la democracia boliviana, en los hechos [Look! The facts of Bolician democracy]. Latin American Research Review, 45(4), 27-58, .
39.
Le BillonP. (2001). The political ecology of war: Natural resources and armed conflict. Political Geography, 20, 561-584.
40.
Le BillonP. (2012). Wars of plunder: Conflicts, profits and the politics of resources. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
41.
LujalaP.RødJ. K.ThiemeN. (2007). Fighting over oil: Introducing a new dataset. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 24, 239-256.
42.
LujalaP.RustadS. A. (Eds.). (2012). High-value natural resources and post-conflict peacebuilding. London, England: Earthscan.
43.
MadridR. (2012). The rise of ethnic politics in Latin America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
McAdamD.BoudetH. S.DavisJ.OrrR. J.ScottW. R.LevittR. E. (2010). “Site fights”: Explaining opposition to pipeline projects in the developing world. Sociological Forum, 25, 401-427.
45.
McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.MeyerN. (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
McAdamD.TarrowS.TillyC. (2001). Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
47.
McCarthyJ.ZaldM. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212-1241.
48.
McCarthyJ.ZaldM. (2002). The enduring vitality of the resource mobilization theory of social movements. In TurnerJ. H. (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 533-565). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.
49.
MelucciA. (1996). Challenging codes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
MinkoffD, (1993). The Organization of Survival: Women’s and Racial-Ethnic Voluntarist and Activist Organizations, 1955-1985. Social Forces, 71 (4), 887-908.
51.
MontalvoJ. G.Reynal-QuerolM. (2005). Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. American Economic Review, 95, 796-816.
52.
ØstbyG. (2008). Polarization, horizontal inequalities and violent civil conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 45, 143-162.
53.
PerreaultT. (2008). Natural gas, indigenous mobilization and the Bolivian state (Identities, Conflict and Cohesion Programme Paper No. 12). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
54.
PetersenR. (2002). Understanding ethnic violence: Fear, hatred, and resentment in twentieth-century Eastern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
PosenB. (1993). The Security Dilemma and Ethnic Conflict. Survival, 35 (1), 27-47.
56.
PosteroN, (ed.) (2013). The Politics of Indigeneity in Bolivia, Past and Present. Special Issue of Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies (LACES), 8 (2), 107-121.
57.
PosteroN.ZamoscL. (eds.) (2004). The Struggle for Indigenous Rights in Latin America. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
58.
RossM. L. (2004). How do natural resources influence civil war? Evidence from thirteen cases. International Organization, 58, 35-67.
59.
RossM. L. (2012). The oil curse: How petroleum wealth shapes the development of nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
60.
Schilling-VacaflorA. (2010). Recht als umkämpftes Terrain. Die neue Verfassung und indigene Völker in Bolivien (Studien zu Lateinamerika, 7). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos-Verlag, English title: “Rights as contested terrain. The new constitution and indigenous people in Bolivia”.
61.
SchorrB. (2012). Mobilisierung, Protest und Strategien in Aktion: Boliviens Protestwelle 2000-2005: Ausbruch, Verlauf und politische Folgen [Mobilization, Protest and Strategies in Action: Bolivia’s Protest Wave 2000-2005: Outbreak, Progression and Political Consequences]. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
62.
SelwayJ. S. (2011). Cross-cuttingness, cleavage structures and civil war onset. British Journal of Political Science, 41, 111-138.
63.
SorensJ (2011). Mineral production, territory, and ethnic rebellion: The role of rebel constituencies. Journal of Peace Research, 48 (5), 571-585.
64.
StephanM. J.ChenowethE. (2008). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. International Security, 33(1), 7-44.
65.
TajfelH. (1974). Social Identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information/sur les sciences sociales, 13 (2), 65-93.
66.
TarrowS. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
67.
ToftM. (2002). Indivisible territory, geographic concentration, and ethnic war. Security Studies, 12 (2), 82-119.
UNIR. (2012, December). Conflictividad y visiones de desarrollo: recursos naturales, territorio y medio ambiente (2011-2012) [Conflict dynamics and visions of development: natural resources, territory and environment (2011-2012). La Paz, Bolivia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.unirbolivia.org/nueva3/images/stories/Libros/Conflictividad%20y%20visiones.pdf].
70.
Van CottD. (2003). Institutional Change and Ethnic Parties in South America. Latin American Politics and Society, 45 (2), 1-39.
71.
Van CottD. (2005). From movements to parties in Latin America: The evolution of ethnic politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
Van CottD. (2006). Turning crisis into opportunity: The achievements of excluded groups in the Andes. In DrakeP. W.HershbergE. (Eds.), State and society in conflict: Comparative perspectives on Andean crises (pp. 157-188). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
73.
VermeerschP. (2011). Theories of ethnic mobilization: overview and recent trends. CRPD Working Paper No.3, September.
74.
WeissbrotM.SandovalL. (2008, July). The distribution of Bolivia’s most important natural resources and the autonomy conflicts (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.cepr.net/documents/publications/bolivia_land_2008_07.pdf
75.
WilkinsonS. I. (2004). Votes and Violence. Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76.
WimmerA.CedermanL.-E.MinB. (2009). Ethnic politics and armed conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global dataset. American Sociological Review, 74, 316-337.
YasharD. (2005). Contesting citizenship in Latin America: The rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79.
ZuazoM. (2006). Staatliche Dezentralisierung und lokale Demokratisierung in Bolivien und Chile: Das ländliche Munizip als Transmitter der politischen Integration von Indigenen/Campesinos in Bolivien als Hauptstudienfall (Doctoral dissertation). University of Konstanz, Germany[Decentralization and local democratization in Bolivia and Chile: the rural municipio as a transmitter of political integration of indigenous people/campesinos with a central focus on the case of Bolivia]. Retrieved from http://kops.ub.uni-konstanz.de/bitstream/handle/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-128197/Diss_ZuazoM.pdf?sequence=8
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
